Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Today has been hectic so  have been unable to complete the whole thing. If you now understand it and want to go ahead with a complaint to the IPC, fine. If not then I won't need to finish it. But below is my response to your request  on post 64. No you don't seem stupid, the Protection of Freedoms Act isn't easy to get one 's head around at first. The part of the above Act referring to private parking is contained within Schedule 4 which you can find online under the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Section 9 of SCH.4 relates to how the parking scrotes have to perform so that they can transfer their right to pursue the keeper from the driver when the PCN is still unpaid after a certain amount of time. In your case the PCN was posted to you the keeper and arrived within 14 days from when they claimed a breach occurred. That means they complied with first part of the Act. The driver at that time was still responsible to pay the charge demanded on the PCN and PCM now have to wait for 28 days to elapse before they can write and advise the keeper that as the charge has not been paid, that they now have the right to pursue the keeper. They claim they sent the first PCN on the 13th March, five days after the alleged breach and it arrived on Friday 15th March. So to comply with the Act they have to observe Section 8 subsection 2f   (f)warn the keeper that if, after the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which the notice is given— (i)the amount of the unpaid parking charges specified under paragraph (d) has not been paid in full, and (ii)the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver, the creditor will (if all the applicable conditions under this Schedule are met) have the right to recover from the keeper so much of that amount as remains unpaid. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So the first PCN was deemed to arrive on the 15th March and for 28 days to have elapsed is when the time is right for them to write and say you are now liable as keeper. So they sent the next PCN on the 12th April which is too early as you could still have paid until midnight of the 12th. So the earliest their second PCN should have gone to you was  Saturday 13th April so more likely on Monday 15th April. The IPC Code of Conduct states "Operators must be aware of their legal obligations and implement the relevant legislation and guidance when operating their businesses." So by issuing your demand a day early, they have broken the Act, the IPC Code of Conduct, the DVLA agreement  to abide by the law and the Code of Conduct not to mention a possible breach of your GDPR .   I asked the IPC  in the letter on an earlier to confirm that  CPMs Notice misrepresenting the law was a standard practice for all of PCMs Notices or just certain ones. Their distribution  may depend on when they were issued and whether they were issued in certain localities or for certain breaches. Whichever method used is a serious breach of the Law and could lead to PCM being black listed by the DVLA . One would expect that after that even if the IPC did not cancel your ticket, PCM could not risk going to Court with you nor even pursuing you any further.
    • thanks jk2054 - do you know any law i can quote (regarding timeframe) when sending the email as if i cant they'll probably just say no like the normal staff have done? thanks.
    • I lived there with her up until I gave notice. She took over the tenancy in her name. I had a letter from the council and a refund of the council tax for 1 month.    She took on the bills and tenancy and only paid the rent. No utility bills or council tax were paid once she took it over. She will continue to not pay bills in her new house which I'm now having to pay or will have to. I have looked online I believe the police and solicitors are going by the partner law to make me liable.   I have always paid my bills and ensured her half was paid then see how much free money is over.   She spends all her money on payday loans and rubbish then panics about the rent. I usually end up paying it or having to get her a loan.   Stupidly in my name but at the time it was because she was my partner. I even paid to move her and clean and decorate her old house so she got the deposit back. It cost me £3000 due to the mess she always leaves behind.
    • Paula Venomous refused to resign for 16 months and eventually did only because a doctor threatened to resign. Interesting snippets and insights in the article. Paula Vennells clung on to ‘plum’ NHS role after Horizon scandal ARCHIVE.PH archived 19 May 2024 21:49:07 UTC  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC - removing default from credit


QD1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6059 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

The default on my credit history was mostly as a result of charges, but ideally I am looking to get it removed straight as quickly as possible.

 

Do you think it would be quicker to reclaim my charges and demand removal as the default was as a result of charges, or whether to demand the cca paperwork (as I KNOW that none was received).

 

Im not actually all that interested in reclaiming my charges from them as it was less than £250, I am just looking to get the default removed asap.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it were me I would go the whole hog with them, end of the day the charges were applied unlawfully.

 

Is it just a standard bank account, credit card etc? Not sure where you would stand with regards to the CCA request, although even if you were fully in the right, which I'm sure you are, HSBC will most likely come back with a fob off letter saying the CCA 1974 sections 77-79 doesn't apply. They're good like that.

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

It was a standard bank account with no overdraft facility and only a solo card. Somehow I defaulted on £202 :mad:

 

Ive moved since the account was closed in 2003. At a push I am able to use my old address as a mailing address, but would rather use my current one for ease.

 

Should I send proof of address when sending off my SAR?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would yes, a copy of a utility bill etc.

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

That is true, if you do a Consumer Credit Act 1977 section 78 request and they cant provide a true copy of the credit agreement within 12 days the account is in default. If that continues for a further calendar month they are committing a statutory criminal offense and the account becomes unrecoverable.

 

As you say if you get the account into this position I think you will have a good case to demand to have the credit defaults removed from your record.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

What if they never agreed to give me credit? Will that make it easier?

 

I simply had a bank account with them, without an overdraft and with only a solo card. They somehow reckon that I defaulted on £202, which was obviously made up of charges, but to be honest Im really not interested in the charges, I just want to remove the default. According to my credit record, I defaulted on 29/5/2003 and it was satisfied at the last update which was on 27/7/2003.

 

Today I drafted a S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) regarding charges, but I also included a bit asking for a copy of the credit agreement under s.78. Would you send that letter? Or would you send two seperate letters?

 

Im aware that they have 40 days to respond to the S.A.R - (Subject Access Request) but less to the s.78 request. for the sake of £200 Im not really all that interested in the money. The default is seriously harming my job prospects as a mortgage advisor.

Link to post
Share on other sites

How does this letter sound?

 

Dear Sir/Madam

Account number – 5434 XXXXXXXXXX

 

After recently obtaining a copy of my credit file from Experian I was concerned to note that your company has placed a "Default" notice against an account in my name.

 

 

Further to this I have no recollection of ever receiving such a notice, and I therefore require you to substantiate this data at your earliest convenience.

 

1. You must supply me with a true copy of the alleged agreement you refer to. This is my right under your obligation to supply a copy of the agreement under the legislation contained within s.78 (1) Consumer Credit Act 1974 (s.77 (1) for fixed sum credit). Your obligation also extends to providing a statement of account. I enclose a £1 cheque in payment of the statutory fee, Cheque number xxxxxx.

 

 

2. You must supply me with a signed true and certified copy of the original default notice

 

I would request that this data is provided to me within the next 14 days, if you are unable to provide this data then I must insist that it is removed from my files as unsubstantiated.

 

 

In addition, take this letter to be a Subject Action Request and please supply me with a complete list of transactions and charges relating to my banking history with your organisation. Alternatively, a complete set of statements for that period will be acceptable.

 

Additionally, where there has been any event in my account history over this period which has required manual intervention by any member of your staff, or any other person, I require disclosure of any indication or notes which have either caused or resulted in that manual intervention, or other evidence of that manual intervention in relation to my banking business with you.

 

If you are unable to supply this data because there has been no such manual intervention, then please be so kind as to confirm this in your response.

 

I enclose the statutory maximum fee of £10. You have 40 days in which to comply. Furthermore, if I discover that you have levied disproportionate penalties against me, then I shall be reclaiming them, and also reclaiming the enclosed £10 Data Protection Act subject access request fee.

 

If there is specific information which you require in order to satisfy yourself as to my identity, please let me know by return. However, please note that the above address is the one which you normally use to communicate my private business to me and which you have hitherto found to be acceptable.

I would be happy to collect the Data from my local branch.

 

Should you forthwith remove the default from my credit history and send me written confirmation within 14 days, please disregard my Subject Action Request without prejudice to any future requests.

Yours faithfully

Link to post
Share on other sites

Couple of suggestions:

 

1. Subject Access Request as opposed to Subject Action Request

 

2. Which address are you using? I ask because of your earlier questions where I suggested a recent utility bill as proof of address. IF using your current address, which I believe is different then I would change that last but one paragraph to read something along the lines of;

 

"If there is specific information you require inorder to satisfy my identity please let me know by return. In the meantime please find enclosed copies of blah blah blah which you should find acceptable."

 

Hope that helps :)

DCA's - they have the same power as an infinite number of untrained chimps working on a script for Hamlet, but the chimps would probably at least get it right :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Today I sent pretty much the above letter, but with details of my new address and copies of ID and utility bills for my new address.

 

I emailed it with the scans of my documents and I also sent it recorded delivery with the copies and the cheque.

 

I think it will be quite interesting to see what happens. If I emailed it, as well as posting it, can I start counting from today?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I have just received a letter from HSBC

 

....Having had the opportunity to investigate you concerns I can confirm that my records indicate your account was closed and the outstanding balance of £202.86 passed to our recovery agents on 27 May 2003 following the issue of Final Demand.

 

Final Demand was issued on 24 April 2003 as the account was being operated outside of its agreed terms and conditions. At that stage the account was overdrawn and inactive. Regrettably due to the passage of time that has lapsed since the closure of your account I am unable to provide you with a copy of the final demand...

 

As a subscriber to the Credit Reference Bureau the Bank has an obligation to other lenders who use the data in assessing credit applications to ensure that this information is accurate.

 

I am satisfied that the entries recorded with Credit Reference Agencies provides a fair and accurate representation of the manner in which your account had been operated. In these circumstances, it would not be appropriate to amend them.

So they have not provided me with a copy of the default notice, nor the CCA and they have pretty much said that they are unable to provide a copy of the default notice.

 

Can anyone help me with the next letter I write to them? I know that they must removed the default on my history if they cannot provide the paperwork, but under what grounds do I need to request it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

QD1,

 

I have to say I am fighting a similar case with the Woolwich, HOWEVER, in my case the account is so old they have no info on the whole thing so cannot say how it occured. If they can show exactly how you got into negative and so it was passed to a DCA then I am sorry to say there is not much you can do. IMHO.

 

The only thing is via the bank charges route etc, but as you pointed out before this is on hold for now. The best you can do is put it into dispute via the CRA's and hope that the OFT case does not take too long. The CCA route does not apply for overdrafts as I have discovered. If you read the posts you will see the relevant legal angles, which believe me I have explored...

 

Penfold

PS It's not what you want to hear

Link to post
Share on other sites

They should have this information they are bound by the banking code and the data protection act to hold all information regarding your account for 6 years.

 

If they have no information regarding the defaults posted against your name demand they are removed imediatly and confirm if they do not do this within 14 days and confirm back to you this has been done you will report them to the FSA and the FOS.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...