Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • quite honestly id email shiply CEO with that crime ref number and state you will be taking this to court, for the full sum of your losses, if it is not resolved ASAP. should that be necessary then i WILL be naming Shiply as the defendant. this can be avoided should the information upon whom the courier was and their current new company contact details, as the present is simply LONDON VIRTUAL OFFICES  is a company registered there and there's a bunch of other invisible companies so clearly just a mail address   
    • If it doesn’t sell easily : what they can get at an auction becomes fair market price, which may not realise what you are hoping.
    • Thank you. The receiver issue is a rabbit hole I don't think I'm going to enjoy going down. These people seem so protected. And I don't understand how or why?  Fair market value seems to be ever shifting and contentious.
    • Hungary is attempting to be a world power in manufacturing electric vehicle batteries, despite locals' reservations.View the full article
    • You can't, but you can (and really should) bring up the point that the lender isn't meeting their legal obligations in selling the property for fair market value. You'll have to do this in court, though. A receiver is bought in by the lender, not you. If they're a registered insolvency practitioner, you may be able to raise a complaint to the insolvency service but there are no guarantees here. Many receivers are also registered with the RICS and self-regulate so if you know the name of the receiver you can check there, again no guarantees. https://www.rics.org/surveyor-careers/career-development/accreditations/registered-property-receivership-scheme
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Paid Vanquis twice in one month!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2706 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I recently received a Vanquis credit card, to help build up my credit, & also to help out during Christmas.

 

My minimum payment was due today(28/11/16),

I have already paid Vanquis twice.

 

Once on the 10th of November & again on the 23rd of November.

A refund of £28 was also paid on the 24th of November.

 

I don't understand why they have tried to take money from my bank account, when I have already paid them twice in one month.

 

I was told that I can make early payments, & I am aware that I have set up a direct debit for Vanquis.

 

They have tried to take a DD of £20 from my bank account, which has now been returned, because I didn't have sufficient funds in my account.

 

does this mean that it doesn't matter if I make a payment early to Vanquis & I will still be debited on the same date as every month?

 

I thought I was doing them a favour too, & in the end they have charged me a fee for not paying them on the intended date!

 

There's a flaw in the plan man!

Link to post
Share on other sites

improves your credit rating is a myth

unless you have no other credit accounts on your file.

 

as for you payments.

 

I will guess you made these payments yourself

and that there was an outstanding balance still after them?

 

 

thus when it came around to the 'correct' payment date

as per your statement,

they collected the minimum payment,

or whatever you'd set the DD too.?

 

if this is the case then your payments were accepted correctly as you voluntarily made them

but as there was an outstanding balance, they rightly collected under the DD agreement you signed.

 

so they've done nowt wrong....

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Vanquis are always doing this,

you make your manually but then they still request the payment via dd on the due date.

 

So what can you do about it?

 

Well there are a couple of things.

Choose one way to pay them,

either manually or by direct debit,

 

 

if you have a dd set up for the minimum payment then any manual payments will be in addition to that dd.

 

Ring vanquis and check if they have, or will charge you for a failed dd when the minimum payment has already been made.

 

Check that your bank isnt charging you for a failed dd.

 

As long as its not a regular occurrence(with the bank) regarding failed dd, then they may be willing to refund any charges levied as a gogw,

 

 

worth ringing and asking and pointing out that as you had already paid the payment, you did not expect the dd to be called upon aswell.

 

With vanquis you can do the same and ask that any charge is refunded on the same basis, that you paid early and did not then expect a dd payment as well.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Martin, I'll give Vanquis a call first thing tomorrow.

I might just cancel the direct debit with my bank & pay Vanquis manually.

 

Thanks dx100uk. I kinda thought that, & now know it was too good to be true.

I did make those payments voluntarily, so yes, I guess they haven't done anything wrong.

I will phone them tomorrow to check up on this.

 

Oh & by the way, because I made early payments, my statement said there was nothing pending for this month.

That's why I assumed that they wouldn't take anything from my bank account on the 28th of November.

Very misleading.

 

Do you think that's why the DD was returned?

 

Suzymcc.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think you could be right..nothing to pay so returned

 

 

so get that sorted

I wouldn't be cancelling the DD

I think its a contractual matter with all credit cards?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

No thats just how vanquis operate, regardless of manual payments they will always take the dd aswell. Note that when a dd is paid on 28th for example, the request for the dd will be sent to your bank 3 days before this, so 25th in this case.

The dd is probably set for the minimum amount due so any additional manual payments are on top of this.

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope.... I paid Vanquis and I currently pay Capital One via a manual payment. Sooo much easier...

No terms on it...

 

Its safe to cancel DD at this point. Just make manual payments.

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nope....

 

"Nope" to which bit FK?

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

Click Here To Make A Donation

I am not legally trained or qualified, any advice i offer is gleaned from experience and general knowledge, if you are still unsure after receiving advice please seek legal advice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Arh sorry xd - This is To DX's point. There are no term that specify that you *MUST* keep a DD to pay them. :)

Vanquis and Cap One allow you to pay via Debit Card etc

 

We could do with some help from you.

 

Have we helped you ...?         Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

**Fko-Filee**

Receptaculum Ignis

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...