Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi, below is a draft of the letter Address: Hugo Martin Director of Legal and Company Secretary EVRi Parcelnet Ltd trading as Evri CAPITOL HOUSE, 1, CAPITOL CLOSE LEEDS LS27 0WH REQUEST OF CONTRACTS      Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing in regards to the ongoing small claims case ____. In your Defendant’s response you make reference to a pre-existing commercial agreement between yourselves and Packlink (2.7). In that, you claim to have a clause removing customers third party rights under the Contract (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999. I would like to request a copy of this contract and confirmation of the date on which the exclusion of third party rights term was included in it. If you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. I also notice that you have destroyed tracking information due to "lapse of time" in line with your data protection policy (2.12). Can you share where this data protection policy is disclosed to customers? I also ask you to forward you a copy of that data protectiono policy, and again if you refuse to provide this then I will be henceforth referring to that refusal in the claim, including to the Judge. Kind regards,
    • Firstly, thank you for filling in the sticky so quickly - we wish everyone who comes here would do that! You're in the clear.  MET don't know who the driver was.  They can use Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 to transfer liability to the keeper if their bilge arrives within 14 days - they didn't send it out till 102 days after!!! So sit on your hands.  MET will come out with threat after threat but ultimately will do nothing. Have a read of other threads for this car park - we are having a tsunami of cases at the moment. Be sure to come back here though if they ever send you a Letter of Claim.  
    • Just received this letter from Lowell.  IMG_1032.pdf
    • I don't think you are misunderstanding. It seems something may have gone missing. HB
    • Hi, Thanks for the reply. The only correspondence I've had from them is attached to the post? Apologies if I'm misunderstanding. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Warnes v NW


Stewpot42
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5190 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I too served my claim on the 13th of March. Today I had a little peak and hey presto a big note saying that the bank admits it owes me the money. I hit the judgement button and filled out the relevant. Should I now be worrying they will defend even though I was told the admitted owing?

18/04/07 Won £4360.09 Nationwide Current Account

19/04/07 Began claiming for 10 years

15/04/07 Began Nationwide Credit Card

26/04/07 Began Egg Credit Card

02/08/07 Won £416.97 Egg Credit Card

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 177
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Can someone tell me how Nationwide are allowed to put in a defence on the 12th April when MCOL told me that teh last day they had to reply was the 11th APril? surely this doesnt give them a leg to stand on?

:| worried and stressed:|

Nationwide! Here i come, could be alot of money they might have to pay me back:eek:

 

Data request letter sent 04/06/06 via Hull Branch Nationwide.

Hull financial consultant called ME to help 04/06/06

:smile:Refunded £1200, 19/07/06, still going for the rest of it though!

LBA posted 22/09/06 claiming £2720!

D`oh! - put wrong amount in LBA - short by £1000!

Finally got the money to go to court 09/03/07

Acknowledged 13/03/07

No reply, so judgement issued 29 days after acknowledgment 14/04/07

DEFENCE FILED ??!! 09/03/07

FULLY PAID UP 17/04/07

Second Prelim sent 20/04/07

Second LBA sent 01/05/07

MCOL acknowledged

County court letter saying PAID UP 20/06/07 - although this wasnt the claimed amount, so i disputed it.

Still awaiting court date/decision due to OFT case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can someone tell me how Nationwide are allowed to put in a defence on the 12th April when MCOL told me that teh last day they had to reply was the 11th APril? surely this doesnt give them a leg to stand on?

 

I think I read somewhere that sometimes they can get a day's 'grace'.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ADVICE NEEDED!

 

Got a letter from CCBC regarding judgement being rejected, it says " A bar on judgement/enforcement is in place"

 

Any ideas on what the next step is?

 

I have emailed MCOL to complain that they got an extra day to defend, where i would have lost the case if i had left it till day after 28 day notice to defend. - as if 28 days isnt enough? any legal boffins out there who know if this is legal or not? or is it a loop-hole!

:| worried and stressed:|

Nationwide! Here i come, could be alot of money they might have to pay me back:eek:

 

Data request letter sent 04/06/06 via Hull Branch Nationwide.

Hull financial consultant called ME to help 04/06/06

:smile:Refunded £1200, 19/07/06, still going for the rest of it though!

LBA posted 22/09/06 claiming £2720!

D`oh! - put wrong amount in LBA - short by £1000!

Finally got the money to go to court 09/03/07

Acknowledged 13/03/07

No reply, so judgement issued 29 days after acknowledgment 14/04/07

DEFENCE FILED ??!! 09/03/07

FULLY PAID UP 17/04/07

Second Prelim sent 20/04/07

Second LBA sent 01/05/07

MCOL acknowledged

County court letter saying PAID UP 20/06/07 - although this wasnt the claimed amount, so i disputed it.

Still awaiting court date/decision due to OFT case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So we can issue judgement against them in the morning of day 29 and even though the rules say that the defence has to be entered within these 28 days the banks are given an extra day.

 

As such the law and the court system would appear to be stacked against us.

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i pressed the judgement button on the 28th day at about 10am the nationwide put in a defence at 4.00pm the same day, my judgement was rejected, nationwide asked for a bar to be put on to stop me from making the judgement. very unfair they have had long enough with 2x letter then 28 days court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think its a bleedin rip-off(unless i get all my claim soon)40 days+14+14+28, then they want a bit longer!!!!

 

Its takin the michael!

:| worried and stressed:|

Nationwide! Here i come, could be alot of money they might have to pay me back:eek:

 

Data request letter sent 04/06/06 via Hull Branch Nationwide.

Hull financial consultant called ME to help 04/06/06

:smile:Refunded £1200, 19/07/06, still going for the rest of it though!

LBA posted 22/09/06 claiming £2720!

D`oh! - put wrong amount in LBA - short by £1000!

Finally got the money to go to court 09/03/07

Acknowledged 13/03/07

No reply, so judgement issued 29 days after acknowledgment 14/04/07

DEFENCE FILED ??!! 09/03/07

FULLY PAID UP 17/04/07

Second Prelim sent 20/04/07

Second LBA sent 01/05/07

MCOL acknowledged

County court letter saying PAID UP 20/06/07 - although this wasnt the claimed amount, so i disputed it.

Still awaiting court date/decision due to OFT case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a rip off and I feel that the banks and coiurts are taking the **** but unfortunately it is the law and there is nothing we can do about it.

 

As long as the banks know that they have 40 days+14+14+28 then they will use every second of the time and unless something changes then there is not mush that we can do.

 

One other thought though on the 8% interest.

 

When my MCOL claim was acknowledged I sent off the 8% interest schedule.

 

As Nationwide have defended my claim,thereby giving themselves another 14 days, can I amend my schedule to include interest to cover these additional days and potentially all days up until the claim has been settled?

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks

The figure that they have put in so far is just the interest and the court fee.

 

wohooo, so glad thats sorted now on to tackle Lloyds tsb who seem more determined than the NW.

 

thanks to all the people for their help, definatly would not have carried it through with your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Any room left in the boat?

 

Filled judgement on the 13th, defense filled... on the 13th. :mad:

18/04/07 Won £4360.09 Nationwide Current Account

19/04/07 Began claiming for 10 years

15/04/07 Began Nationwide Credit Card

26/04/07 Began Egg Credit Card

02/08/07 Won £416.97 Egg Credit Card

Link to post
Share on other sites

Still nothing (as usual) in my account!

 

Heres hoping it could be today or tommorrow, still waiting on confirmation of what their defence is at the moment!

 

Any of you have your judgement rejected?(that have just had money refunded?)

:| worried and stressed:|

Nationwide! Here i come, could be alot of money they might have to pay me back:eek:

 

Data request letter sent 04/06/06 via Hull Branch Nationwide.

Hull financial consultant called ME to help 04/06/06

:smile:Refunded £1200, 19/07/06, still going for the rest of it though!

LBA posted 22/09/06 claiming £2720!

D`oh! - put wrong amount in LBA - short by £1000!

Finally got the money to go to court 09/03/07

Acknowledged 13/03/07

No reply, so judgement issued 29 days after acknowledgment 14/04/07

DEFENCE FILED ??!! 09/03/07

FULLY PAID UP 17/04/07

Second Prelim sent 20/04/07

Second LBA sent 01/05/07

MCOL acknowledged

County court letter saying PAID UP 20/06/07 - although this wasnt the claimed amount, so i disputed it.

Still awaiting court date/decision due to OFT case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

stewpot mine was rejected and transferred to my local court i am currently waiting for a court date, but yesterday the money went into my account not all there yet but have most of it, my mcol was up on 10 april due to bank hols, so should not be much longer for you good luck they must have a back log

Link to post
Share on other sites

Again a case of Nationwide wasting money by saying that they will defend the claim, getting it transferred to a local court and then they pay out before the court date has even been set.

 

Apart from us who get our cash back the other people that must be making a mint are the banks solicitors-they must be loving it!

 

As soon as claim is lodged against them they know that it will not get taken to court and as such the work that they have to do must be, I would have thought, fairly straightforward and if they charge the same fee per case then they must be making a fortune.

PPMAN159

 

If this comment has helped please click on the scales.

Link to post
Share on other sites

WOO-WOO-WOO-HOO-HOO!!!

They paid up!! evry last penny today!! Champagne for tea!!

:| worried and stressed:|

Nationwide! Here i come, could be alot of money they might have to pay me back:eek:

 

Data request letter sent 04/06/06 via Hull Branch Nationwide.

Hull financial consultant called ME to help 04/06/06

:smile:Refunded £1200, 19/07/06, still going for the rest of it though!

LBA posted 22/09/06 claiming £2720!

D`oh! - put wrong amount in LBA - short by £1000!

Finally got the money to go to court 09/03/07

Acknowledged 13/03/07

No reply, so judgement issued 29 days after acknowledgment 14/04/07

DEFENCE FILED ??!! 09/03/07

FULLY PAID UP 17/04/07

Second Prelim sent 20/04/07

Second LBA sent 01/05/07

MCOL acknowledged

County court letter saying PAID UP 20/06/07 - although this wasnt the claimed amount, so i disputed it.

Still awaiting court date/decision due to OFT case.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Congrats Stewpot!! :D

 

K.

Kelly

Settled: Nationwide £372.55

Before you do anything read this:

Guide to Reclaiming Bank Charges

 

Most questions can be answered by checking out these links:

Frequently Asked Questions

Step by step instructions

Letter Templates

And don't forget to use the search facility! Chances are your question has already been answered on another thread. Good luck

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...