Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Can you please also have a look at points 20-27? The sent me a remediation pack with not only statements but sums of arrears they haven't sent for 2 years, so I didn't know I was in arrears. Then they defaulted me after they apologised for their cca breach. I truly didn't understand what that pack was about. I thought it was some kind of a mistake they will make right later as SLC used to do this. Genuinely I thought that but I don't know if that's an OK defence?  
    • Thank you for posting the full sar.  So they definitely did place the PCN on your vehicle only to remove it 10 minutes later apparently because of a possible problem with the driver which seems highly unlikely [the reason for the PCN removal ]. Did the driver even see the warden at all while they were photographing the car . They did take several pictures spread over 12 minutes or so using a flash so the driver would have seen the car being photographed had they been there.   Very strange. You said that you had an onboard camera -are you able to go back and see what happened? Was the warden wearing UKPC clothing? In any event that PCN has not complied with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  That should be a Notice to Driver and the follow up PCN should not be sent until 28 days AFTER the day the first PCN  was given were it a postal PCN. Instead the knuckleheads have issued the follow up PCN on the 28th day of their dodgy first PCN and so totally blowing all their machinations to get over the fact that  the windscreen ticket wasn't a windscreen ticket. In neither case, even if they had been sent properly, they were non compliant. neither of them showed the period of parking which is specified in the Act. Both just show a time of issue at 20.02 but no end period. Their  "mistake" in not giving 29 days  before issuing their keeper Liability notice, makes the PCN more than just non compliant. It means that the PCN was unlawful and probably deliberate as had UKPC waited until the correct time to send that Notice, it would have delayed it until the Monday. And as they probably knew that had not received the original windscreen PCN perhaps they thought it better to rewrite the Law. Part of that is conjecture but the basic fact is correct-the Notice was unlawful. And for that there should be repercussions. My first thought was the ICO but  as it isn't really a breach of data protection it goes higher than that. Perhaps the Site Team would know. I did look at the Legal Ombudsman but they are for complaints against lawyers.  I cannot imagine a decent lawyer even countenancing such a thing though were are dealing with third rate ones when involved with some parking companies.   For reference PoFA Schedule 4 S8 and S9 [2][f] f)warn the keeper that if, at the end of the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice to keeper is given— Their PCN dated 12/04/24 states "as 28 days have now elapsed since the Notice to Keeper was given, Parking Control management [UK] Ltd. [the creditor] are now able ...........to recover the unpaid parking charge from......... the registered keeper. The original PCN was marked by them as being deemed delivered 15/03/2024 so 28 days +1 =13/04/24. Their letter was sent one day early which means they altered or ignored the law . I have never seen that "error" on any other Notice from any of the parking companies. As the Member did not receive the original PCN which was originally a Windscreen ticket but they then changed it to a postal one for some fanciful reason the whole scenario reeks of skullduggery. I am going to ask again from Hamz why their warden might have felt scared about a confrontation with the driver but even if there was a chance the PCN was placed on the windscreen and not removed for around a minute but pictures had already been taken so why remove it? And then why produce a brand new keeper Liability Notice the like of which I have not seen before.  
    • You have not been allowed the statuary 7 days to prepare or submit your statement as you only only received the notice of hearing on Saturday   Example   Erudio Student Loans Limited V XXXX Claim No: XXXXX Witness Statement in response to the claimants application It is respectfully requested that the court allow this statement as evidence in response as I was only informed of the hearing date on Saturday 11th May 2024 and therefore denied 7 days to respond. I, xxxxxxx being the Defendant in this case will state as follows; I make this Witness Statement to oppose the claimant application dated 25/04/23 to lift the stay and Strike Out Defence/Summary Judgment pursuant to CPR 24.5 (1) a & b in view of my defence submitted to the claim dated 06/07/22. The Claimant confirms that this claim issued through Northampton County Court Business Centre on 15/03/22 and remained stayed since. I will respond to the same numbered paragraphs as the claimant’s statement as follows: 1. The claimants witness statement opening paragraph confirms that it mostly relies on hearsay evidence as confirmed by the draft’s person in the opening paragraph. It is my understanding that they must serve notice to any hearsay evidence pursuant to CPR 33.2(1)(B) (notice of intention to rely on hearsay evidence) and Section 2 (1) (A) of the Civil Evidence Act and also be in attendance at hearing to give evidence in support of the claimant’s witness statement. 2. As an assignee or creditor as defined in section 189 of the CCA this applies to this new requirement on assignment of rights. This means that when an assignee purchases debts (or otherwise acquires rights under a credit agreement) it also acquires certain obligations to the borrower including the duty to comply with CCA requirements (such as the rules on statements and notices and other post-contractual information). The assignee becomes the creditor under the agreement. This ensures that essential consumer protections under the CCA cannot be circumvented by assigning the debt to a third party.  Background Insert your pars here   Defendants Response to claimants claim/ Application Insert your points here  Conclusion Insert your points here but finish with the following. 16.  In view of the information set out above I respectfully submit to the court that the claimant’s application be denied. The claim remains stayed until such time the claimant can comply with section 77 of the CCA1974 or in the absence of that compliance strike out the claimant claim and dismiss the claim in its entirety. The claimant has failed to evidence and justify its application to dispose of this claim without a trial where a claim or issue or a defence to a claim or issue has no real prospect of success and there is no other compelling reason for a trial. (CPR 24.2)     Statement of truth I, XXXXXXX defendant, believe the facts stated in this witness statement are true. I understand that proceedings for contempt of Court may be brought against anyone who makes, or causes to be made, a false statement in a document verified by a statement of truth without an honest belief in its truth.   Signed:  Print Name: Dated:
    • Thank you @BankFodder. Apologies for not being clear. Here are some further details that might help clarify: The item in question is a replica of a movie prop. I build highly accurate movie props as a hobby and these items are machined by enthusiasts in very small runs (50-100) and once they're gone, they're gone. I missed out on one of these runs but a friend from the community had purchased two and decided he only needed one so offered to sell me his other one. I bought the replica prop from him and asked him to send it to my Stackry address in USA. He is based in USA and I am based in the UK. Had he shipped it directly to me in the UK, due to the size and weight, the shipping would have been expensive. Stackry is a service in the USA that has access to cheaper couriers. I have used it many times before without any issues. I simply sign in to my account when they notify me the package is received, fill out the customs form, and select my home address in the UK, select one of the couriers after receiveing a quote based on size and weight and pay the shipping fee. On this occasion I chose GlobalDirect. I had no idea the item would be handed over to Evri on arrival to the UK. The initial tracking was with DHL e-commerce. The second tracking number on arrival to the UK was with Evri. It was Evri who lost the parcel through negligence. Below is a complete timeline of events. The item made its journey from my friend in the USA to Stackry, USA without any problems. I was notified when the package was received. The item also made its journey via DHL/Global Mail Direct from the USA to the UK without any issues. The problem happened in the UK, with Evri.   I did not take out insurance. The price of the item was £185.01 Shipping from Stackry, USA to my home address in the UK with Global Mail Direct was £17.87. Total £202.88.  The letter of claim is below. The 14 days is not up yet but I have every intention on following through. I have no priror experience with this which is why I came here for advice, but I have found the online claim form on Gov.UK and intend to start there.   TIMELINE:   Item purchased from individual in USA on 26/3/24. Payment made by PayPal. Item shipped to Stackry, USA on the same day. Item advised received by Stackry on 29/3/24. Redirected by myself to my UK home address on the same day. Payment made and selected Global Mail Direct as the courier of choice. Tracking number generated for DHL e-commerce 02/04/24: arrived to the UK and cleared customs 03/04/24: processed at local distribution centre, forwarded to delivery agent (Evri) - new tracking number generated 06/04/24: marked”out for delivery” at 08:52. No delivery attempt made all day. At 21:21 marked “on its way back to sender”.  09/04/24: no further updates since “there’s an issue with your parcel. Contact the sender”. Customer support contact via email almost on a daily basis from 08/04/24 to 23/04/24 to no avail. Letter before claim sent on 03/05/24.   03/05/2024   Letter before small claims court claim   EVRi Parcelnet Limited Capitol House 1 Capitol Close Morley Leeds LS27 0WH   Dear Sirs   Reference: Parcel with the tracking number H01PQD0027409372 / H01PQA0027204793 lost by EVRi   As it has not been possible to resolve this matter amicably, and it is apparent that court action may be necessary, I write in compliance with the Practice Direction on Pre-Action Conduct.   I have been in contact with customer support numerous times since 08/04/2024. Your driver marked the item “Returning to sender” without a valid attempt at delivery. The package is since then stuck in limbo with no further tracking updates, and as of today 03/05/2024 still says “on its way back to sender”. I have spoken to your representatives many times and they did not offer any help trying to track down the missing parcel or offer me any option for compensation. I have explained that I am both the sender and the recipient, and I am therefore within my rights to claim compensation for this missing item. I have full records of the item from the point of purchase, to its journey with DHL in the USA, and with EVRi in the UK, until it was lost in the system. The value of the item including shipping is £202.88.   From you I am claiming £202.88 paid in full to compensate the price of the item (£185.01) plus international shipping (£17.87).    Listed below are the documents on which I intend to rely in my claim against you: Screenshots of transaction made with the original seller of the item, including photographs of the item and Paypal transaction. Screenshots of the item received by Stackry in the USA and shipping cost via Global Mail Direct to my address in the UK. Screenshots of tracking with DHL Screenshots of tracking with EVRi Email correspondence with various customer support members at EVRi     I can confirm that I would be agreeable to mediation and would consider any other system of Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) in order to avoid the need for this matter to be resolved by the courts.  I would invite you to put forward any proposals in this regard.  In closing, I would draw your attention to paragraphs 15 and 16 of the Practice Direction which gives the courts the power to impose sanctions on the parties if they fail to comply with the direction including failing to respond to this letter before claim.  I look forward to hearing from you within the next 14 days. Should I not receive a response to my letter within this time frame then I anticipate that court action will be commenced with no further reference to you.    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

advice with county court & capquest


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5963 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I took out a loan maybe 9/10 years ago. Then came out of work and was unable to pay. Heard absolutely nothing for years, then suddenly capquest was on the job. The first thing we heard from them was a Judgment for Claimant telling me it had gone to court at Northampton and I had to pay the amount in full. So I looked on the internet and found a form "Application for suspension of a warrant and/or variation of an order" (N245). I filled this in sent a letter saying I had found this form and would it do and encloed a £10 postal order. (still not working as I have young children) Now today we have received a Notice of Transfer of Proceedings letter saying the claim has been transferred to the Redditch County Court for enforcement. What does this mean please? The amount they are claiming we do not recognise either. I thought they would have send a paying in book or something not this, they haven't even acknowledged my £10.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome to CAG,Dolphin.

 

It sounds like they got judgment by default by filing the papers electronically at the 'bulk' centre. For ease, these cases are listed as being at Northampton County Court. In responding the court have transferred the case to the county court nearest where you live.

 

As this debt seems to be over six years old, it may not have been enforceable. If you can, post some details of the case after taking out any personal identifying details to see if you can be helped further.

 

Whatever you do, don't acknowledge that you owe the debt in writing.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi dolphin

Did you receive any letters through the post regarding this case.

Who is the debt with?

How long since you last made a payment or acknowledged it in writing?

Tip us a wink on my scales if you think I may have helped at all;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent this N245 on11/11/07 paying the £10 but before that must be 7/8 years ago since last paying anything. The original debt was from Alliance and Leicester took out before my eldest born hes now 7 1/2 years old. The only letters we received in the post was this judgment for claimant and now the notice of transfer. I have never acknowledged this debt apart from filling in the application for suspension of a warrant and/or variation of an order. It says I cannot pay the amount ordered and

I wish to apply for: suspension of the warrant

and/or

a reduction in the instalment order.

 

I ticked a suspension of the warrant.

 

Looking at the Judgment for Claimant in brackets underneath it says (in default). Does this help?

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK.

You will need to apply to the local county court to have the judgment 'set aside'. The application should be on the general application form (N244) which you can download from the court service website. You may have the address but in case you haven't it is www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk.

The grounds for your application should be (a) because you never received any letter, claim details or other correspondence from the claimant or their solicitors AND (b) because you believe any alleged debt is over eight years old. Explain how you found out about this debt in Part C of the form but do not acknowledge you owe any money.

Take the form to the court if you can with the notice of transfer from Northampton and talk to one of the court staff about putting in your set aside application. There is normally a fee to pay of £75 but this is waived if you are on means tested benefits. Read the Court web site before you go about being unable to pay the court fee if this applies to you.

At the same time you should write to the solicitors asking for details of their clients claim. Make sure you state at the top of your letter that you do not acknowledge that you owe any money. There are templates around on other threads for the kind of letter. I'll try to find one for you unless someone else posts a link.

Cheers

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

It looks at first glance that the judgement has been granted by default.

My point is, can this judgement be quashed as it looks as though it would have been statute barred at the time of the hearing.

Just a thought.

Tip us a wink on my scales if you think I may have helped at all;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dolphin you MUST, MUST fight this, this is disgusting Capquest trying it on to make a totally unenforceable debt 'enforceable' (they are trying to frighten you and get judgement !!! is it at all possible you can cross off all the personal details, scan it and then post it on here....if you are sure you have neither acknowledged or paid anything towards the debt in the last 6 years it is DEFINATELY statute barred and NOT enforceable by law.....I would also inform the FOS, Trading Standards (their local TS), OFT and get your MP involved....

Link to post
Share on other sites

i think this is it. Just been looking through way back stuff and found on a bank statement loan amount went in on 13 May 1999. Would only have paid it for a year or 2 at most because our son was born then and that when I was out of work.

DSC00005.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is this not contempt of court territory? The DCA are obviously misusing court time and assets.

 

Newborn

Beaten:

RBS: £4,500

AMEX: £4,200

Barclaycard Visa: £12,100

Barclaycard M/Card: £12,600

(Including the numerous DCAs they have set on me.)

PPI reclaims (into my bank account): £25,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Dolphin, this was more of an open question than something you should be doing.

 

Contempt Of Court (Tiscali):

 

Behaviour that shows lack of respect for the authority of a court of law, such as disobeying a court order, breach of an injunction, or improper use of legal documents. Behaviour that disrupts, prejudices, or interferes with court proceedings either inside or outside the courtroom may also be contempt. The court may punish contempt with a fine or imprisonment.

 

This seems to cover what you are being put through. I am no expert here but was hoping someone with more legal knowledge than me could comment?

 

Newborn

Beaten:

RBS: £4,500

AMEX: £4,200

Barclaycard Visa: £12,100

Barclaycard M/Card: £12,600

(Including the numerous DCAs they have set on me.)

PPI reclaims (into my bank account): £25,000

Link to post
Share on other sites

The court would not look at statute barring as an option unless it is brought to their attention and obviously a DCA who seeks to earn is not going to draw their attention to it. it's a bit like the CCA that the DCA is supposed to present before every court case, but how many never have a valid one?

 

I would submit a set aside application asap and a complaint to the FOS and TS et al.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very much time related. it depends on how long it is since the judgement was received and how long it is since the court case was actioned. the gist obtained from the thread is that it has only just happened. this is a good thing

 

Tomorrow is a monday and as such the ideal day to get it all started. I would advise to leave the complaining til later, telephone the courts and seek advice on a set aside, it is never a bad thing to get in touch with the courts, they do this on a daily basis and whilst they cannot give legal advice, they can give procedural advice.

 

Either contact them directly/telephone (preferable) or online and initiate a motion to set aside the CCJ at the soonest opportunity. get the forms senty in asap, make notes and take names, ensure your eye for detail is in gear and get the wheels in motion, the court staff will normall be quite helpful and even if they're not helpful, they will be increasingly curious over this one....

 

Once the courts are actioning your instructions then is the time to start complaining, get the scuzzballs off your back and then seek retribution. ideally financial but who knows.

 

The chance to nail one of them, acting not in a way that could be construed as illegal, but in a way that is illegal, persuing through the courts a debt that is prescribed by law as statute barred. a case that is brought by their legal representative as well as a court that fails to recognise the obvious and a legal representative that fails to bring to the courts attention the obvious legal state.

 

The possibilities whilst not being endless are well worth a shimmy to see what falls out.

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok just to clarify here are the dates

default judgement obtained on 8/11/2007

wife sent this N245 on 11/11/07 (heard nothing)

recieved letter "notice of transfer of procedings dated 10/1/082 on 12/1/08

i hope that this isnt too much time that has lapsed

which court do i phone my local one or the one named on the last letter i recieved

any chance of a link to get to the "set motion aside" webpage ive had a look but it is a mine field

finally what do i say am i admitting that i owe this money or doesnt it matter either was as the debt is over 6 years old sorry for all the questions but having a hard time taking it all in

Link to post
Share on other sites

Dolphin,

As Spamhead suggests you need to start with contacting the Court office. The dates are fine if you call your local court in the next few days. Quote the number of the case as a reference to them.

You will need to complete form N244 and pay the fee of £70 but the court staff will help you with the procedure. You may have to go before the judge in your local court but don't worry about that now.

Once you have made the application, post an update. Whatever you do, do NOT acknowledge the debt in writing because the six year 'clock' starts running again if you acknowledge the debt. As to the payment of £10, I think the easiest way to explain that is that you received a court order to pay and sent what you could afford but without acknowledging that you owed anything.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

thanks for that is there anybody out there that could help me with the wording that i use to fill in the n244 form

ie the correct wording to use without admitting this debt

 

also which court office do i call and what questions do i ask

 

if somebody could help me on this i would forever be in there debt

 

many thanks

 

also more questions when filling in the n244 form

 

1 how do i wish my application to be dealt with

a:at a hearing

b:at a telephone confrence

c:without a hearing

 

2 give a time estimate for hearing/ confrence

 

what do i put here

 

3 is this agreed by all parties

 

what do i put here

 

4 give dates of trial period or fixed trial date

 

what do i put here

 

5 level of judge

 

???????? dont know what to do

 

6 parties to be served

 

what do i put here

 

i presume that all these questions in the box should be filled in by the courts

 

 

a 1

 

i get this i just put my name

 

a 2 what is thename of the order i am looking for

 

because? need help with the wording here

 

part b what evidence do i need and how do i word it so i am not admitting the debt

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is not an area I overly familiar with, but here goes

 

You need to have your application dealt with at a hearing.

 

any county court office should be able to answer your procedural questions

 

you are looking for a set aside order, on the basis that you never received any original paperwork, or notice that the matter was going before the court. as such, you were given no opportunity to defend their claim. the debt was also statute barred and as such should not have been pursued in the first place

 

Bump for more assistance please

Link to post
Share on other sites

I suggest you leave the sections 1 – 6 blank at first. Discuss these with the court officer when you take the application in to court.

In part A, put in the name on the document you received from the Northampton County Court at (1) and cross out everything except ‘the defendant’.

At (2) write ‘to set aside the judgement’

At (3) write you “dispute the debt and that I was never served with any particulars of claim by the claimant.”

In Part B, tick part C and sign in the box as applicant. Leave the rest blank.

In part C, explain the circumstances in your own words. In particular that you never received any paperwork.

 

I suggest you post up a draft of your words for part C before submitting the form so that any further help can be given.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

heres a picture for the wording please note it is only rough if there is a better way of wording it or anything to add please let me know

 

****UPDATE*****

 

JUST phoned the court and told them we wanted a set aside order on this case "gave them the claim number" and they said that they would send a form out for us to fill in

DSC00028.jpg

DSC00029.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...