Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • as another of farages faragit reformatory boy shows his true colours Ian Gribbin, the party's candidate in Bexhill and Battle claimed * ' the country would be "far better" if it had "taken Hitler up on his offer of neutrality" instead of fighting the Nazis in World War Two. err tell that to the russians - who did .. * said people should  “exorcise the cult of Churchill and recognize that in both policy and military strategy, he was abysmal”. * Praised Russian president Vladimir Putin as he: "understands the bonds that create more stable societies; the hypocrisy of the West is preposterous as we stare in the face daily the enormous economic equalities created by our deluded neo liberal ideas" and "if only the West had politicians of his class".   * 'women were the "sponging gender" and should be "deprived of health care". * "Men pay 80% of tax – women spend 80% of tax revenue. On aggregate as a group you only take from society. Less complaining please from the 'sponging gender'." - Wonder what his momma thinks of that?   On being caught out, cribbin initially refused to comment before belatedly and weakly 'apologising' A Reform spokesman said the comments were “written with an eye to inconvenient perspectives and truths”. Chairman Tice said “We’re really pleased with all candidates." Leader Farage seemed to think the greens vetting OUT and suspending 20 unsuitable candidates was a 'bigger problem' than reform not only leaving **** the unsuitable in abut also being apologists for them     Reform candidate says UK should have ‘taken Hitler’s neutrality offer’ WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK He also praised Russian president Vladimir Putin and described Winston Churchill as ‘abysmal’   Reform UK candidate apologises over Hitler neutrality comments WWW.BBC.CO.UK Ian Gribbin says his grandparents were "Russian Jews fleeing persecution" and his comments were taken out of context.  
    • do you ultimately want to keep the car?
    • Thank you!    It was bought on my debit card    
    • Hi. Welcome to CAG. How was the car purchased?  
    • Absolutely for the agreement they are referring to.... puts them on notice that this is going to be a uphill fight.   Andy 
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

HSBC and managed loan woes.......


redbryn1
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6178 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

hi all i had a managed loan with hsbc but due to debt problems i had to consolidate it and my other debts into a DMP with payplan. the proposal that payplan came up with was £99 a month instead of the £160 i was paying to HSBC. I have now been paying this amount to the HSBC for 5 months and have been getting constant phone calls and letters from HSBC saying that they will not accept the £99 a month from payplan and want me to agree to another managed loan with them for you guessed it £99 only problem is the repayment term is 4 years longer than it would be with payplan (12years as opposed to 8 years) obviously this sounds as daft as it is and probably just to make more interest from me but is there any way i can sort this out as they are now threatning a default notice even though it says on their letters "all financial difficulties will be dealt with with understanding and sympathy!" any advice greatly appreciated.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Don't dispair, you are right in thinking that HSBC are simply trying to get you to commit to paying the debt over a longer period thus allowing them to gain more interest.

 

If you are issued a default notice it is not really going to cause you much of a problem, it simply allows HSBC to sell the debt on to another company such as a collection agency to take care of the debt. If that happens, I'm sure PayPlan will allow you to make payments to the collection agency. Collection agencies have no more legal power than HSBC, so I would strongly advise you not to entertain HSBC's offer!

 

Hope this helps,

 

CCCS

We aim to advise you on practical ways to deal with your finances and to understand priority & non-priority debts. We can also help you to cope with these in a realistic and sustainable way and help you understand the likely actions of your creditors including any legal action during this process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi there,

 

Don't dispair, you are right in thinking that HSBC are simply trying to get you to commit to paying the debt over a longer period thus allowing them to gain more interest.

 

If you are issued a default notice it is not really going to cause you much of a problem, it simply allows HSBC to sell the debt on to another company such as a collection agency to take care of the debt.

 

A default effectively cancels the agreement and calls the remaining balance in, this would mean that the credtor would then be in a position to consider further recovery options (such as passing it on to a dca or taking court action themselves). ss87-89 of the CCA 74 cover defaults and their effect, bear in mind in order for them to be valid, they have to be in the correct prescribed format.

 

If you cannot meet the terms of the original agreement then the creditor does have a right to serve the notice although they do need to work in a reasonable way with you to try and arrive at a suitable repayment method.

 

Managed loans are pretty notorious, as matthew stated you may end up paying a great deal of interest. I feel a DMP would be a better bet as usually you would have your interest totally frozen, and by virtue, pay the debt off over a quicker period.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's also worth noting that under the OFT guidelines on debt collection, HSBC should be dealing only with CCCS as your appointed representatives; contacting a debtor directly is considered an 'unfair practice'.

 

I'd be inclined to send HSBC a letter complaining about their breach of the OFT guidelines, and asking them to confirm that they will comply with their obligations in future. Unless their 'final response' states that they will do so (£1 to 1p it won't - it'll be full of waffle trying to justify why they think they can ignore the rules), escalate it to the FOS, since breaches of the OFT guidelines calls into question HSBC's fitness to hold a Consumer Credit Licence.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's also worth noting that under the OFT guidelines on debt collection, HSBC should be dealing only with CCCS as your appointed representatives; contacting a debtor directly is considered an 'unfair practice'.

 

I'd be inclined to send HSBC a letter complaining about their breach of the OFT guidelines, and asking them to confirm that they will comply with their obligations in future. Unless their 'final response' states that they will do so (£1 to 1p it won't - it'll be full of waffle trying to justify why they think they can ignore the rules), escalate it to the FOS, since breaches of the OFT guidelines calls into question HSBC's fitness to hold a Consumer Credit Licence.

 

Spot on - I was just about to make this point myself!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just wanted to mention that the orignal poster had mentioned she is using PayPlan rather than ourselves

We aim to advise you on practical ways to deal with your finances and to understand priority & non-priority debts. We can also help you to cope with these in a realistic and sustainable way and help you understand the likely actions of your creditors including any legal action during this process.

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi all just an update after more phone calls from HSBC (5-6 a day) i emailed my payplan case worker and was told to ignore their requests for me to take out another managed loan and to let them use a DCA to recover the debt in which case the payments i'm making to HSBC now would be acceptable to a DCA after all i'm paying £99 a month through payplan for 8 years and HSBC want £99 a month for 12 years so common sense prevails anyway during the last phonecall this evening I told the nice man to stop phoning me and to contact me by post in the future and i would be looking into making a complaint guess what? phone call 15 minutes later arrrrrghhhhhhhhh!!!! so i guess it's time to ask for their complaints procedure?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...