Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • In my experience (not with car payments) but with many other things, my partner has been ill and signed off in the past and we have been unable to meet various commitments.  Naturally if you ring the call centre they are going to fob you off and tell you you must pay, that's why that never ever works. I would obtain a note from her GP listing all her health issues plus medications plus side effects, then write to the finance company with a copy of it, explaining the situation, as you have here, asking for a payment holiday. Perhaps mention that the car is very much needed for hospital appointments etc. It's likely the finance company would rather you pay till term end than, chase you for money they will never see, and sell the car at auction for a loss,  You can search some of my threads going back years, advising people to do this for Council Tax, Tax Credits, HMRC, Even a solicitors company and it always works, because contrary to popular belief people are reasonable.
    • Sorry, I haven't ever seen one of these agreements. Read it all and look out for anything that says when she can withdraw and when she is committed to go ahead. If it isn't clear she may need to call the housing provider and simply say what you posted here, she doesn't want to go ahead and how does she withdraw her swap application?
    • Thank you! Your head is like a power bank of knowledge.  Her health issues are short term, due to a relationship breakdown she took it pretty hard and has been signed off work on medication for 3 months. She only started her job in February 24 so does not qualify for any occupational sick benefits, which is where the ssp only comes in. (You will see me posting a few things over the coming days, whilst I try and sort some things for her)  I sat with her last night relaying all this back and she does want to work out a plan, she was ready to propose £100 for the next 3 months and then an additional £70 per month onto of her contractual to "catch up" but Money247 rejecting the payment holiday and demanding £200 thew her, which is why I came on here.   
    • I've looked at your case specifically more.   Term 8bii reads " when, in accordance with instructions from the Customer or the Consignee, the Consignment is left in a safe place" Their terms choose to not define safe, so they are put to proof that the location is safe. If your property opens onto a street its a simple thing of putting a google earth image and pointing out that its not a safe place
    • New rules and higher rates resulted in a jump in the number of savers opening accounts at the start of this year's Isa season.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Breach of contract caravan storage/service costs


Angel104
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6024 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

First I will appologise if this post gets a bit long.

Basically we had our caravan stored at a storage site we pay £33 a month. Middle of august they sent us a letter saying that they now offer caravan servicing and to contact them if we were interested- which we did and got the caravan serviced. We asked how much the bill was and they said it would be sent out in due course. 10th september we went away for 1 week in the caravan- when we came back we could not access the site with our swipe card we saw a lady at the site who said the card had been cancelled because we had not paid for the service- we explained we had not had the bill and that the service was seperate as they were still getting the storage payments she said we would have to sort it out on the monday. We took the caravan home and we were then forced to store it elsewhere as our landlord told us to move it. We did not receive the bill for the service until 20th september and paid it. As we took the caravan elsewhere we cancelled the direct debit to the other people.

Now we have had a letter from a firm of solicitors saying that they are taking action for breach of contract because we are still liable for the storage payments for the next 9 months. Does anyone know that if they stopped us access if this would have terminated the contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The solicitor may have a heard a different story. "they just took their caravan away and stopped paying". So he reads it as breach of contract by you.

 

You need to reply.

 

I would say that you had a contract for the storage of your caravan and that the payments were up to date at 15 August. This is when you returned with the caravan and tried to use the site you had already paid for.

 

Tell them that you were denied access and told that your right to use the site had been withdrawn - because of a mythical bill that hadn't been paid. Point out that you had not broken the terms and conditions of usage and payments were up to date. Tell them that the site owner unilaterally terminated the contract and that you had to make other arrangements for storage. Tell them you consider that the breach of contract was made by the site owner and that they are liable to damages for breach of that contract.

 

If you've any legitimate costs I'd list and total them up and ask for payment.

 

Why this? Well the Solicitor will have said "we can bang a letter out for £50 - that usually works". But you need to put them on notice that it is not a straightforward case and it will be defended. The Solicitor will go back to their client and say "is it worth it?". I think you'll find the answer he gets back is "no".

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is truely difficult to advise on this, as Edz11 says there is a potential Breach of Contract by the site owners. however, if i were advising you as a legal rep, the first thing i would need to look at is the contract between parties and would also need to know what express terms were agreed at the time the contract was entered into, lets not forget that verbal terms are as binding as written one.

 

Damages may be recovered for Breach of contract but they would need to be clearly quantifiable and the case of Hadley and Baxendale which established that where damages are too remote they cannot be reclaimed so this would need to be considered also.

 

to be honest, you would be better served by going to speak to a local solicitor, many offer a free 30 minute consultation and would give you an idea of your chances of succcesss with this

 

Regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

I tend to agree with paul on this matter. I also suspect a simple letter from a soliciter is very likely to resolve the matter without court action.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

my interpretation would be that the contract for the storage is seperate from the contract for the servicing so the owners would have been wrong to have stopped your access, in my humble opinion they have breached the original contract. i'm only a layperson with limited knowledge in this area but that is how i read it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

its how it appears sequenci but then again that is based upon what we have been told, without the contract in front of us it is very hard to make an informed judgment. you really need to see the terms of the contract before you can be sure of a breach of the contract

 

thats my view anyway

 

Regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the contract is to store your caravan on their land, then i cannot see how a seperate bill for maintaining your caravan can be used as their defence,they have refused you access to your storage point.

Also if it did go to court i'm sure the Judge would be looking at the contract for the terms and conditions of maintaining your caravan as well as storage.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Good luck Angel104

 

im sure you will have a good case, but with this sort of issue where contract law can be a bit of a minefield its best to seek the guidance of a solicitor even if its a free 30 min consultation to see how good your case is

 

the thing is you will be able to present all the documents to the solicitor and also you will be able to tell him or her the info he will need to consider the contract and if the other party has breached it

 

 

I hope everything turns out well for you, if you need any advice please ask us, we will help where we can

 

Kind Regards

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

I was trying to avoid a solicitor's costs. I'd have sent off a letter along my terms and if it provoked a response that required further action THEN I would have gone to Messrs Sue, Grabbitt and Runne. Why pay £50 (or more) to send a letter that Angel104 could do herself. The idea was to keep it nice and low key so that they site owner realises that it isn't a simple case and so leaves Angel104 alone.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Edz11,

 

i mean no disrespect but you are assuming that this is as straight forward. i have suggested that Angel104 lays out all the information in front of a solicitor as it concerns me that where contractual issues give rise to a dispute we must be in full possesion of ALL the facts before we can say yes they have breached the contract!!

 

all we have are very small snipets of information, we are not in possesion of the contract between parties nor are we aware of the express terms agreed at the formation of the contract.

 

a solicitor will offer free 30 min consultation, this will give angel104 the chance to have all the facts assesed and it will then give a better idea of where they stand.

 

Angel104 doesnt have to go with the solicitor to take the case on but it will give her the chance to have it looked at by a legally qualified person

 

Kind Regards

 

Paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

No, we're in total agreement. Contract law is is more than a little complicated. Your "half hour free" sounds the right approach but as you know yourself you have to get the right Solicitor to get the right advice. It's all down to contract and terms.

 

I just speak from lots of experience in using them that you tend not to get a sensible response in the half hour - I'D want to go away and think about things if I was a Solicitor! Just trying to avoid them having a bill of any description.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday we went to a solicitor- he went over everything and said they have no case against us for breach of contract in fact he said we have a case against them. He is now going to write to them and put them straight.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Angel104

 

GREAT NEWS

 

im pleased that this is the case. as i said contract claims are notoriously difficult to advise on without being in full possesion of all the facts surrounding the creation of the contract, we must also remember in contract, verbal agreements are as binding as written

 

if you are happy for the solicitor to handle the case then thats fine as his costs would be recovered from the other party should you win, which i have no doubt you will but its gotta be said

 

i hope this gets resolved quickly for you and if you need any thing else dont hesitate to ask, its what we are here for

 

Regards

paul

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...