Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • its not a good thing or a bad thing its ongoing. mines gone the same route. these new notifications are equally meaningless.
    • Shein has been linked to unethical business practices, including forced labour allegations.View the full article
    • Hi I have to agree with @unclebulgaria67 post#3 For the funding side of moving to a new area and it being private supported accommodation I would also suggest speaking to private supported accommodation provider about funding but also contact the Local Council for that area and have a chat with them about funding because if you are in receipt of Housing Benefit certain Supported Accommodation that meets a certain criteria is treated as ‘exempt accommodation’ for Housing Benefit purposes but you need to confirm this with that relevant Council in your new area especially since it is Private Supported Accommodation as each Council can have slightly different rules on this. If you have a certain medical condition look up the charities and also have a wee chat with them as they may be able to point you to different Grants to assist with moving costs and your question about funding for private supported accommodation as well.
    • Hi Just to be clear a Notice to Quit is only the very start of the Housing Association going down the Eviction route there is a long process to go. Also to be clear if you leave at the Notice to Quit date only and go to the Council claiming you are Homeless they will more than likely class you as Intentionally Homeless therefore you have no right to be given temporary housing by the Council. The only way that works is when the Court has Granted a Possession Order then you can approach the Council as Homeless with the Court Order. As for the Housing Association issuing the Notice to Quit because there investigation has proved it's not your main residence but you have witness statement to prove otherwise. From now on with the Housing Association you need to keep a very good paper trail and ensure to get free proof of posting from the post office with anything you send to them. You now need to make a Formal Complaint to the Housing Association and please amend the following to suit your needs:   Dear Sir/Madam FORMAL COMPLAINT Reference: Notice to Quit Letter Dated XX/XX/2024, Hand Delivered on XX/XX/2024 I note in your letter that you stated that the Housing Association has carried out an investigation into myself and came to the conclusion that I am not using this property as my main residence and have evidence of this and have therefore issued a 'Notice to Quit' by XX/XX/2024. I find the above actions absolutely disgraceful action by the Housing Association. 1. Why have I never been informed nor asked about this matter by my Housing Officer. 2. Why have I never been given the opportunity to defend myself before the Housing Association out of the blue Hand Delivered a Notice to Quit Letter. 3. I have evidence and witnesses/statements that prove this is my Main Residence and more than willing provide this to both the Housing Association and the Court. I now require the following: 1. Copy of your Complaints Policy (not the leaflet) 2. Copy of your Customer Care Charter (not the leaflet) 3. Copies of your Investigation into this not being my main residence.    As well as the above you need to send the Housing Association urgently a Subject Access Request (SAR) requesting 'ALL DATA' that simple phrase covers whatever format they hold that in whether it be letters, email, recorded calls etc. The Housing Association then has 30 calendar days to respond but that time limit only starts once they acknowledge your SAR Request. If they fail to respond within that time limit its then off with a complaint to the Information Commissioners Office (ICO).     
    • Hi Sorry for the delay in getting back to you The email excuse and I do say excuse to add to your account and if court decide LL can't recoup costs will be removed is a joke. So I would Ask them: Ask them to provide you with the exact terms within your Tenancy Agreement that allows them to add these Court Fees to your Account before it has been decided in Court by a Judge. Until the above is answered you require these Court Fees to be removed from your Account (Note: I will all be down to your Tenancy Agreement so have a good look through it to see what if any fees they can add to your account in these circumstances)
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Regal Credit


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5938 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Years ago I had an account with a Royal Bank of Scotland and got into financial trouble. Various excessive charges, bad advice from Baines and Ernst and my own spending later: the account was closed and sent to the RBS recovery department.

 

For at least four years I have had a standing order paying this debt at £10 a month and heard nothing.

 

They have sold this debt to Regal Credit who have demanded the total amount.

 

I have checked with RBS and the money I was paying was going into my old account but they've advised me to canccel the standing order to them and deal with Regal.

 

I did not phone Regal after reading about them on this forum and their business practices.

 

I sent an initial payment and an offer of subsequent payments in writing.

 

I have now received a demand for a debt that is quite clearly belongs to someone else.

 

Is this an attempt to get me to contact them by phone or something more sinister.

 

Have I made a mistake in contacting them at all?

 

A debt of £500 is mine but this is asking for over £1500 with a completely different reference number.

 

Is this just a front for extortion?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Replying to bump your thread, you should only ever write to people such as these, I would think it is best to write to them staitng you do not recognise this debt.

HOLD FIRE UNTIL A MORE EXPERIENCED MEMBER ADVISES ON THE FORMAT TO USE

 

Regards

 

Andy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gibby, You can contact them but DO NOT if possible, give them YOUR contact number.My wife has had problems with this lot recently,she had an old STYLE credit account card many years ago with RBS. Anyway to cut to the chase, she arranged a plan to clear the account by aug 07, by the way nothing signed, direct debit cancelled aug 07.Heard nothing until last week when letter arrived from this regal lot demanding payment for £724, She called them and this arrogant tit explained that this sum was purely interest on the account. Anyway, sent CCA request to them and SAR request to RBS, awaiting outcome.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What brilliant points.

 

If I requested the electronic record from RBS for the account number on the second letter I got they'd be in breach of the Data Protection Act because it's not my account.

 

The debt that is mine (the first letter) was indeed from an overdraft. There were a lot of charges on it. Hasn't the deadline for claiming charges back passed? Do you have a credit agreement for a bank account?

 

I regret now sending a payment as they didn't know for sure it was me and were just phishing? The fact that they then sent me someone else's debt proves they are unreasonable and unethical. They obviously buy bad debts in bulk then try and get them paid by whatever means possible and from whoever they can frighten with false threats. Kind of like a sales team getting leads and earning commission. How can I trust them to knock any payments off the right debt?

 

I have written them one letter but I'm not going to phone them. I'm going to ignore the debt letter that isn't my account. I also check online banking everyday to make sure they haven't used the account details on my cheque to set up a bogus direct debit ( a' la Jeremy Clarkson :rolleyes: ). There's no way I'd trust them with Debit Card details. If I wait until they send me another demand for the right debt which shows that the balance has been reduced by my payment should I pay again? Even if I paid it all off they could still try hound me as a soft touch for other people's debts (which I wouldn't pay, of course, but the letters are still depressing).

 

I have also read elsewhere that a lot of these dubious companies use the £1 you send for a S.A.R as a payment on the debt, even it isn't yours, then say because you've made a payment you've admitted responsibility for the debt! :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've now been sent a direct debit form for the correct debt with the amount I've paid deducted.

 

Should I fill it in?

 

I'll make sure there's only enough money in the account to cover the correct DD amount in case they try and up it.

 

They could have taken my bank details from the cheque I sent so I won't be giving them something they don't already have.

 

They could have scanned my signature from the cheque too, for nefarious purposes.

 

Think they may have been chancing their arm with the letter for the debt that wasn't mine hoping I'd ring them.

 

Just want to get rid of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Old_andrew2018

Hi

I think you should send the SAR letter, after this you will be in a position to decide what to do.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...