Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Heres a point, while we wait for @theoldrouge to condemn rather than promote and support right wing bigots spouting genuine and clear monstrous antisemitic rhetoric ... Isn't it actually specifically unlawful to promote violence against politicians on top of laws to criminalise such things? ... As is reported happening in these closed facebook groups run by Tory staff and where a Tory police minister and the Tory London mayor candidate are members and post?   .. or do the Tories (seemingly like tor) only promote laws for protecting the hate spouting hard right ?   "“Some of these (Tory facebook groups) posts constitute the most appalling racism and I would urge the Conservative Party to swiftly distance itself from these hate-filled groups and urgently investigate what role any Conservative politicians and officials have played within them. “Susan Hall and the Tory MPs who have belonged to these groups need to come out and explain why – and to denounce the content they have tacitly endorsed by their membership.” "Reporters found widespread racism and Islamophobia as well as conspiracy theories and celebrations of criminal damage on the pages, including sharing the white supremacist slogan and antisemitic videos. " "Unearthed found that 46 out of the 82 admins have clear links to the Tory Party, including a recent digital campaign manager for the party and a conservative activist. Conservative councillor for Haywards Heath, Rachel Cromie, is an admin on all the groups. "     Also interesting that Facebook groups opposing 20mph speed limit in Wales are being run by English Tories   Conservative-run anti-Ulez Facebook groups hosted racist and Islamophobic posts - Unearthed UNEARTHED.GREENPEACE.ORG Tory staff running Facebook groups described as 'cesspits of vile racism' WWW.THENATIONAL.SCOT TORY staff and activists are running Facebook pages which are riddled with white supremacist slogans and Islamophobic attacks... Conservative-run anti-ULEZ Facebook groups are rife with racist and violent posts   Conservative-run anti-ULEZ Facebook groups are rife with racist and violent posts - London Post LONDON-POST.CO.UK A coordinated network of 36 Facebook groups opposing London’s ultra-low emission zone (ULEZ), run by Conservative councillors and...  
    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Court Date from DCA


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5889 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I have received a court date for Robinson Way who are chasing me for a debt from Capital One. I had written to them directly when they first contacted me requesting the CCA. They failed to cokmply with this, despite a second letter, all of which were sent recorded delivery.

 

On receiving the court documents, i filed a partial defence, and have requested information from their solicitors under the civil proceedings rule, they have written back refusing saying they have no need to comply with this request, and that as i have filed a defence the information I am requesting is not covered by the civil procedings rules, and is covered under disclosure. Although they did suggest that I could get the information under the DPA sending £10.

 

Any help would be appreciated.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

Was it the letter from this site requesting further info?

No you don't have to pay anything as it's now a court matter and you are asking under the CPR.

Some of the helpers will undoubtedly be by later, it may help if you type the particulars of claim on the court document.

It's unusual I have to say for RW to sue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi,

 

they are suing for approximately £1500-1600. My concern is that I was infront of a judge not so long ago who said there is already agreement about how much a credit card can charge! anyone know what he was on about?

 

Secondly, I need to know how to get the solicitors to comply with the requests I already made under the CCA, and CPR?

 

If anyone could answer these questions I would be grateful.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hm... show the letter to the court, with DCA's response. can you post your defence? and their POC?

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you've sent off your £1 for the CCA and they haven't provided one then

 

"he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement;"

 

Which sort of stops things when they get before a Judge....

 

CPR 18 - A formal request for more information about a party’s claims or documents. Asking if they have the executed CCA with your signature is quite reasonable. Pointing out that they will have to provide the CCA at some point but them saying they won't until ordered to by disclosure is just delaying things and adding to costs.

 

Post up the full POC and your defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi

 

Sorry for the delay inreplying to these posts, but things happened and i need to get a new laptop. Anyway down to buisness.

 

Their claim,

 

"the claimaintclaims outstanding monies due and payable by the defendant under a credit agreement whereby the defendant agreed to repay with interest the value of the credit obtained". The claimed is for 934.09 plus costs.

 

My defence is that I have requested information namely the Credit agreement, which the claimaints have failed to comply with.

 

Any info you could give me would be gratefully received.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

 

I have just compiled a letter to the court requesting they order the claimaints to comply as follows;

 

Having written to the claimants Solicitors on the 29th January 2008, under the Civil Procedure Rules, in order for me to be able to present to the court an adequate defence this information should have been furnished to me by the 8th February 2008. The claimants replied stating that this information could be obtained using a Subject Access Request under the Data Protection Act.

Having previously requesting information from the claimants i.e. a copy of the Credit agreement referred to in their claim, and deed of assignment under s.78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 with the appropriate fee of £1.00 on the 29th May 2007, this request was sent to the claimants by recorded delivery, a proof of delivery being obtained. The claimants failed to reply to any correspondence which included a further letter sent to them on the 6th of August 2007, which directed the claimants to their failure under the Consumer Credit Act to supply the requested information within the timescales laid down within the act of 12 days of supplying the information requested, and after 30 calendar day the company commit an offence.

It is my understanding that under Section 78(6) of the Consumer Credit Act states;

If the creditor under an agreement fails to comply with subsection (1) - is not entitled, while the default continues to enforce the agreement; and, if the default continues for one month be commits an offence.

I would therefore be grateful for the courts help in obtaining the information I have requested from the Claimants under the Consumer Credit Act and the Civil Procedure Rules in order for me to provide the court with an appropriate defence.

 

Any comments of help with wording would be great.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would cut the first bit short.

 

You wrote on xx May 2007 and xx august 2007 asking for a copy of he CCA under S78 and they failed to provide one.

 

You wrote asking for information under CPR 18 on 29 January 2008 after the comencement of Court proceedings. The claimant has failed to comply.

 

Because of the Claimants lack of dillegence the claimant is aware that the proceedings are now caught by Section 78 (6) of the CCA 2004 and that the claimant is not entitled to enforce the alleged agreement .

 

Because of this I'd ask the Court to consider (under its case mangament powers) making an "unless" order that strikes out the claim unless they comply with your CPR 18 request and supply a copy of the executed Credit Agreement containing the precribed terms.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have updated the letter, any ideas would be useful

 

Thanks

 

I wrote to the claimants on 27th May 2007 and 6th August 2007 asking for a copy of the Consumer Credit Agreement under S78 and they failed to provide one.

 

I also wrote asking for information under Civil Proceedings Rule 18 on 29 January 2008 after the commencement of Court proceedings. The claimant has failed to comply.

 

Because of the Claimants lack of diligence the claimant is aware that the proceedings are now caught by Section 78 (6) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 and that the claimant is not entitled to enforce the alleged agreement.

 

Because of this I ask the Court to consider (under its case management powers) making an "unless" order that strikes out the claim unless the claimants comply with the Civil Proceedings Rule 18 request and supply a copy of the executed Credit Agreement containing the prescribed terms, Notice of assignment with proof of delivery, and a transcript of all transaction including charges, fees, interest, and repayments .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi All,

 

I still have not received a reply from the court, and the hearing is scheduled for the 17th March, The solicitors do not want to play ball nor do the courts by the look of it.

 

Any ideas?:idea: :idea:

 

I have also completed a skeleton defence as follows;

 

  • The defendant does not admit or deny the debt, and put the claimant to strict proof thereof.
     
    2. On 29TH xxxxx 2007 the defendant sent a request under the consumer credit act for a true copy of the executed Credit Agreement, and a statement of account detailing the principal, and all charges and fees made in respect of the debt, the claimant received the request on the 31st xxxxxx 2007 by recorded delivery and the claimant has so far failed to send the defendant the required information.
     
    I would respectfully submit the debt is unenforceable under the Consumer Credit Act 1974 until such time as the claimant provides the necessary information.
     
    3. The claimant states the alleged debt was purchased from Capital One. I have not received a notice of assignment for the alleged debt from the original creditor. I therefore put the claimant to strict proof that privity of contract exists between the claimant and Defendant.
     
    4. I have not received a copy of any default notice from the claimant, and ask that the claimant provides the court with a true copy of such a notice, together with proof of postage that this notice was sent to the correct address and was served with the proper notice before this claim was submitted.
     
    5. In addition to asking the court to order the disclosure of the credit agreement, notice of default in the form required by the Consumer Credit Act 1974, and notice of assignment in the form required by the Law of Property Act 1925, the defendant also requests that the court order the claimant to disclose a list of all charges made to the account and a list of the costs associated with each charge in order for them to prove that the debt amounts to the amount claimed.
     
    6. The defendant respectfully asks the permission of the court to amend this defence when the claimant provides the above documents.

Does this sound good enough, do I need to send copies of the letters I have sent to the claimants?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bracknellboy:

Try not to worry about this court appearance - you are not on trial or anything, its much more informal than that.

All that will happen is that the judge will ask if you admit the debt - if so, that will be that - you'll then go into an office type room and all sit round a table to work out how much you can repay per month.

So its best to have your £1 per month worked out in advance ;)

The whole thing is a total waste of the courts time, your time & the DCA's time quite frankly :rolleyes:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Stick to your guns. You've done the right thing by asking them to prove that an enforcable debt exists, and they've manifestly failed to do so. It's not looking good for them, is it?

 

I'd be asking the court to strike the case out, or at least make the "Unless" order referred to above.

 

The absolute worst that can happen is that it gets to court and they pull an agreement out of their hat, in which case you either pick it apart and show it to be unenforcable (any missing prescribed terms, for example) or ask for more time to amend your defence.

 

The text of the Act is well and truly on your side.

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok just received in the post their case, which has the credit agreement, statements etc in , well how can they do that. I also note that there as payment protection charged on the account. Now what do I do, anyone got any ideas?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok just looked at the documents they have sent along with the statements supplied, there is over 660.00 in charges on the statement plues payment protection insurance. the total being claimed is £950.

 

Any ideas how to defend this?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

What did you file as your defence with the court.

 

when is the hearing and what have they provided as documents they are going to rely upon if this goes to trial

 

 

have you filed an AQ yet? it would either have been a Form N150 or N149

 

i had a read through this thread yesterday and im sorry to say but i struggled to make head nor tail of what was happening at this moment in time

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Pt,

 

Ok let me try to explain what has happened. I received letters from a DCA demanding monines from a credit card company, I CCA'd them, enclsoing the appropriate fee, they did not reply, so I sent the default letter. Later I got a summons in the post from their solicitors, I filed a defences stating that I had requested information under the CCA and this had not been forthcoming so was to my understaning unenforceable. I then sent a Civil proceedings letter to their solicitors requesting the information, which they refused saying this would be disclosed prior to the hearing. I then wrote to the court to ask them to enforce my civil proceedings request or strike out the claim due to it being unenforceable.

 

Yesterday, I received a nice little parcel with all of the information that I had requested back in May, but the statements show overlimit fee's of £20.00 and late fee's which total approx £680.00. There is also payment protection insurance on the statements as well. There total claim is £960.00

 

My question what shall i do now? I dont know about forms that have been completed etc, although I do most probably need to amend my defence.

 

Any help with this I would apprecite.

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...