Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I disagree with the charge and also the statements sent. Firstly I have not received any correspondence from DVLA especially a statutory notice dated 2/5/2024 or a notice 16/5/2024 voiding my licence if I had I would have responded within this timeframe. The only letter received was the single justice procedure notice dated the 29.5.2024 this was received on 4.6.2024. I also disagree with the statement that tax was dishonoured through invalid indemnity claim. I disagree that the licence be voided I purchased the vehicle in Jan 2024 from RDA car sales Pontefract with agreement to collect the car on the 28.1.2024. The garage taxed the vehicle on the 25.1.24 for eleven payments on direct debit  using my debit card on my behalf. £62.18 was the initial payment on 8.2.24  and £31 per month thereafter the second payment was 1.3.24.This would run from Jan 24 to Dec 24 and a total of £372.75, therefore the car was clearly taxed before  I took the car away After checking one of my vehicle apps  I could see the vehicle was showing as untaxed it later transpired that DVLA had cancelled my tax , without reason and I did not receive any correspondence from DVLA to state why it was cancelled or when. The original payment of £62.18 had gone through and verified by my bank Lloyds so this payment was not declined. I then set up the direct debit again straight away at my local post office branch on 15.2.2024 the first payment was £31 on 1.3.2024 and subsequent payments up to Feb 2025 with a total of £372.75 which was the same total as the original DD that was set up in Jan, Therefore I claimed the £62.18 back from my bank as an indemnity claim as this payment was from the original cancelled tax from DVLA and had been cancelled . I have checked my bank account at Lloyds and every payment since Jan 24  up to date has been taken with none rejected as follows: 8.2.24 - £62.15 1.3.24 - £31.09 2.4.24 - £31.06 1.5.24 - £31.06 3.6.23-£31.06 I have paper copies of the original DD set up conformation plus a breakdown of payments per month , and a paper copy of the second DD setup with breakdown of payments plus a receipt from the post office.I can also provide bank statements showing each payment to DVLA I also ask that my licence be reinstated due to the above  
    • You know hes had it when they call out those willing to say anything even claiming tories have reduced taxes on live tv AS Salmonella says: The Conservative Party must embrace Nigel Farage to “unite the right”, Suella Braverman has urged, following a disastrous few days for Rishi Sunak. The former home secretary told The Times there was “not much difference” between the new Reform UK leader’s policies and those of the Tories, as senior Conservatives start debating the future of the party. hers.   AND Goves replacement gets caught booking in an airbnb to claim he lives locally .. as of yesterday you can rent it yourself in late July - as he'll either be gone or claiming taxpayer funded expenses for a house - So whens farage getting around to renting (and subletting) a clacton beach hut?   Gove’s replacement caught out on constituency house claim as home found on Airbnb WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Social media users quickly pointed out house Ed McGuinness had posted photos in was available to rent     As Douglas Ross says he'll stand down in scotland - if he wins in Westminster - such devotion.
    • I've completed a draft copy to defend and will post up here for review.  Looking over the dates and payments this all stemmed from DVLA cancelling in Feb , whereby I set up a new DD in Feb hence the overlap, why they cancelled when I paid originally in Jan I have no idea. Anyway now stuck with pending court action and a suspended licence . I am also firing off a letter to DVLa recorded disputing the licence revoke
    • Thank you both for your expert knowledge and understanding. You're fighting the good fight by standing up for people like me and others with limited knowledge of this stuff. I thank you. I know all my DVLA details are good. I recently (last year) renewed my license, and my car's V5 is current with the correct details; the same is valid for my partner. I'll continue to ignore the love letters 😂 and won't let it bother either me or my partner.  I'll revisit this post if/when I get a letter of claim.  F**k ém.
    • Please check back later on today for a fuller response and some edits
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Alan v LPF Littlewoods/Barclays


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5932 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My wife has a Credit Card Account with LPF Littlewoods, she got into arrears a while ago and has thus incurred charges and interest on this account,

The current Balance stands at 312.00 as of Feb.08, of which 104.00 is penalty charges.

Credit Limit 000.00, and has been for years.

 

I wrote to LPF a while ago and informed them that I am now acting on my wife's behalf.

 

My wife recieved a letter from Mercers debt collectors limited on Mon.25th Feb 08, informing her the Account has been passed to Mercers for collection, I was not happy with their attitude when I rang them that day, as they were most abrupt and misleading in theit comments ( see post about mercers )

Re: Mercers....

My wife missed a payment on a littlewoods credit card account earlier this month and recieved a default notice from mercers today i rang them on her behalf (as I have authority to deal with this on her behalf ) I offered to pay the arrears to littlewoods at the end of the month, I was told they can hold off till 29th Feb, after that it will go to doorstep collection. I replied that as part of balance is made up of charges I will be claiming them back etc. but will still pay arrears at end of month.

 

I then re-read the default notice and found that they have given me till 10th march to pay the arrears, got back on the phone and queried this they simply said "oh that's a misprint" I told her "I could hold you to the default notice if I wanted" she said that I would still get a doorstep collection if I failed to pay by end of month.

 

Following this phone call I took the following action:

1. I sent LPF a CCA request for a true copy of any Signed Credit Agreement, (as I suspect they only have an application form), this was recieved by LPF on 5th March 08.

2 I sent LPF a letter regarding Mercers conduct and misleading comments in the above mentioned phone call. I also enclosed the cut up credit card and my wifes "wishes to exercise her right to close the account forthwith". And in view of Mercers attitude I informed LPF "I will Not be dealing with Mercers in any way whatsoever,and respectfully request you take back control of this account from Mercers".

And

3. I sent LPF a LBA Letter requesting a refund of 104.00 in charges.

 

My wife recieved the following letter from LPF today ( Thur. 13th March 08) (addressed to her,even though I am suposed to be dealing with this now) in response to my LBA request for a Refund of Charges:-

Dear Mrs -----------

LITTLEWOODS SERVICES

ACCOUNT NUMBER -----------------------

 

I write further to your recent letter, your correspondence has been passed to me in order that I may investigate and respond in my capacity as Customer Relationship Manager.

 

With regard to your request for a refund of charges I am sorry you feel the charges you have incurred are unfair. We believe that our charges are both fair and transparent, and we make them clear in our Terms and Conditions, and on the reverse of every monthly statement. These charges are avoidable by staying within your limit and making your monthly payment on time.

 

In your correspondence you have outlined case law which you say supports your view. As I am sure you will appreciate Barclaycard is aware of all the information you have drawn to our attention. I must inform you however, that we disagree with your legal analysis.

 

However, as a goodwill gesture and without any admission of liability Barclaycard is prepared to credit you with 8.00,

The adjustment will be confirmed on your next statement.

 

Please be advised that from 1st August 2006, Barclaycard reduced its fee to 12.00 following the publication of the statement by the OFT.

I hope that this now clarifies the situation. Should you have any further questions regarding this matter please do not hesitate to contact me. If my reply does not meet with your expectations you may ultimately be eligible to refer to the Financial Ombudsman Service. Further details if the service are available on request.

If I have not heard from you within 8 weeks from the date of this letter, I will close my file in accordance with our usual practice.

 

Yours sincerely

P-- B---- ( Mrs)

Littlewoods Personal Finance

 

When my wife showed me this I was Livid,

and had to post it on here for all to see ( my scanner dos'nt work at the moment so I typed it )

A goodwill gesture of 8.00 what an insult

I'm going to wait and see if they can come up with an enforcable Credit Agreement and take it from their

If any one has a template letter to respond to this or any sugestions as to how I should respond I would be greatful, as if I respond the way I feel at the moment I may get arrested

 

By the way Mercers have now started to ring me,

1st last night when I was in the Bath,

and again tonight, they left a message to ring Mercers on 0151 473 ****

 

Alan

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alan...., you seem to be doing pretty well so far, I would also post this up on the Bank Charges Forum too as you may get some assistance on this (the claiming back of charges) there (don't forget to add 8% compounded interest to the penalty charges too).....It might be worth starting an official claim in to them.

 

As for Mercers send them this letter....(edit this to suit) You can also tell them that this account is IN DISPUTE

 

Company Name

Road

Town

City / County

Postcode

 

Re: Harassment by telephone

 

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXX

 

Dear Sirs

 

I am writing in relation to the quantity and frequency of telephone calls that I have received from your company, which I deem to be personally harassing.

 

I have verbally requested that these stop, but I am still receiving calls. (Delete if necessary)

 

I now require all further correspondence from your company to be made in writing only.

 

I am of the view that your continued harassment of me by telephone puts you in breach of Section 40 of the Administration of Justice Act 1970, and the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.

 

If you continue to harass me by telephone, you will also be in breach of the Communications Act (2003) s.127 and I will report you to OFCOM, Trading Standards and The Office of Fair Trading, meaning that you will be liable to a substantial fine.

 

Be advised that any further telephone calls from your company will be recorded. (**Even if you don‘t yet have recording equipment!!**)

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

If they continue to call you write down the times and dates of their calls...

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, I sent that letter off this morning, (as I found the template for that letter shortly after posting last nights post and wanted to get in quick) I sent it this morning 'Special Delivery Guaranteed next day'. an interesting point emerged, when the post office typed in Mercers address it flagged up Simmons and Simmons.

I had yet another call from Mercers tonight, this time I was ready for them so instead of hanging up on them I thought I'll have a bit of fun with them first,I asked them that if I was to make a payment who would it be payable to, he said it would be Littlewoods themselves, I replied that's ok as you would not be able to take a payment as you are Dormant according to a Webcheck ( I read that somewhere on this site, and did my own webcheck to see). I then asked who are Simmons and Simmons, there was a 'long pause', an 'ummm', then an 'I dont know, it may be our solicitors', he then went on to say that it has just shown up on his system that Barclaycard are looking into my request for CCA therefore he will take me off their automated phone call system for 14 days while its sorted out, I told him that he will be recieving my Harrassment letter tomorrow, so it'll be longer than that. then hung up.

I did so enjoy that

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...