Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank goodness it's not your roof and you get to foot the bill! How big are these bits of mortar? How often are they falling into your garden? Hourly, daily? Just go ahead with your plans, of course, they're not going to be worried by your time pressures and the urgency of the situation, so simply carry on as you would have done and I'm sure everything will go fine. Unless there is a danger to life and serious structural issues which mean you cannot venture into your garden, then IMHO there is little more you can do less for what you have done so already and made them aware of the issue.
    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tesco Personal Finance CCJ - no claim form received **WON**


Blossomandebony
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5060 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Couldn't believe that i received a JUDGEMENT FOR CLAIMANT form today (CCJ) even though I've not received the original court claim form. (It's from Tesco Personal Finance)

 

Now I know I have to send in a form to get the judgement set aside for the reason above but am wondering:

 

Will a set aside hearing definitely take place or can the court say NO - pay up???

 

If the judgement is set aside what happens? Is the judgement suspended until I get my day in court???

 

And should I phone the court to tell them or just send in the form for the set aside???

 

Has this happened to anyone else??- if so, can you advise!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You shouldn't have any problems getting a set aside as you do have a valid reason ( I assume if you had got the summons you would have defended). Just send the N244 to the court and ask that they acknowledge recept (they should do this anyway).

If the judgement is set aside what happens? Is the judgement suspended until I get my day in court???
Yes.
  • Haha 1

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks, Rory, that has reassured me.

 

Yes, I would have entered a defence - they have no vaild CCA, (only a dodgy application form), and if that fails, I can demonstrate that they actually owe me more money in charges and interest than they want from me!!

 

The reason I've not put in a claim against them first was that I figured we could call it quits! No such generosity on their part!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can demonstrate that they actually owe me more money in charges and interest than they want from me!!
Then you may want to have this as your first counter claim, rather than use there is no copy of the agreement.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no expert with this but have struggled with a lost defence on an MBNA claim, I was told that you have to prove 2 things to get a judgement set aside:

 

1. that you acted expeditiously when you found out

2. that younhave aviable defence,

 

in my inexpereinced way sounds like you are OK on both these counts just need to address it as 2 issues!

 

good luck!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Go for it Blossom, I was successful in getting set aside for my Oh on a Cap One card for the same reason.

 

We didn't get the paperwork and the first we knew was when the Bailiff rang us (on ex directory number) asking for the money.

 

Applied for set aside and quoted non-receipt of original claim form, would have entered defence and counterclaim as unlawful charges applied to account outweighed the amount being claimed, and no enforceable agreement. (Thanks CAG).

 

Got the set aside and then the solicitors acting for Cap One (our "friends" Bryan Carter) sent notice of discontinuance. Game over.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

That is great news, Rob, cheers!

 

I've contacted Northampton Court and they said to give the N244 form in person, to a local court, as the postal strike is on. I've taken the bloke's name to show that I am acting quickly on this, (though he did worry me slightly by saying to do it sooner rather than later as the claimant can go for enforcement!)

 

So I will give the form in first thing Monday morning, with the £75 fee.

 

The only thing I'm not sure of is how detailed I need to be in my application - and whether I need to photcopy items like my CCA request and previous correspondence as evidence to support my application. And do I need to quote things like the s.127 of the CCA Act or is that too much information?

 

Any ideas???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well all I can tell you is what I did, which was filled in the N244, photocopied letter and statements etc highlighting the charges, did a spreadsheet from the templates library on CAG showing the charges etc.

 

I worked on the basis that if I gave them all the info I wouldn't have to take it them later and they could have a good look before the hearing.

 

Yes you will probably have to go to a hearing but it's very informal. You and the DJ in a smallish room sitting at opposite ends of a long table. The claimants may or may not turn up, in my case they didn't, they wrote to the court instead saying why they opposed the set aside. The DJ reads your stuff, reads theirs, asks questions and makes a decision based purely on the law and what info you've supplied which shows you have a valid reason for your request and that you have a reasonable chance of not having a judgement entered against you had you received the original paperwork and defended.

 

Hope this helps. And the very best of luck.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a little key advice.

 

Do your set aside application using an affidavit in support. Use something like the following

 

"

With respect to this claim, the first time I found out about it was on DATE, when I recieved a court judgement. I did not recieve any court documentation before this. I am therefore applying for this set aside within X working days of being notified of this matter. It is public knowledge that the postal service is suffering huge delays and problems due to recurrent postal strikes.

 

If I had recieved the claim form, i would have defended it on the basis of an unenforceable credit agreement and a counter claim of unlawful penalty charges.

 

On the DATE, a request was made under section 78-79, of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, to obtain a copy of a credit agreement that the alleged debt refers to. It was sent by DELIVERY METHOD to the Claimant’s Solicitors, with the statutory £1.00 fee enclosed. It was received on the DATE, which gave the Claimant twelve working days from receipt of the request, to provide said document, which is stipulated in Regulation 2 of The Consumer Credit (Prescribed Periods for Giving Information) Regulations 1983. The claimant has not provided this document. Accordingly, having failed to produce a credit agreement within the requisite timescale or at all, the Claimants are in default of said request under section 78(6)(a) or 79(6)(a) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

I deny that there has been any failure to make payment in accordance with the alleged contract. The Claimant has failed to produced a copy of a properly executed credit agreement and in the absence of such an agreement, which conforms to sections 60 and 61 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, I avers that no agreement has ever existed for there to have been any failure to make said payment.

 

It is denied that any Default Notice in the prescribed format was ever received and the Defendant puts the Claimant to strict proof that said document in the prescribed format was delivered to the defendant.

 

In respect of that which is denied, during the period in which the Account was operating the claimant debited numerous charges to the Account in respect of purported breaches of contract on the part of the Claimant and also charged interest on the charges once applied. The defendant understands that the claimant contends that the charges were debited in accordance with the terms of the contract between itself and the Claimant.

 

I contend that:

 

a) The charges debited to the Account are punitive in nature; are not a genuine pre-estimate of cost incurred by the claimant; exceed any alleged actual loss to the claimant in respect of any breaches of contract on the part of the defendant; and are not intended to represent or related to any alleged actual loss, but instead unduly enrich the Claimant which exercises the contractual term in respect of such charges with a view to profit.

 

b) The contractual provision that permits the Claimant to levy such charges is unenforceable by virtue of the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations (1999) and the common law.

 

 

Accordingly I put the Claimant to strict proof that every charge and collection charge made to the account was valid and lawful. I aver that any default notice sent would have included these charges.

 

I put the claimant to strict proof that any default notice sent to me was valid. I note that to be valid, a default notice needs to be accurate in terms of both the scope and nature of breach. If the claimant sent a default notice that includes unlawful charges, this default notice is invalid under English law for the reason that it is inaccurate and so the claimant may not seek to enforce this debt.

 

Further, the claimant states that I have refused to pay sums due under agreement. In its particulars of claim, it has not explained under what terms of any agreement these sums were due and I put the claimant to strict proof that said monies are due.

  • Haha 2

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You can attach copies of any documents to the claim form.

 

edit: the affidavit form is http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n285_0499.pdf ... take it to the court, and get them to witness it (it's free) or to a soliciter (probably around £2-5)

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thomas, as always, fab advice.

 

Heh, thanks :) you gave some good advice too:)

 

The application form Rodblynd mentioned is available http://www.hmcourts-service.gov.uk/courtfinder/forms/n244_0400.pdf

 

You want to use something like

 

1 - at a hearing

2 - 10 mins

3 - no

5 - distict judge

6 - claimant

 

fill in the side on the right (you are the defendant)

 

part a

 

I apply for the judgement to be set aside

 

because i did not recieve the claim form, and the judgement was issued in default

 

part b

the attached affidavit

 

sign it.

 

Take three copies of everything to the court.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers, Tom, superb that!!!:-) :-) :-)

 

Don't know how you know all that posh jargon but i'm glad you do! I really appreciate the effort you've put in to help me - the way you've phrased things is much better than I could have achieved. In fact, I think the statement you wrote for me should be in a sticky or the library for others to use who don't get the benefit of your advice.

 

I will word my N24 and affidavit with confidence now.

 

:confused: Just time for afew more queries:

 

1 Will I definitely get a hearing to set aside the judgement?

 

2 If , (and it looks unlikely), the judge hears my evidence at the set aside hearing and says, 'No chance - pay up', is that it? CCJ!! Or . . . can I appeal on the point of law that is the Wilson case, because it is a HOL precedent?

 

3 Should I bring up any of the defendant's shocking behaviour in harassing me for this alleged debt, including saying by letter that they had deleted the 'Late payment' entries on my credit record, when they hadn't - I have written proof! (This in a previous small claim against them last year where I asked for charges and a deletion of these negative entries , on my POC), or will that just annoy/ confuse the judge? Any opinions welcome.

 

Anyway, for now - thanks to all those who have posted advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers, Tom, superb that!!!:-) :-) :-)

 

Don't know how you know all that posh jargon but i'm glad you do! I really appreciate the effort you've put in to help me - the way you've phrased things is much better than I could have achieved. In fact, I think the statement you wrote for me should be in a sticky or the library for others to use who don't get the benefit of your advice.

 

I will word my N24 and affidavit with confidence now.

 

:confused: Just time for afew more queries:

 

1 Will I definitely get a hearing to set aside the judgement?

 

No. It's at the discretion of the judge. That's rather like asking me if Australia will definitely win at cricket. However, the arguments rehersed in the set aside application are substantially the same as other arguments I've seen that have got a set aside.

 

2 If , (and it looks unlikely), the judge hears my evidence at the set aside hearing and says, 'No chance - pay up', is that it? CCJ!! Or . . . can I appeal on the point of law that is the Wilson case, because it is a HOL precedent?

 

That very much depends if a higher court gives you permission to appeal.

3 Should I bring up any of the defendant's shocking behaviour in harassing me for this alleged debt, including saying by letter that they had deleted the 'Late payment' entries on my credit record, when they hadn't - I have written proof! (This in a previous small claim against them last year where I asked for charges and a deletion of these negative entries , on my POC), or will that just annoy/ confuse the judge? Any opinions welcome.

 

Don't do it in the set aside application, but you can mention it to the judge when you meet them.

 

Anyway, for now - thanks to all those who have posted advice.

..

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Update:

 

Rushed back from work to put in my application for the set aside at my local court. Got there just in time, 10 to 4, and then was told that they could not process it and I have to send it to Northampton!

 

Apparently the clerk at Northampton CC had give me incorrect advice so that was irritating to say the least. Anyway, it was not a wasted trip as I did get the court staff to witness the affadvit, as advised by Tomterm.

 

Now I will send the aplication notice, affadavit, supporting documents and a covering letter to the judge, to Northampton CC first thing in the morning.

 

I think that's all I can do at the moment.

 

By the way, Tom, the superb affadavit you wrote was slightly too long for the form, when typing it. I thought about adding an extra page but wasn't sure. In the end I cut a little part about the default notices, but I don't think it detracted from the quality of it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Use Special delivery, next day delivery; don't use first class post.

 

the default notice section isn't necessary, but in itself it provides a complete defence to the CCJ. Lots of people get away with only the charge and CCA arguments, though.

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Got a N271 court letter yesterday - 'NOTICE OF TRANSFER OF PROCEEDING TO ANOTHER COUNTY COURT.'

 

Basically, this is good news - the case has been transferred from Northampton to Warrington County Court, which is where I got the affadavit signed. So at least I know that they received my application for the set aside.

 

Now I have to wait and see if the District judge will give me the set aside . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Result!:)

 

Just posting to say thanks to those who have helped me in fighting this CCJ. In particular, Tomterm, Rory32 and Robdblynd - cheers!!

 

 

Basically, this is what has happened in the past 6 weeks:

 

1. Using Tomterm's excellent template, I applied for a set aside.

 

2. Within 10 days the Incasso solicitors, who had applied for the CCJ on behalf of Tesco personal Finance, wrote top me with a Notice of Discontinuance! They had dropped the case!

 

3. I was relieved and amazed at this but then I got a date from the court for the Set Aside hearing.

 

4. I wrote to the court to tell them the the case had been dropped so why did they still want a hearing? This was also the reason I've not posted for a while because I was expecting confirmation from the court on the issue of removal of the CCJ but they seemed oblivious to the NoD.

 

5. A few days ago I received the good news - the court has set aside the judgement and removed the CCJ!!

 

The strangest thing is that no sooner than Incasso drop the case, then a barrage of other DCAs / collection agents have started writing to me about the very same debt - are they stupid or what? The latest one is Intrum Justitia, who have been informed that they are pursuing fresh air, there is no debt anymore, read this copy of a Notice of Discontinuance from your beloved and intellectual client . . .

 

Anyway, cheers all who posted, BAE

Link to post
Share on other sites

BAE, I am delighted you were seuccessful, well done.

 

You will get others trying to get money out of you, it's the nature of the beast I'm afraid.

 

Now you've seen you can fight back .... go for the throat.

 

I'm pleased I was able to help, even if it was only in a small way. And if ever need any advice again, just yell and CAG will come running. :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Great news BAE :D Couldn't be happier for you.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Thanks for the comments, Rob, Rory, PT.

 

Yes, Rory, there will be many, many more battles ahead but with the people on this site ready to help and support there are no worries on my part!!

 

Once you've fought back against the DCAs, CC companies, banks etc you realise their ignorance and total lack of morals. I'm at the point where I quite enjoy the antics they try on me and find their flounderings,(is that a word?) highly amusing! Like a lot of people on this site I've come to a point where I'm not at all bothered by what they throw at me. I look at the legal angle and say, "No, you can't actually do that, let me tell YOU what is going to happen . . . "

 

Anyway, thanks again and PT, I will have that scanned form asap . . .

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...