Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Sorry, I may have forgot to get back on this. Please monitor for a reply tomorrow
    • Yes, now its just about getting the WS / Court bundle finalised to send to the court / Evri. I've attached the most recent version of the WS / Court bundle to save having to scroll back up to the previous post (#204) where it was also shared. If you, @BankFodder or anyone else has any feedback on this, i'd be grateful for your thoughts. In my previous post #204, i'd also attached an invoice from Packlink which shows that I was charged by Packlink for these services: "drop-off at Her mes - Next day delivery" and "Proof of Delivery". It also has the payer's address and there are "Origin" and "Destination" fields which have the postcode of the sender [origin] and the recipient [destination] - I have redacted personal details in the attached invoice.  I am already including this in my evidence bundle (without the redaction) but wanted to share this redacted version so that other people can consider this as example in their bundle of Packlink and Evri's contract being instigated by the sender of the parcel who has paid for the service, and further shows that there is information in the invoice to identify that a third party beneficiary (the sender / recipient) is involved in this transaction. I have also attached this redacted invoice in this post to save having to scroll back up. Happy to get any thoughts and if this invoice is no good, then please let me know.   Draft - Witness Statement and Court Bundle redacted.pdf Packlink invoice - REDACTED.pdf
    • Does anyone know if I would be allowed to record conversations with health professionals for my own use on my phone without them knowing. I know that we are allowed to record phone calls. I do record some of my phone calls for my own use due to my disability and if anything is said then I am covered. I would only record audio in private area's of myself and the professional dealing with me. I know I could not get and other persons audio in it and I don't intend to. my only other option is to buy a body cam but I am not sure the rules regarding this.I never thought i would have to but things are getting worse Thanks for any guidance 
    • Thanks for that. I will give them till Tuesday. Thanks for your help, very much appreciated. 
    • Ok thanks for that, well spotted and all duly noted. Yes they did eventually submit those docs to me after a second letter advising them I was contacting the ICO to make a formal complaint for failing to comply with an earlier SAR that they brushed off as an "administrative error" or something. When I sent the letter telling them I was in contact with the information commissioner to lodge the complaint, the original PCN etc quickly followed along with their excuse!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

It's a NATIONAL-WASTE- MISTER!!!


smokeandmirrors
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6106 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi there, firstly, thanks for all of the useful advice on this forum and for the hours of time that many of you have given freely. My partner and I (under her log-in) have been perusing this site with interest for a couple of weeks. I have now decided to take the plunge and am about to embark on attempting to recover excessive bank charges from Natwest. I have 2 current accounts with Natwest. Phoned on the 14th of June requesting historic bank statements from both accounts (while requesting statements I mentioned that " I understood that I could request them under the Data Protection Act - they offered the last 6 years, which I took ). £5 debited from my account on the 14th June, tatty, brown, ripped envelope arrived on Friday 14th June containing 6 yrs statements for one of my accounts. They managed to 'forget' to process my request for statements from the second account, so will call and chase-up tomorrow.

 

Have gone through statements from account no.1 and have calculated £2,747.00 worth of charges :eek: and £265.71 interest over the last 6 years!!!!:mad:

 

(using the excel spreadsheet as provided in the template library ).:)

 

Planning to send a 'preliminary approach for payment' letter based around the templates so kindly provided, tomorrow, via recorded delivery. Hoping to open back-up account next week.......

 

Here goes, fingers crossed...... will keep you posted!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well done you. It's nice to find someone has done their homework to claim back unfair bank charges, read the FAQ's and clearly got such a good handle on it. Obviously you know we are here if you need us, but keep us posted anyway. I won't bother wishing you luck, because luck doesn't come into it.

 

All the best to you and your:)

  • Confused 1
The Consumer Action Group is a free help site.

Should you be offered help that requires payment please report it to site team.

Advice & opinions given by Caro are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Received the above letter on the 27th June in response to our Preliminary letter (of the 24th June)....... LBA time me-thinks. Received our second lot of statements for account no.2 yesterday and preparing the prelim. letter and charges spreadsheet to send for that account - recorded delivery tomorrow. We're also sending a slightly ammended version of the DPA, as we odered statements originally by 'phone, but want to ensure that we are covered (for the manual intervention clauses etc.), in case things get to court. Double-checking figures on spreadsheets for one last time before sending the Letter Before Action. Time to take the plunge...... anyone out there who's gone all the way - does this sound right? Wish us luck!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi there, we are about to file our claim with the county court but have one question and would be most grateful if someone could advise. I have 2 bank accounts (in the same name) one for which I am claiming 1,648 charges and 195.61 interest (totalling 1,843.62) and the other 2,747 charges and 265.71 interest (totalling 3012.71) can we file one claim for both accounts (Does the 5,000 small claims limit refer to the claim on the charges alone or is the interest included) or is it recommended that we file two separate claims? Thanks!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there, we are about to file our claim with the county court but have one question and would be most grateful if someone could advise. I have 2 bank accounts (in the same name) one for which I am claiming 1,648 charges and 195.61 interest (totalling 1,843.62) and the other 2,747 charges and 265.71 interest (totalling 3012.71) can we file one claim for both accounts (Does the 5,000 small claims limit refer to the claim on the charges alone or is the interest included) or is it recommended that we file two separate claims? Thanks!!!

 

You're ok in small claims as your total is £4590.62 - charges and the 8% interest doesn't figure into that amount for the purposes of determining which track it goes to (ie small claims, fast track, multi track).

  • Confused 1

If my reply or advice was helpful, please click the scales!

-------

DISCLAIMER: My opinions are strictly personal, and should not be taken as a substitute for individual professional legal advice on your own particular situation.

-------

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that thunderpuss :-) Can I clarify then, that the threshhold of 5000 applies to the charges alone that we are claiming for, excluding the interest relating to the charges ...... (I understand that the extra 8% interest doesn't come into play untill actual court stage). Would someone mind confirming then that we can file ONE claim for the total of 4395 charges with 461.32 interest (NOT allowing for the 8% interest) across both accounts held in the same name? MAny many thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would be fine. Just so you know, the court fee would be £250 (recoverable for winners!)

 

Also, you seem to have posted some sort of image in post 3 (now deleted) - this was creating a pop up window for BT dial up whenever this page was opened. Not sure what it was or why, but please be aware that whatever it was created a problem on this site (hence the deletion).

 

Thanks.

  • Confused 1

..

.

 

Opinions given herein are made informally by myself as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for that thunderpuss :-) Can I clarify then, that the threshhold of 5000 applies to the charges alone that we are claiming for, excluding the interest relating to the charges ......

 

Yep, as jonni2bad has said it's fine. To clarify, only the claim itself is taken into account and not any interest - as the claim for interest can add a substantial sum to the claim, especially if the claimant has delayed before issuing proceedings.

 

(so it says in this book I've got in front of me)

If my reply or advice was helpful, please click the scales!

-------

DISCLAIMER: My opinions are strictly personal, and should not be taken as a substitute for individual professional legal advice on your own particular situation.

-------

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 10 months later...

OK - Here's where I've got to so far.......

 

After a mistake on my original claims (an error in my calculations - see this thread where i got some really useful help http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/natwest-bank/84728-urgent-help.html), I applied for an amendment of my claim.

 

The court have written to me saying that I need to red-line in ink my original claim (how very 21st centuary!), rather than submit a new claim with an Application Notice, as I did - follwing the advice on the tread above (no blame on the advisors of course, but a lesson learned and shared for anyone else in the same position).

 

I will be sending my red-lined claim (re-attaching the statement of charges) back this week with a letter explaining my errors to avoid further confusion.

 

In the meantime, I have had an offer from Stuart Higley of Natwest on each of my accounts!!!!

 

The first is for £2,808.00 (the claim is for £2752.51)

and the second is for £2481.00 (the claim is for £4538.10)

 

It appears that there is no relationship between the offer and the claim amounts?!

 

Anyway..... I have read that some people have rejected the offer but suggested that the bank pay it as a part payment.

 

A few questions:

 

Is it wise to suggest that Natwest make the payment as a part payment now?

 

Has anyone been sucessful in getting part payment and then getting the rest through the court?

 

Does anyone have a nicely worded letter I can use?!

 

Should I just reject at this stage as I am already involved in the court process?

 

Help woudl be greatly appreciated as always!

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most people reject the the first offer and carry on through the court stages, but it is your money and your decision.http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html. I returned a cheque twice for £3,700

before they eventually settled.

A person is only as big as the dream they dare to live.

 

 

Good things come to he who waits

 

 

Its your money taken unlawfully from your account and you have a legal right to claim it back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

OK... Here's where I am now....

 

As instructed by the court, I sent my amended claims (now consolidated into one claim as required by the Judge) back to the court and to Cobbetts (both recorded delivery) on the 5th July. It's now the 1st August and I've not had a peep from Cobbetts or the court.

 

Does anyone know whether the time limit for the defence applies where an amended claim is sent in?

 

I'm hoping that someone might be able to advise on what the next stage might be if there is no defence provided...

 

I'm hoping I'm on the last stretch now as it's now been a year since I started the process (admittedly due to my initial mistakes in my first claims). I've still been getting charges on my accounts so if or when I get my money back, I intend to do the same for my charges since Jan 07!

 

Many thanks

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Steve - what stage was your claim at when you filed the amendment? (e.g., what date did you file at court, had you received acknowledgement of service, etc).

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Hedgey - thanks.

 

I had received a defence from Natwest and a letter from the court, transferring my case to my local court. It encloses the Defence and the Request for Further Information and Clarifcation.

 

The letter also states:

 

IT IS ORDERED THAT:-

 

1. The filing of an alocation questionnaite be despensed with in this case unless the District Judge at the court of trandfer orders otherwise.**

 

Note: Any party affected by this Order may under Rule 3.3 (5) apply to have it set aside, varied or stayed. Such aprty must apply under Rule 23.3 within 14 days of this service order.

 

** Please note that an allocation fee may be payable in this instance. Please contact the court of transfer for further details.

 

Does this help - I can check my paperwork tomorrow morning if you need any more info

 

many thanks

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

In which case, I feel you need to contact the court to ask what's happening with your claim and when you can expect further directions from them.

 

As Cobbetts have already submitted their defence they don't have to submit another one because you've amended your claim (the original template they sent you in the first place will still 'stand'!)

 

So your first and only port of call really is the court - they've had your amendment for two months now, you're entitled to know what's happening.

 

Best of luck - keep us posted ;)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK - an interesting turn of events!!

 

I called Brighton Court and a very helpful lady there said that my claim was in a backlog waiting for the Judge to review. She told me that the majority of claims are being put on hold pending the High Court hearing. This was scheduled for Jan/Feb (she couldn't recall). She said either party may then appeal so if my claim made it to a hearing then that could be as late as March/April next year.....

 

Obviously I was very disheartened by this news!!

The today however I received another settlement letter from Natwest - offering me about £5200 (my claim is for about £7500).. Deal or No Deal!!??

Any advise... I'm assuming others are aware of the hold being placed on claims?

Cheers

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the decision has to be yours I'm afraid Steve - particularly as their offer is almost £2.5K less than what you're claiming.

 

Best of luck with whatever you decide to do though :)

Can't find what you're looking for? Please have a look at Michael Browne's

A-Z Guide

*** PLEASE NOTE ***

I do not answer queries via PM. If you send me a PM, please include a link to your thread - any advice I am able to offer will be on your thread.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...