Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you for your pointers - much appreciated. dx100uk - Apologies, my request wasn't for super urgent advice and I have limited online access due to my long working hours and caring obligations - the delay in my response doesn't arise in any way from disrespect or ingratitude. I will speak to her at the weekend and see if she will open up a bit more about this, and allow me to submit the subject access request you advise - the original creditor is 118 118 loans and from the letter I saw (which prompted the conversation and the information) the debt collection agency had bought the debt from 118 and were threatening enforcement which is when she has made a payment arrangement with them for an amount of £180 per month. It looks as if she queried matters at the time (so I wonder if I might with the FIO request get access to their investigation file?) - the letter they wrote said "The information that you provided has been carefully considered and reviewed. After all relevant enquiries were made it has been confirmed that there is not enough evidence present to conclusively prove that this application was fraudulent.  However, we have removed the interest as a gesture of goodwill. As a result of the findings, you will be held liable for the capital amount on the loan on the basis of the information found during the investigation and you will be pursued for repayment of the loan agreement executed on 2.11.2022 in accordance with Consumer Credit Act 1974"  The amount at that time was over £3600 in arrears, as no payments had been made on it since inception and I think she only found out about it when a default notice came in paper form. I'm a little reluctant to advise her to just stop paying, and would like to be able to form a view in relation to her position and options before unsetting the applecart - do you think this is reasonable? She is young and inexperienced with these things and getting into this situation has brought about a lot of shame regarding inability to sort things out/stand up for herself, which is one of the reasons I have only found out about this considerably later Thank you once again for your advice - it is very much appreciated.    
    • That's fine - I'm quite happy to attend court if necessary. The question was phrased in such a way that had I declined the 'consideration on the papers' option, I would have had to explain why I didn't think such consideration was appropriate, and since P2G appear to be relying on a single (arguably flawed) issue, I thought it might result in a speedier determination.
    • it was ordered in the retailers store  but your theory isnt relevant anyway, even if it fitted the case... the furniture is unfit for purpose within 30 days so consumer rights act overwrites any need to use 14 days contract law you refer too. dx  
    • Summary of the day from the Times. I wasn't watching for a couple of interesting bits like catching herself out with her own email. Post Office inquiry: Paula Vennells caught out by her own email — watch live ARCHIVE.PH archived 23 May 2024 11:57:02 UTC  
    • Frankly I think you should go to a hearing unless you feel especially nervous . If you have any worries then you should follow our link to find out about a county court familiarisation visit     You shouldn't forget that county Court judgements are very helpful but they are not binding. They are only persuasive.  It is difficult to see you losing but it might be better to be there in order to counter any arguments from the other side
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Next Directory - Duplicate Accounts


IHB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6533 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

If anyone could offer any advice on what I should do next, I'd be really grateful. This is a long story, hopefully the letter below should explain everything..If not, let me know. I posted this by recorded delivery to

 

Next Directory

Customer Relations

P.O. Box 4000

Sheffield

S97 3ET

on 13th June.....

 

"13th June 2006

Re: Set-Up of Duplicate Account – Account Numbers DAxxxxxx & DA xxxxxx

Dear Sir / Madam,

It is with regret that I express my dissatisfaction at your service regarding an order made recently.

I ordered a suit (one jacket, and two pairs of trousers, for sizing) from your website, proceeded to the checkout page and discovered that you do not take Maestro. I then aborted this order.

My mother then offered to pay with her Visa Delta card. We logged into the site with her name and address (name xxxxx, address as above) and the system would not allow us to go any further than entering the name and address.

I presumed this was due to the fact that I had entered the same address 5 minutes earlier. Therefore, we aborted this order at the rejection page. The following morning, I logged onto the site again with my name and address, proceeded to checkout and entered my mother’s card details. I selected a delivery date, received confirmation of my order.

The order was delivered when requested and I packaged up one pair of trousers to return. Everything up to this point was as expected.

A few days later, a second set of packages arrived, in my mother’s name. A second account had been created, without ever getting to the checkout, order confirmation or delivery selection stage with these details.

We called Customer Services straight away to notify of this further delivery and they arranged a collection and advised they would close both accounts for us. The courier then failed to turn up three times for the parcels. On each occasion, we called the helpline and were advised someone would definitely be calling around. I took time off work, and my Mother also waited in.

The courier eventually arrived on 8th June and collected the unwanted item from my account (1 pair of trousers) and everything that was sent to us in my Mother’s name (one jacket and two pairs of trousers). At this stage, we both returned our copy of the Directory, as regrettably, we do not feel we will be using the service again.

Yesterday, we received a bill for the items delivered to my Mother, despite never setting up this account, never ordering them, reporting the error, and arranging collection straight away.

Your FAQs also state the following:

Q. Am I charged for the items as soon as I order them?

A. You have a 14-day approval period from the day the items are actually dispatched. If during the 14 days you return the items, there will be no charge to your account. So you can try before you buy.

Far less than 14 days elapsed since receiving the items and calling to report the error and arrange collection and yet we have been billed.

I called Customer Services yesterday and was told that it could take up to 28 days to credit the account. However, the bill stated that the minimum payment of ten pounds must be received by 1st July.

The whole service from start to finish has been completely despicable, no apologies have been made for the error, or the inconvenience of waiting in for three collections.

I only have one order confirmation email, arranged one delivery time, and proceeded to checkout once. I can not see where this error has occurred and yet was asked by your representative yesterday if I “knew how I had managed to cause this”.

I would appreciate if somebody could contact us regarding this as a matter of urgency, as myself and my Mother do not feel comfortable leaving the bill on the second account unpaid, yet do not feel it is justified that we pay a minimum payment on an account opened in error and then wait a further 28 days from 1st July to have this refunded.

If you require any information, please do not hesitate to contact me. My mobile number is above and both I and my mother can be contacted on the landline number.

I look forward to your reply.

Kind regards,

Miss X Xxxxxxx"

I have had no response to this yet, and am completely furious. I just do not know where to go from here.

Any ideas????

Barclays Bank: £880 owed. Letter Before Action sent 06/06/06 (!) Awaiting Response......

Link to post
Share on other sites

Might as well bang your head against a brick wall. Next are completely useless. We ordered a new King size mattress from them. The day before delivery we disposed of the old one at the local tip and spent the night on our camping airbed. Waited in all day for delivery...not a thing. This king size mattress had been 'lost' in their warehouse and could not be found so me and my wife spent the christmas season sleeping on an air bed.

 

In the end, we did get £100 compensation from them but that was after many many emails and phone calls. Just refuse to speak to anyone who answers the phone and demand that they escalate it. They must have put the phone down on me 2 or 3 times (couldn't stop myself from calling them useless!!), but I eventually got through to someone who was able to make a decision.

Just the FAQ’s ma'am. Please read 'em thoroughly before jumping in. Cheers :)

 

Find all the letters under the rainbow here

 

Being a man, I am always right (however I will make no admission of liability if you have misinterpreted my instructions!! :) ) If you are in any doubt, then consult a professional. All opinions offered on this site are just that, and should not be taken as legal advice.

 

Halifax - £1400 reclaimed. Now on a crusade to help others!

Link to post
Share on other sites

We received a call from Customer relations on Friday. They called my Mother to ask her permission to discuss the account with me. I am expecting a call from them today. Here's hoping I get somebody who can help.......

Barclays Bank: £880 owed. Letter Before Action sent 06/06/06 (!) Awaiting Response......

Link to post
Share on other sites

A nice lady called Maureen called me today (as promised) and apologised for the whole mess. The balances are clear, both accounts are closed and the matter is being taken up with the Courier. She is also sending me some vouchers in the post. Nice outcome, very happy, apology sounded sincere too.:)

Barclays Bank: £880 owed. Letter Before Action sent 06/06/06 (!) Awaiting Response......

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...