Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Particular's of claim for reference only 1. the claim is for the sum of £6163.61due by the defendant under an agreement regulated by the consumer credit act 1974 for hsbc uk bank plc. Account (16 digits) 2. The defendant failed to maintain contractual payments required by the agreement and a default notice was served under s 87(1)  of the consumer credit act 1974 which as not been compiled with. 3. The debt was legally assigned to the Claimant on 23/08/23, notice on which as been given to the defendant.  4. The claim includes statutory interest under S.69 of the county courts act 1984 at a rate of 8% per annum from the date of assignment to the date of issue of these proceedings in the sum of £117.53 the Claimant claims the sum of £6281.14. Suggested defence 1. The Defendant contends the particulars of the claim are generic in nature. The Defendant accordingly sets out its case below and relies on CPR r 16.3 (3) in relation to any particular allegation to which a specific response has not been made. 2. The claimant has not complied with paragraph 3 of the PAPDC (Pre action protocol) failed to serve a letter of claim pre claim pursuant to PAPDC changes of the 1st of October 2017. It is respectfully requested that the court take this into consideration pursuant 7.1 PAPDC. 3. Paragraph 1 is noted. I have in the past had financial dealings but do not recognise this specific account number or recollect any outstanding debt and have therefore requested clarification. 4. Paragraph 2 is denied. I have not been served with a default notice pursuant to the consumer credit act 1974. 5. Paragraph 3 is denied. i am unaware of any legal assignment or notice of assignment. A copy of assignment was sent by Overdales solicitors when acknowledgement of receipt of CPR request was received, but this was not the original.   6. Paragraph 4 is denied. Neither the original creditor or the assignee have served notice pursuant to sec86c of the Credit Consumer Act 1974 Notice of Sums in Arrears and therefore prevented from charging interest on debt regulated by the CCA1974. 7. The defendant submitted a request for a copy of the alleged agreement pursuant to s78 CCA 1974. The claimant has acknowledged receipt of request but has failed to comply. The claimant has failed to provide any evidence of balance or Default Notice requested by CPR 31.14 8. It is therefore denied with regards to defendant owing any monies to the claimant. therefore the claimant is put to strict proof to:  a.  Show how the defendant has entered into an agreement with HSBC. b.  Show and evidence the nature of breach and service of a Default notice pursuant to section 87 (1) CCA 1974. c.  Show and quantify how the defendant has reached the amount claimed for. d.  Show how the claimant has the legal right, either under statute or equity  to issue a claim. 8.  As per civil procedure rule 16.5 (4) it is expected claimant prove the allegation that the money is owed. 9.  Until such time the claimant can comply to a section 78 request he is not entitled, while the default continues, to enforce the agreement 10. By reasons of the facts and matters set out above, it is denied that the claimant is entitled to the relief claimed or any relief.     .
    • OK, well rereading the court orders from March, in the cold light of day rather than when knackered late at night, it is quite clear that on 25 June there will only be a preliminary hearing about Laura representing her son.  Nothing more. It's lazy DCBL who haven't read things properly and have stupidly sent their Witness Statement early. Laura & I had already been working on a WS, and here it is.  It needs tweaking now after reading the rubbish that DCBL sent and after all of LFI's comments.  But the "meat" is there. Defendant's WS - version 1.pdf
    • Morning, I purchased a car from Big Motoring World on 10th December 2023 for £14899.00. On the 15th December I had a problem with the auto start stop function of the car in which the car would stop in the middle of the road with a stop start error message. I called the big assist and the car was booked in for February. The BMW was with them for a week and it came back with the auto stop start feature all fine and all error codes cleared on the report from big motoring world. within 5 days I had the same issue. Warning light coming on and the car stopping. I called big assist again and the car was again booked in for an other repair in May. Car was taken back in may, they had the car for a week and returned with the report saying no issue with the auto stop start feature and blamed my driving. Within 5 days of having the car back it broke down again. This time undrivable. I had the rac pick my car up and take to Stephen James BMW for a full diagnostic. The diagnostic came back with the car needing a new fuel system as magnetic swarf was found.  I have sent big motoring world a letter stating all the issues and that under the consumer rights act 2015 I have asked for a replacement vehicle. all reports from Stephen James BMW have been sent over to big motoring world. Big motoring world have come back and said they will respond to my complaint within 14 days for the date of my complaint letter. I am not feeling confident on the response from them, what are my next steps?   Thanks in advance. 
    • That is really good is that a mistake last off "driver doesn't have a licence" I assume that should be keeper? The Court requested me to send the Court and applicant proof of my sons disability from their GP this clearly shows he has Severe Mental Impairement, he is also illiterate.  I naively assumed once the applicant received this that they would drop the claim.  It offends me that Bank has asked the Judge to throw the case out at the preliminary hearing and to make us pay up.
    • Hi, we are looking to get some opinions on weather or not to bother fighting this PCN. This comes from a very big retail park parking where there are restaurants, hotel, amongst other businesses. The parking is free but I suppose there must be a time limit on it that I am not aware of. We were in the area for around 4 hours. Makes us wonder how they deal with people staying in the hotel as the ANPR is on what appears to be a publicly maintained street (where london buses run) which leads to the different parking areas including the hotel.  1 Date of the infringement 26/05/2024 2 Date on the NTK  31/05/2024 3 Date received 07/06/2024 4 Does the NTK mention schedule 4 of The Protections of Freedoms Act 2012? [Y/N?]  YES 5 Is there any photographic evidence of the event? Entry and exit photos however, based on the photographs we are almost sure the photos are taken on public street. This is the location I believe photos are taken from.  https://maps.app.goo.gl/eii8zSmFFhVZDRpbA 6 Have you appealed? [Y/N?] post up your appeal] No Have you had a response? [Y/N?] post it up N/A 7 Who is the parking company? UKPA. UK Parking Administration LTD 8. Where exactly [carpark name and town] The Colonnades, Croydon, CR0 4RQ For either option, does it say which appeals body they operate under. British Parking Association (BPA) Thanks in advance for any assistance.  UKPA PCN The Collonades-redacted.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6038 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I am sorry to have ask you, but you seem to have help lots of people in my situation and I was hoping you would be kind enough to help me?

My wife had a bailiff from Rosendale’s knock on the door yesterday. He said I owed council tax for 2006 at my previous property amount £1204. The letter stated that I must pay this immediately or if I payed £117 now I could discuss a payment plan with them. When I got home I called the bailiff and said I could find the £117 and pay £55 per month until the debt had been cleared. He said there was no way he would accept that at all! And said it must be cleared within 6 months maximum time he is allowed to give. When I asked him what the £117 fig is he said it was for fees incurred. I questioned this and said you have only been out once, to which he replied yes but we have to put the maximum amount it could go up to. I said that the fee for one visit is not within the guidelines, and he then said will if you let me come over tomorrow and sign a walk in possession the fee will change to £24 for today’s visit and £18 for tomorrows. I advised him he will not gain access in my property and I do know my rights. He has now said what he will do Is come over collect the fees of £43 and leave me with a form to request monthly payments.

When I said I will try and speak to my council and pay them direct he told me he has never seen the council take back an account ? and I would be getting in more trouble if I try and do this.

Do you have any advise or letters you could help me with. I am so stressed with bills and with Christmas coming up I don’t want people knocking at my door whilst my wife and two infants are in.

Kind Regards

 

Robin

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rossendales apply all the fees to an account on the letter they issue. If you question them about it they will tell you its the new computer system they use. It details all the fees on the letter and they state if you pay before the fees are actually incurred they will be removed from the balance.

 

I personally think this is rubbish, the number of accounts they must get paid in full by people who have got scared and paid what the letter says.

 

I would suggest ringing Rossendales office, you will likely be on hold for a while, and asking for a breakdown of the fees and when they were incurred. Then ask them for a means test so you can make an arrangement. Tell them you wont pay any fees for visits while you are writing to them etc as they are aware you are addressing the situation.

 

Be aware they will likely tell you to speak to the bailiff direct. Stick to your guns. You wish to complain about the fees and want to make an arrangement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, do you think the council will accept an offer from me direct as i dont wont to deal with the balliffs ? and from what the balliff has said to me rossendale more then likley will refuse my payment option ? as it does not meet with there guidelines from the council ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

All you can do is try, to be honest the Council is only likely to interveine if they consider you vunerable, on a low income, single parent, on benefits etc. If they feel there is no valid reason why you didnt pay as billed and have the means to pay they will likely refer you to the bailiff.

 

Call the Council, declare you are in hardship and ask for a means test. Just see what they say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the ballif came over yesterday, and left paperwork for me to look at. when i open it, is said once agian we have returned with the intention to remove goods (they can't remove without a WPA) then a had written note from the balliff on the back. say he has spoken to the council and hey are on the understanding the account will stay with rosendales. if a payment is not aggreed with rosendales, they will proceed with an attachment of earnings.

 

i wanted to try and get my account back with the council, but is it even worht me speaking to them now as the balliff has got to them before me ? is this just another tactic these bullies are trying to use to keep the account with them ?

 

they have given me 5 days or appartantly will return with a van to remove goods (which they have not even levied on?) If theydo return can i be charged again ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rl,

with council tax they can only charge for two visits, first visit £24.50 second £18.50 I believe. Any subsequent visits are at no charge. As you rightly said, they cannot remove goods without entry and a levy/walking posession. If they try charging you for any of these I would write a strong letter of complaint to the council advising them of the underhand practices their employees are using in order to collect on their behalf and the over charging on their fees. The council are ultimately responsible for the actions of their employees. ;) Although they will most probably deny this.

Friendship costs nothing but its rewards can be priceless. Do not judge, as you will not be judged but if you can, try and assist where possible.:smile:

everyone is entitled to MY opinion!:D

I offer my comments without prejudice or liability.

If you found my advice helpful, please click the scales at the top.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly the council' will say that they CANNOT discuss the matter further and direct you back to the bailiff. In the case of Rossendales, if our companies experience is anything to go by, they will try as hard as poss to keep the debt with their company.

 

The bailiff by law can only charge £24.50 for a first visit and £18.00 for a second visit. He can visit 10 times he he likes.......but the maximum number of visits he can charge are hust the 2. That's it.

 

For the collection of COUNCIL TAX the bailiff can try sending out notices to say:

 

REMOVAL NOTICE.

24 HOURS REMOVAL NOTICE

AUCTION NOTICE

However, this is the important thing to remember:

 

In order to "attend to remove", he must first have been into your property and "seized" goods which he would have listed on a walking possession. If you then default on your payment arrangement, he can then return to "remove" those goods....and only goods PREVIOUSLY seized.

 

In your case the bailiff has not "levied" on goods and cannot therefore come to your home to remove.

 

I am sending you a PM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i have sent of a letter to rossendales on tuesdays night, using a template from this fantastic site. however as i only have a basic account i could not send a cheque with it. i want to pay the 1st installment now to show a good will gesture. i have no debit/card and no cheque book. I do have internet banking. and have been on the councils website to get there sort code and account number. should i pay the 1st installment direct to the council or to the balliff in your honest opinion ?

 

many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Personally i would pay the council and not rossendales but this will meen that even once the council are paid and rossendales informed they will be wanting their "fees" which in my experience will be blown out of proportion and totaly illegal, pretty sure worst case scenario their is you send them a subject access request (which will show the fees charged) and thats your evidence realy, pay them the first and second visit fee as stated above but nothing beyond that

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for that BORO, i did want to pay them directly, i have paid the 1st two visit fees. and my payment offer as not been accepted from rosendales as of yet, but i wanted to make my 1st payment now to sure a good will. is this what i should do, or should i wait for the aggreement to be accepted ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would also say that each time you write to Rossendales (write, don't phone!), copy in the Council as well. The bailiff here seems to constantly be trying it on with you, but now that you know the fee structure you won't be fooled.

If you really can't use a cheque, a postal order should do - however, with POs you have no way of checking if it's been cashed or not, and some collectors do have a habit of 'losing' your payment so that they can say you've defaulted. The ideal thing to do would be to scrape some money from somewhere and issue a cheque. You don't have to wait for the agreement to be accepted to make a payment, and making a payment shows that you are not attempting to avoid paying.

Keep copies of everything!

-----

Click the scales if I've been useful! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...