Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • ae - i have no funds to appoint lawyers.   My point about most caggers getting lost is simply due to so many layers of legal issues that is bound to confuse.  
    • Lenders have a legal obligation to sell the property for the best price they can get. If they feel the offer is low they won't sell it, because it's likely the borrower will say the same.   Yes.  But every interested buyer was offering within a range - based on local market sales evidence.  Shelter site says a lender is not allowed to wait for the market to improve. Why serve a dilapidations notice? If it's in the terms of the lease to maintain the property to a good standard, then serve an S146 notice instead as it's a clear breach of the lease.   The dilapidations notice was a legal first step.  Freeholders have to give time to leaseholders to remedy.  Lender lawyers advised the property was going to be sold and the new buyer would undertake the work.  Their missive came shortly before contracts were given to buyer.  The buyer lawyer and freehold lawyers were then in contact.  The issue of dilapidations remedy was discussed..  But then lender reneged.  There was a few months where neither I nor freeholders were sure what was going on.  Then suddenly demolition works started.   Before one issues a s146 one has to issue a LBA.  That is eventually what happened. ...legal battle took 3y to resolve. Again, order them to revert it as they didn't have permission to do the works, or else serve an S146 notice for breach of the lease   A s146 was served.  It took 3y but the parties came to a settlement.   (They couldn't revert as they had ripped out irreplaceable historical features). The lease has already been extended once so they have no right to another extension. It seems pretty easy to just get the lawyer to say no and stick by those terms as the law is on your side there.  That's not the case   One can ask for another extension.  In this instance the freeholders eventually agreed with a proviso for the receiver not to serve another. You wouldn't vary a lease through a lease extension.  Correct.  But receiver lawyer was an idiot.   He made so many errors.  No idea why the receiver instructed him?  He used to work for lender lawyers. I belatedly discovered he was sacked for dishonesty and fined a huge sum by the sra  (though kept his licence).  He eventually joined another firm and the receiver bizarrely chose him to handle the extension.  Again he messed up - which is why the matter still hasn't been properly concluded.   In reality, its quite clear the lender/ receiver were just trying to overwhelm me with work (and costs) due to so many legal  issues.  Also they tried to twist things (as lawyers sometimes do).  They tried to create a situation where the freeholders would get a wasted costs order - the intent was to bankrupt the freeholders so they could grab the fh that way.   That didn't happen.  They are still trying though.  They owe the freeholders legal costs (s60) and are refusing to pay.  They are trying to get the freeholders to refer the matter to the tribunal - simply to incur more costs (the freeholders don't want and cant's afford to incur)  Enfranchisement isn't something that can be "voided", it's in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 that leaseholders have the right to.... The property does not qualify under 67 Act.  Their notice was invalid and voided. B petition was struck out. So this is dealt with then.  That action was dealt with yes.   But they then issued a new claim out of a different random court - which I'm still dealing with alone.  This is where I have issues with my old lawyer. He failed to read important legal docs  (which I kept emailing and asking if he was dealing with) and  also didn't deal with something crucial I pointed out.  This lawyer had the lender in a corner and he did not act. Evidence shows lender and receiver strategy had been ....  Redact and scan said evidence up for others to look at?   I could.  But the evidence is clear cut.  Receiver email to lender and lender lawyer: "our strategy for many months  has been for ceo to get the property".  A lender is not allowed to influence the receivership.   They clearly were.  And the law firm were complicit.  The same firm representing the lender and the ceo in his personal capacity - conflict of interest?   I  also have evidence of the lender trying to pay a buyer to walk.  I was never supposed to know about this.  But I was given copies of messages from the receiver "I need to see you face to face, these things are best not put in writing".  No need to divulge all here.  But in hindsight it's clear the lender/ receiver tried - via 2 meetings - to get rid of this buyer (pay large £s) to clear the path for the ceo.   One thing I need to clarify - if a receiver tells a lender to do - or not to do - something should the lender comply? 
    • Why ask for advice if you think it's too complex for the forum members to understand? You'd be better engaging a lawyer. Make sure he has understood all the implications. Stick with his advice. If it doesn't conform to your preconceived opinion then pause and consider whether maybe he's right.
    • The Barclay Card conditions is complete. There was only 3 pages. This had old address on. Full CCA. 15 pages. The only personal info is my name and address. Current Address The rest just like a generic document.  Barclays CCA 260424.pdf
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Unpaid Holiday pay, ADVICE on letter needed PLEASE...


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5771 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hello, thankyou for reading my request..

 

Basically, i have been working for my employer for over a year and never been paid any holiday.. i assumed this was the norm as i never signed a contract.

 

I handed in my notice the other day and whilst trying to negotiate me staying my boss let slip that i should of had holiday pay, she acted really supprised and angry that i have never had it.

I have since found out that i was entitled to holiday pay all along reguardless of a contract!!!

 

Now i have asked my employer for it she denies i have any, i assume this is because i am still leaving...

 

My next step is to write to my soon to be X-employer asking for my entitled holiday pay,, but i dont know how to put it to words?

 

Does anybody have any idea how i should word this letter?

I would like to request all 4.8 days owed (24 days!)

Please can anyone help...

Regards sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know when the company's holiday year runs from, for example May 1st to April 30th, or January 1st to December 31st? This would possibly change the entitlement as they could argue that the fact that you didn't take holiday in the last holiday year was your fault and you may find that you haven't yet accrued the full 4.8 weeks in the current holiday year.

 

A bit worrying that you don't have any form of contract as every employee is legally entitled to a basic statement of terms outlining hours, pay, holiday etc within 2 months of starting work.

Any advice given is done so on the assumption that recipients will also take professional advice where appropriate.

 

PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

DONATE HERE

 

If I have been helpful in any way - please feel free to click on the STAR to the left!

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Sidewinder

Thanks for the reply. I dont know when there holiday year should officially run from. I have worked with them from june last year doing 40 hours a week. Never been paid any holiday in that time. When I handed my notice in they didnt want me to leave I said one of the reasons for leaving was because they didnt do holiday pay. My boss then said yeah you do. I said how come I have never had any. The job I have been doing is taxi driver, I get a wage slip every week with 40 hours on it. They lead me to believe while I wasnt working earning them money ,they had no money to pay me holiday pay. I have been taken for a fool and wish I had checked out my entitlements sooner.

I have been to the cab today and even without a acontract they still have to pay me something but I have to put a request in writing. I dont want to word it wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what you mean by this bit Sam:

 

I would like to request all 4.8 days owed (24 days!)

 

Are you saying you have had all but 4.8 days of holiday pay or haven't you had any.

 

You should have been given a 'Particulars of Employment' when you started work with this company, those particulars should have contained at least:

 

Names of employer and employee;

Date when the employment began;

Pay;

Whether pay is weekly, monthly etc;

Any terms re hours of work, holidays and holiday pay (including overtime)

Job title or description of job;

Place(s) of work;

A person to whom the employee can apply for seeking redress of any grievances relating to his employment can be addressed.

 

The Working Time Regulations 1998 give almost every worker the right to four weeks paid holiday per year, or proportionally for part of a year. A full time worker who works 5 days a week will thus be entitled to a minimum of 20 paid days holiday per year.

 

New rules being phased in from 1st October 2007 increase the minimum number of days of annual paid holiday for most full time workers to 28 by April 2009, pro rata for part time workers.

 

The bit your interested in

 

The regulations give a worker the right to his normal weekly pay in respect of holiday entitlement.

 

If you did not get a particulars of employment then that is unlawful.

 

You should write using recorded delivery requesting 24 days pay as per the 'Working time Regulations'.

 

I am assuming you have had 'no' holiday pay.

 

Dear

 

I request 24 days holiday pay that I am entitled to in accordance with the Working Time Regulations 1998(amended).

 

You have 14 days in which to fulfill my request. If at the end of 14 days you have not responded to me positively then I will take further action which could include redress in the small claims court which will incure further payment from you.

 

Yours

 

If you start the letter Dear Sir, then end it Yours faithfully, if you start it with the name of the person you are sending it to then end it Yours sincerly.

 

They seem to have breached a lot of the rules in not informing you of your holiday entitlement, but if you are happy with 24 days pay, then just send what I have said or similar to them.

Edited by Conniff
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Connif

Thank you for your reply very helpful:). I have never had any holiday pay in the time I have worked for them. I have taken holiday but never got paid whilst I was off.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello sam, it's just a simple letter, but will show them that you have done some research or taken advise and they must adhere to the laws of employment.

 

Keep us informed of what they say in response.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...