Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Marcus will cut the rate on its easy-access savings account to 4.55% from Saturday - can you find better rates elsewhere?View the full article
    • Legal claim alleges Steam's market dominance means consumers are paying too much for video games.View the full article
    • In-person collaboration has been linked to high performance and job satisfaction, but these benefits don't increase with more days spent in the office.View the full article
    • We need to see the actual document from the IAS where it is written - "The Operator's evidence shows no payment for the Appellant's vehicle, or anything similar. It does show two payments for the same registration in quick succession. I would take a reasonable guess, based on the circumstances described, that the person paying has paid for the registration of the person they assisted again." You can't just type it up yourself. At the hearing in July or August or whenever the judge will have two Witness Statements. One from Bank's director says you never made a second appeal. You say you did make a second appeal and the IAS concluded that payment was made. The judge will immediately twig that either you or the director is lying.  But who? Fail to show the documentation form the IAS and instead just produce something you've typed yourself will make it look like you just made up the appeal and you are lying and you will lose the case. Please let us see what the IAS adjudicator sent.
    • I used to have a retail outlet in London selling my husband's photography.  We also had a co-op with staff so they weren't directly employed by me, but I paid for the other overheads etc.  When my husband died, I carried on as usual for a while but then I became ill and moved quite far away so logistically was becoming very difficult.  I came to an arrangement (verbal) with one of the guys I trusted, that I would send him the images to print and sell as normal, and I wouldn't take any money, as a short term solution until I got back on my feet and worked out the best way to do things. He would pay all the  rent, insurance etc... Over a year later, not able to give things away for free anymore,  I drew up a contract as a wholesale agreement, so I would get everything printed and sent to him and I would invoice his for what he ordered. I noticed form the beginning that he wasn't ordering enough or frequently enough to be making any money, and was suspicious he was doing his own orders on the sly and ordering just enough from me to keep my happy.  I checked with my printer, which I've been with for 20 years, and he sad he wasn't getting orders for my images from anyone else. I emailed a few other printers to ask them to keep a look out for some images but I soon realised this would be impossible to police.  The only option really would be to buy a print from him and check the stamp on the back of it.  I finally managed to get hold of on the prints on sale, and sure enough, he did not order it through me.   In the contract he signed in 2022 it explicitly states that he must destroy all files I had previously sent him etc etc so e is in breach of that.  When I drew up the contract, I was careful to make sure it was legally binding, but before I let rip at him, I need to know where I stand.  The contract is here: PARTIES This WHOLESALE AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made effective as of 30th June, 2022, by and between ############################## The Supplier and the Client, collectively referred to as the "Parties," hereby agree to the following terms: TERMS AND CONDITIONS SALES OF GOODS The Supplier agrees to provide the following goods to the Client (“Goods”): Description of Goods ################################# Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b BOTH PARTIES AGREE: The Client purchases the Goods through the Supplier directly, and agrees to delete/destroy any previously held digital images (Goods) owned by the Supplier, and agrees not to use any such files for monetary gain, outside of this agreement, either directly or through a third party from immediate effect of this agreement. The Client purchases the other materials necessary for resale of the Goods independently of this agreement. The Client shall have exclusive rights for resale of Goods at ###########, and also with permission, as a retailer of the Goods elsewhere, provided that there is no conflict of interest between the Supplier and the Client. The Client is free to decide their own retail prices, for the Goods. The Supplier shall use #####  to provide the printed Goods on Fujifilm Crystal Archive paper, with Lustre finish, and will not use any other Printer unless #### cease to trade, without prior approval from the Client. The Supplier shall not impose restrictions on size or frequency of orders made by the Client. The prices provided by the Supplier shall not increase for a minimum of 3 years, unless the prices of the raw materials rise, in which case the client will be informed immediately. Any discounts/promotional prices of raw materials shall be passed on to the Client by the Supplier, and the invoice will show adjustments for this, as well as credit for return postage of any damaged goods. This agreement can be terminated by the Client without notice; the Supplier must give notice of no less than 90 days, unless the terms of the agreement are breached, in which case, the agreement can be terminated with immediate effect. PAYMENT Orders must be paid for upon receipt of invoice, via Bank transfer: ######### Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b DELIVERY AND INSPECTIONS All orders received by 12.00am (midnight) shall be processed by the Supplier the following working day and delivery of order shall arrive in accordance with the Royal Mail schedule, or DPD, should express delivery be requested. The Client shall be liable for the delivery charge which shall be added to the invoice. The Goods will be delivered to the address specified by the Client. The Client shall be provided with order tracking, and should any problems arise with the ordering system or the couriers (Royal Mail, DPD), the Client shall be informed without delay of any such issues. The Client will inspect the Goods and report any defects or damage to the Goods in transit as soon as possible upon receipt of Goods, and will retain damaged Goods for return to Supplier for refund/replacement. GENERAL PROVISIONS CONFIDENTIALITY The prices of the Goods and other information contained in this Agreement is confidential and will not be disclosed by either party unless with prior written consent of the other party. INDEMNIFICATION The Client indemnifies the Supplier from any claims, liabilities, and expenses made by any third party vendors or customers of the Client. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with UK Law. ACCEPTANCE Both parties understand and accept the wholesale arrangement stipulated under this Agreement. Doc ID: 3d54c1d336d8780243801e0e068ebd33114b088b IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the Parties has executed this Wholesale Agreement as of the day and year set forth above.   Signed by us both electronically.   I haven't broached any of this yet, and I am looking for some advice about what action to take.  The main issue I've got is that he has still go those images.  If I terminate the contract, I will need to know that he no longer has those images and I can't think of a bulletproof way to do this. I'm thinking I might tell him I will continue with the contract but ask for a  sum in damages and say that if I find out he's still doing it down the line I will terminate the contract and sue him for damages. The damages side of things I'm not sure how it would work as he is self employed, and I'm positive he doesn't declare all of his earnings to HMRC, in order to find out how much I have lost, would the court demand to go through his tax self assessments?  I'm not sure how to proceed with this, I don't want to lose that place as an outlet as it is in a prime spot in London, which is why I let him have those images in the first place as I would have had to pull out altogether at that point.  I am regretting it somewhat now though.  Please help.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Moorcroft unable to provide agreement


221b
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5931 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Moorcroft chasing me for £1800 debt that thief of my phone abroad ran up.

 

Been in dispute with Voda over this for 1 1/2 years as they did nothing to stop thief's phone calls accelerating to this level in less than 24 hours.

 

Voda referred to Capquest Debt Recovery first of all.

 

I stupidly paid £500 as I got scared what with threats over the phone etc.

 

Didn't know what I know now!

 

Capquest gave up when I asked for copy of CCA and DOA. They provided neither and referred me back to Voda.

 

The next day (!) a letter came from Moorcroft Debt RA.

 

I sent off request for CCA and DOA to them. Actually not sure CCA relevant as it's a mobile phone contract...

 

They have written back outside of the 12 days saying they don' t have access to this info and that upon consultation with Voda, they have confirmed that I will have to contact Phones 4U for a copy of the agreement as my original contract was with them and as I originally took the handset out with them - back in 1999!

 

Do Moorcroft have to provide the DOA themselves and if they can't it's unenforceable? Would appreciate advice on this point.

 

Also, strictly, contract was never signed by me, but my dear old Mum (who's now 73) who got the phone for me as a gift back when I was a student.

 

Appreciate all advice and wisdom!

 

Many thanks

 

221b

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Moorcroft are attempting to collect monies due under and agreement, then they are responsible for furnishing you with a copy of the agreement, or forwarding your request on to the original creditor, irrespective of whether it is governed by the CCA or not.

 

if they don't have the agreement, what exactly is it they are enforcing?

 

Stand your ground, make them prove that they have a right to collect on the debt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Alas, mobile phone contracts are not regulated by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, so there is no point in making a s.77/78 request.

 

However, if it is the case that you did not sign the contract then on what basis are they pursuing you? Unfortunately, however, if you go down this road, they may well end up going after your mother!

 

Usually mobile phone contracts include a clause that limits the customer's liability if the phone is stolen, provided it's reported to them within a predefined time. You'll need a copy contract to determine if this is the case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that, Scarlet Pimpernel!

 

They are pursuing me (rather than my Mum) becuae the bills have always been paid by me, yet I have to admit they are constantly addressing all correspondence to my Mum, but at my address.

 

Now, I don't for one moment want them to go after my Mum obviously.

 

I asked Voda over a year ago for a copy of the original agreement, but they have never given it.

 

My very first contract (or my Mum's to be specific) was actually with Phones4U, though it was a Voda airtime contract and was so for the next 7 years.

 

So, my questions are:

 

1 Who do I now write to and ask for what?

 

2 Also, what do I do about Moorcroft - do I write back to them, and if so, saying what?

 

It does seem like everything is grinding to a halt, I must say, but would like to bring this to a conclusion. It's been occupying my headspace for 18 months now :(

 

Advice so far - most thankful to all.

 

I'd appreciate help on the above points.

 

Best wishes

 

221b

Link to post
Share on other sites

you need to get them to prove they have a right to the debt, so write to the people who are demanding payment, the agreement is what they are trying to enforce. ask for a copy of the signed agreement and also a copy of the final statement from Voda, to prove that no unlawful charges have been applied.

 

If the original creditor cannot supply you with the agreement, then it's doubtful that Moorcroft will be able to.

 

You can use letter N from the templates library but you will need to amend it to remove the CCA references (as mobile debts are not covered by the CCA)

 

 

if this has been helpful, please feel freee to tip the scales

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

Many thanks for your reply Spamheed

 

I've already asked them for copy of the original agreement and the deed of assignment (as mentioned in post 1) and they have referred me to Phones 4U as both they and Voda don't have it.

 

I have already sent them the template letter along with my request for the above, so I don't really want to send the same letter again!

 

Can I ask them for it again, then? And if so, how do I couch the letter?

 

Many thanks

 

221b

Link to post
Share on other sites

Going back to the theft...As mentioned in a previous post, you should only be liable for a very limited amount as long as you reported it in a timely fashion. What answers have you had from then regarding this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh dear!

 

Floodgates. Opened. Etc.

 

Been in wrangles with Voda since the incident happened - I was pickpocketed abroad having just had an operation. No phone. No money.

 

I rang within 24 hours of the theft - the minute I landed on UK soil in fact.

 

They say that bottom line is I should have called them immediately otherwise I'm liable. They don't have any anti-fraud software and they 'prioritise' all the alerts they do receive - clearly nearly 2 grand in less than a day isn't important enough ;) They sent a text to my phone when it reached £500 and that was it, despite me never really going above £35 a month for the last 7 years...

 

Got BBC involved. Appeared on Working Lunch programme. Got Otelo involved (they are worse than useless, quite frankly and in the pay of the Mob companies so no surprise there).

 

Bill brought down to £800 odd by endless letters and the above.

 

Me still saying they should have done more to protect me.

 

Them denying any responsibility or duty of care.

 

Then the Debt RAs start with first Capquest then Moorcroft.

 

Voda no longer communicating on the dispute front. They send me the occasional bill showing that I've paid £500:mad: . Part of the £2,300 they're after is a lovely £500 they charged me for leaving them! Priceless!

 

They've never provided me with a copy of the original agreement.

 

Anyway, back to Moorcroft and the current situ! :)

 

What letter next and to whom?

 

Many thanks all!

 

221b

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is turning into one of moorcroft and the mobile companie's silly soaps :rolleyes:

 

Of course you did everything you were supposed to do. How can you call them with NO money? They do have a duty of care and could easily have suspended the line. Every account has a credit limit and this should have kicked in automatically on thier systems when the call charges reached it.

 

The only flimsy 'defence' they might have is that when calls are made abroad it takes a bit of time for the foreign carrier to pass the info. to the UK carrier. But their admition of sending a text to your phone when it reached £500 in charges would negate this :rolleyes:

 

Did you report the theft to the foreign police and notify your travel insurance company?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Didn't have TI :-(

 

Reported to Station authorities - not sure if they were Police ( I was pickpocketed at Bruxelles Centrale) and filled out a form just before I started to make my way home but Voda not interested in that. They didn't seem to care whther I reported it or not, just that I pay up.

 

Have been through the rights and wrongs of it all a zillion times with Voda and they aint budging...

 

Just need to know who to write to, and what next!

 

Thanks so much...

 

221b

Link to post
Share on other sites

I didn't unfortunately...

 

I was a little dazed and in shock from the theft/recent op and aware I was about to miss my train connecting me to my onward journey home.

 

At that point I thought perhaps I had dropped my things and hadn't really considered I'd been pickpocketed :rolleyes:

 

In hindsight I'd have got a copy of the form had I been thinking straight.

 

Voda don't really care whether I reported it or not. They just want me to pay up...

Link to post
Share on other sites

My best advice is to write to moorcroft advising that you have disputed the account explaining the grounds. Ask them for a statement of the account which is free of charge so you can check if they've added any charges.

 

Also write to the mobile company asking for a copy of their complaints procedure.

 

Send these letters recorded and keep copies of them for future reference.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been through Voda's complaints procedure already - last year in fact - that's how I got to Otelo (the mobile ombudsman).

 

Voda say they have exhausted the complaints procedure which is why they've handed over to a debt recovery agency.

 

I get a bill from Voda from time to time - all the charges are for the phone calls the thief made plus the termination fee of £500 whacked on top.

 

HTH.

 

Thanks

 

221b

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok...Time for other avenues.

 

MP

 

Trading Standards:

 

Trading Standards Central - Trading Standards and Consumer Protection information for the UK

 

Still write asking what I suggested to moorcroft. You never know, pigs might fly and they may see sense :rolleyes:

 

Office of Fair Trading:

 

The Office of Fair Trading: making markets work well for consumers

 

Financial Ombudsman Service:

 

Financial Ombudsman Service

 

Advise in your letter to moorcroft that you're contacting these people ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...