A little patience is required here, as you mentioned not having a reply after 2 days. Most Insurers have a target for their staff/teams to reply within about 4 or 5 days. Insurance companies are normally extremely busy and they respond as soon as they can. You don't mention whether a third party caused accident damage to your car and therefore if you got a cheap hire car you could potentially reclaim costs from third party. It could be a few weeks before you receive write off settlement for the car.

Litigants cant question the opposite party they do not have right of audience, you request the judge raise the matter with the claimants rep.

Hi and thankyou both and will collate the detail as requested and add to the post a around the lunchtime marker

Thank you. I apologise as I should really have come to that conclusion myself after reading your extensive contributions elsewhere, my confusion was how parcel2go.com were seemingly hiding in the “Evri International” shadows, but it appears that EI is simply another parcel2go.com department/website. I’ve been constantly complaining to EI which I think is the section of parcel2go.com that deals with the EI operation. I asked them for their address to send a letter before claim and they’ve ignored that and all correspondence since. I’ll put together a timeline and paste it on here as you suggest. Thanks again

I have found time to have a closer look at this after the confusion about this thread. I'm afraid that the delay in your engagement with the thread and also the posting by somebody else of their own story on this thread which confused us as we thought that it was all same story, has caused some misunderstanding. I'm looking at this message which you received from kinderton on 4 March. The message makes me feel far more comfortable about the status of the hire car which you have used. There is a certain ambiguity in the message but it seems to me on an ordinary reading that they are saying that they will bear the cost of hire if

Thank you both for your replies and tremendous input elsewhere on this forum. @lolerz Yes I’ve read that excellent resource. I don’t know if I was totally clear in that in this case I booked Evri International (EI) on the Evri website (NOT on parcel2go.com), yet apparently “Evri International” is just a brand name and I actually contracted with parcel2go. That’s what it says on the EI site, screenshot attached. So this appears to be somewhat of a reverse of the usual “bought an Evri service on parcel2go.com” cases! It looks like parcel2go.com run the EI site, and use regular Evri to get the parcel to a depot within the UK and

Is your partner's mother the sole executor? Was she aware that money was owing to the plumber when her husband died and she was dealing with his Estate? Please clarify one important point: do you accept that your partner's father owed money to the plumber at the time he died? And if so is the £5k about right, eg in line with estimates/quotes given before the work started? Or is the £5k disputed? As executor she could be personally liable for the £5k if she distributed the Estate without paying her husband's debts. It's irrelevant whether there is any money left in the Estate now, the question a judge would ask would be whether

Back to the extremism definition. The new definition, which will be distributed across government and Whitehall, will say: “Extremism is the promotion or advancement of an ideology based on violence, hatred or intolerance, that aims to: 1 negate or destroy the fundamental rights and freedoms of others; or 2 undermine, overturn or replace the UK’s system of liberal parliamentary democracy and democratic rights; or 3 intentionally create a permissive environment for others to achieve the results in (1) or (2).” [My bolding] The previous guidelines, published in 2011, said individuals or groups are only defined as extremist if they sh

I think you should raise a complaint with your Insurance company about the poor handling of your claim particularly the unnecessary hassle from Kindertons. Explain what happened about being forced without proper consent into a hire car, that they now want a signature from you after the event, so they can pursue from third party. Your Insurers have a responsibility to ensure that the service provided meets with the required standards.

No. Only payment or **written** admission of the debt resets the statute-barred limit. Logging in to a portal is not admission.

Unlikely you've messed up completely but you certainly haven't helped yourself. You've got 2 options. 1. Pay their invoice and the matter will go away. 2. Listen to us and fight the PPC. We'd rather you take option 2. The good news is that when people listen to us, take our advice, and fight it, most of the time countrywide don't do court. There was a similar case to yours a few years ago with Countrywide. They did take the driver to court but as they listened to us the case was dismissed TWICE and costs were awarded to the CAGger both times. If you're willing to take option 2. You should simply sit on your