Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi mitm are you able to DM me? Need some advice and rather just take off here for now. Won’t let me DM you as a new user. 
    • Just a little something for consideration When a card is compromised, the replacements can be set up to automatically allow or manually re-add, old recurring transactions. The card issuer may ask you to confirm legitimate transactions which they would effectively 'migrate' to the new card Some do - some don't. Some staff on some cards seem to be entirely unaware/uncaring about this. Some card issuers expect you to sort it all out manually.   BUT if the leak is an ongoing lyca leakas it seems - as soon as you or your CC supplier give it to lyca/the leak source - compromised again     A note on security DONT use the same email or phone number for your banking as you do for sims etc. Although a bank eg santander leak would compromise this Infp seems to suggest that single/compromised multi factor authentication customers are priority targets, with more robustly secure cards being hit by 0.00 tests first Consider that the email address is one of the OTP recieving options AND one of the OTP security checks prior to sending the OTP - with the phone number being another So if they've got your card and email (same email for banking and end contact) - and you aren't forcing a phone OTP - you are compromised.  
    • Thanks for posting up the back of the NTK. The good news s that as it does not comply with the Protection of Freedoms Act, it means that you are not liable for the charge as the keeper as I explained in a previous post.  The PC fails for two reasons. The first is that it does not specify the period of parking. All it does is list the arrival and departure times of your car. Obviously that does not include the time taken to drive to the car parking space, manoeuvre the car into the space and later drive from the space to the exit. Nor does their times include things like getting kids disabled people out of and into the car as well as things like returning the trolley whilst still being parked. All of which can add a fair bit of time to the parking period which can then be subtracted from their ANPR times and makes your actual parking time a lot shorter than 118 minutes they seem to think it is. The second reason is that they failed to ask the keeper to pay Schedule 4 Section 9 [2][e]  (e)state that the creditor does not know both the name of the driver and a current address for service for the driver and invite the keeper— (i)to pay the unpaid parking charges You as keeper are now in the clear which is a good reason for you to contact Sainsbury  stating that you are being pursued as the keeper when you are not liable under the Act as well as the oher things I suggested in my previous post. If you don't get it cancelled with Sainsbury this could drag on for months with endless letters unlawfully pushing the price up to scare you into paying.  
    • Brilliant! That's great to hear and honestly pleased I'm wrong, my advice was out of concern. I checked some of your previous posts last night and you've been giving great advice to others at times. Bringing a claim can be serious (counter-claims etc) and it didn't appear you were knowledgeable based on posts so far. Far from an expert myself, just interested and will try to help. I'll sit on the sidelines, best of luck with the claim!
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Welcome Finance - This company needs to be banned.


tightbum
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4594 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 9.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

it seems norwich union and direct group are plying silly buggers

 

i gave them there chance as requested

 

this is the correct number for the correct dept or should i say fraud dept

 

the buck stops hear with norwich union

 

give em hell

 

Norwich Union

Department 33

The Warren

Worthing

West Sussex

BN14 9QD

 

Tel: cb_transparent_l.gifgb.gifspace.gifspace.gifarrow.gifspace.gifspace.gifspace.gifspace.gifspace.gifspace.gifspace.gif01903 273632cb_transparent_r.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

ill be diplomatic on this one

 

ever wondered why norwich union have no records

 

no records = no insurance

 

welcome= easy money

direct group=easy money

 

consumer= screwed for high cost policy

consumer=screwed on apr

 

welcome= win on double whammy

Link to post
Share on other sites

biddy

 

it does not matter if they signed the old one

 

rollocks

 

a new agreement is just that, cancells out the old one period

 

the only exception would be if you signed a bit of papper to vary the original, which again needs both sig,

 

but yours is a new loan

 

 

BIDDY

WHO IS CORRY

Link to post
Share on other sites

whats keeping the share price up

 

I see this question all the time on here, what’s keeping it up in my opinion is people are in such loss with it, they are holding on to their share, as it dropped so quick that made their investments practically worthless so what they will get pulling out is practically nothing. They are now clinching to hope and praying for a miracle. If the miracle happens then they will be rich if it doesn't nothing to lose from the current position.

 

So weighed up at current position its worth the risk.

 

But as days go buy people are losing faith and taking their pennies out hence its deteriorating slowly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take My Word For It

 

No Matter What Happens Welcome Are Finished, History.

If By A Miricle Cattles Survive, It Will Be A Very Minor Player If It Does, It Will Dump Welcome.

 

This Biz Over Insurance Has Not Only Direct Group And Welcome Worried But Also Norwich Union.

 

Just Look What Has Happened To The Cattles Shares On Welcomes Anticts,

 

Myself, Dipply, Animal Lover, And A Few Others Are Responsable For This.

 

We Were Being Talked About On These Share Trading Sites 12 Monts Ago About Cattles Dodgy Dealings.

 

What Set It Off Was That Cattles Had Nothing In Reserve To Handle All The Misselling Claims, After That, Every One Got Involved And All But The Hardest Investor Jumped Ship.

 

Just Look At The Share Trading Graph Over The Last 12 Months

 

NOT SO LONG AGO CATTLES WAS NEARLY £5.00 A SHARE

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yesterday I Was Playing The Fool.

There Was A Few People Trying To Put A Spanner In The Works, I Played Along.

 

They Are No Longer With Us After I Rapped There Knuckles

 

Mr Palmers School Report

 

Must Try Harder

Link to post
Share on other sites

No Original

Game Over

 

Welcome Under The Cca Can Now Reconstruct An Agreement To Look Like The Original,

But To Enforce, They Need The Original

 

People

 

Just Because You Get An Agreement, Does Not Mean Its Legit

 

Smoke Screen And Mirrors Again

 

Well Done Sol

 

Happy For You

Link to post
Share on other sites

I Think This Acceptance Fee Issue Needs To Be Cleared Up

 

If The Credit Ammount/loan And Acceptance Fee Have Been Put Togeather Before Calculating Interest, Game Over

 

If The Acceptance Fee Has Been Kept Seperate And Included In The Total Ammount Of Credit

 

Its Ok

Link to post
Share on other sites

style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4594 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...