Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Is the letter headed Letter of Claim/before Claim or similar? If not, it sounds like more of the threatogram chain. If you're not sure, post up an anonymised copy of the letter and we'll check. HB
    • So guess what, we have received a final demand letter for £100. It states if payment is not made by 11/06 they will have no option but to forward the case to their litigation dept with a view to commence County Court Proceedings. So just wondering if anyone has any advice. Do we ignore this? or do we need to take action? Thanks 
    • hi dx, thanks for helping just re-reading everything this morning and I must have missed this one from uncle in his thread "What you should not do, is not contact the Banks and simply default on payments. "  are you in disagreement with this based on your last sentence?
    • Thanks for the reply and clarification, that might just explain why in my case contact has pretty much ceased. Though with such companies it doesn't mean they won't ever threaten to return to court as a tool to force one's hand if they feel they are not self informed on their chances etc.  But concerning how last year they tried to use the CCJ to get a charging order and the court granted an intirum order on our mortgage using the CCJ that would have been a good 2-3 months beyond the 6 years, should the court not have checked the age of the CCJ in the first case or would they always grant an interim order simply off the back of a CCJ being produced without even checking the age of it?.  Had I not defended that action at the time they may well have got a default using a CCJ older than 6 years which could be a concern going forwards. At the time when I contacted the court to question the paperwork for a final order application the clerk suggested people don't get informed when companies apply for interim charging orders, they are automatic if a claimant has a CCJ and people only get contacted once a date for a final order application goes through. kind of begs the question if such companies can continue a seemingly backdoor method to attempt default action if un-defended if the initial application doesn't need to check the age of a CCJ?.
    • Hello!  Wondering if someone can help with this.  I suspect not but worth a go.  I appreciate the "contract is with the seller" line, which is what Evri has fed me but wanted to see if someone with experience in these things could suggest anything else I could do here.  I appreciate there are many topics about lost parcels - My parcels weren't lost, until the driver walked up to my door with them and then decided to make them lost/stolen... I'll summarise what has happened.  Wednesday of last week - Evri delivery driver stole / walked off with 3 of my parcels.  -  Arrived outside my properly, took photos (3 separate photos as its 3 separate deliveries) of the tops of the parcels (pointlessly zoomed in on just the labels, couldn't see anything else, other than a small piece of the pavement and a little weed, which doubly confirms it was outside my door as I can see the same plant), marked the order as delivered and walked off with them.  He's marked on the Evri GPS marked that he was outside.   -  3 different deliveries, from the same company (same boxes etc.), but 3 separate tracking numbers. -  Went through the Evri bot which opened a case on each tracking number.  I then phoned them and left a voicemail explaining what had happened. -  24 hours later had a canned response asking me if the packages had turned up and to check around etc..  I responded explaining again what happened and that they've definitely been taken. -  4 days later,  this morning, I get a response telling me to ask the merchant to refund me. I've responded to this message with a long email, repeating what I said, that I believe the driver has stolen these packages and that he took those suspicious top down shots of the packages, marked them as delivered without ringing or knocking etc.  I've said that I expect them to investigate further, but I gather they won't. In my several messages to them initially and later, I told them I don't care about a refund and wanted the parcels.  They contain some sentimental stuff, nothing of high monetary value, hence me going to this trouble.  I only paid £25 for the contents. I did contact the merchant when this first happened and they asked me to wait a few days.  They ended up refunding me despite me asking them not to and that I wanted them to escalate it with Evri because this appears to be a case of theft.  They didn't seem bothered - Refunded me and told me to go back to Evri and escalate it with them? So - Is there any way to compel Evri to conduct a proper investigation with this driver?  Search for my parcels? I have quite a lot of deliveries handled by Evri (not out of choice) - They used to have a fantastic chap and I rarely had any issues.  He has been replaced by a new guy and I believe the route is handled by this same guy who I believe has taken my packages.  Naturally, I fear this is going to happen again in the future if no investigation occurs. Appreciate any assistance - Thanks for reading. Al.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Capquest Claimform - old £11k Halifax Loan


Gonnagetem
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4653 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Please some help guys no response from my last post and I have to return this to the courts tomorrow by recorded delivery to ensure it meets its deadline off 1st Feb.

 

Unsure of how to proceed and if I don;t reply they are going to win.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 99
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

In the ************* County Court

Claim number **********

 

 

 

 

Between

************* - Claimant

and

 

xxxxxxxxxx - Defendant

 

 

 

Draft Order for Directions

The Claimant shall within 14 days of service of this order send to the Defendant and to the Court:

  • Copies of the Credit Agreement and any documents referred to within it which complies with the consumer Credit Act 1974 and all subsequent regulations, which the claimant seeks to rely upon
  • Default Notice compliant with s87 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 andConsumer Credit (Enforcement, Default and Termination Notices) Regulations 1983 (SI 1983/1561) as amended,
  • Document, contract or deed of assignment
  • Notice of assignment, with proof of service of the same compliant with s196 of the Law of Property Act 1925.
  • Copies of any statement or other document relied upon

If the Claimant fails to comply with this order, the claim will be struck out without further order.

 

The Defendant shall within 14 days thereafter file and serve the following

  • An amended defence sufficiently particularised in response to the documents supplied by the claimant

If the Defendant fails to comply with this order, the Defence will be struck out without further order.

 

 

 

right then, amend the header to suit your case

 

 

and then print it off on plain a4 paper

 

then

 

XXXXXXXXXX -v- XXXXXXX

Claim No: xxxxxxxxx

 

N150 Allocation Questionnaire

 

Section H - other information

If the court is in agreement, the defendant respectfully requests that special directions may be given as per the attached draft order.

 

The defendant proposes these directions in mind of the Overriding Objectives, and in particular the duty of the parties to help the court further them. The issues outlined below are the crux upon which this claim rests, and the proposed directions identify these issues and will allow them to be assessed in advance of the hearing so that this claim may proceed justly and expeditiously;

 

without production of the requested documents, I am at a disadvantage and am unable to serve a proper defence. Failure of the claimant to supply the requested documentation will make the case much harder for the court to deal with as without production of the requested documentation will inhibit the courts ability to deal with the case

The House of Lords in the case of Wilson v First County Trust Ltd - [2003] All ER (D) 187 (Jul) made it clear in paragraph 29 of LORD NICHOLLS OF BIRKENHEAD judgment

29. The court's powers under section 127(1) are subject to significant qualification in two types of cases. The first type is where section 61(1)(a), regarding signing of agreements, is not complied with. In such cases the court 'shall not make' an enforcement order unless a document, whether or not in the prescribed form, containing all the prescribed terms, was signed by the debtor: section 127(3). Thus, signature of a document containing all the prescribed terms is an essential prerequisite to the court's power to make an enforcement order. The second type of case concerns failure to comply with the duty to supply a copy of an executed or unexecuted agreement pursuant to sections 62 and 63, or failure to comply with the duty to give

notice of cancellation rights in accordance with section 64(1). Here again, subject to one exception regarding sections 62 and63, section 127(4) precludes the court from making an enforcement order.

 

Its is respectfully requested this case be allocated to the small claims track, it is a straight forward case and is easily resolved on production of the required documentation by the claimant, should the claimant not have the documentation required to progress this case I suggest that there will be no case to answer

 

Therefore it stands to reason that this document must be disclosed before this case can progress any further

 

 

 

 

then do the same with this

 

 

now do you need help with the form itself?

 

 

 

in box H write

 

Please find the following attached to this allocation questionnaire;

 

1) Section H - other information

2) Draft order for directions

 

This allocation questionnaire and its attachments were sent to the Claimant on **/**/**.

 

 

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Paul your a lifesaver!!! Yes I do not understand the form at all, I hope you don't mind will list below the bits not sure of:

 

Section A have you sent a copy of this completed form to the other parties? Do I tick yes and send it to Capquest?

 

C Pre Action protocols?

The ******** (name which) protocol applies to this claim. have you complied with it? or

No pre-action protocol applies to this claim. Have you exchanged iformation/documents with the other party?

 

DApplications? have you made any applications in this claim?

 

Which track? small, fast or multi?

 

F proposed directions

Have you attached a list of the directions you think appropriate for the management of the claim?

 

Sorry about this I just do not understand the form

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Paul your a lifesaver!!! Yes I do not understand the form at all, I hope you don't mind will list below the bits not sure of:

 

Section A have you sent a copy of this completed form to the other parties? Do I tick yes and send it to Capquest? yes and yes

 

C Pre Action protocols?

The ******** (name which) protocol applies to this claim. have you complied with it? or

No pre-action protocol applies to this claim. Have you exchanged iformation/documents with the other party? thats the one,part 2 no preaction protocols

 

DApplications? have you made any applications in this claim?No

 

Which track? small, fast or multi? How much is the claim for? if its 5k or lower then small, if its under 15000 the fast above 15K then multi

 

F proposed directions

Have you attached a list of the directions you think appropriate for the management of the claim? YES and no they havent been agreed with the other parited

 

Sorry about this I just do not understand the form

 

Also in the witness box, put the your name and then write Witness of Facts

 

final trial put 1 hour reading case statements , 1 hour for the trail

 

 

i cant think of anything else

 

regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

subscribing

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you very much. Do I send them a copy of the original CPR letter and recorded delivery proof? they haven't sent anything so am assuming they do not have it at the moment

 

No at the moment

 

its not going to be needed til later, just the AQ and the directions and other info

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi Guys an update on the Crapquest case and some help required please...

 

Firstly after submitting the details as provided by Paul (thanks Paul) I received form N24 from the courts stating as follows:

 

Order In the ********* County Court

 

Parties Capquest Investments Ltd Claimant

******************* Defendant

 

On ********

 

District Judge ********* sitting at the Court House ********************** considered the papers in the case and

 

ordered that:

 

1) The action shall be deemed to be struck out at *** on **** unless the Claimant files and serves a particulars of claim which fully complies with the provisions of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998

 

2) Because this order has been made by the Coourt without considering representations from the parties, the parties have the right to apply to have the order set aside, varied or stayed. A party wishing to make an application must send or deliver the application to the court (together with any appropriate fee) to arrive within seven days of service of this order.

 

 

Now I have had no written posted correspondence from Capquest or from the court since so today thought great they haven't produced the Credit Agreement, however I have had an email addressed to my personal email address, which my partner has never used (this is his debt) with the following (below) in a letter, this was delivered at 14.41 before the 4 pm deadline but still no credit agreement, how do I now respond? Should I respond saying that the email has been incorrectly delivered after all I am not the defendant or do I ignore them?

 

Details of email below:

 

Amended pursuant to the

IN THE COUNTY COURT CLAIM NO.

B E T W E E N:

CAPQUEST INVESTMENTS LIMITED

Claimant

and

*********

Defendant

________________________________________

AMENDED PARTICULARS OF CLAIM

 

________________________________________

1. These amended Particulars of Claim are filed in substitution and replacement of the Particulars of Claim first filed on *******

2. The Claimant seeks payment of the unpaid balance of sums due under a Loan Agreement (“the Agreement”) made between ****** and the Defendant.

PARTICULARS

i) Date of the Agreement: *********

ii) Parties to the Agreement: ******** and the Defendant

iii) Number of the Agreement: ************

iv) The Agreement is a regulated Credit Agreement under The Consumer

Credit Act 1974

v) The total amount payable under the Agreement: £********

vi) The paid up sum: £*********

vii) Balance outstanding under the Agreement: £********

viii) The term of the Agreement: *** months @ £****** month.

3. In breach of the Agreement the Defendant failed to maintain instalment payments as they fell due.

4. It is averred that it is not necessary for the Claimant to rely upon service of a Default Notice pursuant to section 87(1) of The Consumer Credit Act 1974 as all sums payable under the Agreement are now overdue for payment.

5. The rights and duties of passed to the Claimant pursuant to an assignment dated ***** notice of which was given to the Defendant on ***********.

6. The Claimant seeks interest pursuant to section 69 of The County Courts Act 1984 at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of issue and continuing at the daily rate of £*******

AND THE CLAIMANT CLAIMS:

1. The said sum of £******

2. Interest thereon as aforesaid;

3. Costs.

DATED this **********

Statement of Truth

The Claimant believes that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true.

I am duly authorised by the Claimant to sign these Particulars of Claim.

Full Name:

Name of Claimant’s Solicitors: H L LEGAL & COLLECTIONS

Attached to email:

***********

Dear Sir

re: Capquest Investments Ltd -v- Yourself

In accordance with the Order of dated ********, we enclose herewith by way of service upon you, Amended Particulars of Claim and confirm that a copy has been filed at Court.

Kindly acknowledge safe receipt.

Yours faithfully

HL Legal

Signed ……………………………………… Position or office held: Solicitor

Link to post
Share on other sites

well point 4 really fillets their donkey

 

there is a basic statutory requirement to issue a default notice.

 

without it, there is no right to action (Woodchester & Swain) nor do they have a right to terminate the agreement or demand repayment of a sum for a breach of contract

 

 

silly beggars

 

 

right, what defence did you file to this action?

 

it may be the case that you need to file a response to their amendment

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi pt2537,

 

Thanks for your response and ODC, the defence I originally filed was as on page 1 here that someone kindly gave me requesting the credit agreement etc, then as you pt2537 gave me on pg 2 I have had no other correspondence other than suggested on this thread. I take that they do not have the credit agreement and hence this written amendment? Is it deemed as served before 4pm if it has gone to my personal email address?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

I suspect they probably haven't sent the docs becasue they don't have them.

 

As to meeting the terms of the order, well the judge didn't specifically send the documents but probably implied that. However, they could still send them by hard copy today and claim they met the terms of the court order by sending the amended particulars of claim.

 

As to sending the amended POC by email, if you acknowledged receipt of the original N1 claim form electronically using your personal email address, then I think they could argue they have properly served you.

 

I'd wait now for a few days to see what comes by snail mail.

Arrow Global/MBNA - Discontinued and paid costs

HFO/Morgan Stanley (Barclays) - Discontinued and paid costs

HSBC - Discontinued and paid costs

Nationwide - Ran for cover of stay pending OFT case 3 yrs ago

RBS/Mint - Nothing for 4 yrs after S78 request

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with DOCMAN they cannot send the documents because they dont have them. They respond with a load of legal jargon in the hopes of scaring you off. They are going to learn a costly lesson.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Hi pt2537,

 

It does not state what I need to do on the order should I respond anyway? I have not received anything from the courts yet either? Please could you advise as to what I should do next?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, well i would check with the court to see if the POCs have been sent to the court , if they have then i would ask if the court has sent a copy out to you. if they say they have or the claimant has informed them they have served a copy on you then we need to look at replying

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...