Hi Dixon, I assume you're ready for the video hearing on 10th August. Bear in mind HMRC are looking to convince the judge that the FTT has no jurisdiction because your appeal has no technical merit. They'll suggest the tax relief was claimed by you resulting in a tax refund when none was due - hence it must be repaid. I suggest you argue that HMRC's stance :- 1. Seeks to deny you the only chance you have to challenge their attempt to claim back from you all the tax refunded even though they repaid it to FTR who kept most of it. 2. Fails to answer important questions about their respo

@dixon2094 I've been thinking what I would say if I were in your position at the hearing (although I have no personal experience or expertise or special knowledge of how these hearings work). I would be insistent in putting it to the hearing that I am a victim of a fraud. But because the actual fraudsters can't be found I am expected to pay HMRC's bills and that's just wrong. (I wouldn't be arguing that as a point of technical tax law, just as a 'person in the street' point about fairness and justice). I would want to point out that what HMRC are painting as me being negligent or complicit in the fraud are actually e

I know Bayswater pretty well and you are not quite right with your location. 26 Queensway is Qpark which is a totally different company. Regent parking are in Princess Court which is a little further down than from where you said you parked. And when you said you parked opposite 37 did you mean that you parked in the layby next to 37 since there isn't a layby across the road from 37 . If you parked next to Taza kebab you are still several car lengths from Princess Court which would make it difficult to be caught by ANPR cameras in Princess court. Is it possible that you parked in the lay by in front of Princess

In referendum campaigns they should have to submit information to a checking panel. before they can issue such campaigning material. e.g. like advertising standards In 2016, those claims appeared fantasy then and anything negative said about the claims was immediately branded as 'project fear'. The referendum was very unfair, as I don't think people had really good balanced information to base their decisions on.

Someone has tweeted this video from Leave.eu in 2016.

I've been through the submission and there's really nothing new. I'm not particularly worried about what HMRC have now said. There's no counter-reply needed now - it's down to the hearing on the day and for the judge to decide :- 1. If the FTT even has a part to play in the appeal process and..... 2. If it does, how this will be moved forward. Dixon, I suggest you go through each point made by HMRC and make brief relevant notes as necessary. HMRC's submission is clearly written for their own success, and for your failure. It's now down to you to have your counter arguments ready to use if you're