Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Request for Payment sent on 9th March 2006


intersimi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6562 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hummm, still no refund of the charge!

 

I phoned the Branch manager who refunded the charge, and whom I recorded. They said they were sorry, the refund was showing on the system. After they checked, they said that they have a lot of refunds going through at the moment and that it should be paid in today.

 

It seems to be that either of two possibilies have occured:

 

a. They have not paid it back and were waiting to see if I chace it up

 

b. They do have a genuine backlog and this process is manual.

 

In eaither case it is not really acceptable. I recoreded this conversation too :). But for my own private use (did not tell them)

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 136
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

It has been quite a busy day today regarding Lloyds.

 

First of all, I get a phone call at midday in relation to my letter. The first letter requesting my charges back. The lady informed me of the terms and conditions (as she is programmed to do), I informed her that they are unlawful etc etc etc. She then went on to say that I have £70 of charges coming out of my account this month and that she would waive these charges as a king gesture from the bank. I informed her of my second letter and that I have given them another 14 days before going to court.

 

Then, I come home to find a latter stating that they have recieved by request for DPA and have 40 days from reciept of £10 payment to supply them (I did not send a cheque).

 

Then I check my home e-mail and see the following e-mails:

 

Letter Before action

 

Thanks for your e-mail.

 

I have passed this on to Mandy Horton, the designated case handler dealing with your concerns.

 

Regards

 

Keith Boden

Lloyds TSB

Service Recovery

Birmingham

 

and this one:

 

Our Ref : xxx/xx/xx/xxxxxx

 

Dear Mr Intersimi

 

Thank you for your e-mail's dated March 2006 and March 2006.

 

Unfortunately I am unable to add any further information to Mandy Horton's letter dated 10 March 2006 and can only refer you to the terms and conditions of your account. However, I respect that you have your own opinion about our charges.

 

Regarding your request for details of charges on your account since March 2000, I can advise that I am prepared to accept your request under the Data Protection Act. However I should point out that there is normally a £10 fee for information requested under Data Protection, although I am prepared to waive this on this occasion. I have asked for copy statements to be produced for the period in question, which will highlight the charges you have referred to and I will send these to you within the next three weeks, which I trust will be acceptable.

 

This letter is the bank's final response, which means that if you remain dissatisfied you may refer your complaint to the Financial Ombudsman Service. If you decide to pursue your complaint through the Financial Ombudsman Service you must do so within 6 months from the date of this letter. I have attached a leaflet, which outlines how to contact them.

 

 

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

 

David Just

Assistant Manager

 

>

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. When you issue your County Court claim, include all charges. The preliminary letters are invitations to them to start a dialogue.

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry Richard.

 

I have two accounts with Lloyds, my main account, which I am in the middle of processing with the bank, plus a seperate account. My seperate account had charges applied to it a few years back.

 

Basically, I have only mentioned my main bank account in my letter to the bank. Can I also claim via the court for my other account charges?

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would suggest that you write now to Lloyds reclaiming the charges on your second account. Give them the 3 weeks, then combine the two in your claim to the County Court. Knowing the way the donkey's lawyers operate, this might be the easiest option for you even though it gives them a little more time. If the total claim is over £5000, however seperate them. Let one go through and then start second claim.

The law, in its majestic equality, forbids the rich as well as the poor to sleep under bridges, to beg in the streets, and to steal bread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am on one claim now (main account) going back 4 years. This is almost £3000, when my statements turn up, I could well be close to the £5000, so I think I will only claim for the main account this time around, then when that is all done, make a start on my other account (only about £250 owed).

 

Would that be reasonable?

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a large letter come in the post today containing all of my bank charges going back to August 2001, and then photo copies of statements going back to January 2000.

 

I have added up the total amounts and have a revised figure of: £3500

 

That means with the Interest from the courts (if it goes that far) it will be a total of: £3700 So that is what I will be claiming when I go to court. I am also going to e-mail LloydsTSB so that they know the revised amount.

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is my e-mail to the Bank:

 

I have now recieved my statements going back the full 6 years as requested. Please accept my thanks for this.

 

I am now able to make a corrected figure of the unlawful charges that you have taken from me over the 6 year period. The total figure now stands at £3500. The interest charge as originally stated by myself are not owed to me, as they are a lawful charge by yourselves.

 

I re-iterate that the charges I have requested are in the sum of £3500 since 7th August 2000. You have until 6th April to make full payment to me, or else I will proceed with legal action to retrieve the said amounts.

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have had another letter from LloydsTSb and not a moment too soon I might add, as I am due to start my Court Claim tomorrow.

 

Dear Mr InterSimi

 

I am writing to acknowledge your e-mail dated April.

 

I have noted that you are requesting a full refund of charges amounting to £3500. However, I can only reiterate the comments that have been made to you in our previous correspondence.

 

You had the bank's final response on March 2006 and therefore, your recourse is now through the Financial Ombudsman Service.

 

Yours Sincerly,

 

Mandy Horton

Assistant Manager

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you want to give them a final kick before raising your claim tomorrow, you may wish to send this to Mandy Horton:

I thank you for the furnished information regarding the Financial Ombudsman Service. Whilst I fully intend to raise this issue with the Ombudsman, I realise that I am able to do this in my own time, and will do so once the issue has been resolved to my complete satisfaction. I understand the bank's intention in offering this route to resolution, and am fully aware that this is merely a diversionary tactic, designed to stall my timetable, and to undermine my determination to seek full financial restitution for the inconvenience this has caused me.

Alecto, Magaera et Tisiphone: Nemesis on Earth is come.

 

All advice and opinions given by Spiceskull are personal, and are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

My Claim has been submitted via Money Claim. Once files, they have to check it. I am passed that stage now (take a day or so). Now my status on Moneyline is:

 

spacer.gifLloydsTSB

xxxxxxxxxxxx

Issued

Your claim request has been accepted. The Defendant has 14 days from the date they are served with the claim, to reply.

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had a letter from the court today.

 

I know this website is not too clear in the process of what happens during the court process, so here is what my letter says:

 

Your claim was issued on April 2006

The court sent it to the defendant by first class post on the April 2006 and it will be deemed served on the April 2006

The defendant has until April 2006 to Reply.

 

The defendant may

+ Pay your total claim

+ File and acknowledgment of the service.This will allow the defendant 28 days from the date of service of your particulars of claim to file a defence or contest the court's juristiction

+ Dispute the whole claim. The court will send you a copy of the defence.

+ Admit that all the money is owed. The defendant will send you a completed admission form and you may ask the court to enter judgement.

+ Admin that only part of your claim is owed. The court will send you a copy of the reply form and you will have to decide what to do next.

+ Not reply at all. You may ask the court to enter judgement

 

So, my time line is as follows:

 

April - If no reply from the bank, I win and have to claim so via Moneyline

May - If Lloyds enter a defence, this is the court date

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hiya, I too have had exactly the same response letter. In your first post you said you felt you should prepare yourself for the worst - you need to prepare for this as I have gone through the letters procedure with Lloyds and no result. I will be issuing my claim at Court today or tomorrow. Do not look at it as 'the worst', look at it as an opportunity to get justice and get back what has been illegally taken from you.

 

The only issue I have is that since I sent the letters to Lloyds asking for a refund of charges for a specific amount, the amount has risen due to more charges. Do I now sue for the amount I have been asking for in the letters, or the new increased amount? I cant find this query anywhere so if anyone can advise I would be grateful.

 

AG

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

How about you send Bookworm a private message, rather than use someone elses post! You just confuse issues this way

 

 

MOD: Don't worry, I'll delete them from your thread. This is hijacking of the worst kind and won't be tolerated.

regards,

 

InterSimi

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6562 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...