Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 31/12/23 in all areas
-
So you can either continue to claim CA and also claim the carers element of UC, however the CA will be deducted in full from your UC or you can cancel CA and still claim the carers element of UC. Either way you will be classed as a carer and have no work related commitments for UC. In regards to PIP, just because you are caring for somebody, this does not mean your PIP claim will end or even be looked at, UC agents have no control over PIP and vice versa PIP has nothing to do with UC. There is also no definition of caring in law and many couples claim CA for one another and still claim PIP in their own right, without any issues, slighlty2 points
-
Again, not wanting to knacker your version, some tweaks are below. I've added sections UNFAIR TERM and FRUSTRATION OF CONTRACT but the sections will be weak if your friends don't cooperate. LFI, is (10) correct re POFA? Witness Statement of XXXXX INTRODUCTION 1. I, XXXXX am the Defendant in this claim. I represent myself as a lay person, with no formal legal training. Everything in the following statement is true to the best of my knowledge and belief. 2. I was the registered keeper of the vehicle: XXXXXX. 3. In my statement I shall refer to exhibits within the evidence se2 points
-
You could use the fact that your friends were unwell but as you could have driven off and drunk your coffee and eaten food off the premises. It will be pretty hard to say that you didn't see the entrance sign. Although as it did not contain all the T&Cs it was not capable of forming a contract it was just an invitation to treat. You have done a fair amount of reading for your WS but I don't think you touched on the Parking period. In Schedule 4 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 . Under Section 9 [2][a] it states (2)The notice must— (a)specify the vehicle, the relevant land on which it was parked and the period of par2 points
-
Kplanet you have nothing to worry about as they will lose the case against you should they be stupid enough to take you to Court. Why ? You are the hirer of the vehicle and CEL have totally failed to observe the terms of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012. Once they received the notification that the NHS were leasing the vehicle to you CEL had to comply with the Act relating to hirers. They didn't so they cannot hold you responsible for the charge. How they failed- 1] when they received the advice that you were hiring the vehicle they should have sent you a Notice to Hirer not a Notice to Driver. Included with the PCN th1 point
-
Sorry missed the LCWRA bit, no you won't get the CE then. CA can open other doors for you such as free carer tickets on days out etc. But the choice is yours on whether you continue with it or not, personally I would. Not sure why it's asking about your health, have you clicked the wrong change of circs tab? Neither the caring or DLA change should bring this question up. Caring is just under caring and all it should ask is who do you care for, is it over 35 hours per week and do they receive a disbility benefit. The DLA change shuld be under children, which again shouldn't ask about your health as it is relevant. Have the review team st1 point
-
signed for so you know they got it imo1 point
-
A few quick things. 1. You're a Litigant-in-Person, fighting a large company, if your WS is 24 hours late the court won't bat an eyelid. In fact it's likely your WS will get there before UKPC's. 2. If you can get a signature from your friends then you can do the WSs yourself. It'd only be a couple of paragraphs about being ill. 3. The only other thing from them you need is a photo/scan/something of the bank statements with proof of purchase after 10:10:57. Well that's disappointing given you were helping them during illness and have ended up in court as a result.1 point
-
Firstly, to answer your questions. All the bully boy tactics, refusing to stop using e-mail, etc., means they are arrogant, nasty pieces of work, but that has absolutely nothing to do with whether you entered a contract with them that day and agreed to pay them £100. So forget this peripheral stuff. In fact judges appreciate concise arguments. I don't want to knacker what you've prepared so there is another version below with answers to your points or my own suggested changes in blue. I think your big problem is going to be that 50 minutes is a long time to overstay. Anything that justifies that is extremely important.1 point
-
Time to look at train or coach fares to Dartford. If you can't make a simple copy of an important legal document and store it somewhere, then this will be the result.1 point
-
why give a discount? make you think there's something wrong here somewhere does it not? claimform says STA legal not unity.1 point
Latest
Our Picks
Reclaim the right Ltd
reg.05783665
reg. office:-
262 Uxbridge Road, Hatch End
England
HA5 4HS
The Consumer Action Group
×
- Create New...
IPS spam blocked by CleanTalk.