Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Please see my comments on your post in red
    • Thanks for your reply, I have another 3 weeks before the notice ends. I'm also concerned because the property has detoriated since I've been here due to mould, damp and rusting (which I've never seen in a property before) rusty hinges and other damage to the front door caused by damp and mould, I'm concerned they could try and charge me for damages? As long as you've documented and reported this previously you'll have a right to challenge any costs. There was no inventory when I moved in, I also didn't have to pay a deposit. Do an inventory when you move out as proof of the property's condition as you leave it. I've also been told that if I leave before a possession order is given I would be deemed intentionally homeless, is this true? If you leave, yes. However, Your local council has a legal obligation to ensure you won't be left homeless as soon as you get the notice. As stated before, you don't have to leave when the notice expires if you haven't got somewhere else to go. Just keep paying your rent as normal. Your tenancy doesn't legally end until a possession warrant is executed against you or you leave and hand the keys back. My daughter doesn't live with me, I'd likely have medical priority as I have health issues and I'm on pip etc. Contact the council and make them aware then.      
    • extension? you mean enforcement. after 6yrs its very rare for a judge to allow enforcement. it wont have been sold on, just passed around the various differing trading names the claimant uses.    
    • You believe you have cast iron evidence. However, all they’d have to do to oppose a request for summary judgment is to say “we will be putting forward our own evidence and the evidence from both parties needs to be heard and assessed by a judge” : the bar for summary judgment is set quite high! You believe they don't have evidence but that on its own doesn't mean they wouldn't try! so, its a high risk strategy that leaves you on the hook for their costs if it doesn't work. Let the usual process play out.
    • Ok, I don't necessarily want to re-open my old thread but I've seen a number of such threads with regards to CCJ's and want to ask a fairly general consensus on the subject. My original CCJ is 7 years old now and has had 2/3 owners for the debt over the years since with varying level of contact.  Up to last summer they had attempted a charging order on a shared mortgage I'm named on which I defended that action and tried to negotiate with them to the point they withdrew the charging order application pending negotiations which we never came to an agreement over.  However, after a number of communication I heard nothing back since last Autumn barring an annual generic statement early this year despite multiple messages to them since at the time.  at a loss as to why the sudden loss of response from them. Then something came through from this site at random yesterday whilst out that I can't find now with regards to CCJ's to read over again.  Now here is the thing, I get how CCJ's don't expire as such, but I've been reading through threads and Google since this morning and a little confused.  CCJ's don't expire but can be effectively statute barred after 6 years (when in my case was just before I last heard of the creditor) if they are neither enforced in that time or they apply to the court within the 6 years of issue to extend the CCJ and that after 6 years they can't really without great difficulty or explanation apply for a CCJ extension after of the original CCJ?.  Is this actually correct as I've read various sources on Google and threads that suggest there is something to this?.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Im really starting to panic now! Help please.


1stlifeline
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6041 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Im sorry this is a bit long but I really need some advice.

We have a lot of debts and have been to the CCCS and done all the usual income/expenditure form filling and sent copies off to all our creditors. We have also have had the building society try to repossess the house although that has been suspended and we have it up for sale at the moment. Our plan was to sell the house and then make offers to each creditor to see if we can make reduced offer settlements.

Some debts are mine and some are my partners and all of the companies have accepted reduced payments for a while and all but one have suspended interest.

This is where we have the problem, my partner has a loan and a credit card with Nationwide which together come to just over 20,000. His credit card had a balance of just over 4,000 and even though he obviously no longer uses it they have added interest and charges each month and so now the figure is nearly 8,000. Nationwide have been inflexible from the start even though he has continually made reduced payments regularly and did inform them of the problem right at the start. On the loan they did accept a smaller payment which they said they would review after 12 weeks but during this period they twice took the origional amount from his bank without any warning which again caused him a £38 charge each time for the direct debit failing. They did agree that they should not have tried to take the larger sum as they had agreed smaller payments and promised to repay his bank charge but it never happened.

Yesterday he got a letter from a collection company and he rang them this morning. The woman he spoke to said they want over £150 extra each month. He told her that we do not have the mney and so cant promise that. They admitted that they had his income/expenditure form in front of them and could see that there was no possibility that he could increase the payments, however they said he must find a way or be taken to court. He told them that they would have to take him to court then and that he would show that he couldnt afford any extra and that he had always made a payment every month and so was doing his best.

They told him that they would take him to court and have a charge put on the house. The problem is that if they do this it will mean that ALL the collateral in the house would be eaten up by them. Our plan was to distribute the collateral between all the creditors to try to get back on our feet. We thought selling our home was a last resort but would allow us to make some headway to becoming solvent again.

Can they do this when we have other creditors? As the house is jointly owned and the debt is my partners are they entitled to my share of the equity? There really is no point in selling if they are going to take it all and by the time we get a sale they are going to add court fees and more interest and we could end up with negative equity.

Sorry this is long winded but can anyone advise please.

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Send nationwide a CCA request for both the credit card and the loand to see if they ahve the correct paperwork. this should at least buy you a little time and if they don't have the correct paperwork, puts you in a much stronger position to bargain.

 

Or you can look at having the debt reduced by claiming back all unlawful charges on the account. you start by sending a SAR - follow the guide at the beginning of the website.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

I wouldn't worry to much about a DCA threatening to put a charging order on your house at this stage, what you have to remember is their one aim in life to coerce as many payments out of you as they can.

 

Tiglet has given good advice (as always:D ) I would send the CCA request to the DCA first, they then have to reply with 12 working days and prove they have a legal right to collect the debt, if they can;t provide an agreement the debt is unenforcable, most likely they will simply pass the account back to the original creditor in that situation.

 

Do you think there might be any penalty charges on any of the accounts?

 

With regard to your house how much equity do you have at present? When you sell will you have a lump sum left over?

 

kind regards,

shane

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you Tiglet. Im really confused by this CCA request thing. I did do it with my Halifax account and my charges came to over £1000 but I fell at the last hurdle because they took it to the court stage and I couldnt afford th £120 to go the whole way and am not entitled to it FOC.

This thing about them having the correct paperwork confuses me because even if they dont have it what do you do? Do you still have to go to court yo argue it out because if you have been making payments then surely that means you have been acknowledging a debt which you are now disputing exists. Also if do I work out which are unlawful charges on the loan are they not just going to call our bluff on the premis that we owe them more than they will owe us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No CCA = no enforecable debt - the court cannot enforce the debt without the CCA, but you would need to go to court and defend their action.

 

If you owe them more than they owe you, then at least it will get the debt reduced - plus, if they take it to court you can defend on the bais that the amount they are asking for is not correct. But that is a long way down the line.

 

I'd get the CCA request with the £1 fee sent off to them pronto.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Shane, Thanks for the reply. At the moment we will probably have about 23,000 equity in the house provided we get the asking price we are hoping for. Im sure there are penalty charges on most of the accounts but as in my last post regarding the Halifax credit card I cant afford to take a claim to the court stage because of the costs and I feel that because we owe them money they will just call our bluff and push us all the way knowing we cant afford to take the final step as the Halifax did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You could always phone Halifax now and give them one last chance to settle amicably before you start court proceedings (they don't know you are bluffing).

 

You never know, they may give in or agree a partial refund.

 

Not all credit card providers are the same - but, as I said, the CCA is a good place to start.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya,

 

With regard to court action and not being able to afford fees keep in mind if you are defending any action you don't need to pay an upfront court fee so you need not worry about that. If they bring court action against you without holding an agreement they haven't a hope of suceeding, no agreement = no enforcable debt.

 

kind regards,

shane

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

First NEVER talk to these "people" on the phone as they will try and get you to agree to anything.

 

Before you even think about making any sort of acknowledgement or payment to a DCA you MUST ensure that they have the LEGAL right to collect the debt.

This is achieved by requesting a copy of the Signed, Executed Credit Agreement via a Consumer Credit Act (CCA) request.

There is a template letter to be found here: http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general-debt/20758-creditors-dcas-letter-templates.html

Letter N.

Is it important to start the letter:

I DO NOT ACKNOWLEDGE ANY DEBT TO YOUR COMPANY in Big Bold letters.

 

It is best to send this request via recorded/special delivery as there are some important deadlines to observe.

 

After 12 WORKING days the "debt" is in default and stays that way until the request is complied with.

If a FURTHER month passes then the DCA has committed a summary criminal offence and the matter should be referred to Trading Standards for action once the DCA continues to demand payment.

 

I hope this clarifies some things.

Be VERY careful whose advice you listen too

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the replies. I am going to CCA them. Just out of interest though, IF, it did go to court and they want to secure the loan against the house, can they include my share of the equity as the debt is in my partners name. I plan to use my share of the equity to pay off my creditors which I want be able to do if they secure the whole loan against the house.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure, but I think you're thinking too far ahead - it's very easy to do, i know.

 

Best if you just take it one step at a time and try not to worry.

All help is merely my opinion only - please seek legal advice if you need to as I am only qualified in SEN law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

take Curlyben's advice and DO NOt speak to them on the phone, especially DCA's. I have had numerous telephone calls and letters from DCA's Threatening charging orders / Bankruptcy etc and I have point blank ignored them. Absolutely nothing has happened, they are just business' trying to make money by using scare tactics.

Keep all correspondence in writing and always use recorded or special delivery.

 

Good luck

The only man who sticks closer to you in adversity than a friend is a creditor.

 

Debt Collection Charges

 

There is no legal basis for a creditor or a debt collection agency acting on its behalf to claim collection costs from a debtor unless there is an express provision in the original agreement.

 

Without such provision, collection charges cannot be demanded as a debt due under the agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for the replies. I am going to CCA them. Just out of interest though, IF, it did go to court and they want to secure the loan against the house, can they include my share of the equity as the debt is in my partners name. I plan to use my share of the equity to pay off my creditors which I want be able to do if they secure the whole loan against the house.

 

 

Hi,

 

Just to set your mind at rest on this it is only your partners interest that they can secure on and should the worse happen andif you do get to this stage (which hopefully you wont) there would be a hearing and you would have chance as an interested party to defend the order.

 

Kind regards,

benson05

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...