Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Parents and teens alike are trading in their smartphones for "dumber" models to help stay offline.View the full article
    • The coffee giant is suffering as customers "lose it" over price hikes and other controversies.View the full article
    • Victims as far afield as Singapore, Peru and the United Arab Emirates fell prey to their online scams.View the full article
    • Rights groups warn of state paranoia as experts on hypersonics, the science behind ultrafast missiles, have been jailed.View the full article
    • The Contract itself The airport is actually owned by the Ontario Teachers Pension Plan. There should be an authority from them for Bristol airport group  to sign on their behalf. Without it the contract is invalid. The contract has so many  clauses redacted that it is questionable as to its fairness with regard to the Defendants ability to receive a fair trial. In the case of WH Holding Ltd, West Ham United Football Club Ltd -v- E20 Stadium LLP [2018],  In reaching its decision, the Court gave a clear warning to parties involved in litigation: ‘given the difficulties and suspicions to which extensive redaction inevitably gives rise, parties who decide to adopt such an appropriate in disclosure must take enhanced care to ensure that such redactions are accurately made, and must be prepared to suffer costs consequences if they are not’. The contract is also invalid as the signatories are required to have their signatures co-signed by independent witnesses. There is obviously a question of the date of the signatures not being signed until 16 days after the start of the contract. There is a question too about the photographs. They are supposed to be contemporaneous not taken several months before when the signage may have been different or have moved or damaged since then. The Defendant respectfully asks the Court therefore to treat the contract as invalid or void. With no contract there can be no breach. Indeed even were the contract regarded as valid there would be no breach It is hard to understand why this case was brought to Court as there appears to be no reasonable cause to apply to the DVLA.............
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

marbles card/Restons court claim form - help new to this!!!


jfk_8
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4683 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

you are entitled to charge them at their purchase or cash rate from the date of EACH charge to the date of you claim

 

use:

http://www.egalegal.com/compoundWindow.html

 

rests = 12

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 144
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi I have added a spreadsheet to this post which details the dates description and amount they have charged me .

 

advice on the interest calculation would be great

 

thanks

 

Jfk

 

sorry dx posted the spreadsheet without checking you had replied ! doh !

 

retail purchases interest rate monthly is 1.24% on the early dates and then on the ones after 2006 it states simple annual retail rates are 21.66% effective annual rates 23.9% I guess I just divide them by 12

 

Jfk

CHARGES.xls

Link to post
Share on other sites

otherway around

the int using that calculator should be annual so's *12 your 1.24 and use that [read the notes at the bottom in blue]

as for latter one - the ERF - use that

 

dont forget rests=12

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers DX Just to clarify

 

dates before 2006 take the amount of £20 use interest rate 1.24 x 12 =14.88%

on the calculator enter the amount and interest rate and use rests = 12

 

ERF apologies but I dont understand that , do you mean effective annual rate in this case 23.90 % also using rests = 12

 

Thanks again Jfk

Link to post
Share on other sites

yep 14.88

and 23.9 is correct too

 

make a word table

or a spreadsheet and list the results inc the info from the two result boxes

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

that looks ok

delete the rests column

put in a column that shows the total amount due column too

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Received letter yesterday from HFC dated 27th sept saying they are looking into my complaint ( requesting charges back ) and will respond in ten days .

 

Received another letter today from restons saying that hfc are looking into my complaint and that they need the income and expenditure form completing that they sent recently and sending back to them by 8th october ,it also states should a refund be applied to the account then they will update their records

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi , I requested the charges on my credit card be refunded , As this is my money should it be recieved back in cheque form or deducted from the balance on the card ?

 

I recieved a letter from restons ( see my other post HFC and restons solicitors letter ) saying that a refund may be applied to the account

 

cheers

 

Jfk

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi jfk

 

If there is a negative balance on the account, the practice is to refund it to the account.

I'm not sure if the OFT agreed to that at the end of the investigation, but knowing them they probably did.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rebel , I am in dispute with these guys , been through the CCA / SAR scenario , I acknowledge the debt which is around 9k , after receivng SAR info decided to claim the charges back , they are looking into it and the solicitor ( restons ) said that a refund may be applied to the account , the charges add upto around 1k ish so my question was can they knock those charges off the 9k leaving me with 8k , I believe they cannot do this as it is my money and they can only clain the arrears , would rather have the 1k in my pocket

 

Cheers

 

Jfk

 

I read in another thread that you can tell them how you would like the charges refunded , it is not upto them to tell you how they refund them

 

how can I check the oft's decision ? anyone point me in the right direction on this one ??

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you please tell me what a cca is

 

Consumer Credit Act , normally abbreviated to CCA when requesting a copy of the credit agreement under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

Here's a useful thread which explains various terminologies; http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?161658-A-to-Z-of-Debt-Terminology

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a letter today off HFC offering £460 refund of charges thst have been applied in the last 6 years including an interest payment ... would appreciate if DX100 could comment on this

Link to post
Share on other sites

that fig looks within £20 of my fig for charges+int going back 6yrs

 

pers i'd accept it as a partial settlement and threaten to go to court over the rest

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

dont forget that HFC are using american calculations on all loans thus adding approx 2% to your loan , i am about to challenge this as it goes against the European Directive

Directive 90/88/EEC sets out a single mathematical formula for calculating the annual percentage rate of charge throughout the Community and for determining credit cost items to be used in the calculation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

links dead

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Just checked with HFC and they have credited my accuont with the default charges that I reclaimed , I todl them that it was my monety and wanted it sending to me in cheque form , this was not possible said the woman because there was an outstanding balance on the card so the charges have been credited back to that card .

 

I said well what if the balance on the card was zero , she said then they would send a cheque out

 

can they do this ?

 

hope dx can comment on this

 

thanks JFK

Link to post
Share on other sites

it is typical for a charges reclaim to come off the outstanding balance of a CC

PPI is diff though

 

unless your bal was £0 ofcourse!

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Hi ,Just recieved a N1CPC from northampton bulk centre regarding a claim by restons for a credit card debt with HFC Bank .Basically I had an agreement with theM to pay an amount every month , for one reason or another I have missed the last 3 months payments hence the N1CPC

 

particulars are

contract dated on or around novenber 2000

sum of 10336.99 inclusive of interest to date of this summons at 19.8% from 19/2/10 to 28/6/11

02/11/10 ins rebate - 462.76

19/02/10 default balance 9035.02

23/03/11 post refrl cr - 549.92

28/06/11 interest 2314.65

total 10336.99

 

I am not disputing that I owe this debt but can they add interest to the balance after they agreed to freeze interest ? Obviously I know I broke the monthly payment agreement

 

Any assitance would be appreciated as I need to complete the form

 

for referenece I already have the SAR request and have also got the rebate for late charges etc etc

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thread moved to Legal Issues.

Hopefully you should get some tailored help

If you are asked to deal with any matter via private message, PLEASE report it.

Everything I say is opinion only. If you are unsure on any comment made, you should see a qualified solicitor

Please help CAG. Order this ebook. Now available on Amazon. Please click HERE

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...