Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
    • Thank-you FTMDave for your feedback. May I take this opportunity to say that after reading numerous threads to which you are a contributor, I have great admiration for you. You really do go above and beyond in your efforts to help other people. The time you put in to help, in particular with witness statements is incredible. I am also impressed by the way in which you will defer to others with more experience should there be a particular point that you are not 100% clear on and return with answers or advice that you have sought. I wish I had the ability to help others as you do. There is another forum expert that I must also thank for his time and patience answering my questions and allowing me to come to a “penny drops” moment on one particular issue. I believe he has helped me immensely to understand and to strengthen my own case. I shall not mention who it is here at the moment just in case he would rather I didn't but I greatly appreciate the time he took working through that issue with me. I spent 20+ years of working in an industry that rules and regulations had to be strictly adhered to, indeed, exams had to be taken in order that one had to become qualified in those rules and regulations in order to carry out the duties of the post. In a way, such things as PoFA 2012 are rules and regulations that are not completely alien to me. It has been very enjoyable for me to learn these regulations and the law surrounding them. I wish I had found this forum years ago. I admit that perhaps I had been too keen to express my opinions given that I am still in the learning process. After a suitable period in this industry I became Qualified to teach the rules and regulations and I always said to those I taught that there is no such thing as a stupid question. If opinions, theories and observations are put forward, discussion can take place and as long as the result is that the student is able to clearly see where they went wrong and got to that moment where the penny drops then that is a valuable learning experience. No matter how experienced one is, there is always something to learn and if I did not know the answer to a question, I would say, I don't know the answer to that question but I will go and find out what the answer is. In any posts I have made, I have stated, “unless I am wrong” or “as far as I can see” awaiting a response telling me what I got wrong, if it was wrong. If I am wrong I am only too happy to admit it and take it as a valuable learning experience. I take the point that perhaps I should not post on other peoples threads and I shall refrain from doing so going forward. 🤐 As alluded to, circumstances can change, FTMDave made the following point that it had been boasted that no Caggers, over two years, who had sent a PPC the wrong registration snotty letter, had even been taken to court, let alone lost a court hearing .... but now they have. I too used the word "seemed" because it is true, we haven't had all the details. After perusing this forum I believe certain advice changed here after the Beavis case, I could be wrong but that is what I seem to remember reading. Could it be that after winning the above case in question, a claimant could refer back to this case and claim that a defendant had not made use of the appeal process, therefore allowing the claimant to win? Again, in this instance only, I do not know what is to be gained by not making an appeal or concealing the identity of the driver, especially if it is later admitted that the defendant was the driver and was the one to input the incorrect VRN in error. So far no one has educated me as to the reason why. But, of course, when making an appeal, it should be worded carefully so that an error in the appeal process cannot be referred back to. I thought long and hard about whether or not to post here but I wanted to bring up this point for discussion. Yes, I admit I have limited knowledge, but does that mean I should have kept silent? After I posted that I moved away from this forum slightly to find other avenues to increase my knowledge. I bought a law book and am now following certain lawyers on Youtube in the hope of arming myself with enough ammunition to use in my own case. In one video titled “7 Reasons You Will LOSE Your Court Case (and how to avoid them)” by Black Belt Barrister I believe he makes my point by saying the following, and I quote: “If you ignore the complaint in the first instance and it does eventually end up in court then it's going to look bad that you didn't co-operate in the first place. The court is not going to look kindly on you simply ignoring the company and not, let's say, availing yourself of any kind of appeal opportunities, particularly if we are talking about parking charge notices and things like that.” This point makes me think that, it is not such a bizarre judgement in the end. Only in the case of having proof of payment and inputting an incorrect VRN .... could it be worthwhile making a carefully worded appeal in the first instance? .... If the appeal fails, depending on the reason, surely this could only help if it went to court? As always, any feedback gratefully received.
    • To which official body does one make a formal complaint about a LPA fixed charge receiver? Does one make a complaint first to the company employing the appointed individuals?    Or can one complain immediately to an official body, such as nara?    I've tried researching but there doesn't seem a very clear route on how to legally hold them to account for wrongful behaviour.  It seems frustratingly complicated because they are considered to be officers of the court and held in high esteem - and the borrower is deemed liable for their actions.  Yet what does the borrower do when disclosure shows clear evidence of wrong-doing? Does anyone have any pointers please?
    • Steam is still needed in many industries, but much of it is still made with fossil fuels.View the full article
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Alliance & Leicester Loan Agreement


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3882 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello,

 

I recently recieved my A & L cca request, its looks enforceable to me, Boo!

However, I have a question regarding the ' cooling off period ' of 14 days

that is not mentioned in the agreement or T&C's. I cant see it!

 

Is there any possibility that it could be unenforceable because of this ommission?

 

What are your thoughts,

 

Thank You

 

ps agreement to follow

Edited by San Martino
No Reply
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I got your PM but I am not 100% sure with this. I think the cooling off period depends on the way the loan was obtained (i.e you went to the branch, cold calling etc). Someone else should be along to help you soon though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am wondering if the sentence

 

"This offer is available for 28 days from the date of the Alliance & Leicester signature "

 

could be construed as such ?

 

I will pop your link on to a couple of other threads that are more frequently visited by "those that know about these things" and they might be able to advise you more fully.

 

:)

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

Uploading documents to CAG ** Instructions **

Looking for a draft letter? Use the CAG Library

Dealing with Customer Service Departments? - read the CAG Guide first

1: Making a PPI claim ? - Q & A's and spreadsheets for single premium policy - HERE

2: Take back control of your finances - Debt Diaries

3: Feel Bullied by Creditors or Debt Collectors? Read Here

4: Staying Calm About Debt  Read Here

5: Forum rules - These have been updated - Please Read

BCOBS

1: How can BCOBS protect you from your Banks unfair treatment

2: Does your Bank play fair - You can force your Bank to play Fair with you

3: Banking Conduct of Business Regulations - The Hidden Rules

4: BCOBS and Unfair Treatment - Common Examples of Banks Behaving Badly

5: Fair Treatment for Credit Card Holders and Borrowers - COBS

Advice & opinions given by citizenb are personal, are not endorsed by Consumer Action Group or Bank Action Group, and are offered informally, without prejudice & without liability. Your decisions and actions are your own, and should you be in any doubt, you are advised to seek the opinion of a qualified professional.

PLEASE DO NOT ASK ME TO GIVE ADVICE BY PM - IF YOU PROVIDE A LINK TO YOUR THREAD THEN I WILL BE HAPPY TO OFFER ADVICE THERE:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree with what has been said above......was this an online loan ? or in branch ? I would have thought that it would include cancellation rights but it wouldn't IMO be enough to make it unenforceable......was the default notice compliant ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello SM!

 

Thanks for the PM.

 

I regret that Loans are not something I'm that up to speed on.

 

The above comments from the others are all valid and are good points to explore.

 

I can see they Signed the Agreement before you, so this Thread may be of some interest:

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/144099-does-matter-when-creditor.html#post1514689

 

Key issues seem to be:

 

(1) Did they discuss the Loan with you before signing, i.e. within one of their Branches, or did they send out a Rep etc.

 

(2) Have they issued a Default Notice yet?

 

Cheers,

BRW

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you all for your comments, it is much appreciated.

 

I initiated this application over the phone, at no point did i visit a branch

and i signed the agreement at home then posted it back to A & L.

 

I have sent a subject access request recently in order to see whether or not a 'cooling off period' was offered to me after i signed their agreement.

 

"This offer is available for 28 days from the date of the Alliance & Leicester signature " could be construed as such ?

CitizenB - This is a good point you make, however I believe that as consumers we should see a clear and defined cancellation option.

 

Banker Rhymes, clemma - I only dicussed the loan over the phone and I was issued a default notice in March 2008, also I have been paying a agreed reduced monthly amount with A & L.

 

42man - I will check the SAR to see if the default notice was compliant.

 

In general I realize the agreement looks enforceable, however there does seem to be a question as to whether it is a cancellable agreement as defined in CCA 1974, and if so, should it not be made clear as to our right to cancel within the agreement and or the terms and conditions.

 

I may be clutching at straws here, so your advice is taken on board.

 

All the best to you all.

 

San Martino

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 11 months later...

Hi, just picked this one up. We had an A&L loan with the same paperwork as above. Also questioned themn about the no right to cancel box and after 6 weeks of 'investigating our concerns' came back with a load of gumpf about Distance Marketing Regulations stating they did not need to provide cancellation rights.

 

Nonsense I thought. This loan was dealt with via post and at no time were any face to face discussions had, no branch visits etc. Went back to them over a year ago now stating we weren't happy with their response and ended up with two seperate letters from an A&L representative stating that she 'would not be entering into any further communication about this matter as it is inappropriate'.

 

Quite how discussing a legitimate query with a customer is 'inappropriate' I have no idea. We stopped paying making it clear we'd recommence once happy and we've heard nothing from them for around 13 months now. Interestingly I don't think they've even bothered to send a statement of account through either.

 

We also questionned the APR calculations asking them to provide a working out of how they had calculated the various rates. I'd been reading up on the great APR [problem] and was interested to read that many finance organisations and banks had used this in the past to generate extra sums. A&L had a great deal of difficulty providing these, asked why we wanted them etc before finally sending a letter with a series of equations and formulae on that made little sense to me.

 

When we'd asked for a detailed setting out of the calculations relating to our specific finance agreement it was entirely unhelpful to simply get sent a sample calculation with figures on that were wildly different to our own. No help at all and this I took to be a partially deliberate attempt to shut us up. Is it really too much to ask a finance organisation to supply the details applicable to our account? I thought not.

 

Anyway, that's our story, A&L couldn't have been less helpful and the tone of some of their letters was pretty aggressive. All I wanted was the details for the loan, hardly unreasonable. So, nothing heard from them for ages, no idea what they'll eventually do. Will update if anything happens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Any further dealings with A&L San? Ive just compared my app and t&c with yours and its identical - its even signed by the same A&L person so im interested in this. I am about to start my own thread though,

 

Madge

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

Hi. I too have received such a Fixed Sum loan agreement which is exactly the same as the OP. Mine also has no cooling off period, A&L signed the agreement before myself with the footnote "This offer is valid for 28 days from the date of the Alliance & Leicester signature"

This agreement was posted to me, pre-signed, for me to sign and return via post. The loan was taken out on the Internet.

The only difference is on page 1, A&L also charged me Personal Loan Protection which I did not sign for.

 

Also there are some key prescribed terms missing regarding repayments;

Frequency and timing of repayments;

Dates of repayments;

The manner in which any of the above may be determined; or in any other way, and any power of the creditor to vary what is payable.

I'm now having to deal with a DCA. Any advice?

Edited by frazefast
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...