Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • the claimant in their WS can refer to whatever previous CC judgements they like, as we do in our WS's, but CC judgements do not set a legal precedence. however, they do often refer to judgements like Bevis, those cases do created a precedence as they were court of appeal rulings. as for if the defendant, prior to the raising of a claim, dobbed themselves in as the driver in writing during any appeal to the PPC, i don't think we've seen one case whereby the claimant referred to such in their WS.. ?? but they certainly typically include said appeal letters in their exhibits. i certainly dont think it's a good idea to 'remind' them of such at the defence stage, even if the defendant did admit such in a written appeal. i would further go as far to say, that could be even more damaging to the whole case than a judge admonishing a defendant for not appealing to the PPC in the 1st place. it sort of blows the defendant out the water before the judge reads anything else. dx  
    • Hi LFI, Your knowledge in this area is greater than I could possibly hope to have and as such I appreciate your feedback. I'm not sure that I agree the reason why a barrister would say that, only to get new customers, I'm sure he must have had professional experience in this area that qualifies him to make that point. 🙂 In your point 1 you mention: 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver. I understand the point you are making but I was referring to when the keeper is also the driver and admits it later and only in this circumstance, but I understand what you are saying. I take on board the issues you raise in point 2. Is it possible that a PPC (claimant) could refer back to the case above as proof that the motorist should have appealed, like they refer back to other cases? Thanks once again for the feedback.
    • Well barristers would say that in the hope that motorists would go to them for advice -obviously paid advice.  The problem with appealing is at least twofold. 1] there is a real danger that some part of the appeal will point out that the person appealing [the keeper ] is also the driver.  And in a lot of cases the last thing the keeper wants when they are also the driver is that the parking company knows that. It makes it so much easier for them as the majority  of Judges do not accept that the keeper and the driver are the same person for obvious reasons. Often they are not the same person especially when it is a family car where the husband, wife and children are all insured to drive the same car. On top of that  just about every person who has a valid insurance policy is able to drive another person's vehicle. So there are many possibilities and it should be up to the parking company to prove it to some extent.  Most parking company's do not accept appeals under virtually any circumstances. But insist that you carry on and appeal to their so called impartial jury who are often anything but impartial. By turning down that second appeal, many motorists pay up because they don't know enough about PoFA to argue with those decisions which brings us to the second problem. 2] the major parking companies are mostly unscrupulous, lying cheating scrotes. So when you appeal and your reasons look as if they would have merit in Court, they then go about  concocting a Witness Statement to debunk that challenge. We feel that by leaving what we think are the strongest arguments to our Member's Witness Statements, it leaves insufficient time to be thwarted with their lies etc. And when the motorists defence is good enough to win, it should win regardless of when it is first produced.   
    • S13 (2)The creditor may not exercise the right under paragraph 4 to recover from the keeper any unpaid parking charges specified in the notice to keeper if, within the period of 28 days beginning with the day after that on which that notice was given, the creditor is given— (a)a statement signed by or on behalf of the vehicle-hire firm to the effect that at the material time the vehicle was hired to a named person under a hire agreement; (b)a copy of the hire agreement; and (c)a copy of a statement of liability signed by the hirer under that hire agreement. As  Arval has complied with the above they cannot be pursued by EC----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- S14 [1]   the creditor may recover those charges (so far as they remain unpaid) from the hirer. (2)The conditions are that— (a)the creditor has within the relevant period given the hirer a notice in accordance with sub-paragraph (5) (a “notice to hirer”), together with a copy of the documents mentioned in paragraph 13(2) and the notice to keeper; (b)a period of 21 days beginning with the day on which the notice to hirer was given has elapsed;  As ECP did not send copies of the documents to your company and they have given 28 days instead of 21 days they have failed to comply with  the Act so you and your Company are absolved from paying. That is not to say that they won't continue asking to be paid as they do not have the faintest idea how PoFA works. 
    • Euro have got a lot wrong and have failed to comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 Schedule 4.  According to Section 13 after ECP have written to Arval they should then send a NTH to the Hirer  which they have done.This eliminates Arval from any further pursuit by ECP. When they wrote to your company they should have sent copies of everything that they asked Arval for. This is to prove that your company agree what happened on the day of the breach. If ECP then comply with the Act they are allowed to pursue the hirer. If they fail, to comply they cannot make the hirer pay. They can pursue until they are blue in the face but the Hirer is not lawfully required to pay them and if it went to Court ECP would lose. Your company could say who was driving but the only person that can be pursued is the Hirer, there does not appear to be an extension for a driver to be pursued. Even if there was, because ECP have failed miserably to comply with the Act  they still have no chance of winning in Court. Here are the relevant Hire sections from the Act below.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Hoist/Cohen claimform - JDW CAT debt ***Claim Withdrawn***


pcrdaddy
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 2914 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Good Evening Forum.

 

I wonder if you can please help me

 

 

i got court papers in the post from a company called howard cohen in relation to another company called hoist portfolio.

 

The claim forms say its in respect of an alleged debt to JD Williams back in 2011 for £233.30 but there claim including costs and interest is £400.37

 

I remember back in to 2011 to receiving statements from this company even though i never had an account,

I contacted the company to which they said goods had been delivered and signed for,

I disputed this as i work all the time and so does my wife and nobody is home all day

to which they disbelieved me and continued to send correspondence to my home.

 

I continued to ignore them as i believed they had the wrong person or made some sort of error,

The issue went away until i started receiving debt letters

i contacted these companies to explain it had nothing to do with me and to stop contacting me.

 

I didn't hear nothing for years up till Friday when i received court papers claiming i owe this money.

 

I contacted Hoist portfolio and whilst talking to them i went into a police station as they were adamant i owed it and received the goods,

Whilst they were still on the line on hold trying to find more info

i explained to the police officer that allegedly goods were sent to my home address to which i never received.

 

I was abit disappointed that the police would not take this seriously they said that no crime had been committed against me

and it was up to the person who sent the goods to report it.

 

Hoist were still on the line when i left the station and observed what had been said and i relayed it once again back to them

that its up to them to report this to the police to which they said they would NOT be doing.

 

I was very annoyed at this point as i feel i have been a victim of fraud and hoist could see i was trying to get this sorted

and attempt to get the police to investigate this.

 

I have asked Hoist for all the paperwork relating to this account the original agreement along with delivery signatures

and date of delivery so i can get my work to go back and check my rota for that date and year.

 

They said they would put the account on hold for 8 weeks till they can request this information from the client.

 

I feel all this is unjust i have been a victim of fraud and being treated like a common criminal

whilst trying to deal with them they kept saying you owe it no compassion that i am a victim of a crime,

They are not even going to investigate what i am saying to them its on hold only for them to get paperwork to send me.

 

Whilst reading around the internet i see people sending them requests for agreements and default notices in my situation its fraud

should i still request this information from them,

Rather than allowing them 8 weeks should i start the ball rolling to give them 12+2 to send it instead?

 

I feel i have run out of options to prove i have not received these goods as police not interested

even manager my call was escalated to kept saying you could of got somebody to receive the goods whilst you were at work

implying i could of got somebody else to steal them absolutely absurd, 2 hours i was on the phone to them on friday.

 

I am just a typical family man on crap wages trying to support my young family and i really do not need this

as i work in an industry where a CCJ would destroy your career,

 

 

Potentially from this i could lose my job & my home as i earn just enough to keep head above water.

I feel my only route is one that others use in relation to default notices and CCA requests

i feel i should not have to do this as its fraud but do you think i should as i got no other option?

 

These court papers have the 6th Jan dated on them, The information i will type below that's in particulars of claim.

 

"The claim is in the sum of £233.30 being monies due from defendant in respect of goods supplied by JD Williams

and company limited (EX JD WILLIAMS) The debt was legally assigned by JD Williams

and company limited (EX JD WILLIAMS) to the claimant and notice has been served.

 

The defendant defaulted with payment and is liable, The claimant claims

 

(1) the sum of £233.30 (2) Interest pursuant to s69 of county court act 1984 at a rate of 8.00 percent from the 10/08/11 to the date here of 1606 is the sum of £82.07

 

(3) Future interest accruing at daily rate of £.05

 

(4) Costs

 

I really do not know what to do,

I have the call from friday recorded all 2 hours of it as my phone auto records all calls in and out,

I was thinking of raising a complaint to regulator along with sending them the call as the stuff

that was being suggested to me after i told them i was a victim of fraud

and going into police station whilst they were still on the phone they still suggested

i was in cahoots with these apparent goods that's been allegedly delivered.

 

I moved into the old property around about 6 months prior to getting the statements from Jd Williams

and the area is drug ridden and theft constantly on daily basis

and i am sure people knew myself or partner would not be there in the daytime.

 

Hoist told me i was responsible for checking my credit file,

I explained i have never done that as i don't live above my means and have no reason to,

But i think it maybe in hindsight now to get a copy to see what other things could be potentially on it.

 

Sorry for such long post i wanted to get the facts out,

I would be so grateful if somebody could help me as i cannot afford to take time off work

or a solicitor and feel this company is trying it on as

 

 

they have told me to forget about the court papers for now whilst its on hold for 8 weeks

but i have a feeling deep down that they could just get the court order by default,

 

Thank you for reading my post

 

All the best

 

Pcr

Link to post
Share on other sites

can you7 fill this Q&A out please

and paste it here

 

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?419198-You-have-received-a-Claim-What-you-need-to-do.-**UPDATED-December-2014**

 

 

then we'll have the info to help properly

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

firstly

stay off the phone

 

 

its a civil debt

if it is fraud, well that's for them to its prove not.

 

 

just remember

a dca is not a bailiff

and have

no such legal powers.

 

 

they issue 10'000's of speculative claims every week

hoping to find mugs that don't bother defending

so they get a default rubberstamped judgement.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Name of the Claimant Hoist Portfolio

Date of issue 6th Jan 2016

What is the claim for:

 

 

1. The claim is in the sum of £233.30 being monies due from defendant in respect of goods supplied by JD williams and company limited (EX JD WILLIAMS)

The debt was legally assigned by JD Williams and company limited (EX JD WILLIAMS) to the claimant and notice has been served.

 

2.The defendant defaulted with payment and is liable,

The claimant claims

 

(1) the sum of £233.30 (2) Interest pursuant to s69 of county courticon act 1984 at a rate of 8.00 percent from the 10/08/11 to the date here of 1606 is the sum of £82.07

 

(3) Future interest accruing at daily rate of £.05

 

(4) Costs

 

What is the value of the claim? £400.37

What Is Claim For Alleged Catalogue Goods

When did you enter into the original agreement before or after 2007? I never entered agreement fraud alledged 2011

Has the claim been issued by the original creditor

or was the account assigned and it is the Debt purchaser who has issued the claim Hoist Portfolio

 

Were you aware the account had been assigned – did you receive a Notice of Assignment? No Did NOT receive this document

 

Did you receive a Default Notice from the original creditor? No

 

Have you been receiving statutory notices headed “Notice of Default sums” – at least once a year No Never

Why did you cease payments? Didn't Make any payments at all

What was the date of your last payment? N/A

Was there a dispute with the original creditor that remains unresolved? Yes, I told them back in 2011 it was fraud they didnt act or do nothing.

Did you communicate any financial problems to the original creditor

and make any attempt to enter into a debt management plan NO

Link to post
Share on other sites

ok 1st port of call is go ack [AOS] the claim on the MCOL website

defend all

leave juris unticked

 

 

get a CCA request running to hoist

get a CPR 31:14 from the legal section of the library running to cohen

 

 

read the full threads of each first before sending them

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Dx

 

Just in middle of doing the CCA request am i right in saying i use s78 in my circumstances?

 

By issueing the CCA request would this also cover the default notice and the yearly account statements??

 

I have no documentation what so ever to defend myself :(

 

Thank You

 

PCR

Link to post
Share on other sites

read the full threads of each and all the posts below each document

everything is explained there

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

with ref to claimform number XXXXXX

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

default is mentioned in the POC

so is the notice of assignment.

so those should be in your 31:14 list?

 

 

statement of account is part of the CCA request return they must send.

 

 

time to get reading like thread in this forum on CAT debts .

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

we've been having a little rethink behind the scenes about the number to use on the CCA

 

 

have you never had any other letters regarding this 'debt'

 

 

and theres def no mention of any numbers in their poc?

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx

 

Thanks for your reply, Don't say that i've just had right hassle printing it off lol

 

I had calls from hoist in the past but told them to remove my number which they did and never heard from them.

 

Sorry what do you mean mention of numbers in POC? What i wrote above from POC is exactly how its written on the form word for word.

 

I moved address Feb 2015 so don't know if they sent letters after that point but they seem to found my new address

 

Thanks

Edited by pcrdaddy
Link to post
Share on other sites

ah prob sent to an old address then.

 

 

they are very unlikely to respond anyway to CCA Requestlink3.gif.

..I think the defence can be submitted challenging the lack of information

...no account number and therefore pursuant to CPR 16.4 (2a 1)

 

(2) If the claimant is seeking interest he must –

 

(a) state whether he is doing so –

(i) under the terms of a contract;

 

 

 

to comply with cpr 16.4...

 

 

...in particular ...

 

16.4

(1)Particulars of claim must include –

(a)a concise statement of the facts on which the claimant relies;

 

 

 

Contents of the particulars of claim

16.4

(1)Particulars of claim must include –

(a)a concise statement of the facts on which the claimant relies;

(b)if the claimant is seeking interest, a statement to that effect and the details set out in paragraph (2);

©if the claimant is seeking aggravated damages or exemplary damages , a statement to that effect and his grounds for claiming them;

(d)if the claimant is seeking provisional damages, a statement to that effect and his grounds for claiming them; and

(e)such other matters as may be set out in a practice direction.

 

 

have you looked at your credit file?

 

 

that might give you a clue to an account number

 

 

try noddle listed below.

 

 

if that shows an account number

use that in the CCA request.

the debt will prob show robbersway as the owner.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dx

 

Thanks for your reply.

 

Should i put in my defence straight away or wait for the information to come or time to expire?

 

I really am going to need something to copy and paste as a defence as trying to go through it with the jargon i could easily mess it up.

 

Thank you for your continued help i wouldn't know where to start on my own,

 

 

Do you think i should inform my employer of this fraud and the situation i find myself in with the threat of a CCJ,

If i don't and it all goes belly up i am straight out of a job

 

I will be making a complaint to them as well

in hope of taking it to regulator over the 2 hours of treatment i was subjected to when i made it clear i was a victim of fraud,

 

 

The way they conducted themselves was shocking and the things being said to me were just outrageous

 

I know something for certain once this is over and done with ill be doing what i do best building a website

and exposing this call that was recorded to the world.

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

well don't worry too much about all that for the mo.

 

 

you seem rather green,

not your fault, but this is how the debt collection industry works.

 

 

its by far the biggest and most profitable banking offshoot there is...

 

 

any way

 

 

can you go look at your credit file.

 

 

we need to move this fwd in the next day or so.

 

 

but no immediate rush to do anything you've done the important thing

acking the claim defend all.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks DX

 

I will once i finish work today look into obtaining my credit file something i never done before.

 

My wife will also get the £1 postal order and send both letters via first class recorded delivery first thing in the morning

 

I will try not to worry too much about it but its human nature when everything is on the line to be anxious.

 

Once again thanks for your help, I am off to bed up in a few hours for work.

 

Good Nigh

 

PCR

Link to post
Share on other sites

wont hurt to hold off on the cca incase the cra file gives you the number.

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Quick Update

 

Sorry for the late reply to this.

 

Hoist has decided they no longer want to pursue their claim and have withdrawn it :)

 

Thank you so much DX100uk for all your advice, On a downside have another company wanting to sue me now will make a new thread in relation to this.

 

Regards

 

PCR

Link to post
Share on other sites

so you filed a defence and they ran away?

 

 

dx

please don't hit Quote...just type we know what we said earlier..

DCA's view debtors as suckers, marks and mugs

NO DCA has ANY legal powers whatsoever on ANY debt no matter what it's Type

and they

are NOT and can NEVER  be BAILIFFS. even if a debt has been to court..

If everyone stopped blindly paying DCA's Tomorrow, their industry would collapse overnight... 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...