Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Residents are being consulted on plans to run overhead power cables 60km across the county.View the full article
    • The number of people out of work compared to jobs on offer mean more are competing for the same roles.View the full article
    • Small boat crossing numbers in last 7 days much more than the planned number to be sent to Rwanda. Small boat arrivals – last 7 days - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK These migrants obviously believe that being sent to Rwanda is not a consideration when they are aware of other migrants having died making the English channel crossing. If Rwanda was going to receive thousands of migrants, then it probably would be a deterrent to some. But the threat of sending 300 migrants to Rwanda is just not going to make any difference.
    • Last June, 3.4m members received a £100 payment from the building society. Now they will be wondering whether the offer will be replicated this year.View the full article
    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HFC/Weightmans Advice


mazel01
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5516 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 287
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It seem the left hand doesn't know what the right one is doing with regards to HFC and weightmans.

 

Could you not contact HFC by letter requesting the outstanding balance figure? That way at least you know what you owe from the horses mouth as it were, and maybe at the same time send a token payment as Rory suggests telling them that you have very little disposable income and that is all you can afford at this time, you could also include a statement of means showing just how little income you have to play with.

 

At least it shows willing and if it does come to court the Judge will at least see that you are prepared to deal with the issue with the limited resources you have.

 

Hope this helps

 

Mick

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi mazel01,

Dont worry sbout the amount, i have had 4 different values of my loan, all of which are wrong, when you get yoy SAR back it should state on that info, you could also send away for you credit report as this will show you what balance the loan has left. I,ve just started on weightmans and they want new info on me and said that i owed £37,000 which calculates to 3.5 x the original loan amount with PPI at nearly £5000, make sure your SAR is exactly what it is supposed to be as what they sent me was basically a list of telephone cal logs, they are basically refusing to supply me with SAR so after the ICO i'm goig to court....i cant stress enough....IF YOU CAN GET THE CORRECT INFO then you can apply your defence....If you cannot get the requested information they are legally abliged to give you then you can file an order through the courts and claim comp for non-compliance of SAR regarding PPI.

 

Chin up bud, and keep your wits about you coz they are b*****ds.

 

Regards Gordon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Please could someone help me on this, I am shaking like a leaf...

 

Received letter from HFC this morning enclosing statement of account but no other information although I SAR'd them.

 

Also received a letter from the courts via Weightmans that they have started legal proceedings against me.

 

I was fuming so I rang Weightmans and spoke to someone who said that they were entitled to issue legal proceedings against me. I told them that I had only received a part answer to my SAR from HFC and the account was in dispute. She said well thats nothing to do with Weightmans we can issue proceedings when we want to and have done. I said thats totally incorrect & illegal what you have done.....she said no HFC haven't told us that the account was in dispute so therefore we have issued these proceedings......after 20 minutes of talking to a brick wall I slammed the phone down......

 

PLEASE HELP I AM SO WORRIED & STRESSED!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Forgot to mention, when I rang Weightmans, I only gave my account number & they started talking about my account.....

1) The first guy I spoke to only asked me for my account no.

2)Then he put me through to someone else, who again didn't ask me for any personal details

3)Finally he put me through to the head of the dept, again no personal details were asked from me.....

 

I thought that solicitors have to follow DATA PROTECTION????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sequenci, according to Weightmans they have never been told that the account was in dispute and have sent me a statement of account..should HFC have told them that I had sent a SAR to them and therefore the account is in dispute until they provided me with this information. Weightmans reckon not, they say that they have an agreement in plave to issue procedings when they feel suitable????

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, when I asked Weightmans on the phone why the figure they are claiming was totally different to the one on the statement from HFC. There answer was it should be the figure that was on the default notice that HFC sent originally....I am so confused:confused:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya Maz... got your PM :)

 

Unfortunately, HFC are not shy in issuing proceedings against people but there's plenty of good info. on some of the other HFC threads re. Weightmans and the tactics they like to use. Unfortunately, although you have disputed the balance and sent a SAR, the SAR won't have placed the account "in dispute" as such... only a CCA request will do that and since they you've said earlier that they supplied an enforceable Agreement.... the account is no longer in dispute through non-compliance. I assume this is why they've gone ahead and contacted Weightmans.

 

You say that HFC supplied you with a Statement of Account... what's the figure on there ? What was the figure on the Default Notice (if you have it available) ? Are they the same ?

 

You say that you've received a letter from the courts Via Weightmans... what do you mean ? Are these court documents or is it just a letter from Weighmans threatening court action ?

 

:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Priority, the amount on the statement of account is £9200.

 

I have got 2 default notices:

 

1) Sep 06 - Outstanding balance =£9877.53

Less Statutory rebate allowance = £1893.86

Oustanding balance = £8415.99

 

2) Feb 07 - Oustanding balance = £17643.41

Less statutory rebate = £7898.75

Amount to be paid = £9744.66

 

The letter that I received said that legal proceedings have commenced and I would receive the court papers shortly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have 2 Default Notices ?.... they can't default the same account twice.

 

If court papers have already been filed though, you're best to wait for these so that we can look at the Particulars of Claim.... and see the balance on there. I assume that there'll be a whack of unlawful charges on there as well.

 

Rory32/pt2537 (Paul)/tomterm8 (Tom) are the legal bods. that can help the most when things reach this stage.... so it may be best to PM one of them to look in on the thread at this stage.

 

Please try not to worry.... :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

No... you cannot end (default) an Agreement twice. HFC did this to me recently and I made an official complaint. Under the circumstances, I would wait for one of the legal bods. to advise whether you should make a complaint about this now... or wait and mention it as part of your Defence.

 

I would be inclined to wait.... :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did the default notices come from HFC or Weightmans?

 

I think it would be a good idea to send Weightmans a letter headed ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE outlining why the account is in dispute. Also make an official complaint to them. Send recorded delivery so that they can't deny that they received it.

 

While this may not stop them from filing a claim against you it removes any excuse that they were ignorant of any dispute and starts to build a case against them. Really you need to stop speaking to them on the phone - it is a pointless exercise and phone calls can always be denied.

 

If you need help with the letter let us know.

 

Try not to overly worry about this. If they file at court (this isn't a given as often DCA's will inform you that your account is being prepared for legal action when in fact it isn't) then you will have a good defence for any claim against you and they will be forced to supply you with all the account information including PPI and charges.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ACCOUNT IN DISPUTE

 

ACCOUNT NUMBER: XXXXXXX

 

Dear Sir/Madam,

I refer to your letter of **/**/**, in which you advise of your intention to issue court proceedings with regard to the outstanding balance of my loan.

 

 

As you are aware, this account and the balance thereof is currently subject of a dispute. I can only assume your letter has been sent in error, as you must surely be aware that action such as that you propose would constitute breaches of the banking code. This matter has been discussed in correspondence with your clients ********* department and on **/**/**

 

Additionally, this action you propose is clearly quantifiable as retaliatory due to my own claim against your client to recover unlawfully levied penalty charges and PPI. To proceed as you have indicated would therefore be contrary to the statement of the Financial Services Authority of 6th July 2006 in which it ruled such action to be discriminatory. I also believe this action to be tantamount to a sanction imposed merely for pursuing my legitimate right of seeking a judgement from a court.

 

 

I trust your client is committed to upholding the standards of the Banking Code to which it subscribes, and would not hold its regulator, the FSA, in such contempt as to ignore its 6th July statement.

 

 

I will allow you 7 days to reply to me, in writing or by Fax only, withdrawing the threat of action imposed in your letter of **/**/**. If you do not do so, I will draw your client’s transgressions to the attention of the Financial Services Authority and the banking code standards committee, by making formal complaints and enclosing copies of all recent correspondence.

I look forward to your prompt response.

 

Yours faithfully

...

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Rory. This is to go to Weightmans recorded delivery?

 

Weightmans said that legal proceedings had already commenced & the court papers will arrive within the next few days. So I presume that I ammend the letter you kindly posted above to mention that.

 

Also if they have already started legal action & I send this letter, can they still withdraw it?

 

Do I need to change 'banking code' in the letter to anything else or does HFC fall under that for a personal loan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is to go to Weightmans recorded delivery?

 

Yes, although special delivery would be better if you can afford it.
Weightmans said that legal proceedings had already commenced & the court papers will arrive within the next few days. So I presume that I ammend the letter you kindly posted above to mention that.

Yes just amend the letter to reflect that.
Also if they have already started legal action & I send this letter, can they still withdraw it?

Yes they can withdraw the claim at any point right up to the actual hearing.
Do I need to change 'banking code' in the letter to anything else or does HFC fall under that for a personal loan?
No you don't need to change it. HFC subscribe to the banking code.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This matter has been discussed in correspondence with your clients ********* department and on **/**/**

 

Is this referring to the SAR that I sent HFC?

 

As you are aware, this account and the balance thereof is currently subject of a dispute.

 

Rory, when I spoke to Weightmans today, they said they were not aware of any dispute and hadn't been informed from HFC that there was one. I told Weightmans that I had sent in a SAR to HFC but had only received a statement of account back. Is it still ok to include this section in the letter?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...