Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
    • please stop posting up unnecessary unnamed screenshot files  you've done it throughout your threads and we have to renamed them. RENAME THE FILE before you upload if its just text information like a defence or a claim history or a link to a previous post  type it here not by an unnamed screenshot attachment  . sorry NM but you've been here dealing with PPC claims since 2021 somehow you always manage to screw up.......or do totally the opposite of std repeated advice on 10'000 of PPC threads here you are your own worst enemy... dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

TLTS vs Cabot Court Summons Defence Wording


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5940 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all,

 

New to the site, and after a little bit of advice.

 

To summarise:

 

Received a Court Summons from our friends Cabot re two 'alleged debts'.

 

Have no knowledge of 'alleged debts'. Sent two letters by Recorded asking for true copy of agreement, deed of assignment and statement of account with the relevant £1 fee for each 'alleged debt'.

 

Received back interim letters stating response to 'alleged debt' A "have contacted original creditor for archived agreement" and response to 'alleged debt' B "we should be able to send it within 12 days if not will write again."

 

The 12+2 days have passed for both A & B and no documentation have been received, nor follow up holding letters. So are in default.

 

Have checked credit files with relevant sites and all clear, no record of any connection with the two companies 'alleged debt' or Cabot apart for a 'unrecorded enquiry' on the 25th September by Cabot.

 

Have completed acknowledgement of service and now about to file the defence statement. This is where I require a bit of your help.

 

What is the best way to word it, should I be quoting CCA 1974 and the Limitation Act 1980 (although I don't know when this 'alleged debt' originates from or date of debt?) Should I ensure the court knows that I requested the agreement yet Cabot have failed to produce within the 12+2?

 

The way I see it is that there is no true copy, no evidence that the 'alleged debt' is connected with me. No defaults, CCJ or anything on my credit file.

 

I have read a couple of other threads where Cabot have taken someone to court and a defence that can be used has been posted on here, can these be adapted to suit my case or am I having to start from scratch.

 

Thanks for your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

At the moment your defence is that Cabot have never supplied any proof of these alleged debts. You can't claim they're statute barred as you don't know what they're for (yet).

 

Thinking aloud, would it be considered vexatious to start court proceedings without ensuring you had copies of these agreements first?

 

Don't worry about the CCA request so much now, you've got a right under CPR to see what Cabot are relying on.

  • Haha 1

  • Barclays: WON!!! It took four months but was totally worth it!
  • Cabot: I'm still waiting for an enforcable agreement, more than a year after requesting it. Go on, Uncle Ken, take me to court if you dare. You know you want to!
  • Elephant.co.uk: VICTORY - they admitted there was no debt!
  • Ashbourne Management (gym membership): Finally got my default removed and out-of-court settlement; I'm not finished with them yet!

<--- If I've been helpful please remember the scales ;)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks all for the advice and comments.

 

Have filed defence and the main basis on the ground they have to prove the 'alleged debts' are in any way connected to me plus advising the court that they are already in default as to supplying CA, DoA and Accounts.

 

I await their response and look forward to becoming another member of the fan club. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just an update.

 

'alleged debt' A - Sssssssssslience!

 

'alleged debt' B - Despite stating they should be able to provide all the information within 12 days, they failed! Now received a letter informing me that the OC is experiencing delays in finding my alleged CA from their imagination and it might take them some while to hunt around within the space between their ears to find it.

 

Cabot kindly informed me of how many days have passed since my request. How nice of them to save me from having to work out the days! Do you think they might be kind enough to let me know when they commit the 12+2+30 criminal offence date, and report themselves to TS to save me having to do it.

 

They really are a two bob bit company and spoil the green gardens of lovely Kent.

 

We wait..........................

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Just an update.

'alleged debt' A - Stilllllllllllllllll Sssssssssslience!

'alleged debt' B - Apart from the last letter advising me the OC are having issues finding my 'alleged debt credit agreement' from their imagination, nothing since.

Both CCA requests have now passed the 12+2+30, without Cabot being able to supply one piece of evidence that I ever had a debt, yet alone a credit agreement with said companies.

As they are taking me to court and the court have advised that Cabot have until early next month (don't want to give too many details away!) to provide the court with their evidence, and have now committed a criminal offence for failure to supply the requested documents.

I think it's now time to

1) Advise Cabot that they have indeed defaulted on XX/XX/XX and have now committed a criminal offence on XX/XX/XX.

2) Advise TS that Cabot have committed the above as point 1.

3) Send an update to the court advising them of Cabot on point 1.

Some questions.

Re point 1) - Is there a template letter for this, did have a quick hunt around here?

Re point 2) - As I understand it, TS should be advised if Cabot still request payment after the 12+2+30, but I see it as Cabot currently have an open case with me, I feel this is good enough to suggest they are still chasing. Am I correct?

Re point 3) - Do I have to send a copy to Cabot of what I am going to send to the court re: their criminal offence in failure to provide documentation vital to this case and my defence?

Thanks as always.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

A little confused from your posts, has the court ordered Cabot to provide a copy of the agreement?

 

I wouldn't bother writing back and telling Cabot they have comitted the summary offence, just contact your local trading standards and let them take it up on your behalf.

 

Have you received any Notice of Assignment and did you request full disclosure under CPR?

 

When do you have to file a defence by?

 

kind regards,

shane

 

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

____________________________________________

All advice is offered freely & without prejudice

 

 

If my post has been useful to you please click the scales

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi shane5408,

 

Defence was filed last month.

 

Court have sent Cabot copy of defence and given Cabot 28 days to response should they wish to proceed. This expires shortly, if no response case stayed.

 

Cabot have failed to provide any documents. no CA, DoA, Accounts, yet alone a completed application form. The 12+2+30 have now passed.

 

Would rather the court have the case struck out than stayed, is the reason why I'm asking whether it would help if I informed the court that Cabot have now committed a criminal offence and have been reported to TS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Did you ask for standard disclosure of these docs, or are you still waiting for Cabot to respond to your CCA request?

 

Might be worth a word with the court to say that you are relying on these documents in your defence, and Cabot have so far yet to respond.

 

Seahorse,

 

Yes sent the standard CCA request, which all deadlines have now passed, and only received a 'holding' letter back from them stating they have contacted the OC for the documentation. You know the standard templated letter that everyone gets.

 

That's what I am thinking, send a letter to Cabot telling them that they have now committed a summary offence. Advise TS of this also. And send a letter to the court advising them too, plus informing then that I have now reported Cabot to TS.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Contacted the court today, and they haven't received any response from Cabot. Which doesn't surprise me one bit, as they have failed to provide the requested information to me in time, so why should they supply to the court.

 

Just adds more power to the defence that the claim be struck out rather than stayed. Which I will advise the court as soon as their deadline for responding has passed.

 

Cabot are so bad at achieving success I've heard that they are lining up Steve Mclaren for the CEO role :grin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

:lol:

 

The way things are going, I think you'll turn up in court, and Cabot will have "forgotten" to send anyone. ALthough I'm dying to see which poor local brief they send without any preparation this time. It really must be embarrassing to turn up, with no idea what you are supposed to be doing or any suport at all from Cabot, and be expected to win a case. But I suppose Cabot pay their solicitors no matter what, so it'll be a quick in-out-here's your bill, Ken sort of affair. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I predicted, Cabot have failed to provide the court (or me) with any evidence or confirmation that they wish to proceed with the claim. Therefore the case is now stayed, and Cabot will need to obtain a court order, if they want to continue with the claim, and have to explain to the judge why they failed to provide in the first place.

 

I knew all along that they were chancing their arm on no defence being entered and getting judgement by default and there was nothing on my credit files or that I had anything to do with the companies mentioned.

 

I want to follow this up now and report them to the relevant bodies to hit them further in the pocket apart from the £240 they have just wasted on court fees.

 

I've heard nothing from them apart from the initial response acknowledging my CCA request and one holding letter.

 

What letters and bodies do you guys now suggest?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Seahorse,

 

Think I will now invoke their complaints procedure to start with.

 

Will demand that the failure to provide the court with any repsonse proves without question of doubt they were attempting to achieve judgement by default, and therefore the stress and time involved in obtaining credit reports, understanding my rights, learning the details of the CCA 1974, my cost to send a CCA request which will include electricity, paper, ink, petrol, envelopes, postage. Plus the need to use the internet to file my defence, should now be compensated.

 

However I will give them the option to correct if they advise myself and the court that they are never to proceed on this case and attempt to remove the stay that they couldn't even provide a application form for, which they normally send to everyone else, trying to fob off as a CA!!

 

So could I have some balloons on my thread, and thank you guys for all the help, support and interest.

 

Thanks for the fun Cabot :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Well since the last letters from Cabot were mid November advising that we don't have your CCA but have requested in from the Original Creditor, I had no further contact until today. Although the court ordered them to reply if they wished to proceed with the case after being informed of my defence by early December, which they failed to do and thus case with stayed.

 

The letter today advises me that they have been advised by the original creditor that no CCA can be found and that no further attempt at collection will take place on one of the alleged debts

 

Well bully for them, the fact is I never had an account, or that they ever sent me any docs to prove otherwise, but had the front to try and pass a judgement against me stinks.

 

Keep fighting everyone, know your rights, make them prove.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...