Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • J&P Credit Solutions are specialists on debt recovery. Either way they seem to be swapping between the JandP and IDR whatever their exact definitions are.
    • Primary and secondary teachers are supporting pupils with their own money, buying food and warm clothing. Eight in 10 primary teachers in England spending own money to help pupils | Education | The Guardian WWW.THEGUARDIAN.COM Increasing numbers of children hungry and lack adequate clothing, with two-thirds of secondary teachers also supporting pupils  
    • I googled "prescribed disability" to see where it is defined for the purposes of S.92. I found HMRC's definition, which included deafness. I don't  think anyone is saying deaf people cant drive, though! digging deeper,  Is it that “prescribed disability” (for the purposes of S.88 and S.92) is defined at: The Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1999 WWW.LEGISLATION.GOV.UK These Regulations consolidate with amendments the Motor Vehicles (Driving Licences) Regulations 1996...   ….. and sleep apnoea / increased daytime sleepiness is NOT included there directly as a condition but only becomes prescribed under “liability to sudden attacks of disabling giddiness or fainting” (but falling asleep isn't fainting!), so it isn’t defined there as a “prescribed disability”  Yet, under S.92(2)(b) RTA 1988 “ any other disability likely to cause the driving of a vehicle by him in pursuance of a licence to be a source of danger to the public" So (IMHO) sleep apnea / daytime sleepiness MIGHT be a prescribed disability, but only if it causes likelihood of "driving being a source of danger to the public" : which is where meeting / not meeting the medical standard of fitness to drive comes into play?  
    • You can counter a Judges's question on why you didn't respond by pointing out that any company that charges you with stopping at a zebra crossing is likely to be of a criminal mentality and so unlikely to cancel the PCN plus you didn't want to give away any knowledge you had at that time that could allow them to counteract your claim if it went to Court. There are many ways in which you can see off their stupid claim-you will see them in other threads  where our members have been caught by Met at other airports as well as Bristol.  Time and again they take motorists to Court for "NO Stopping" apparently completely forgetting that the have lost doing that because no stopping is prohibitory and cannot form a contract. Yet they keep on issuing PCNs because so many people just pay up . Crazy . You can see what chuckleheads they are when you read their Claim form which is pursuing you as the driver or the keeper. they don't seem to understand that on airport land because of the Bye laws, the keeper is never liable.   
    • The video-sharing app told the BBC that a "very limited" number of accounts had been compromised.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Lowell & T-Mobile!!


alanam
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I would love some help and advice, im pulling my hair out with all the hassle!!

I have recieved a letter from LOWELL asking me to confirm i used to live at my previous address and for me to call them to confirm. I had no idea who they were so i called them straight away, i was informed by them that they brought a debt from T-MOBILE saying i have an outstanding balance of £175! I have told them that i have told them that i would like proof of the outstanding bill. They have informed me that because it is not under the Credit Consumer Act 'by law' they dont have to send me a copy of the original signed agreement. I am refusing to pay them until i have proof of the debt. I have been searching the internet for a letter template, but unfortunatly all the templates i can find have the CCA quotes in them.

Please can you advise me on what to do next as they have sent me a letter telling me court costs, and im worried that this will ruin my credit history.

Thank for help

Alana

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well in that case send them this and request definite proof this debt is valid.

 

Dear Sir/Madam

 

You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply.

 

Yours faithfully

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do have recollection of the account but i was un aware of the outstanding balance. Is this letter still ok even though i acknowledge account with T-mobile?

Thanks

Alana

Link to post
Share on other sites

You may of had an account with T-mobile, but until Lowell prove that they can collect this debt, this is the best tack to take.

After all we all want to ensure that the correct parties get our payments.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, my girlfriend is in exactly the same situation.

I sent a simmilar/or the same letter to them and they replied by sending a bunch of account statements which dosent really mean anything to her, theres no call lists, signatures or account information, just a bunch of bills.

 

So we responded by sending an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to t-moblie and a letter to the debt collection agency explaining that T-mobile have been sent an S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) and they are going to have to do better than that if they expect to get paid.

 

See here if you want to follow our progress:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt-issues/131061-please-help-lowell-dcas.html

 

The SAR, allong with obligitory £10 postal order for admin fees, we sent is as follows:

 

T-MOBILE(UK)LTD

HATFIELDBUSINESSPARK

HATFIELD

HERTFORDSHIRE

AL10 9BU

 

SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST FOR COMMUNICATIONS DATA

 

To the attention of the Data Protection Officer

 

Dear Sir or Madam

 

Ref: XXXXXXXXXXX Red Debt collection Services

 

This is a subject access request for disclosure of information under Section 7 of the Data Protection Act 1998.

 

Please send me the information which I am entitled to under section 7(1). In accordance with that section, please provide a statement:

• confirming whether any personal data is being processed;

• describing the personal data processed;

• specifying the purposes for which data is processed for each category of data, and the recipients of any data disclosed[1];

• detailing any transfers of data outside the UK in whatever form or by whatever means;

• naming the person responsible for the data protection compliance.

This information should include any personal data comprised in, linkable to, or which can be associated with the following identifiers:

• All records relating to telephone calls made from or to the telephone number All records relating to electronic services and text messages made from or to this same telephone number;

• All records relating to billing information, including subscriber data relating to my account.

 

In particular, the following types of personal data are sought:

 

• "communications data" as defined by Section 21(4) and Section 21(6) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000;

• any data processed by switches, cells, Message-Transfer-Agents(MTAs), monitoring-systems, voice mail, or other software or hardware devices under your control, which is retained and/or disclosed in hardcopy, electronic media, backup devices, transient storage or otherwise including location information;

• case notes on incidents, events, disclosures, collections, modifications or faults;

• records of disclosures to other parties, including emails;

• the logic of any automated decision processes[2];

• The sources of the personal data.

 

As required by the Data Protection Act 1998 section 8(2), please provide an explanation of the purpose, meaning, and context of the information. This includes geographical information for any location data that is retained.

 

You are required to supply this information as soon as possible, no longer than forty days. If possible, I request that the information be provided in electronic form, as allowed under section 8(2) of the DPA 1998. If this is not possible, please provide it to me in hard copy. If you are not providing me with copies of all records that you hold related to this request containing personal information because of an exemption in the DPA or for any other reason, please inform me of that fact.

I understand that you are required to properly identify any applicant for access to personal data. Please promptly advise me whether any further information is required from me, or whether the information contained in this letter and/or my personal cheque for the access fee is sufficient. Please advise me by telephone of any further information you require.

 

If you believe you are not the data controller for any of the above data, please provide the contact details of the organisation you believe to be the controller and explain why you have reached the conclusion why you are not the controller.

 

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that, im waiting for a horrible response so now i can at least throw one straight back at them!!

Good luck with yours keep in touch and ill let you know how im going! They are so rude aren't they!!

Alana

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi,

I have just received another letter.... this time from RED DEBT COLLECTION SERVICES!! The letter says....

 

We refer to your letter 18th March and would advise you that your comments have been noted.

The account in question relates to a T-Mobile phone number 0000000000 connected on 21st Nov 2002 with the last payment being recieved on 8th june 2003.

We have today requested copies of any availible statements form our client and these will be sent to you uopn receipt.

We hope this information clarifies the current situation and we look forward to hearing from you shortley.

 

......Do i need to reply to them with anything or will they automatically sent me these document they have requested? Also if they sent me statement of that account is that enough proof of them saying i owe them this balance??

 

Thanks for help

Alana

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...