Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank goodness it's not your roof and you get to foot the bill! How big are these bits of mortar? How often are they falling into your garden? Hourly, daily? Just go ahead with your plans, of course, they're not going to be worried by your time pressures and the urgency of the situation, so simply carry on as you would have done and I'm sure everything will go fine. Unless there is a danger to life and serious structural issues which mean you cannot venture into your garden, then IMHO there is little more you can do less for what you have done so already and made them aware of the issue.
    • Hi all!   Thank you in advance for any help you can give me!!    I parked up (at 18:08) in a rush, entered my Reg and paid for an hour of parking. At 18:20 I got a ticket for not paying for parking.    I've just looked at my receipt and noticed why ... I put "22" instead of "21"  when i put in my Reg. yes... what a stupid mistake.    I seem to remember there being a court case or a rule change about entering the wrong reg but the company wasn't at a loss because i had paid for the parking just technically for the wrong car. Am i making that up?    Any advice would be gratefully received, even some key points i have to hit when doing the appeal      
    • You haven't returned to the thread to give us your views, but a couple of other things strike me which you should consider: 1. You say that at no time was your father's licence revoked by the DVLA. It didn't have to be revoked. It expired in September and his "entitlement to drive" (of which the licence provides proof) expired along with it. He could only continue driving whilst his application was being processed by virtue of s88, and it seems clear to me (based on what you have said) that he was not able to take advantage of the benefits provided by that section. 2. The letter he received threatening to revoke his licence was probably a template letter sent when any medical issues are brought to the attention of the DVLA. But it is clear that beyond September until it was eventually renewed, your father had no valid licence to be revoked. I believe a "not guilty" plea in court will fail. The basic facts are that your father's licence expired in September, it was not renewed until February because the DVLA were looking into his medical declaration and he could not take advantage of s88. So in December he had no licence and no entitlement to drive under s88. The facts that he believed he was fit to drive and that his licence was eventually renewed may mitigate the offence but they do not provide a defence. I also asked whether he had received a summons (very unusual these days) or whether he had received a "Single Justice Procedure Notice". The way to proceed from here differs slightly depending on what he has received so if you let me know, I'll advise further.  
    • Well, what I've read from various sources suggest if a CCJ is 6 years old that if becomes pretty much ineffective for enforcement purposes in its original form.  And that if it's about to expire then the claimant needs to apply to the court to extend the original CCJ within the final year.  Even if they do apply for an extension within the 6 years they have to have a very strong argument for doing so such as the person being out of the country or could not be traced, basically show they were actively still perusing the debt I guess. Now if a claimant ever does apply within the 6 years to extend the CCJ, would the person named on if be notified by the court that such an application has been made?.  In my case I've heard nothing from the court so assume no such application has been made.  The original CCJ in my own case is now a year beyond the 6 years of issue so must now make things even less likely again. So whilst the CCJ exists that they have not enforced it in that time must surely make it unlikely they can now take it back to court because as said it would be very rare for a judge to agree to such action now. That said, I guess they now can't use the CCJ to continue with any action for an attachment order to our mortgage either?
    • Donald Trump now banned from countries including Canada and UK as convicted felon WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK There are 37 countries that bar felons from entering, even to visit.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Land of Leather Flakey suite


RickB
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6036 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

I bought a Juliet suite from LOL – 3 seat recliner sofa, 2 seat sofa and recliner chair delivered in Feb 06. By August 06 the leather on the recliner chair and left hand seat of the 2 seat sofa was flaking and peeling. I contacted LOL and was told someone would be sent to assess the fault. This indeed happened after several unreturned calls to LOL and in Nov 06 an ECOMASTER technician arrived to repair the faults, he assured us “we use the best of materials for the repair and it wouldn’t happen again”!

Lo and behold in July this year the same problem appeared again to the same seats only worse. Again after several calls LOL organised a call from an ECOMASTER technician. Having heard nothing from LOL for several weeks we phoned them to be told that as the fault was due to wear and tear they would not be repairing the suite. I told the person I was speaking to (who I assumed was a manager) that I did not think it was correct as it was the same fault to the same seats as previously repaired and how could it be classed as wear and tear to a “luxury” leather suite after only 6 months.

I should say at this point that both my wife and myself work, I have 2 boys the oldest who is 15 spends most of his time out with his mates/girlfriend or playing his computer/ps2 in his room and when he is in the lounge sits on the 3 seat recliner sofa, the younger one is 11 and prefers to sit on the floor to watch TV so the suite can hardly be classed as overused.

I asked LOL for copies of the ECOMASTER reports to be sent to me giving them 7 days to deliver, but of course nothing arrived and it took several calls from me to actually get them, the excuse was they were waiting on them being e-mailed through from ECOMASTER, but they managed to e-mail them to me 5 minutes later (I will try to attach them). The technician has said the suite is un-repairable which is why I think LOL are refusing to take any action as that would mean them replacing the suite or refunding our money. The technicians report also states as well as wear and tear a lack of maintenance as a reason for the flaking, we were given a “free” leather care kit with the suite out of which we used the cleaner, conditioner and cloth which when used came away with flakes of leather and the colour of the suite (chocolate brown). The leather suite we had previously (not bought from LOL thankfully) was never conditioned and was only ever cleaned with warm water and hadn’t flaked by the time we sold it 6 years later!

Am I being unreasonable thinking a “luxury” leather suite should not wear out in 18 months?

I was told by the person I spoke to at LOL (Alistair who I assume is a manager) that if I wasn’t happy I should go to trading standards!

I also stupidly took out the extended warranty which obviously won’t cover wear and tear so that’s another £200 down the drain.

Any advice as to whether we have a valid claim, and if so how we should proceed would be gratefully appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your input gyzmo but I was hoping for a few opinions as to what action I can/should take in view of the time I have had the suite and the fact LOL will not budge from their attitude of we've made our decision and thats it. I also thought there might be others out there with the same sort of fault who would be willing to share their experience as I have never been in this position before.

 

Here are the technicians reports I received from LOL.

 

http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff270/RICK1EB/LOL/lol1.jpg

http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff270/RICK1EB/LOL/lol2.jpg

http://i237.photobucket.com/albums/ff270/RICK1EB/LOL/lol3.jpg

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hmm. The first report is very interesting and indicates that the suite is not of suitable quality (given that it shouldn't suffer wear and tear in so soon a time).

 

The only thing I could suggest is to obtain an independant report to state that the quality was not satisfactory. You will be able to claim back the cost of obtaining this. Write a letter to LOL stating that the copany has breached s. 14 (implied terms about quality or fitness) of SoGA in that the product is not of durable nature to be expected by a reasonable person. As such, you expect a replacement suite that does conform to the contract. Give them 14 days to reply (send recorded delivery), and if no response a final letter giving 7 days for a response before court action is taken (without further notice).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Rick,

 

The person to deal with is

Kevin Maguire

Company Secretariat

Units K1-K2

Lower Road

Northfleet

Kent

DA11 9BL

 

Ours was sorted quickly with him involved, although it was in response to a Court Summons.

 

complain to your local Trading Standards and copy everything to Kent Trading Standards:

 

Kent County Council

Consumer Advice

PO Box 71

Ashford

Kent

TN24 8WB

 

Apparently they have a large file on LOL

 

Good luck with this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello There,

 

Sorry to hear about your problems with Land of Leather. Im not in the least bit surprised though.

 

You will have to fight them all the way as they give nothing. Also be warned, they will stall and delay all the way in an attempt to make you give up with frustration.

 

I read somewhere on this site a sofa should last 6 or 7 years so 18 months and onto the seond fault is owhere near an acceptable standard.

 

Your will have to go to County Court to get any reasonable solution.

 

Stick with it and keep posting.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

I am having the same problem with a chair purchased from Reid Furniture in Edinburgh. The chair is 12 months old and flaking where the head rests on the chair.

I've taken the matter to trading standards, and now waiting to see how they help. An independant inspection costs aroung £400 so hopefully I can avoid that.

I've been told the leather was probably not finished and sealed correctly, making it a manufacturing fault, but I will wait and see.

It would seem all the major furniture manufacterers have dreadful after care, and don't care once the purchase has been paid for. They are not looking for repeat business from loyal customers.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...