Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Couldn't agree more, really wanted a true ruling on this just for the knowledge but pretty sure the Judge made some decisions today that he didn't need to?.. maybe they all go this way on the day? We hear back so few post court dates I'm not sure. Each Judge has some level of discretion. Their sol was another Junior not even working at their Firm, so couldn't speak directly for them! that was fortunate I think because if she would have rejected in court better, she might have  been able to force ruling, we are at that point!, everybody there!!, Judge basically said openly that he can see everything for Judgement!!!  but she just said "I can speak to the claimant and find out!" - creating the opportunity for me to accept. I really think the Judge did me a favor today by saying it without saying it. Knowing the rep for the sol couldn't really speak to the idea in the moment. Been to court twice in a fortnight, on both occasions heard 4 times with others and both of my claims, the clerk mention to one or both parties "Letting the Judge know if you want to have a quick chat with each other"! So, it appears there's an expectation of the court that there is one last attempt at settling before going through the door. So, not a Sol tactic, just Court process!. Judge was not happy we hadn't tried to settle outside! We couldn't because she went to the loo and the Judge called us in 10 minutes early! - another reason to stand down to allow that conv to happen. Stars aligned there for me I think. But yeh, if the sol themselves, or someone who can make decisions on the case were in court, I would have received a Judgement against today I think.
    • that was a good saving on an £8k debt dx
    • Find out how the UK general elections works, how to register to vote, and what to do on voting day.View the full article
    • "We suffer more in imagination than in reality" - really pleased this all happened. Settled by TO, full amount save as to costs and without interest claimed. I consider this a success but feel free to move this thread to wherever it's appropriate. I say it's a success because when I started this journey I was in a position of looking to pay interest on all these accounts, allowing them to default stopped that and so even though I am paying the full amount, it is without a doubt reduced from my position 3 years ago and I feel knowing this outcome was possible, happy to gotten this far, defended myself in person and left with a loan with terms I could only dream of, written into law as interest free! I will make better decisions in the future on other accounts, knowing key stages of this whole process. We had the opportunity to speak in court, Judge (feels like just before a ruling) was clear in such that he 'had all the relevant paperwork to make a judgement'. He wasn't pleased I hadn't settled before Court.. but then stated due to WS and verbal arguments on why I haven't settled, from my WS conclusion as follows: "11. The Defendant was not given ample evidence to prove the debt and therefore was not required to enter settlement negotiations. Should the debt be proved in the future, the Defendant is willing to enter such negotiations with the Claimant. "  He offered to stand down the case to give us chance to settle and that that was for my benefit specifically - their Sols didn't want to, he asked me whether I wanted to proceed to judgement or be given the opportunity to settle. Naturally, I snapped his hand off and we entered negotiations (took about 45 minutes). He added I should get legal advice for matters such as these. They were unwilling to agree to a TO unless it was full amount claimed, plus costs, plus interest. Which I rejected as I felt that was unfair in light of the circumstances and the judges comments, I then countered with full amount minus all costs and interest over 84 months. They accepted that. I believe the Judge wouldn't have been happy if they didn't accept a payment plan for the full amount, at this late stage. The judge was very impressed by my articulate defence and WS (Thanks CAG!) he respected that I was wiling to engage with the process but commented only I  can know whether this debt is mine, but stated that Civil cases were based on balance of probabilities, not without shadow of a doubt, and all he needs to determine is whether the account existed. Verbal arguments aside; he has enough evidence in paperwork for that. He clarified that a copy of a DN and NOA is sufficient proof based on balance of probabilities that they were served. I still disagree, but hey, I'm just me.. It's definitely not strict proof as basically I have to prove the negative (I didn't receive them/they were not served), which is impossible. Overall, a great result I think! BT  
    • Seeking further advice now. The 33 days in which the defendant has to submit a defence expires at 16:00 tomorrow. The defendant has submitted an acknowledgement of service but looking to get the claim awarded by default in failure to submit the defence. This is MoneyClaim Online and can see an option to request a default judgement but believe that is for failure to acknowledge the claim within 14 days??  So being MoneyClaim Online, how do I request the claim be awarded in my favour?
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5910 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I got a rather disturbing letter from these people today.

 

" We refer to your Council Tax debt owed to Birmingham City Council.

 

You have failed to clear the outstanding sum for the above debt, therefore we have no other option but to instruct our enforcement bailiff and porters to clear your house of your possessions to settle this debt, You goods will then be sold at PUBLIC AUCTION.

 

Please contact my removals co-ordinator on the number below to arrange a convenient time when someone over the age of 18 will be present to acknowledge the inventory listing the items to be removed.

 

Should the amount realised from the sale of all your goods be insufficient to cover the sum outstanding, including bailiff and auctioneer's costs, we shall then recommend that proceedings are commenced for you committals to prison. Alternatively we may, in some exceptional cases be able to enter into a short-term payment plan.

 

Our bailiffs will be calling within the next few days."

 

I got this letter the day after i got the Council Tax bill for next year, with a note in book to contact Birmingham City Council over the arrears for this year. i panicked first and phoned Equita and made an arrangement to pay 150 pounds at the end of the month (arrear's are £309 raising to £342 for just this first letter). I also made them aware i going to research this a little if they think they going to add silly charges and which point the guy i was talking to turned rather nasty on me demanding how i was going to do that, i gave reply of your company name in google go try it which is how i found this site.

 

After i calmed down a little i decided to call Birmingham Council on why it has gone to Equita, given i have been paying them on a regular basis, sometimes more sometimes less given the wage going into the house each month but usually over £100 a month and we missed a month due to a work bonus being paid late in February, the young lady i spoke to mentioned something about the account being recalled back after going to a bailiffs back in September, for what reason that is down to i not sure given up to that point we never missed a single payment as i can remember. i then asked if they could take it back and i would be willing to pay £200 off the arrears and then pay £30 a month to take it back, which i was given a flat No and try talking to Bailiffs speech.

 

I hope i not been to confusing in this post but its my first so if i made any error please advise.

 

Any help and advice of this i will be extremely grateful.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got a rather disturbing letter from these people today.

 

" We refer to your Council Tax debt owed to Birmingham City Council.

 

You have failed to clear the outstanding sum for the above debt, therefore we have no other option but to instruct our enforcement bailiff and porters to clear your house of your possessions to settle this debt, You goods will then be sold at PUBLIC AUCTION.

 

Please contact my removals co-ordinator on the number below to arrange a convenient time when someone over the age of 18 will be present to acknowledge the inventory listing the items to be removed.

 

Should the amount realised from the sale of all your goods be insufficient to cover the sum outstanding, including bailiff and auctioneer's costs, we shall then recommend that proceedings are commenced for you committals to prison. Alternatively we may, in some exceptional cases be able to enter into a short-term payment plan.

 

Our bailiffs will be calling within the next few days."

 

I got this letter the day after i got the Council Tax bill for next year, with a note in book to contact Birmingham City Council over the arrears for this year. i panicked first and phoned Equita and made an arrangement to pay 150 pounds at the end of the month (arrear's are £309 raising to £342 for just this first letter). I also made them aware i going to research this a little if they think they going to add silly charges and which point the guy i was talking to turned rather nasty on me demanding how i was going to do that, i gave reply of your company name in google go try it which is how i found this site.

 

After i calmed down a little i decided to call Birmingham Council on why it has gone to Equita, given i have been paying them on a regular basis, sometimes more sometimes less given the wage going into the house each month but usually over £100 a month and we missed a month due to a work bonus being paid late in February, the young lady i spoke to mentioned something about the account being recalled back after going to a bailiffs back in September, for what reason that is down to i not sure given up to that point we never missed a single payment as i can remember. i then asked if they could take it back and i would be willing to pay £200 off the arrears and then pay £30 a month to take it back, which i was given a flat No and try talking to Bailiffs speech.

 

I hope i not been to confusing in this post but its my first so if i made any error please advise.

 

Any help and advice of this i will be extremely grateful.

 

I presume that you have not allowed Equita into your home and you have not signed a Walking Possession Order. If you have not done so, they are clearly threatening you with an illegal break-in. They simply cannot legally instruct their people to enter your home and take your possessions without first having been allowed into your property on a previous occasion or gaining peaceful entry through an open door or window. If they have not gained prior entry, they are simply trying to frighten you with an unlawful action they will not dare to take and you should not allow yourself to be intimidated. If you have not previously let them in and continue to refuse them entry, there is nothing they can do about it.

 

I would insist that the council take back the debt and if they refuse you should complain to your local councillor. In any event, send all payments direct to the council, whatever they say, and ignore the bailiffs.

(However never pay the council by direct debit as that gives them the power to change the amount paid without your permission) Standing orders and cheques are fine, and even cash if they accept cash payments, but always get a receipt.

 

Don't bother ringing the bailiffs. Ignore them, treat them as non-persons. Pay your debt in instalments you can afford but send ALL money without exception to the council.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council...and in particular this one will NOT take back your account unless the case is returned back to them as Nulla Bono.

 

You MUST refuse to allow them into the property and you MUST NOT deal with this by way of telephone. You need to make a payment proposal of an amount that wil clear the account very quickly but also will ensure that you do not pay more than you know you can afford.

 

Inform them also that you will not allow a bailiff peaceful entry into your home as to do so will incur you in further charges that you will be unable to afford.

 

Also request a breakdown of the fees and charges made to your account.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The council...and in particular this one will NOT ake back you account unless the case is returned back to them as Nulla Bono.

 

You have the advantage over me in knowing about this particular council, but surely there is nothing to stop the debtor paying the council anyway - whatever their declared policy - and presenting them with a fait accompli. My council has consistently refused to take back my case but I have refused under any circumstances to deal with the bailiffs and have gone on merrily making regular payments to the council, which they have accepted. I simply haven't given them the option of refusing and have told them in no uncertain terms that they can like it or lump it. Moreover, I think I'm right in saying that councils have no legal right to refuse payment and can be reported to the Local Government Ombudsman if they try to do so.

 

Better brains than mine may be able to give a definitive legal view on this one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope i make some sense here, i just paid £200 on council tax direct to them via there site, i plan on paying more next week, my question is i going to end up clearing this debt within the next 8 weeks, but i just wondering what to expect from bailiffs when they find out i paid debt in full to the council not them, will the council call them off or i do i expect some games from the bailiff.

 

Many thanks as always

Link to post
Share on other sites

I hope i make some sense here, i just paid £200 on council tax direct to them via there site, i plan on paying more next week, my question is i going to end up clearing this debt within the next 8 weeks, but i just wondering what to expect from bailiffs when they find out i paid debt in full to the council not them, will the council call them off or i do i expect some games from the bailiff.

 

Many thanks as always

 

As long as you have not let the bailiffs into your home or left a door or window open through which they can gain "peaceful entry", they have no right of entry (If you have let them in previously I'm afraid they do have such a right). And, yes, you can expect some "games" from the bailiffs. They will continue to write to you and lie about their powers and they may visit your property. But, again, to reiterate my previous point, as long as they have not succeeded in gaining entry in the past, they have no right either to enter your home or take any property therein. They can, however, take your car (if you have one) if they know its registration number and can find it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As long as you have not let the bailiffs into your home or left a door or window open through which they can gain "peaceful entry", they have no right of entry (If you have let them in previously I'm afraid they do have such a right). And, yes, you can expect some "games" from the bailiffs. They will continue to write to you and lie about their powers and they may visit your property. But, again, to reiterate my previous point, as long as they have not succeeded in gaining entry in the past, they have no right either to enter your home or take any property therein. They can, however, take your car (if you have one) if they know its registration number and can find it.

 

One other point: when you have paid off the debt, make sure that the council are aware that you have done so and tell them to call off the bailiffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have now paid them in full and made the account 1p in credit, phoned council to let them know i have paid up, to be told give it a few days for payment to show up given Easter but would put a note on the account, i not to worried about that as i got receipts. As i not had a bailiff turn up as yet, i assume that i owe them nothing in costs given that they cannot charge for letter fees, am i right or just plain wrong on this.

 

Many thxs as always

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a pain, i paid off the arrears and contacted the Council, i was then informed that the payments are not showing on the system, so as far as they concerned the debt is still owed, my partner got a call out of the blue from Equita, she told them the debt was paid off in full to Council at which point she got loads of abuse threatening illegal action, when i found out about this i in a fit of rage called Equita and informed them the debt is now cleared as i have receipts for the balance of the the sum owed, then to be told a bailiff will be attending in the morning, my problem now is i having my central heating replaced at the moment so trying to stop them getting access might be hard.

 

Whats my best course of action now as i paid the debt in full and have proof of that, and if they do turn up it will be only there first visit, do i just show them receipts if they manage to get access, as the council saying because of the bank holiday my payments might not show on there account till Monday. i have emailed Equita and the Council copies of the receipts so is there anything more i can do?

 

Many thxs as always

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just an update on whats happened. I took my online receipts direct to the Council Tax Office, Spoke to a very friendly lady on the desk and explained my position, within 5 mins had a number to call direct to someone who deals with Council Tax issues in my area, had a short chat again explaining my position and that i paid and have proof, she checked the account and checked the ID transaction for an online payments, was to my great delight told consider bailiffs called off and they will recall it after i finished talking to them.

 

I would like to thank everyone that helped me on this, i know Equita will go nuts for fees, but i can handle that from reading up on this wonderful site and will just have to restrain myself from making an insulting call to "Paul" (considering way he talked my partner).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...