Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Everyone knows the tories were hiding the costs - and even added 4 billion quid to the taxpayers high interest credit card to fund a chunk of the NI tax reduction - prime example - look at how much cost was hidden re the Rwanda dogwhistle -10 Billion quid     and re the handful of rebels on the benefit limit If the disasters (like the Rwanda rubbish) of Tory dogs being wagged by the extremist minority ERG tail doesn't highlight the issues .. Enlighten yourself here .. (fat chance) Sir Keir Starmer is right to show Labour rebels the door WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK Editorial: Suspending seven MPs following their rebellion over the two-child benefit cap is more than a prime minister flexing his political muscle. It is a...  
    • Trump instigated that didnt he @theoldrouge despite losing the election - and Biden mitigated as much as he could within his boundaries?   "President Donald Trump ordered a rapid withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Afghanistan and Somalia in the wake of his 2020 election loss"   “The order was for an immediate withdrawal, and it would have been catastrophic,” said Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of two Republican members of the special panel. “And yet President Trump signed the order.”   Trump ordered rapid withdrawal from Afghanistan after election loss WWW.MILITARYTIMES.COM The memo was among the latest revelations from the congressional committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol building.   Although i agree that Biden should have done more to mitigate Trump driven disasters
    • ok your WS is wrong. Paragraph 16 and 17 says  you did not contract with evri but this is not true - see below  Furthermore to the eBay Powered By Packlink T&Cs that Evri is referring to, Clauses 3b and c of the T&Cs states:  (b)   Packlink is a package dispatch search engine that acts as an intermediary between its Users and Transport Agencies. Through the Website, Users can check the prices that different Transport Agencies offer for shipments and contract with the Transport Agency that best suits their needs on-line. (c)  Each User shall then enter into its own contract with the chosen Transport Agency. Packlink does not have any control over, and disclaims all liability that may arise in contracts between a User and a Transport Agency post 251 of occy thread - £844 lost    you should also add a paragraph on donough v Stevenson talking about the fact that even without contract there is still duty of care to goods and by failing to deliver this duty has been breached.   Make those changes and post it back up here and I'll check over things again
    • no we cant add the occy thing because leicster are being difficult people so we're just going to go without it for now
    • no you can email it dont worry about that. take out the index of statement of truth, just not needed
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 162 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Can My Landlord do this?????


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6143 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good day

On the 25th November 2006 i signed a six months fixed tennancy agreement for a two bed cottage paid a months rent £450 and two months deposit £900 and after six months the tennancy wiil revert to a month to month tennancy

 

On the 31st July 2007 i gave one months written notice that i will be leaving the cottage on the 29th August 2007 and i hand posted the notice through my LL home letterbox.

 

four days passed with no reply so i sent the same letter by recorded delivery and my LL finally replied to me on the 6th August.

 

A couple of days later i recieved a rather frosty letter from my LL who said that i should have given a full calender months notice and because my month to month starts on the 25 August that in effect i have only given 19 days Notice and if they re -let the house out on before i leave then there will be no problem

 

To cut a long story short i moved out of the cottage on the 1st September. The LL did the inventory and meters check and signed a note to say that the cottage was left in a clean state and all is well.

 

He then said that he spoke to his solicitor who told him that i can not leave mid month.

And his his words ( that the clock will keep ticking until he finds a new tennant. Then he will send me an itemised statement with a cheque for whats left of my £900 Deposit.

 

He assured me that he had a tennant moving in soon and that we would recive the bill /statement in the next few days.

 

It has been twenty days since and i have recieved nothing also i have seen the cottage re advertised in the paper .

 

I feel that my deposit has gone but i also know that the LL has a legal right to take up to 30 days to repay the deposit.

 

I have decided that i am going to take my LL to the small Claims court from the 1st october as i feel i have a strong case IE

  • I have mobile statements to prove that i tried to contact my LL at least 18 times from the 2nd – 6th august, to show that my notice period started on the 31st July/1st August and not on the 6th August as my LL Says it started
  • There is no mention of giving a full calendar month in the tennancy agreement
  • I have taken multi pictures of every room inside and outside to show the courts that the house was left spotless
  • I stayed for the full notice pediod

So the only Questions i have is

 

 

can my LL do this?

 

Does it matter in a court of law that i did not give my notice to quit before the start of the month to month (25th of the month) and waited untill the 31st?

 

I have just brought a house of my own so hopefully i wont have to put up with this **** again but i want my money back and i want to stop this LL doing this again to the next tennant.

 

Thanks for taking time out to read this posting and i look forward to the repiles

Hines316

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 1 month notice can be from anytime after the end of the tenancy agreement, so if you serve notice on the 6th then you leave on the 6th of the next month.

 

But wait to hear from the more informed members, as my opinion is not an expert one unfortunately.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure where you get that info lok, but its wrong...

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

He then said that he spoke to his solicitor who told him that i can not leave mid month.

And his his words ( that the clock will keep ticking until he finds a new tennant. Then he will send me an itemised statement with a cheque for whats left of my £900 Deposit.

 

Those bits sound really dodgy, sounds like he's tried this [problem] before.

 

Then apologies to Hines & MrShed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not sure where you get that info lok, but its wrong...

 

If you know its wrong, why not put what is correct. instead of just leaving that. I can't see how your post helped, the OP is still no better off

 

 

You cannot leave mid month. You can only leave at the end of a rent period.

 

If you pay the rent on the 1st of the month, you can only officially leave the property on the first.

 

Maybe MrShed, if you'd put something like this, it would have helped the OP

Link to post
Share on other sites

With respect PKea, I would suggest you check my post history, before slating my perhaps one abrupt post. I unfortunately work, and sometimes I actually have to do work at work, so have time to leave only a very brief message. My message made it clear that what lok and the OP thought was the case was not, and so did help emphasise that the position they had thought was wrong. I was in time, when I got a second, going to return and clarify the position. I thought the important thing in short term was to ensure incorrect advice was not accepted, then less important giving the correct advice. Therefore my post was of some use. However, if you want to see a post that helped no-one at all, the OP or otherwise, feel free to look at your own - it merely consisted of flaming my post, with no real purpose.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

You need to effectively give your months notice before or on the day you pay the rent. To end the tenancy at the end of that months rent period (or agree a pro-rota amount for any days staying over that month period).

 

If you did leave half way through the month, i.e 19 days early you would still be liable for that 19 days rent which the landlord could take out the deposit. Essientally you would owe the landlord till 24th September.

 

He should however only take out that amount and not anymore from the deposit if the money is still outstanding. If the landlord cannot find a new tenant, he cannot charge you for the rent of the property after the 24th.

Ex-Retail Manager who is happy to offer helpful advise in many consumer problems based on my retail experience. Any advise I do offer is my opinion and how I understand the law.

Link to post
Share on other sites

After my rant above, I shall embellish. You are liable for rent until the 24th of September. It is impossible, from my reading of your posts, to actually give a full answer, as you have not actually said up until which date you were paid up for the rent - we need to know this. Also, there are as you say potential deductions for damages in addition to outstanding rent, which you are awaiting confirmation from the landlord for. Post these when you get them. As for the 30 day timescale you quote, this is an advisory by professional bodies - it is not written in law anywhere.

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

With respect PKea, I would suggest you check my post history, before slating my perhaps one abrupt post.

 

MrShed

 

First I must apologise for the brief thread Hijack.

 

As I can easily check your post history, with experience of this site, a newcomer may not know how to do this.

I was merely pointing out that your post will have just left the OP in limbo, for the sake of adding onto your post 'I will clarify later' or words to that effect.

 

I apologise for having a go at you personally, but it seems that the responses to people’s problems on this site are sadly lacking in some instances. Where moderators or site helpers, rather than explain an answer, will just post a link. To a newcomer this doesn’t help, because all they will find is the answer someone else has received and understood. It doesn’t mean that the other person will still understand it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll forget it if you will :) lol. I agree in general regards non constructive/non embellished answers. As you will probably see, 99% of the time I actually go into considerably more detail than required. Just sometimes I get called away from my desk whilst trying to type an answer, makes it difficult to do so!

7 years in retail customer service

 

Expertise in letting and rental law for 6 years

 

By trade - I'm an IT engineer working in the housing sector.

 

Please note that any posts made by myself are for information only and should not and must not be taken as correct or factual. If in doubt, consult with a solicitor or other person of equal legal standing.

 

Please click the star if I have helped!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't see where the rent payment date comes into it?

The periodic tenancy started the day after the initial 6 month tenancy finished. So if the tenancy was 6 months from and including 25 November it would have expired on 24 May and the periodic tenacy would run from 25 May to the 24 of the next month and so on.

The date you pay your rent isn't relevant surely?

The rent payment PERIOD is relevant to the PERIOD of the periodic tenancy but not to the date on which those periods start and end.

Is that not right?

If it is then the poster hasn't given the correct notice so the tenancy continues surely?

Link to post
Share on other sites

So to clarify hines316,

 

If the LL hasnt found a replacement tenant, then he will be able to make you pay rent up until the 24th September, which based on a £450 monthly rent would be £340.27 (450*12 / 365 * 23) assuming you have paid upto and including 1st September when you moved.

 

Whether the LL is arguing with you about the date notice was served (31st July or 6th August) is a mute point as rent is still payable to 24th September, as a clear months notice is required (ending on the same date in the month that the original fixed period ended, which may or may not be the rent due date - 1988 Housing Act).

 

As you have a signed note from the LL saying all is well with the house, I think you can write a polite letter stating that you accept that rent was due to the 24th September, and reminding him of the obligation to return the remaining £560 quid. If no luck then letter before action and small claims for the £560 + court fee + interest.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking this matter back to basics (and thank you for giving all relevant dates) was the notice given valid and in time?

Good day

On the 25th November 2006 i signed a six months fixed tenancy agreement for a two bed cottage paid a months rent £450 and two months deposit £900 and after six months the tenancy wiil revert to a month to month tenancy

 

On the 31st July 2007 i gave one months written notice that i will be leaving the cottage on the 29th August 2007 and i hand posted the notice through my LL home letterbox.

The rent day is the 25th of the month. The Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (clarified by Laine v Cadwallader 2000) requires notice monthly periodic tenancy to end on a rent day, and be a minimum of 4 weeks. Thus (and it will change depending on the month) for the notice to be valid for 25th August, it would have needed to have been served before 28th July. Even if you had evidence it was personally served on 31 July it was insufficient notice. Thus the 4 weeks runs from 25 August making it finish on 21 September.

 

21 September is the correct date for rent due, not 24 September.

 

Sadly, you cannot change the rent day after the event. The rent day can change, but this should be done in writing so both parties are in agreement.

 

In law, depending on how much the landlord deducts for needing adequate notice, you won't know until you get it refunded.

 

On some things I am very knowledgeable, on other things I am stupid. Trouble is, sometimes I discover that the former is the latter or vice versa, and I don't know this until later - maybe even much later. Read anything I write with the above in mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

i paid up to the 25th of august and my LL said that he will deduct the six days over i stayed out of the deposit

 

Following on from my previous post, where I state that rent is due to 21 September, if he does this, you are on a winner as he doesn't know what his entitlement is under law.

 

If he does only deduct to 1 September, I would keep quiet and be thankful he is an amateur.

On some things I am very knowledgeable, on other things I am stupid. Trouble is, sometimes I discover that the former is the latter or vice versa, and I don't know this until later - maybe even much later. Read anything I write with the above in mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Taking this matter back to basics (and thank you for giving all relevant dates) was the notice given valid and in time?

 

 

The rent day is the 25th of the month. The Protection from Eviction Act 1977 (clarified by Laine v Cadwallader 2000) requires notice monthly periodic tenancy to end on a rent day, and be a minimum of 4 weeks. Thus (and it will change depending on the month) for the notice to be valid for 25th August, it would have needed to have been served before 28th July. Even if you had evidence it was personally served on 31 July it was insufficient notice. Thus the 4 weeks runs from 25 August making it finish on 21 September.

 

21 September is the correct date for rent due, not 24 September.

 

Sadly, you cannot change the rent day after the event. The rent day can change, but this should be done in writing so both parties are in agreement.

 

In law, depending on how much the landlord deducts for needing adequate notice, you won't know until you get it refunded.

 

 

Erois Trot, I think you need to cllarify your position here as conflicting advice is being given.

 

 

You refer to Protection from eviction act 1977 and Laine v Cadwallader 2000, both of which have been superseeded/modified

 

by 1988 Housing Act (& 1996 Housing Act) and clarified in case law by church commisioners for england vs meya (2006).

 

I believe you are suggesting that the notice period is 4 weeks i.e. 28 days?

What was decided here is that the correct notice period is - what was the rent period of the fixed term -i.e. 1 Month. Therefore the correct date is the 24th September not 21st September as suggested.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...