Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Can a PPC (claimant) refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Unauthorised 3rd party withdrawals from bank account.


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2702 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

My Aunt died aged 94 in hospital from Alzheimers which she had for over 10 years

during which time she never left her home

 

. I and my father,(her brother) cared for her.

I was executor and it was apparent that over the past few years

there had been withdrawals of large sums of money from her bank :

£13,000 £5000 £6000 etc a total of £75,000 in 6 years.

 

Her outgoings were very small, under £300 per month.

I bought clothes, food etc.

 

There was no POA.

The bank refused to state who had withdrawn these amounts

but when my father died aged 92 two years ago

it was apparent from his bank statements that he had been responsible for these withdrawals.

 

The financial Ombudsman has been no use

. The bank stated that they phoned my aunt and she agreed the withdrawals

. Their security check was that she knew her telephone number

and that they 'recognised her accent'.

 

My Aunt didn't even know what year it was and was not capable of giving her permission

. As she had never left her home in 10 years I don't understand how anyone from the bank could recognise her accent.

 

The bank are refusing to acknowledge their mistake or to recompense .

 

I now need to know if I can claim back this money from my father's estate

or how difficult would it be to take the bank to Court?

Thank you for any input.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think for something like this, you may need to consult a specialist lawyer. We could give advice, but the bank will definitley challenge you and flood you with legal fees hoping you give up. Remember, youre talking about 75k and there is absolutely no way theyll back down without a fight.

 

But the first step IMHO would be to send a SAR and see exactly what their internal notes say regarding the security checks.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, unfortunately the size of this problem – £75,000 – means that the bank will put up a vigourous defence and they will be happy to do so because they will know that that they can intimidate you with the possibility of huge costs if you lose.

 

If this matter was within the small claims limits – less than £10,000 then I think that you would have them over a barrel

 

Have you fully exhausted the FOS route? I wouldn't expect the FOS to find in your favour anyway, but what would be interesting would be for the FOS to be able to give an account of the security checks which have been put in place even though the FOS would eventually so that they were satisfactory and find against you. It sounds from your account that to some extent this has happened.

 

It seems to me that this is a matter of unfair treatment and therefore subject to BCOBS, but the problem of course is bringing the action. As far as finding a specialist lawyer to deal with this, I think that you will have a lot of difficulty. I don't think that there are any banking lawyers who would be affordable and who would understand the significance of BCOBS. All other lawyers will have no idea and will simply shuffle paper around and charge you a load of money and eventually tell you that it's not worth your while.

 

I'm afraid that unless you really want to take a risk on the question of costs, if you have exhausted the FOS procedure, then the only thing to do is to set in for the long haul and start writing around to interested members of Parliament and see if you can enlist some help there. From what you say it seems very clear that the court bank has been completely negligent – but even the Co-op is too big to give a rats arse about you or any of their other customers.

 

Certainly, send the SAR and check it very carefully, not only for what is there but more interestingly, what is missing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to add to the above, I suddenly had an idea that might help you. If you can identify one particular withdrawal that is well under the small claims limit of £10,000, then you could consider bringing a small BCOBS claim for that sum alone and see how that went.

 

A withdrawal of about £5000 or less would be very handy. If you could discover all the circumstances of that withdrawal – how it was made, what security checks were – et cetera. I think that this would be well worth a punt. We would be very pleased to help you with a BCOBS action for something at that level. Of course, don't imagine that the bank won't fight tooth and nail – but at least if you lose, you will have lost your claim fee and may be a hearing fee – but not much else. If you can win on one action for a small amount then firstly you will probably have gathered a lot of information from disclosures and from conversations with them, and also you may have loosened them up and also you will have given yourself confidence to try another one. I think it might be an idea to identify a number of withdrawals all less than the small claims limit. Research the circumstances of all of them and then cherry pick a nice easy one for a small amount and run with that and see how it goes.

 

We will help you of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you both for your helpful advice. I'm not familiar with SAR but have seen that its about the banks rules and regs. I will go to CAB tomorrow to see if I can get more info and help with SAR. And yes you're right in that my usually helpful solicitor just accepted what FOS had said. I know for sure that my aunt's signature was forged on the cheque she supposedly signed 4 days before she died, but the bank say it matched what they have on file...also forged of course because they weren't signed in front of anyone.

I'll also write to Alan Campbell my local MP who is usually very helpful. Thank you again.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an excellent idea Bankfodder. I hadn't even thought of that. There are many withdrawals of amounts under £10,000 and still money in my father's account which was withdrawn from my aunt's account and deposited in to his on the same day. My father's estate is due to be wound up soon, I am sole executor but not sole beneficiary. My solicitor told me to put a claim in to that estate. I don't know what you think because both the bank and my father are equally responsible.

Link to post
Share on other sites

By all means go to citizens advice. As much information as possible is a good thing. However, you can be almost certain that citizens advice will not know anything about BCOBS and am afraid although they are well-intentioned, they are not sufficiently informed or aggressive enough to deal with this kind of problem

 

You don't need any help from citizens advice with the SAR. Simply follow the SAR link and use our template and modify it that by and large make sure that you ask for everything – including screen notes, call recordings, call logs, all correspondence internal and external. Pay the £10 fee with a cheque and keep an eye on your bank account to see when the cheque has been cashed.

 

Don't expect easy. Because there has been an FOS complaint about this already, the bank will be highly defensive and could be quite selective about what they choose to send you – even though that would be unlawful.

 

I think you will eventually find that the help you get here will be rather more direct and businesslike than Citizens Advice – but you should make your own mind up about this.

 

If you are dealing with forged cheques and if the signatures are good, then there would be comparatively little that you could do, I can imagine. On the other hand, if the security checks are as you have said in your first post – merely on the telephone and the accent sounded correct, then I think that you may have something to work with.

 

Make sure that the SAR discloses everything including the cheques. If you are sending SARs for your answer state and also for your father's estate, then you will need to send two SARs. Of course this kind of complication will delight the bank because it will give them lots of opportunity to try and raise obstacles in your way. The more obstacles you raise, the more you can start to believe that they realise they've made some errors and they want to cover them up.

 

Make sure that your bank knows that you are involving your MP. You can do this by writing letters of complaint and making it clear that there is a copy sent to your MP. You need to ramp it up but it will be a hard slog.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's an excellent idea Bankfodder. I hadn't even thought of that. There are many withdrawals of amounts under £10,000 and still money in my father's account which was withdrawn from my aunt's account and deposited in to his on the same day. My father's estate is due to be wound up soon, I am sole executor but not sole beneficiary. My solicitor told me to put a claim in to that estate. I don't know what you think because both the bank and my father are equally responsible.

 

Get all the information you can and then we can have a look. The kind of suggestions I'm making here are not the kind of suggestions that you will ever hear from Citizens Advice or any high Street lawyer.

 

The fact that your father may be jointly liable with the bank may be helpful because it could give you a negotiating position whereby the bank agrees to refund half the money – probably under conditions of confidentiality – and they would feel that this was a good situation for them rather than suffering the humiliation of having to cough up the lot. However, I wouldn't talk about this kind of arrangement with the bank yet. This is the kind of proposal that you hold onto until the last moment – and in fact, it would be better for the bank to work out that kind of suggestion themselves so that they feel that it was their idea and that they were in control and that they had won a compromise. If the suggestion came from you then they would more likely feel that they had still lost control of the situation and they would be less likely to agree to this kind of compromise. This is how stupid and vindictive these people are. Very quickly becomes personal with them and then they become incapable of making sensible businesslike decisions. You will have to try to be the mature one in the eventual negotiation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

That's really helpful thank you. I'll not bother with CAB and I've read about BCOBS previously which I will pursue. I'll be sure to send copies to my MP. haven't had sight of the cheques or the signatures but my aunt was so ill that she couldn't sign before she died and my father told me he withdrew forged her signature on a cheque for £13000 to pay her funeral and other expenses. BTW I paid for her funeral.:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You should visit the CAB. There's nothing wrong with getting a bit of extra free advice.

 

Where did you read about BCOBS? It's very unusual to find any references to it other than on this forum.

 

You didn't answer my questions about the extent of your FOS complaint

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry, been looking up my paperwork. This is where I'd seen BCOBS

 

The FOS said that the bank had agreed to pay me £150 so I guess that's a small admission that they did something wrong. I would have to find the appropriate docs for the complete reply.

I'm not fazed by having to goto Court as I was adviser to the Judges for 14 years for family matters, but of course this is different and I'd like to get it right ...and not lose.!

 

I had to cut out the reference but I found out about BCOBS on BBC news business-19511542

This forum won't let me post the link?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not a small admission. Its basically a pay off for you to go away and to agree never to bother them again.

Any advice i give is my own and is based solely on personal experience. If in any doubt about a situation , please contact a certified legal representative or debt counsellor..

 

 

If my advice helps you, click the star icon at the bottom of my post and feel free to say thanks

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

[...] my father told me he withdrew forged her signature on a cheque for £13000 to pay her funeral and other expenses.

 

Was this cheque made out after your aunt's death ?

 

All her accounts should have been frozen and no transactions should have been permitted by the bank except those given by the executor of the estate.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

 

No... you can't eat my brain just yet. I need it a little while longer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was this cheque made out after your aunt's death ?

 

All her accounts should have been frozen and no transactions should have been permitted by the bank except those given by the executor of the estate.

 

No the cheque was cashed shortly before she died.

 

Not a small admission. Its basically a pay off for you to go away and to agree never to bother them again.

 

I thought that and didn't accept the offer which was made via the ombudsman.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Its a little confusing this solitaire..just to confirm a few blank spots.....

 

Was you a beneficiary to your Aunt's estate ?

 

Without being nosey why are you not to your fathers estate?

 

As you are and were executor to both estates what has happened to raise this point and what/where (if successful) do you intend to do with the £75K ?

 

Feel free to ignore the above points...but it would add clarity to the problem.

 

Regards

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

Yes I am beneficiary and sole executive to both estates. Although co-op bank wouldn't tell me who had withdrawn the money, what has happened is that after seeing both bank statements it was clear that monies had been transferred directly from my aunt's bank account to my father's. As to what I would intend to do with £75,000 I haven't thought that far. It should go to any beneficiaries of my aunt's estate, in theory and in practice I would have thought.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to cut out the reference but I found out about BCOBS on BBC news business-19511542

This forum won't let me post the link?

 

I thought that it might be that. Nice to see that at least one person has read it.

 

Actually, it fails to point out that there is an even better route to bringing a BCOBS action because it also confers a direct right of action on aggrieved persons.

The right is tucked away in the transitional provisions of BCOBS which is why it didn't register when I wrote the piece. Very careless.

 

The FOS said that the bank had agreed to pay me £150 so I guess that's a small admission that they did something wrong. I would have to find the appropriate docs for the complete reply.

I'm not fazed by having to goto Court as I was adviser to the Judges for 14 years for family matters, but of course this is different and I'd like to get it right ...and not lose.!

 

 

Yes, you have the basis of a complaint - but that is not the same as having a case.

I expect that it will take some months of preparation to see if you have something solid. It is worth being cautious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I sent a reply earlier on my mobile but it doesn't seem to have materialised?

I wrote the letter this morning to the Bank re SAR and will post by recorded delivery today. I'll keep in touch.

BTW I made a donation ut hopefully a much bigger one if I receive compensation from the bank...here's hoping:madgrin:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, thanks very much – but I wouldn't start spreading largesse too much before you get a result.

 

I see that your name is very apt for somebody who was advising judges. I can imagine that it attracted a lot of comment.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Andy,

Yes I am beneficiary and sole executive to both estates. Although co-op bank wouldn't tell me who had withdrawn the money, what has happened is that after seeing both bank statements it was clear that monies had been transferred directly from my aunt's bank account to my father's. As to what I would intend to do with £75,000 I haven't thought that far. It should go to any beneficiaries of my aunt's estate, in theory and in practice I would have thought.

 

Don't finalise your Father's estate just yet then until you resolve this...of course the further you dig and try to resolve it you realise your father will then be deemed to have committed fraud and there may be fallout from that estate....unless your the only beneficiary.

 

Andy

We could do with some help from you.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHER

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group - The National Consumer Service

If you want advice on your Topic please PM me a link to your thread

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hello again, I have eventually received info from Britannia bank. The checks they made with my aunt, were to phone her on 3 occasions and said that she knew her telephone number, her DOB, knew the balance of her account and that the caller recognised her accent. Considering that my aunt had very severe alzheimers for over 10 years, didn't even know what year it was, she was not capable of giving permission to access her account. They have verified that 3 cheqes totalling £17,000 were written to National Savings.(Bonds) They were deposited with National Savings in the name of my father and now form part of his estate.

The bank states that there was a signed 3rd party agreement beginning in 2010 but there was nothing before that date, yet they allowed withdrawals regardless.:-x

Britannia feel that all avenues have been exhausted and they are not prepared to consider my complaint.

They have not addressed any of my concerns but just sent a generalised non specific reply.

I can PM the correspondence if necessary.

Where now???

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...