Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • This is a ridiculous situation.  The lender has made so many stupid errors of judgement.  I refuse to bow down and willingly 'pay' for their mistakes.  I really want to put this behind me and move on.  I can't yet. 
    • Peter McCormack says he has secured a 15-year lease on the club's Bedford ground.View the full article
    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me (as trustee and leaseholder) with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

What am i entitled too?? WTC/CTC/IS??


bumblebee2009
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5305 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

 

I wonder if any one can help me!

 

My life has changed dramatically over the last year and trying to find out what I am entitled too has so far been a nightmare!!!

 

Brief description about me and the situation:

 

I was kicked out of my house by a family member when I was pregnant, and went to stay with my dad temporary! I will be moving to a new place at the end of this month through help from the homeless (Deposit scheme) and will be claiming housing benefit!

 

I was advised by CAB that I was not entitled to any thing other then child benefit and housing benefit!

 

I have now found out I am entitled to working tax credit, child tax and income support??? But im not sure if this is correct! And if so how it will affect the housing benefit!!

 

There is too much info, and I don’t seem to be able to complete one form that gives all the answers!! So please if any one can help that would be great!

 

Additional info: I was working as an account assistant full time (40 hours) and I started my maternity leave on the first of June, and my baby was born in July. I now only get statuary maternity pay and child benefit!

 

As I said my life has totally changed and I have always worked prior to this and I just want to get things back on track!

 

Sorry for the extremely long post! But im at my wits end trying to get some help!!

 

Thanks in advance!!

 

Also... i am now a single mother but do intend to return to work at the end of my maternity

Edited by bumblebee2009
Link to post
Share on other sites

I get £123 per week for SMP, and at the moment i only get child benefit! I was told that i wasnt entitled to anything else but have just found out that i can get child tax benefit but im note sure whether or not i can get this with income support and working tax?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Working Tax Credit (Entitlement and Maximum Rate) Regulations Reg.5 & 5A

 

If a claimant receives Maternity Allowance, Statutory Maternity Pay, Statutory Adoption Pay or Statutory Paternity Pay, they are treated as being in work from the date these payments began, as long as they were in qualifying remunerative work (of at least 16 or 30 hours, whichever applies) before going on the maternity/adoption/paternity leave. It should be noted, that whether or not they received MA/SMP/SAP/SPP, a claimant on ordinary maternity/ordinary adoption/paternity leave, is treated as in work provided they were in qualifying remunerative work before that leave began. A claimant undertaking a period of additional maternity/adoption leave is treated as in qualifying remunerative work during the first 13 weeks of that additional leave period provided they were in qualifying remunerative work before the initial period of ordinary maternity/adoption leave began.

 

A claimant who is already a parent before going on the ordinary maternity, ordinary adoption or paternity leave, can claim WTC if they worked at least 16 hours a week before the leave began. From April 2004 they can claim the WTC childcare element to help with the costs of eligible childcare for the new baby/child as well as for other children in the family. (For claims for the year 2003/04, claimants could not claim for the cost of childcare for the new child, for which they were taking leave, but could claim the childcare element for the costs of childcare for any other child in the family).

 

If a claimant is becoming a parent for the first time, WTC is available before the baby/child arrives if they were aged 25 or over and worked at least 30 hours a week before the ordinary maternity, ordinary adoption or paternity leave began. From April 2004, a first-time parent can claim WTC, including the childcare element, from the child’s date of birth or placement for adoption, as long as they usually worked at least 16 hours a week before the maternity, adoption or paternity leave began. (For claims in the year 2003/04, a first-time parent could not claim WTC when going on maternity, adoption or paternity leave unless they were aged 25 or over and usually worked at least 30 hours a week before the leave began. Childcare element for the new baby/child was not available).

Working Tax Credit (Entitlement and Maximum Rate) Regulations Reg.5 (4)

 

A person who is self-employed is treated as being in qualifying remunerative work for any period which would have been ordinary maternity/ordinary adoption/paternity leave if they had been an employee. The self-employed person must meet the work requirement before that "leave" began.

 

 

 

 

You can claim Income Support only when your SMP runs out and if you decide that you are not going back to work,

You would get £64.30 per week plus your child tax credits about £63 per week and Child benefit of £20

and full housing benefit entitlement

if you can claim WTC then you will have to cancel it before you make the claim to IS or it will nil your claim

 

You should claim child tax credits and working tax credits straight away :)

good luck with every thing

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you so much for your reply!

 

I spoke to job centre on Thurs regarding community care grant and was informed that i can claim income support, and made a claim that day. This was because i am only getting SMP and therefore my income is not high enough. I informed them that i have put in a claim for working tax and child tax and they said that was fine... now this is where i get confused!!

 

I would think that they would cancel each other out, however it does seem to look that i can claim working tax credit for 26 weeks as im on mat leave and it wouldnt affect the income support etc...

 

...Also if i claim WTC and CTC my housing benefit goes down, however on income support it is then paid!!

 

It would be great if there was a loop hole that let me get that as its like im being punished for having a baby especially as i have always worked full time but i doubt it!!

 

Sorry if i am babbling im just so confused, there is all this information but trying to get it together is a headache!! I just dont want to be overpaid and then they claim it back etc!

 

Thanks again!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi

think you have been advised wrongly

Income Support is £64.30 for you as a lone parent.

You have SMP which is way over that amount, you would not be entitled to IS as your SMP would be classes as an income. Income Support is for people with no Income Unfortunately at the moment you have SMP. When that runs out you could claim IS then if you wanted to.

 

 

If you claim WTC then decide not to go back to work for what ever reason and claim I.S instead, you would have to cancel WTC because that would be classed as an Income for I.S purposes.

 

You can claim WTC now as you are still employed , and child tax credits because you are entitled to that for the baby.

Go to the site and get a calculation.

 

 

As regards to Housing Benefit, if you are on IS get then you get full housing benefit but you would need to claim Income Based HB at the moment as you have an income SMP

If go to your local council web page there will be a calaculator put in your figurbe entitled to and see how much you will get

 

Unfortunately you can not get SMP I.S and WTC at the same time. Why they told you to make a claim I dont know.

bit confusing I know

good luck ;)

Edited by MIKEY DABODEE
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...