Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
    • Hi DX, Sorry, fell asleep as I was up all night last night writing that statement. Yes, I attached the rest of the witness statement on post 50, bottom of webpage 2. That's the important part.  It looks like the lawyer who wrote Erudio's Witness statement does not work for them any more. So, I'll have another lawyer representing instead. Not sure if I can use Andy's hearsay argument verbally if that happens.... I did not put it in writing. Apart from not sending deferral forms, my main argument is that in 2014 Erudio fixed some arrears mistake that SLC made and then in 2018 they did the same mistake, sent me confusing letters. What is the legal defence when they send you confusing material?
    • Chinese firm MineOne Partners has been ordered to sell land it owns near a US nuclear missile site.View the full article
    • That isn’t actually what the Theft Act 1968 S1 actually says, BTW. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/60/section/1 (1)A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it;   The difference between what you’ve said and the Act? a) intent to permanently deprive rather than  just depriving (which is why the offence of “taking without consent” was brought in for motor vehicles, as otherwise "joyriders" could say "but I intended to give it back at the end") b) dishonesty : If I honestly believed A's pen belonged to B, and took it and gave it to B - B might be found guilty of theft but I shouldn't be. 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

citi cards CCA request does not apply me too


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 4509 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi

Yes they are now in criminal default, but im not sure they would admit to this, I find it slightly confusing that you have a right to request a true copy of the agreement and CITI state they do not have to??????????

Gill

Link to post
Share on other sites

i too have received the we dont have to supply the cca and 12 pages of twaddle updated in may 2007 of t&c's which have been nicely updated with charge fee's of 12 pounds.

 

What are they hiding? barclaycard not only sent me original agreement, signed, but also sent me original t&c's to boot! Methinks citi need some new solicitors who know what they are doing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi rince

what have you responded with?

Gill

 

I think I would respond with somthing along the lines of I requested a true copy of my original credit agreement under s77-s79 of CCA act 1974. As you have not supplied an agreement I must assume that no agreement exists and I have stopped all payments etc.

 

This is just my opinion all the best dpick:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi gill, yes my OH got exactly the same reply, do forum search Consumer Credit Agreements Resources/workshop, some excellent template letters there - we did our letter in May and only get statements showing charges and interest added but no more telephone calls (not until I've posted this anyway!), have just sent in report to Trading Standards as they didn't comply with SAR either, just shout if you need any more help:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have received the same letter and I have responded with the following paragraphs inserted.

 

Furthermore, in the event that you are considering litigation, your attention is drawn to CPR 4.6 © enclose copies of documents asked for by the claimant, or explain why they are not enclosed;

I would therefore request, in compliance with CPR 4.6© a copy of the document that you will be relying on as proof that a properly executed agreement, complying in all respects with the form and content requirements of the CCA, was signed by myself in respect of this alleged debt.

 

Be also advised that your statutory time period has elapsed and YOU are now in default and very shortly you will have committed a criminal offence.

As you are now in default NO further action can be taken on this account until such a time as the original SIGNED EXECUTED documents are made available to me.

 

I expect, in accordance with CPR, your prompt response to this formal request without further delay.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gill, i have drafted a response in line with the previous posts, but thanks to surprise i will be adding a little bit more now!!

 

i recommend checking out some of the threads in the debt collection section on this site as they cover cca's a bit more there.

 

still waiting from court as they said AQ is being dispensed with and i sent them info from citi stating i do not have an account with citicard!! so, my argument is citi's solicitor says i do not have an account, citi cannot provide cca therefore i have no debt with them and they have illegally obtained monies from me by deception.

 

i wonder how that will all go down....

 

which reminds me i need to update my citicard thread!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look in the Consumer Credit Agreements Thread, General Forum, PeterBard has given a brilliant response to this standard letter that Citi are sending out. Its over 400 pages, its around the last couple of pages.

 

 

Page 410 Post 8194 :cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, here is a draft response to Citicard.... any thoughts?

Thank you for responding to my request regarding a copy of my credit agreement. I am disappointed you have not been able to fulfil my original request and have simply sent me a copy of Terms & Conditions that are dated 30 May 2007.

As you may be aware, the Act sets out that a valid agreement must exist in the prescribed form in order for that agreement to be executed. As it appears you are unable to provide a copy of the agreement in the prescribed form then it appears to me that there is no executable agreement in force.

I sincerely urge you to reconsider providing me with a copy of the original agreement as per the CCA 1974 to verify that an executable agreement does exist. Please note that simply sending the Terms & Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement. Sending Terms & Conditions does not fulfil this requirement.

If you are unable to provide a true copy of the original agreement, the required fee already having been received by you, then I will have no other option to assume you do not hold a valid credit agreement for my account and will be forced to pursue the necessary lines to ensure my position is not compromised as a consumer.

 

Furthermore, as litigation is currently in progress, your attention is drawn to CPR 4.6 © enclose copies of documents asked for by the claimant, or explain why they are not enclosed;

I would therefore request, in compliance with CPR 4.6© a copy of the document that you will be relying on as proof that a properly executed agreement, complying in all respects with the form and content requirements of the CCA, was signed by myself in respect of this alleged debt. If you are not able to supply such a copy then I contest the validity of any such debt and also request that monies taken from me for default charges be repaid immediately.

 

Be also advised that your statutory time period has elapsed and YOU are now in default and very shortly you will have committed a criminal offence.

 

As you are now in default NO further action can be taken on this account until such a time as the original SIGNED EXECUTED documents are made available to me.

As your own in-house solicitor, David Travis, has advised me that no account exists with CitiCard corresponding to my account number or address details then I will not be making any further payments until I receive the requested information. I also respectfully request that no interest is applied to my account until I have received the requested information and that if a valid agreement is supplied that interest is not applied retrospectively as this would be a punitive action as a result of your failings to provide substantiating information within statutory timeframes. Also no penalty or other such charges should be applied to the account in question whilst you attempt to supply me with the requested information.

 

I expect your prompt response to this formal request without further delay.

Not sure whether to add this from Peterbards letter though.....

As per section 127(3) of the act the minimum requirement for a court to consider enforcing a agreement of this type(Running account Credit) is that it should have the Debtor/ Hirer’s signature and all the prescribed terms contained in Statutory instruments 1983/1553 Schedule 6; As directed by section 60 of the Act

• Credit limit• Rate of interest • Repayments

If any of these items are missing then a court cannot enforce any agreement made and regulated by the Act prior to April 6th 2007.T

The absence of all other aspects of the agreement relating to form and content as defined in the Agreement Regulations (1983/1553) render the contract enforceable only by order of the court.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, here is a draft response to Citicard.... any thoughts?

 

Thank you for responding to my request regarding a copy of my credit agreement. I am disappointed you have not been able to fulfil my original request and have simply sent me a copy of Terms & Conditions that are dated 30 May 2007.

 

As you may be aware, the Act sets out that a valid agreement must exist in the prescribed form in order for that agreement to be executed. As it appears you are unable to provide a copy of the agreement in the prescribed form then it appears to me that there is no executable agreement in force.

 

I sincerely urge you to reconsider providing me with a copy of the original agreement as per the CCA 1974 to verify that an executable agreement does exist. Please note that simply sending the Terms & Conditions is a breach of the Act and Regulations as, apart from the information that the Regulations provide that you may exclude, the copy must be a “true copy” of the agreement. Sending Terms & Conditions does not fulfil this requirement.

 

If you are unable to provide a true copy of the original agreement, the required fee already having been received by you, then I will have no other option to assume you do not hold a valid credit agreement for my account and will be forced to pursue the necessary lines to ensure my position is not compromised as a consumer.

 

Furthermore, as litigation is currently in progress, your attention is drawn to CPR 4.6 © enclose copies of documents asked for by the claimant, or explain why they are not enclosed;

 

I would therefore request, in compliance with CPR 4.6© a copy of the document that you will be relying on as proof that a properly executed agreement, complying in all respects with the form and content requirements of the CCA, was signed by myself in respect of this alleged debt. If you are not able to supply such a copy then I contest the validity of any such debt and also request that monies taken from me for default charges be repaid immediately.

 

Be also advised that your statutory time period has elapsed and YOU are now in default and very shortly you will have committed a criminal offence.

 

As you are now in default NO further action can be taken on this account until such a time as the original SIGNED EXECUTED documents are made available to me.

 

As your own in-house solicitor, David Travis, has advised me that no account exists with CitiCard corresponding to my account number or address details then I will not be making any further payments until I receive the requested information. I also respectfully request that no interest is applied to my account until I have received the requested information and that if a valid agreement is supplied that interest is not applied retrospectively as this would be a punitive action as a result of your failings to provide substantiating information within statutory timeframes. Also no penalty or other such charges should be applied to the account in question whilst you attempt to supply me with the requested information.

 

I expect your prompt response to this formal request without further delay.

 

 

Not sure whether to add this from Peterbards letter though.....

 

As per section 127(3) of the act the minimum requirement for a court to consider enforcing a agreement of this type(Running account Credit) is that it should have the Debtor/ Hirer’s signature and all the prescribed terms contained in Statutory instruments 1983/1553 Schedule 6; As directed by section 60 of the Act

• Credit limit• Rate of interest • Repayments

If any of these items are missing then a court cannot enforce any agreement made and regulated by the Act prior to April 6th 2007.T

The absence of all other aspects of the agreement relating to form and content as defined in the Agreement Regulations (1983/1553) render the contract enforceable only by order of the court.

 

 

 

Hi when I had my MBNA agreement response checked I was advised unenforceable due to s127(3) with the three terms you quote missing plus "details of any power to vary the agreement" also quoted as a missing prescribed term. As you state any term missing not enforceable at all. Not saying you include this in letter but someone may be looking through thread and they may be missing this term on their agreement.

 

I have two catalogue's that have sent blank agreements (I never had an agreement to sign from them) so I will nick and amend your letter to suite if that OK.

 

all the best dpick:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Page 410 Post 8194 :cool:

Thankyou, but funnily that is in answer to my citi quiery which I had placed there to recieve more feedback

If you think that is great, I will study it, it looks good to me

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...