Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I think his point is renewing his season ticket shows it wont happen again. using contactles doesnt.
    • Thanks dx for your guide. Yes, I will use their services, but not often. I usually spend around 80 per month, but the season ticket price is 160. I plan to renew it as long it could help me to show that I will not do it again.
    • if you are going to be using its services yes if not no. STOP PANICKING........ yours is not the next move. dx  
    • You could try this and include a copy to the SRA who are being particularly tolerant to this bunch of jackapes. This also shows that you are not to be messed with and are capable of stirring up trouble for them when they step out of line. Dear DCBL, I am in receipt of your letter of 18th April 2024 regarding CPR1.1 After studying the whole section I cannot see anywhere that I am required to furnish you  with my mail address or my phone number. Perhaps you would be kind enough to provide me with a reference to it. I suspect that your subterfuge is designed to allow you to bombard uninformed litigants with last minute information on the day of their Court case which appears to occur at times with your company. I notice that you are asking for proportionality at the same time as you are demanding  an unlawful £160 when you are aware that under PoFA the maximum that can be demanded  is only £100. You will note  that I have included the Solicitor's Regulation Authority into our conversation in order to ensure your reply. And your old excuse of "admin. error" is surely wearing a bit thin even with the SRA. so I look forward to an apology for your error and a declaration that you will desist from trying to hoodwink other motorists in future.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Natwest PPI


chno9
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5927 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello

 

I previously sent a SAR to Natwest for a loan i had with them. They in reply sent a statement of all payments that i had made. I again wrote to them explaining that this had not complied with the original SAR that had specifically asked for ALL documentation they held including agreement etc. This final letter was sent on 7/11/07, and i still have not received any reply from them.

 

What should my next course of action be?

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I just say that bumping a post after 5 hours is a bit unreasonable - I personally tend to look through for unanswered posts on the PPI forum at least once a day, and would not have got to your post any earlier.

 

Regarding your question - You do need to be pushing them to comply, and sticking to your timetable. In the main forum Bank Template Library, there is some information on what to do when the bank does not comply with your DSAR.

 

At the end of the day you have two choices - you can complain to the Information Commissioner, or issue a court claim for an order to force them to comply.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello

 

I previously sent a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) to NatWest for a loan i had with them. They in reply sent a statement of all payments that i had made. I again wrote to them explaining that this had not complied with the original SAR that had specifically asked for ALL documentation they held including agreement etc. This final letter was sent on 7/11/07, and i still have not received any reply from them.

 

What should my next course of action be?

 

Thanks

 

Hello chno9,

 

The Natwest are the most frustrating company to get any information out of in my experience.

 

You must push them hard.

You can send them a Non-compliance of the DPA. the letter is in the bank letter template sticky, report them to the information commissioner office, and if they do not comply, then issue a N1 at your local court to get the information.

 

Now as regarding your credit agreement, another way to get it (Bet you 50p they don't have it) is to sent them a legal request under 77/78 of the CCA. It costs £1, use a postal order and they then have time limits of 12working days and then a further 30day + postage to come up with it.

 

Creditors and DCAs - Letter Templates & Budget Planner

 

You need letter N.

 

Get these letters sent, recorded delivery and sit back and wait;) to see what they come up with.

 

Good luck and keep us posted

If any of my posts are helpful, please feel free to click my scales. All information is given as my opinion only, based on my own personal experiences. I have no legal training, but have educated myself in aspects of consumer legislation. My motto "NEVER GIVE IN, NEVER SURRENDER", THERE IS A WAR ON YOU KNOW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the advice.

 

I will send them a non-compliance with the original SAR, and will also send a CCA request.

 

My reason for requesting this information is so i can see how much they added on to the loan in PPI. The loan which i have recently finished paying was outrageous. Whilst i was a student i ran into some financial difficulties and they closed my account and told me to pay my overdraft back immediately. Being a bit wet behind the ears at the time i agreed to whatever they told me i should do.

 

I ended up paying approx 5k back over 5years for a debt of around 2.5k.

 

Needless to say now i have my head screwed on the right way round i am going after every single penny i can get back from them. I have already received a refund + interest for all charges they made against me, and am pursuing this PPI.

 

What would happen if they can not locate this information, if as you say it will be unlikely they still have this?

 

thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

It would be very difficult for them to argue that they have not got the transactional records as they have a legal duty to keep such information - indeed they would in breach of company law and their CCL if they have not got such information. That should therefore give you enough information to discover the details of the PPI.

 

If they haven't got a copy of the original agreement then that is another matter which will only go to support your claim.

 

In the extremely unlikely event that they have no information, you should contact the FOS and the ICO - but I cannot see any circumstances where they would not hold such information.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi

 

Just an update on this one.

 

I had sent them a non-compliance letter on the 11/01/08, they in turn responded sending out the same information as they had previously (a statement of payments made). The letter i had sent them specifically listed what items were missing from my original SAR. They have ignored this now on three seperate occasions.

 

I am looking now to take this to the next level, as they are repeatedly ignoring my requests. What should be my first port of call. I presume i would need to complain to the information commissioner. If this is the way to go how do you go about this??

 

Appreciate any advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...