Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Lolerz - I don't understand you.  Rebuked you?   No. I simply replied to your orange comments with legal facts as I know them.  I've already worked through the s42 and s146 issues - over the last 3-4y - and these issues are (mostly) resolved legally.  In terms of posting evidence.  Sure I can post some.  But my most recent questions have been a) how can I enforce a sale before trial?  And b) how can I make a complaint and/or a claim v receiver? (E.g. to which body do I complain?).  At the mo I'm asking for some helpful pointers on those specific questions??  I'm not asking for help with how to prove or present evidence. Fwiw - all evidence for trial has been disclosed (although additions are poss). The lender sent me like 10,000 emails and docs.  There's also 000s of emails, docs, photos, videos, recordings and texts that relate to freeholders/ me.   I read, filed and categorised everything for ease of future reference.  Witness statements and evidence were prepared for trial in the 42 and 146 matters. (now joined with current claim to save duplication).  I've lived the process before.  My current statement and linked evidence has taken like 6 months to draft/ write - to ensure I can succinctly prove my defence and counterclaim points.   Whether I can convince a judge at trial w/o lawyer / barrister is debatable 🙄   But I've prepared.  And continue to try better prepare - which is why I visit this site (and clinics).  This is NOT my business or expertise at all.  I'm just trying.  Not that anyone should ever have to justify why they need help if they ask politely! 
    • Thanks for the other info will also take a look at that.
    • It doesn't use the word reconstructed in the cover letter.  Although, I have just noticed on the cover letter they have asked me to complete a financial statement and offer a repayment within the next 10 days, or they will continue to follow court directions.  They sent a separate letter on the same day advising me they will be continuing with their claim ?  They have done the same for both claims.  Is it worth just doing that - doing the financial breakdown and offering a x amount.    
    • hahah except I can't locate the courier to frighten them with it hahaha   
    • Dx100uk according to the ICO office, who I spoke to at some length earlier today after getting the email from the court, Equita are the data controller if they have instructed the contracted EA. The ICO have noted the case, and stated very clearly that the court has the higher standing in terms of dealing with, and punishing either party if they fail to adhere to the district judges order and any action they take will not be criminal.    but they also stated very clearly that with what I’ve told them, and on the basis of accepting what I’ve told them as gospel (which it is with written confirmation from both the courts and the police) then there is some major red flags being raised on both sides with them blaming each other.    they’ve advised me to essentially keep my powder dry until there is a charging decision and an outcome from the seperate proceedings with the EAC2 complaint, and then come back to them with the case and they will be in a stronger position to act against Equita and the EA as there will be established facts and evidence that have already been laid before a court.     
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What an absolute shambles at PC World Plymouth


PCW-Victim
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3341 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Well folks, back in October 2014, I was seeking a good new computer and at PC World in Plymouth

I came across am Asus All-in-One ET2020 PC for just over £300. I purchased the new computer

 

 

after thinking about it for a few days, also decided to take the care plan at £4 per month believing that it would give me all round protection should anything happen.

 

on the 17th February 2015, the worst did happen when the PC developed a fault with the TV tuner card.

I duly took it back armed with my care plan agreement and all receipts to the PC World Plymouth store

 

 

I was greeted by an awful Knowhow assistant who kept insisting that it had to go back to Asus and that it would take 28 days.

I told him that my care plan guaranteed me a repair or replacement within 14 days, that is what I have been paying for each month.

 

I had to get the assistant manager involved, who quite frankly was not much more help, but he did agree to send it to their own repair centre in Newark,

and he assured me that it would be repaired within 14 days, probably coming back a lot sooner.

He also stated that I would be able to track its progress all the way, this was not the case.

Now the care plan also provides a like for like loan pc, but they did not have any at the store.

 

I needed my computer for work and without it I would be loosing £80 per day in income,

I agreed that they could provide a loan pc delivered to me the next day.

 

 

Well that did happen on the 18th February 2015, but the loan was a useless antiquated laptop.

I could not use this for my work so found myself loosing even more income, and I was not happy.

 

Saturday 20th February 2015, I found out upon calling Knowhow that the PC was being sent back to me,

not repaired as the repair centre in Newark said it had to go to Asus.

 

 

My argument is why o why was I paying £4 per month for an useless care plan.

I complained to the store manager at PC World Plymouth to after much argument

agreed to refund me my money paid for the PC but not for the care plan.

At this time the useless loan laptop was returned to them.

 

on the 22nd February 2015 Knowkow delivered the PC back to me,

yes the PC that the store manager refunded on just two days before.

 

 

By this time I was preparing a court claim against PC World for my

lost income,

cost of calls

and full reimbursement of the care plan.

 

 

I sent their head office an email on the 22nd February 2015 stating that I would be withholding

the PC they mistakenly delivered back to me in lieu of my claim against them,

and offered then a settlement where the damages claimed would cover the cost of the PC,

with the known fault at a reduced cost.

 

on the 27th February 2015 I got a phone call from the assistant manager of PC World Plymouth accusing me of theft and deception,

far from the truth, so to protect myself duly delivered the PC mistakenly delivered to me, into his arms, realty felt like ramming it down his throat.

 

So you see dear British people, not only do they take your money for a care plan they had no intention to honour,

they then go and blame the customer for their own mistakes and then threaten the customers saying that the customer has broken the law.

I leave it for you to draw your own conclusions on this one,

 

 

but please, please, stay well clear of PC World, Currys, Carphone Warehouse, Knowhow and any other company associated with them. You have been warned.

Edited by PCW-Victim
Link to post
Share on other sites

certain manufacturers fix their own equipment, asus and samsung are two of them, the care plan means your machine would only be fixed at newark if it'd been damaged and now not covered by manufacturer warranty.

however in the case of yourself, the time limit still applies and if the unit wasnt returned from asus within the time span, it will be elligable for write off under the policy. i know this cos i have literally done this for a customer last week. rang asus on the14th day to find out it hadnt been despatched, got proof sent to the relevant dept at knowhow from asus, got code within 48hrs for customer and have since received the repaired asus back in store to forward back on to newark.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Read our customer services guide for the future

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oliver, you must be the only good chap in an ocean of rotton eggs at that company.

 

 

I now get my computer equipment from an independent computer shop based in Abingdon, real excellent service at a much lower cost compared to the PCW shower.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...