INSIGHT! The entire procedure,misconduct from a PCN to a County Court, 'CAUGHT'

[adamna]

And what's so wrong with a good old English word with 4 letters?

[Medusa]

ONLY YOU know whats best for you. You have the stage tonight, good night.

[adamna]

Googled it: It is a very old word, recorded in English since the 15th

century (few acronyms predate the 20th century), with cognates

in other Germanic languages.

 

It's only a word. But the sound is so satisfying.

[Medusa]

The second page in this case has been posted, The fraudulent charge certificate that manufactures commissions by way of omissions. HOW it is done exactly.

 

 

The main link; that should be read first is

http://www.logiclaw.co.uk/Injustice/

the two newer pages are

http://www.logiclaw.co.uk/Injustice/l1.html

and

http://www.logiclaw.co.uk/Injustice/l2.html

Sorry I am unavailable at the present time to comment on replies, please, if its not for you, then don't read it.

[adamna]

Excellent, thank you.

[rocket1]

[edited]

 

I am not allowed to use pretty normal language to say what I really think because of the politically correct mo.ons (you'll have to guess this word because you're not allowed to be rude !) who delight in idiotic censorship.

 

[edited]

[demon_x_slash]

^^ Excuse me? Of course you're allowed to use 'pretty normal language' - you just did, correct me if I'm wrong. Politically correct morons? Please point them out.

 

As for your thoughts, pleasant or no, perhaps they'd be better kept to yourself so that we can stick to the point in hand, or taken to the Bear Garden with all the other emotive and argumentative threads.

[Bernie_the_Bolt]

Rocket1,

 

What you are not permitted to be is gratuitously offensive and that is what IMHO your post is.

[rocket1]

There you go.

 

You are making it plain that I am not allowed to to use politely strong language to express my opinion that people who post meaningless gibberish on forums like this are an unpleasant nuisance.

 

Clearly, this is censorship.

 

In my ignorance of the stupidity of the web, my first post on this thread using more robust language to indicate what I and many others thought of time wasting idiots posting gibberish was deleted by a moderator because of a complaint.

 

[edited]

[demon_x_slash]

And again, gratuitously offensive. Yes, I am going to report you. No, it is not censorship. It is against site rules to attack posters, and comments such as yours are attacks from the blue. Do you dislike my method of communicating? Yes? No? Why/not? Does it mean you can call me an idiot out of nowhere?

'Time wasting idiots posting gibberish' - again, just because you did not understand it, doesn't make it gibberish. I rather think that it says something about you, as you are so obviously offended by the legal register and abstract thought.

[rocket1]

Rocket1,

 

What you are not permitted to be is gratuitously offensive and that is what IMHO your post is.

 

I would say it is medusa who is being gratuitously offensive, not me.

 

I think I have an obvious right to express annoyance and distaste at people who are professional times wasting twits.

 

I think it it immensely offensive for people to try and censor comments like the ones I have been making by describing them as offensive.

 

It is politically correct nonsense which has spread throughout our society like a nasty smell.

 

I would remind you this is a free country where freedom of expression has always been nurtured.

 

People who object to others who have different opinions are positively sickening.

[barracad]

Personal attacks are not welcome on this site.

[pt2537]

Lord Woolf initiated the outlawing of Latin in courts so that the common man could understand what the f*** was going on, and maybe even defend himself. I'm with him on this, the use of Latin was an elitist ploy to keep the wealthy in clover. We don't always have fantastic translations for the nuances implied, but can work on it. Medusa, can I advise you to do the same for public forums?

 

Sorry but i am afraid you are wrong in your comments

 

Latin is still very much used in courts even as we speak

 

Prima facie

 

ratio decedendi

 

Mens rea

 

Actus Reus

 

Obiter Dicta

i can go on and on if you like

 

if one uses a Latin term it is fair at least on the forum users that a translation of the terms is provided

 

My 2p...

 

regards

paul

[demon_x_slash]

Hmm, can you see all right, way up there? Horse want a carrot?

 

You have the right to an opinion. You have a responsibilty to be adult about it.

 

You do not have the right on this forum to attack others. Perhaps if you had expressed your opinion properly:

 

"Idiots spouting gibberish,"

 

to

 

"I'm not sure what you mean - can you simplify this?"

 

would be an example of acceptable behaviour. This careless, crass, "I can do anything I want and label it free speech," nonsense has spread throughout our society like, oh, a nasty smell, and I find you to be a proponent of it. If you cannot understand someone, ask. I find myself unable to put it any more simply than that. I may be able to break it down into words of less than one syllable, but frankly, I'll only do that now if you ask nicely.

[demon_x_slash]

Solicitors speak like that in the course of their jobs. So do judges, lawyers, doctors - if Stephen Hawking came on here to discuss quantum physics and the infinite expansion of entropy, and you couldn't understand it, would you call him an idiot? Dearie me. If you're normal, I'm glad I'm not.

 

My final note. I've said all I have to say, and find I'm going to start repeating myself, when it's evidently a waste of time trying to communicate. I speak a few languages, but none of them Trollish - I can't seem to get a correspondence course in Trollish, funnily enough. I'll leave you to dwell on your own shortcomings. In my day, we bought a dictionary and tried to improve ourselves...

 

 

(do not feed)

[rocket1]

You would look amazingly silly if you found out I was a qualified solicitor, wouldn't you ?

 

I can assure you, from my time spent in and out of court dealing with various legal cases over many years, that people in the legal profession do not speak nonsense of the sort Medusa is prone to do.

[Michael Browne]

I find it very offensive indeed to be unavoidably exposed to this sort of rubbish.

 

Now who's talking rubbish? No -one forced you to connect to the internet, join this forum or read this thread. Turn off your computer and you'll never be 'unavoidably exposed' again.

[Joa]

The website, on which I have admittedly spent only about 10 minutes, looks like a veritable mine of information. It is the layout that gives me headache. Messy, too colorful, links all over the place; I nearly had a panic attack because there are obviously goodies scattered everywhere but it was kind of....overwhelming. I must say that links like that: A "tiny piece of Logic with the matrix truth table" scarred me but hey, I am no genius so I backed away.

 

All in all- great site......probably! It would be great if it was easy to navigate though.

[HSBCrusher]

posts moderated.

please refrain from posting rocket if you cant be civil, thanks.

[adamna]

Sorry but i am afraid you are wrong in your comments

 

Latin is still very much used in courts even as we speak

 

Prima facie

 

ratio decedendi

 

Mens rea

 

Actus Reus

 

Obiter Dicta

 

i can go on and on if you like

 

if one uses a Latin term it is fair at least on the forum users that a translation of the terms is provided

 

My 2p...

 

regards

paul

 

Could I draw yout attention to the original post:

Lord Woolf initiated the outlawing of Latin in courts.... I didn't say it was completed....

Will this do? BBC NEWS | UK | R.I.P. Courtroom Latin and could I have an apology? Wrong is a strong word.

 

My 4p

[pin1onu]

In my day, we bought a dictionary and tried to improve ourselves...

 

Rocket try doing a google search for Wordweb. Its a freeware dictionary program and spellchecker that you can activate in any windows program.

It sounds as though you need it.

 

I find it invaluable in decoding Medusa's posts.

[demon_x_slash]

See? No probs

[pt2537]

Could I draw yout attention to the original post:

Lord Woolf initiated the outlawing of Latin in courts.... I didn't say it was completed....

Will this do? BBC NEWS | UK | R.I.P. Courtroom Latin and could I have an apology? Wrong is a strong word.

 

My 4p

 

 

Hi

 

i m not too big to say sorry;)

 

i did misread what you posted,

however, it appeared imply that latin was no longer used with in the legal system and it was that which i was correcting,

 

Much of the legal system uses latin phrases even today

[adamna]

I'm not too small not to accept your apology, thanks.

[Medusa]

Rocket1

 

Permit me if you will kind sir, and master of the Queen's / King's English. to say this once. Your replies fit the category of a sophist in the wide use of fallacies. To ensure you understand what a fallacy is.

OED 3. a. A deceptive or misleading argument, a sophism. In Logic esp. a flaw, material or formal, which vitiates a syllogism; any of the species or types to which such flaws are reducible. Also, sophistical reasoning, sophistry. In certain phrases in the formal terminology of Logic, as fallacy of accident (see quots.); fallacy of composition (see composition 4 b); fallacy of division, the fallacy that whatever is true of a whole must be true of any part or member of that whole.

 

There are innumerable fallacies but the classical 70 includes these that your assertions, not arguments fit, providing no grounds for their contentiousness other than YOU don't like X.

 

If you don't then don't read, go to HIDE park corner and speak with all the 'polite'; as you palliate it, language at your disposal.

 

Several common fallacies in the the fallacy list.

APPEAL TO EMOTION fallacy

(to express annoyance and distaste at people.)

 

APPEAL TO PITY fallacy

(sad little people )

(hordes of retarded immature people )

 

APPEAL TO RIDICULE fallacy

(nonsense irritating nuisances)

 

APPEAL TO SPITE fallacy

(idiot and gibberish )

BTW 'gibberish' is on the site posting, looks like you plagiarised it, it's not your kind of language.

 

APPEAL TO AUTHORITY fallacy

(You would look amazingly silly if you found out I was a qualified solicitor)

What sort of adjectival / adverbial QUALIFICATION would you like about yourself? And what makes you think that qualifications render one's argument sound? He is a qualified palliater and subtracter, and he is a qualified plumber)

(I can assure you, from my time spent in and out of court .....)

I have the notion that your 'court' time is full of saying things you are paid to say, whatever it is.

 

This is also a Non sequitur fallacy

Meaning it does not follow. That a qualified solicitor is an expert in sound reasoning, any more than a surgeon is an expert at law

 

If your writing doesn't uphold itself and you are forced to imp lie you re a qualified solicitor, then you have too many problems. Many sites are an intellectual meritocracy for thinking with reason, and thus far, I haven't observed a single argument from yourself that is put together; as you say with 'court expertise', where your claims show grounds..... other than the above fallacies of about ten appeals to some specious emotion or another.

 

If it takes more than twenty seconds to identify and corroborate this analysis then I suggest you ponder what a genius – Shakespeare, (You certainly won't like him) had to say on the quantity of grey matter wit as opposed to whit.

 

"Look, he's winding up the watch of his wit; by and by it will strike."

 

Suggestion, not to be taken, better to argue soundly, if not profoundly than roundly.

 

The day is yours if you think yours are other than sound spinning arguments!