Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • An update to this case as I’ve not been on in a while.    I am still awaiting a charging decision in the case. The two police officers involved have said their personal belief is a section 47 ABH charge is the most likely outcome but this isn’t a sure thing of course.    The EA certificate from the issuing court has now lapsed. The court have refused to recertify him until they’ve had a hearing in to the case, and the district judge has issued orders to surrender all evidence, footage, photos etc.    I have done so promptly.    the EA, not so much . Equita have claimed they cannot provide his bodycam footage as the camera he was wearing is the EA personal one not one of theirs.   the EA has claimed he has asked Equita and the police for the footage as he claims he doesn’t have it.    the police have confirmed they didn’t seize his camera and they don’t have it.    so they are basically pointing the finger at each other all the while failing to comply with the district judges order to provide all evidence they intend to rely on at the rescheduled hearing.    The district judge has stated the hearing for his certification will NOT be the hearing for my complaint as there is no charge as of yet, and just as to whether he should be recertified or not.    I’m not 100% on why that can’t be done at the time, but I’m not about to question a judge…..      
    • Thanks FTMDave, I like the cut of your jib - I'll go with that and obtain proof of postage. Encouraging that NPE have never followed through and seem to blowing hot air, let's see where they go after this   Regards
    • Please see my comments in orange within your post.
    • no i meant the email from parcel2go which email address did they send it from and who signed it off (whos name is at the bottom)
    • I understand confusion with this thread.  I tried to keep threads separate because there have been so many angles.    But a team member merged them all.  This is why it's hard to keep track. This forum exists to help little people fight injustice - however big or small.  Im here to try get a decent resolution. Not to give in to the ' big boys'. My "matter' became complicated 'matters' simply because a lender refused to sell a property. What can I say?  I'll try in a nutshell to give an overview: There's a long lease property. I originally bought it short lease with a s.146 on it from original freeholder.  I had no concerns. So lender should have been able to sell a well-maintained lovely long lease property.  The property was great. The issue is not the property.  Economy, sdlt increases, elections, brexit, covid, interest hikes etc didn't help.  The issue is simple - the lender wanted to keep it.   House or Flat? Before repo I offered to clear my loan.  I was a bit short and lender refused.  They said (recorded) they thought the property was worth much more and they were happy to keep accruing interest (in their benefit) until it reached a point where they felt they could repo and still easily quickly sell to get their £s back.  This was a mistake.  The market was (and is) tough.   2y later the lender ceo bid the same sum to buy the property for himself. He'd rejected higher offers in the intervening period whilst accruing interest. Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same. I had the property under offer to a fantastic niche buyer but lender rushed to repo and buyer got spooked and walked.  It had taken a long time to find such a lucrative buyer.  A sale which would have resulted in £s and another asset for me. Post repo lender had 1 offer immediately.  But dragged out the process for >1y - allegedly trying to get other offers. But disclosure shows there was only one valid buyer. Again, points as above. Lender appointed receiver (after 4 months) - simply to try acquire the freehold.  He used his powers as receiver to use me, as leaseholder, to serve notice on freeholders.  Legally that failed. Meanwhile lender failed to secure property - and squatters got in (3 times).  And they failed to maintain it.  So freeholders served a dilapidations notice (external) - on me as leaseholder (cc-ed to lender).   (That's how it works legally) Why serve a delapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease. I don't own the freehold.  But I am a trustee and have to do right by the freeholders.  This is where matters got/ get complicated.  And probably lose most caggers.   Lawyers got involved for the freeholders to firstly void the receiver enfranchisement notice. Secondly, to serve the dilapidations notice.  The lack of maintenance was in breach of lease and had to be served to protect fh asset. Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to buy the freehold of the property. It's normal, whether it is a "normal" leaseholder or a repossession with a leasehold house, to claim this right of enfranchisement and sell the property with said rights attached and the purchase price of the freehold included in the final completion price. That's likely what the mortgage provider wished to do. The lender did no repairs. They said a buyer would undertake them. Which was probably correct. If they had sold. After 1y lender finally agreed to sell to the 1st offeror and contracts went with lawyers.  Within 1 month lender reneged.  Lender tried to suggest buyer walked. Evidence shows he/ his lawyers continued trying to exchange (cash) for 4 months.  Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been to renege and for ceo to take control.   I still think that's their plan. Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at? Lender then stupidly chose to pretty much bulldoze the property.  Other stuff was going on in the background. After repo I was in touch by phone and email and lender knew post got to me.   Despite this, after about 10 months (before and then during covid), they deliberately sent SDs and eventually a B petition to an incorrect address and an obscure small court.  They never served me properly.  (In hindsight I understand they hoped to get a backdoor B - so they could keep the property that way.)  Eventually the random court told them to email me by way of service.  At this point their ruse to make me B failed.  I got a lawyer (friend paid). The B petition was struck out. They’d failed to include the property as an asset. They were in breach of insolvency rules. So this is dealt with then. Simultaneously the receiver again appointed lawyers to act on my behalf as leaseholder. This time to serve notice on the freeholders for a lease extension.  He had hoped to try and vary the strict lease. Evidence shows the already long length of lease wasn't an issue.  The lender obviously hoped to get round their lack of permission to do works (which they were already doing) by hoping to remove the strict clauses that prevent leaseholder doing alterations.  You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension. You'd need a Deed of Variation for that. This may be done at the same time but the lease has already been extended once and that's all they have a right to. The extension created a new legal angle for me to deal with.  I had to act as trustee for freeholders against me as leaseholder/ the receiver.  Inconsistencies and incompetence by receiver lawyers dragged this out 3y.  It still isn't properly resolved. The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there. Meanwhile - going back to the the works the lender undertook. The works were consciously in breach of lease.  The lender hadn't remedied the breaches listed in the dilapidations notice.  They destroyed the property.  The trustees compiled all evidence.  The freeholders lawyers then served a forfeiture notice. This notice started a different legal battle. I was acting for the freeholders against what the lender had done on my behalf as leaseholder.  This legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease. The simple exit would have been for lender to sell. A simple agreement to remedy the breaches and recompense the freeholders in compensation - and there's have been clean title to sell.  That option was proposed to them.   This happened by way of mediation for all parties 2y ago.  A resolution option was put forward and in principle agreed.  But immediately after the lender lawyers failed to engage.  A hard lesson to learn - mediation cannot be referred to in court. It's considered w/o prejudice. The steps they took have made no difference to their ability to sell the property.  Almost 3y since they finished works they still haven't sold. ** ** I followed up some leads myself.  A qualified cash buyer offered me a substantial sum.  The lender and receiver both refused it.   I found another offer in disclosure.  6 months later someone had apparently offered a substantial sum via an agent.  The receiver again rejected it.  The problem of course was that the agent had inflated the market price to get the business. But no-one was or is ever going to offer their list price.  Yet the receiver wanted/wants to hold out for the list price.  Which means 1y later not only has it not sold - disclosure shows few viewings and zero interest.  It's transparently over-priced.  And tarnished. For those asking why I don't give up - I couldn't/ can't.  Firstly I have fiduciary duties as a trustee. Secondly, legal advice indicates I (as leaseholder) could succeed with a large compensation claim v the lender.  Also - I started a claim v my old lawyer and the firm immediately reimbursed some £s. That was encouraging.  And a sign to continue.  So I'm going for compensation.  I had finance in place (via friend) to do a deal and take the property back off the lender - and that lawyer messed up bad.   He should have done a deal.  Instead further years have been wasted.   Maybe I only get back my lost savings - but that will be a result.   If I can add some kind of complaint/ claim v the receiver's conscious impropriety I will do so.   I have been left with nothing - so fighting for something is worth it. The lender wants to talk re a form of settlement.  Similar to my proposal 2y ago.  I have a pretty clear idea of what that means to me.  This is exactly why I do not give up.  And why I continue to ask for snippets of advice/ pointers on cag.  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Monument Credit Card - Help!!!


drob
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5079 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Over 2 months ago i tried to claim all the charges that Monument had levied on my account, Stupidly i accepted a part payment from them as a full and final settlement, which i now regret as i should have gone for the lot.

 

I then set up a payment plan for several months and Monument agreed to freeze interest and and charges on the account. The agreed term has now run out on the payment plan. I have wrote to Monument to try and set up another Payment plan, unfortunately to date they have not responded.

 

I am now being bombarded by an American call centre 2 to 3 times a day. They ask me to confirm my name and then become rude, aggresive and arrogant. Apart from confirming my name no other security checks are done to confirm my identity.

 

I have now asked them not to telephone me and that i will only deal with this matter in writing. They reply "We will phone you when we want to" I then asked them are they are aware of the English law of telephone harrasement. they replied "Are you aware of the American law" At this point i bit my tounge and simply hung up.........

 

I am looking for a bit of help on what options i have.......

 

> Even though i accepted a Full anf Final part settlement am i able to

start a fresh claim for unfair charges???

 

> Do i send them another telephone harrasement letter???

 

> Do i complain to a regulatory body if so whom???

 

>Monument are now owned by Raphaels Bank, does any one have any

addresses for Monument???

 

Many Thanks in advance for your help

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 118
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Monuments address is;

 

Monument Credit Services

PO Box 6476

Northhampton

NN4 1ZN

 

I too have a reduced payment plan with monument, which they set up in June last year. They did not stipulate a time period on it and have never heard from them since they aggreed to it.

 

Maybe I have your experiences to come shortly

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Sent off my £1 postal order to Monument for a copy of the CCA and received the following reply>>>>

 

"The agreement we have enclosed in this letter is a copy of your credit agreement which we are providing to you in accordance with our obligations under the requirements of section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (as ammended) (the CCA). Section 78(1) requires that we provide you with a copy of your executed agreement within 12 days of receiving your request for such a copy and upon the payment of £1.00"

 

"It is perhaps worth us explaining a little about the "copy of the executed agreement" section 78(1) requires us to provide to you. "Copy" for the purpose of the CCA does not refer to an exact copy of the agreement you signed. We are therefore not required by the CCA to provide you with a photocopy of the agreement showing your signature. Section 78 requires us to provide you with a copy of the agreement that looks like the one you signed but which has been updated to contain the terms and conditions which currently apply to your agreement (rather than those which applied at the time you signed the agreement) Importantly, the copy is not required to include your name or signature".

 

"We hope that you are now satisfied with the documentation we have provided and that you will now recommence payments on your account"

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Naomi Wort.

 

All that monument have sent along with the letter is Monument Visa Conditions and a copy of the Monument Conditions. Can anyone comment on the above reply from Monument and advise me on how i should reply to Monument?????

 

I have attatched what they have sent me.

Monument Visa Conditions0001.pdf

Monument 20001.pdf

Mon30001.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no expert but I think what they have sent is a load of tosh. Can't see what the first attached file is as it will not open but the other two are just terms and conditions, which may or may not be the ones that were current when you opening the account.

I don't think there is any way they could enforce this debt with what they have sent.

 

Someone more in the know will be along shortly I expect

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as im aware Monument are now part of Raphaels Bank and not Barclays hence the annoying and clueless American call centre.

 

I also asked for a statement with all transactions that they alledge i owe. They told me that they do this every month. They can't get into there head that that is a monthly statement that just shows the alledged balance and does not list any transactions.

 

Are they really this stupid or are they pulling the wool over my eyes?

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI,

Monument (or rather part of Monument) was sold by Barclays in April last year to an American company called CompuCredit Corporation. Their UK arm is CompuCredit UK Ltd.

I would suggest writing to these people.

Also, some other things to consider are if the t&cs actually allow them to send your data outside of the EC or not. If not then they have messed up big time by sending your data to the States. However (I did used to work for Barclaycard) it is likely that the t&cs would allow them to do this.

Secondly, debts are sold (or assigned) under the Law of Property Act 1925 and this states that you have to be given notice and that this notice has to be left at your property personally or sent by recorded delivery. Otherwise it is not effective.

If it is not effective then Compucredit do not actually own the debt (even though they think that they do). However it might be wise not to remind them of this fact until / unless they take you to court and then use it as part of your defence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a quick look at the T&C and it states the following>>>>>

 

Monument is a trading name of Raphaels Bank PLC, can you tell me what the connection is to CompuCredit UK ???

 

It also states that "We will store and process information on the Raphaels Bank Computer" so does that allow them to store my information outside the EC???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had a quick look at the T&C and it states the following>>>>>

 

Monument is a trading name of Raphaels Bank PLC, can you tell me what the connection is to CompuCredit UK ???

 

It also states that "We will store and process information on the Raphaels Bank Computer" so does that allow them to store my information outside the EC???

 

Hi,

 

I've had a look at the t&cs that you posted and I can't see any mention of Raphael anywhere. Could you post the document you have that mentions Raphael?

 

Barclays made a press statement at the time that it was selling to Compucredit. However, if you google this you'll find that at the same date there was also a sale from Raphael to Compucredit of the right to receive the receivables (ie your payments). So, it may be that teh deal was set up in some strange way to sell it to Raphael and then to sell it on to Compucredit.

 

Raphael Bank are part of a private group that also owns Southern Finance and a big currency exchange operation. So, given that it's a private company there's no indication who owns them.

 

 

Who you need to contact depends on who is writing to you, but if you just look on google you will find that "Raphael Bank" (without the plc - there is no company called Raphael Bank plc) is a trading name of:-

 

R. RAPHAEL & SONS PLC

ALBANY COURT YARD

47-48 PICCADILLY

LONDON

W1J 0LR

Company No. 01288938

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to throw another spanner in the works !!!!!! I have just checked my credit report and it states the Lenders name as Raphaels Bank.

 

It also marks the account as delinquent, and the delinquent date is 30th December 1899 :lol:

 

No defaults have been registered

Link to post
Share on other sites

They are a strange bunch Monument.

 

I have an credit card account with them, which at the time of issue was part of Barclays group, Plus 2 Barclaycard accounts.

 

When I could not afford the repayments in March last year I contacted Monument with a token payment offer and they accepted immediately and seemed quite happy to have their £1.50 a month and even suspended all interest and charges, I have never heard anything from them since March last year.

 

Barclays on the other hand are complete A Holes, would accept nothing I offered, banged on the interest and charges, then famed it out to the various DCA's, could supply no proper CCA, just application froms and are still adament that the application form is the executed agreement.

 

So it would appear that Monument are bangin the same drum here. Write to them as advised and inform them of their misgivings.

 

My credit file also had a entry as Raphaels Bank, same as you delinquent 30th Dec 1899. No default issue on my account either

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, you need to write to Monument at either of the addresses that they gave you. You can either write to the PO Box 504 address that they give for complaints in the About Us section in the top right hand corner or you can write to the registered office of the company which is given in the paragraph below. All ltd companies have to give a registered office so that legal or other documents have a definite place that they can be served.

Looking at the bottom of the How we use your information box it clearly has a bit about what will happen if they transfer your data overseas so that is ok.

You mentioned about requesting your statements in an earlier post. You need to do this with an sar otherwise they are quite within their rights to tell you to get lost.

With the Full and Final settlement of charges earlier, if you signed anything to agree that it was full and final then there is nothing you can do about it. However, if they’ve put any more charges on since then you can still claim those back.

With the telephone harassment it might be worthwhile seeing if you can get the name of the company that are phoning you up to find out who it is. On a more practical note if you dial 1471 after the call and it comes up with a telephone number then you can use BT’s call barring service to bar all calls from that number – there’s also one for withheld numbers. But I’m not too sure if it works with overseas numbers – you’ll need to ask them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

nicklea, many thanks for your help. but have Monument satisfied my request for an executed CCA?? Is what they have sent me merely just terms & conditions?? This is what they have written in their reply>>

 

"The agreement we have enclosed in this letter is a copy of your credit agreement which we are providing to you in accordance with our obligations under the requirements of section 78(1) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974 (as ammended) (the CCA). Section 78(1) requires that we provide you with a copy of your executed agreement within 12 days of receiving your request for such a copy and upon the payment of £1.00"

 

"It is perhaps worth us explaining a little about the "copy of the executed agreement" section 78(1) requires us to provide to you. "Copy" for the purpose of the CCA does not refer to an exact copy of the agreement you signed. We are therefore not required by the CCA to provide you with a photocopy of the agreement showing your signature. Section 78 requires us to provide you with a copy of the agreement that looks like the one you signed but which has been updated to contain the terms and conditions which currently apply to your agreement (rather than those which applied at the time you signed the agreement) Importantly, the copy is not required to include your name or signature".

 

"We hope that you are now satisfied with the documentation we have provided and that you will now recommence payments on your account"

 

Yours Sincerely

 

Naomi Wort.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Im planning on sending the following reply in reference to their reply to my request for a CCA. Please can anyone have a look and advise??

 

 

DearMonument,

 

Before I continue I wish to establish that I am not seeking to avoid responsibility for any alleged debt or breach of any alleged agreement that I may have or have had.

 

Thank you for your recent letter sent to me dated April 8th 2008, the contents of which are noted. However, the reply received by me does not fulfill your requirements under the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

 

The Act demands that I am supplied with a true copy of any properly executed credit agreement that exists in relation to the above account. I may ask for this on demand providing that a fee of £1.00 is paid. This fee was sent with my original letter, dated 26th March 2008. I also asked for a full statement of my account

 

Upon receipt of the original request the specified account legally entered into disputed status.

 

You had until 9th April 2008 to provide me with the true executed copy I requested. You have now entered into default of my request. If the request is not satisfied after a further 30 days then you commit an offence.

 

Accordingly, it is my consideration that you have been unable to supply an agreement because no such agreement exists.

 

Your non-compliance with my request means that your company has committed an offence under Section 77 (4) of the Consumer Credit Act 1974, summarily punishable by a Level 4 fine on the standard scale.

 

Any court action you may take will be vigorously defended using Sections 61 and 127 of the CCA 1974, which will preclude a judge from making an enforcement order in this instance.

 

Should you nevertheless choose to initiate legal proceedings against me, I will expect to receive, with any Letter before Action, a copy of the document that you will be relying on as proof that a properly executed agreement, complying in all respects with the form and content requirements of the CCA was signed by myself in respect of this alleged debt

 

I hope that you will enter into a sincere dialogue with me about this matter and I am writing this letter to you on the assumption that you would prefer to do this than merely respond with standard letters and leaflets.

 

 

I look forward to hearing from you in writing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi drob,

 

What you have been sent seems to be fine for the s78 request. You've got a document with all the prescribed terms on it - they don't have to show your signature or anything. Looking at the last page there is a reference 09/06 which would imply that this dates from Sept 2006. Was your account opened round about then or was it opened earlier? If it was opened earlier then they also need to send you the original t&cs as well in order to comply.

 

A s78 request is totally different from what they will have to supply if it goes to court - in that case they do have to supply you with everything. But for a s78 request, with the proviso of what I've said about it does appear that they have complied with your request.

 

I also note that there is no number 13 in the t&cs - very strange - is there a page missing or is this one of those American things of not using the number 13?

 

Also, and this is really strange, there is no mention of any charges anywhere in the document. So, in terms of this contract they cannot apply ANY charges to your account other than interest.

 

Just a thought about the opening para in bold of your letter, I don't think that is necessary

Link to post
Share on other sites

The account with monument was opened in February 2004. So am i correct in saying that unless they send me the old t&c they have not complied with my request for an executed CCA?

Link to post
Share on other sites

that is my understanding - yes

 

However, you don't need to go writing them letters, I personally don't believe it achieves much. Also, don't get too hung up on the whole s78 thing. For example, Morgan Stanley sent me this sort of rubbish when I did a s78 request and then, when it came to court they provided the actual agreement itself.

 

The best way to get information from a company - including the actual agreement itself - is to do an sar.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am dissapointed that if you pay £1 you should receive a "true and executed" copy of your CCA and not terms and conditions. So without sensing off a Subject Access Request it is just guess work, do they or don't they have a "true and executed" copy.

 

I have previously requested a S.A.R from a previous dispute from Monument but have recently shredded the information and to be honest i do not remember seeing a true and executed copy of a credit agreement.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...