Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • well you made the cardinal sin by phoning these scammers at least once so their persistence could go on. however you are new so there you go. you never ever ever phone any of these likes of scammers on these fake schemes that seem plausible.  just like a DCA chasing any old debt .. they are NOT BAILIFFS and have  ZERO legal powers to actually do anything. dx  
    • Okay understood now just based on personal experience how long does this go on for 
    • civil recovery schemes run by the likes of RLP DWF etc etc are a scam. totally IGNORE EVERYTHING. no if's or but's dx  
    • I’m 17 years old and Received 2 letters from dwf with my name spelt wrong and they are asking for for £230.40. I rang dwf civil recovery the first time upon taking advice from citizens advice to explain to delay to deadline as I was in the process of receiving advice which wasn’t much help. When that deadline was done I then called again to delay the deadline as I’m struggling financially and it’s lot of money they are asking for and I tried to dispute the cost to which they said okay we will delay it another 7 days for you to dispute the cost but I asked them how do I dispute this to you or Sainsbury’s and they said “we can’t advise you on this matter” I’ve read a lot of threads saying to ignore them but I was unsure now as I’ve made contact and have tried to dispute the payment and pay it which might mean I have admitted. Would they just persist harder and take me to court eventually or file for a ccj.   I would like to ignore them still but I would like to send a strong email so they know I’m clued up and then ignore them. I also want to pay the reasonable amount and get this matter solved. any advice on the law or similar situations are helpful when I called them I asked for an itemised bill. £101 stolen goods  ( supposedly caught me because they watched me on cctv over the duration of the week) also why did they not stop me in the first day. £20.40 recovered goods £150 security costs     Thank you 
    • Theirs does, it’s the first line of it confirming name, occupation and address  thanks again though jk for highlighting! 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Mackenzie hall and Meritforce


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5958 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, first post so hi to everyone. My problem is i received a phone call from a firm called mackenzie hall in november 07, saying i owed a debt from northern rock for a bank loan in jan 2001 for 3,500. I did not acknowledge the debt as i have no idea where it came from and told them that, they said i would receive a letter with more details.

3 weeks passed then i received a letter just stating that a outstanding debt in my name for 3,500 was due payment, also i keep getting phone calls and messages left on my answer machine. After looking at some of the posts on this site i did not return any calls and binned the letters, the last one was for a direct debit agreement the cheek of them. I have now received a letter from a doorstep collections agency called meritforce advising me that i am getting a vist from them reguarding the above debt. I have read about this mackenzie hall and they sound a bit dogy should i just ignore them or is ther anything i can do to get them off my back. Also i checked my credit reference reports and found that mackenzie hall had searched my fles without my permission.

Any help would be appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If the debt was from 2001 and you haven't made any payments on it since then it is STATUTE BARRED and they should not be collecting on it. Write to the OFT and Trading Standards and state that Meritforce have done a credit search.

 

Meritforce's agents (usually via Scotcall) have as much right to ask for money from you as the pizza delivery person - ie unless they have the proper documentation and the debt isn't statute barred then you should pay, if the other tell them to go forth and not multiply.

 

Somebody else will be along with more advice soon as to what letter to send them telling them to vanish and not darken your doorstep with their false claims.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bluenose and welcome to CAG :)

 

If you have no knowledge of this alleged debt, then Mackenzie Hall may be purely on a “phishing” trip.

 

First of all, DO NOT speak to them on the ‘phone. Also, don’t “bin” any letters you receive from them as these can be used against them at a later date (for example, if you need to report them to Trading Standards).

 

I would suggest that you send them the following letter (from the library of Curlyben!):-

 

 

"You have contacted me/us regarding the account with the above reference number, which you claim is owed by myself/ourselves.

 

I/we would point out that I/we have no knowledge of any such debt being owed to (insert company name).

 

I am/we are familiar with the Office of Fair Trading Debt Collection Guidance which states that it unfair to send demands for payment to an individual when it is uncertain that they are the debtor in question.

 

I/we would also point out that the OFT say under the Guidance that it is unfair to pursue third parties for payment when they are not liable. In not ceasing collection activity whilst investigating a reasonably queried or disputed debt you are using deceptive/and or unfair methods.

 

Furthermore ignoring and/or disregarding claims that debts have been settled or are disputed and continuing to make unjustified demands for payment amounts to physical/psychological harassment.

 

I/we would ask that no further contact be made concerning the above account unless you can provide evidence as to my/our liability for the debt in question.

 

I/we await your written confirmation that this matter is now closed. Otherwise I will have no option but to make a complaint to the trading standards department and consider informing the OFT of your actions.

 

I/we look forward to your reply."

 

Edit to suit!

 

Keep us updated and post up any reply received so that we can help you further.

 

Good Luck!

 

I have asked for your thread to be moved to the Debt Collection Agency forum.

 

Bo :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is very unusual for either of these companies - who are of course very closely linked, they share the same directors - to respond to letters that don't have money in them.

 

Curly's letter is excellent and should be sent recorded delivery. You could add a line or two in it stating that as all discussion between you and them on this matter is to be in writing they should delete your telephone numbers from their systems. Ask for written confirmation within 7 days. Any further calls received after they sign for the letter can be regarded as harrassment and dealt with accordingly.

 

You could also ask them for details of their complaints procedure. I am not aware of them ever sending this out when requested so that gives you an added dimension when a complaint is made against them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...