Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I've read loads of old messages about what to do but feel my case is different, it's a bit of a back story so ill break it down. - Had a letter from an Italian province in July of 2020 for a speeding offence in 2019 for 575 euros, was in a hire car I used for work, no longer work for them and heard nothing from either. - Thought blimey, but went to pay it anyway, it had doubled to over 1100 euros, yeah I can't afford paying that, filled out the attached information sheet to say it was me driving but I have no money or job due to COVID (true story) and sent it back (durrrr) - Heard nothing until December of 2023, a letter from an appointed solicitor from Florence saying if I don't pay, we will chase you through the legal system with costs born by you. - May of this year, I get a letter from CLI (Credit Limits International) saying they have been appointed to carry out the collection, £1475. - Stupidly, I started the 'three letter process' asking for proof etc, and they replied a few days ago with a copy of the fines I had received from Italy, they stated the debt has no terms and conditions as it relates to a fine in Italy and the debt is not subject to the Consumer Credit agreement. I translate that to "at the moment we don't own the debt and have been given authority from Italy to pursue the debt". That is where I am currently at, I would begrudge giving in and paying an obscene amount. As seen from similar threads, I know a threat of a visit is coming, followed by a threat of court action, but annoyingly it hasn't been mentioned how these cases were concluded and the threads are now locked. I've read to ignore them, but can't help but feel that because it's such a substantial amount that they will feel it's worthy of pursuing this no matter the hoops they have to jump through. Along with admitting it was me driving and opening the can of worms by contacting the DCA, it wouldn't look good for me should it ever get to a courtroom.  Has anyone with previous experience managed to 'get away with it'? Anyone know what they're capable of other than nagging me? I'm not after any moral judgment. Forgot to add, got friends in Italy, and one of them rang the Police where the fine came from, and her reply was “Tell your friend it’s not a big deal, it’s only a speeding fine we’re not going to chase him, tell him in future to take his foot off the gas, however it he returns to a Italy and gets control checked, he would be held until the fine is paid”  A bit odd I thought, considering I am being chased now.
    • take the SD card out and put on a pc/laptop then run recuva on it in  select videos only option select specific location hit browse then select drive letter of the SD card. then next  then deep scan then go have a cup of tea..  when done dont recover the all files back to the card select a new folder on your pc/laptop        
    • hi all, i will list my curmcumstance first then list the details of the penalty charge - we are 2 diabled people being affected by the cost of living crisis and are skint etc. i am disabled with mobility issues(arthritis in knees and ankles and gout) and cant operate car pedals anymore so i let a friend up the road use my car in exchange for her driving me about. its a good arrangement as i get a 'chauffer' and she gets the use of car. the car is parked in her drive which is better as i was refused a disabled space (even on appeal) and too much congestion to park the car outside my house. my friend is vulnerable as she has suffered depression and suicidal thoughts since the loss of her mother a few years back, she is dyslexic, she is a carer for one of her sons that is disabled due to mental illness and mobility. she lives in a council house and cannot work. we went to iceland ..attracted by the 10items for £10 offer - we've never been there before. a large artic lorry was parked accross the car park blocking the view of one of the parking signs and blocking the disabled bays where the pay&display machine is. by the time she helped me out of the car and then went to see if it was pay&display then came back to me at the car she said she thinks it was pay even for disabled, so we looked for change in the car which we didnt have (she normally goes asda which dont need to pay for parking)so then we said we'd either go get change or go to asda...so then by the time it took her to help me back in and get out the car park took 15 minutes...5 minutes overstay past the 10minutes grace. the letter from excel parking came through and i sent it back giving her name as driver (before i saw on here that you shouldnt name the driver) then i appealed explaining what happened (lorry blocking etc) and even said we were being descriminated (advised by citizen advice)as we are disabled and 15minutes is not long enough for a crippled disabled man and a woman with dyslexia to read and understandd the sign and get out, then back in the car and look for change then get out the car park in 15minutes. i even explained she was a vulnerable person on anti-depressants and even sent a photo of medication and said if you need a doctors note then let me know....the appeal was rejected. i've emailed iceland over 50 times and they just wont tell excel to cancel this charge - they are ignorant and ive even asked them why they have a webpage saying 'iceland combatting the cost of living crisis' pretending to help their customers and they wont comment...they'd rather put more stress and anxiety on an already suicidal vulnerable person just to get money out of them..so their 'help' during this crisis is a lie as it wont even extend to disabled customers. she has now received 2 letters from DCBL saying she owes £170 for 5minutes of overstay. the last one is a final demand. as she cant read or write very well ive sent a recorded letter to DCBL (as advised by citizen advice) asking not to attend the property due to a vulnerable woman inside the property as it will only exasperate the situation, they have ignored it and basically said we dont care, you still owe. could anyone please advise - we are not very good with letters or these situations and are slow on the uptake.   1 The date of infringement? 28th dec 2023   2 Have you yet appealed to the parking company yet? [Y/N?] yes   If you have then please post up whatever you sent and how you sent it and the date you sent it, suitably redacted. [as a PDF- follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   Has there been a response? yes   Please AS A PDF FILE  ONLY ..post it up as well, suitably redacted. - follow the upload guide]cant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   If you haven't appealed yet - .........DONT ! seek advice on your topic first.   Have you received a Notice To Keeper? (NTK) [must be received by you between 29-56 days] yes   What date is on it? 15th january 2024   Did the NTK provide photographic evidence? yes   [scan up BOTHSIDES to ONE PDF of the PCN and your NTK - follow the upload guide] please LEAVE IN LOCATION AND ALL DATES/TIMES/£'scant do that - will have to get my son to do it when he visits   3 Did the NTK mention Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA) [Y/N?] not on the front - maybe on the back but cannot find the letter now   4 If you appealed after receiving the NTK, did the parking company give you any information regarding the further appeals process? [it is well known that parking companies will reject any appeal whatever the circumstances] yes   5 Who is the parking company? excel   6. Where exactly [Carpark name and town] did you park? gravesend in iceland    
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Struggling Simon vs Cabot **WON**


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5863 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Don't worry SH, took that advice a long time ago. This is Citifinancial and is a confirmation of identity for my SAR. I telephoned Mr Cooke the Data Protection Officer in response to his letter , his secreatry was very polite and helpful. She says that the request will be fulfilled within the statutory time frame (... that's good progress IMHO).

 

I am who I am, whether or not I signed it with my left hand. They don't need a proof of signature after all.

 

Also sent a nice letter to Ms. Robertson c/o Cabot Towers, reminding her that ;

a) she hasn't responded to my letter of the tenth

b) Hasn't sent a copy of the complaints procedure which is outside of their own targets for response

c) Still hasn't provided a statement of account

d) Still hasn't let me know why they feel justified in enforcing this

e) Hasn't given me a breakdown of the 'interest and/or charges' they have applied since orginially contacting me.

 

f) oh .... and has until Thursday 24th Jan before a CCA breach occurs.

g) oh .... and has until Thursay 24th February before they break the law

h) oh .... and has until 7th March to provide me with everything they hold on me.

 

The phrase 'go ahead punk, make my day' seems fitting. Am actually disappointed not to be getting any letters from these monkeys.

 

God alone help them if Citi don't have the documents either. My feeling is it may be a likely scenario, as Associates have been taken over twice by other companies since the account was 'closed', almost 5 years ago now.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 68
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Also, meant to say that I have been asking around about the Law of Property 1925, just in case they try that old chestnut(although I think that they may just have cottoned on that in order for that to be applicable they'd have to be able to prove absolute assignment - which actually gives them more duties to the alleged debtors than CCA does - go figure!

 

Had a very interesting conversation with a guy who was head of department within the insolvency service for 23 years(retired some time ago), but some useful insights!!!

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

With pleasure Rhia.

(not direct quotes, editied for brevity, I listned hard but didn't get a lot of it)

 

1)A legally assigned creditor needs only to attempt contact once every 5 years with the debtor in order to ensure that the debt remains persistant; the ability to enforce is a different matter - Insolvency Inspectors must identify the differences.

 

2)Under certain circumstances, it's possible to be discharged from bankruptcy after 4 months if, the debtor can prove it was not intended, i.e through illness, accident, the acrimonious end of a relationship, bereavement, or loss of a sibling or unfair dismissal.

 

as I understood him...to the extent of .. any traumatic experience.

 

I guess 'non compus mentis' .....or whatever it is..

 

Happy to introduce this fellow, if I can get him away from his cricket, beer/wine and dogs. (He's a 'foster home' for trainee guide dogs for the blind, a caring chap).

 

Another strory ...... they come from Forfar, where I was born.

 

Signing off,

Si

 

RHIA - PM Me for more .. bit sensitive

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Follow my train of thought

 

LoP can't be used to enfoce debts of the nature cabot are re-presenting(think about that word).

 

 

Cabot(and others) are buying debts that are now unimportant and unenforcable from the OC's. Their Loss!!!

 

The OC's have, in most cases, already written any monies due off - and gained relief from under capital gains taxation rules. It is a loss, no doubt.

They loaned money which wasn't recovered.

 

The OC's only have to prove that they made attempts to minimise the losses, and by redemption of a penny in the pound, even by assignation it counts -one letter then drop does work in their favour.

Edited by Struggling_Simon

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup Simon, the LoP is only the vehicle used to assign the debts... CCA still the Act that applies if they want to try their luck in court. I've long said this LoP nonsense is a bit of a red herring, and nobody should get too caught up in it. As has been proved, the ONLY thing that matters is the CCA. Irrespective of whether or not they think they need to produce one to satisfy a CCA request, nevertheless, they would need to dig one out to prove their case in court.

 

And as you have said, these debts tend to be getting bought WITHOUT there ever having been a valid agreement in the first place. A fact which really needs to be shouted from the rooftops.

 

If EVERYONE was aware of this fact, and EVERYONE challenged these companies, I really do believe their whole industry would collapse almost overnight. The stockmarkets might take a bit of a tumble. But hey! Perhaps certain people should have done their homework right at the very start.

 

If the OC's had done their job properly in the first place, none of this would be coming back to bite them on the bum.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Much Celebrity Debtor(catchy name;) ).

 

To Business -

 

Much as it pains me to say, you know I think we may be seeing a change in Cabot's behaviour.

 

2 days before the CCA request is due to go into default, they've posted a standard template letter, forgive me if I quote salient points verbatim for expidience;

 

Although Cabot have requested the information, the original lender is experiencing a delay in retrieving the information from its archives.

What about your lovely archive in cabot towers,or is it not staffed like your office at No1. Kingshill , by coincidence PO BOX 241 services the same building.

 

We shall send the information when we have it

Second admission that you don't have it; You're rumbled. = MISREPRESENTATION -> Trading Standards , Credit Standards authority??

 

followed by

We will as a

.....You won't believe this.....

a gesture of goodwill suspend your account

 

Mighty nice of you big Ken ..... not to break the law..Again....

 

If you have any queries about your account , pleas call one of our helpful customer advisors
Do I look like i need advice from a money hound?

 

On a lighter note , the balance of the account (ahem, alleged debt actually) has decresed by a whole £13.80. I sure hope that's not my £10 Subject Access Request money.

 

I have the proof of delivery, and they didn't acknowledge.

I will be phoning Post Office today to get proof of cashing of my Postal Order. Somone signed for the delivery in the place that doesn't employ anyone? Interesting.....

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

Much as it pains me to say, you know I think we may be seeing a change in Cabot's behaviour.

 

 

That's why the Cabot Fan Club and CAG need to be put forward for a Credit Today Magazine Award for ' Contributions to the Credit Industry throughout the Year' - we have walked up to mountains (and Towers :D ) and moved them :p

 

Sarah

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree.

 

Can somone remind me what CSA rules are for handling complaints, I have asked 3 times for a complaint form, and still don't have one. Has been goign on for 3 weeks plus.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for CFC albeit, with a shamrock.

 

Nobody from Cabot has replied yet

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Excellent SH

 

... who do I send this to? Is there a separate address I should use?

 

It's nearly criminal offence time, but I'm still waiting for Cabot to send me THEIR complaint form. No sign of it despite me asking for it three times.

 

I need to exhaust all the means available to me before FOS will hear my complaint.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

apologies for "quoting" legal sources that are copyright that resulted in post 1 on the above thread being removed

 

suffice to say the posting was highly significant supplying information from the highest sources

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pop your complaint in the post to the address on the form. Mark it FAO the lovely Claire Aynsley ([email protected])

 

You won't get a complaint form from Cabot, but you can ensure they are sticking to their own complaints procedures by perusing their literature. What, you don't havea copy? Oh, OK. You'll find it in my blog here...

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK , That'll get posted tomorrow

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now Strange as it may seem I got a letter from those nice people over at cabot towers.

 

Dear Mr Simon,

 

We recently wrote to you informing you that the OC is experiencing delays ...

 

Well, that's real funny but I've had no such report from the OC. The Citicards DPO's office are very nice people. My S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) should be coming very soon. If there is no agreement there ... game over.

 

Although 24 days have passed since your request, we hope to be able to send this information to you soon.

 

We'll be reminding the lender ......

 

I hope you can too. Otherwise you'll break the law.

 

Your account shall remain on hold until further notice.

 

Can they still process my data , and pass it on to CRA's etc? When should I send a Section 10 Data Protection Act notice?

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HEy, someone ought to go to Cabot and offer to 'buy' all their debts on hold - must be thousands! :D

 

Poor ole Ken, what will he do with himself down there - maybe retire? Get out before his business is totally anniolated! :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just itching to see that default of my credit report. I'll be patient until they comitted and offence then bang them with a section 10 notice to quit processing my data.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If any of the Men In Black from Cabot towers are reading....

Please resume clock-watching. You have until Close of Business before I call Trading Standards.

 

Cabot can't do anything from then on without committing an offence.

 

 

I have a preapred letter informing them of what they have failed to do, and what I now require them to do. I will be only to happy to enforce and order on these people.

 

Stop processing my data.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

TIME IS UP .......... Let loose the dogs of law.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

tick follows tock .. Soon my lovelies, soon.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

HEADS UP ->

 

The results of my Cabot SAR have arrived before their due date. TBH quite impressed by that.

 

I wish I understood it all, but I have a plan for that. I will try to post up any queries I have once I've had a read through properly.

 

It gives me a nice excuse to write a big long letter asking them to remove it all.

:-)

 

Nowhere to I find/notice any assignment in it so far. No Credit agreement.

OOPS Cabot. Take me to court, or drop the lot. You failed. at law.

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guys sorry for the delay, I am busy at work.

 

I have a full response to Cabots SAR Results in preparation

Struggling_Simon vs Cabot - WON

Struggling_Simon vs Abbey - WON

Struggling_Simon vs HBOS - Pending

--------------------------------------------

IF I HAVE HELPED PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES

 

Vigilantibus non dormientibus æquitas subvenit

Somper in excretia,som solem profundus variat.

 

 

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...