Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • I'm sending back to plea guilty and not appear in court. Nothing to add really. Then complete the form where it ask for my finances, monthly income, employment status and monthly out goings.  
    • What we need to see is all the original paperwork  That would include the pre contract information and the original HP Agreement  Post it up and I will have a good look over it at the weekend  It really hangs on the wording as to whether it’s a scrapage adjustment /discount on the price of the car( that is how some schemes worked) Every manufacturer had their own version  Have you sent VW a SAR?
    • Wrong as usual Jugg    Did Michael Cohen Commit Perjury In The Trump Trial? WWW.ZEROHEDGE.COM ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero Michael Cohen. He still has one day of cross examination ahead of him on Thursday. With the government resting after Cohen’s cross examination, I believe that an honest judge would have no alternative but to grant a motion for a directed verdict and end the case before it goes to the jury. Judge Juan Merchan will now have to give the full measure of his commitment to the rule of law. Given the failure to support the elements of any crime or even to establish the falsity of recording payments as legal expenses, this trial seemed to stumble through the motions of a trial. Michael Cohen was only the final proof of a raw political exercise. For critics, some of Cohen’s answers appear clearly false or misleading. Like their star witness, the prosecutors have shown that they simply do not take the law very seriously when there is an advantage to be taken.
    • So to sum up. 1.  You & your friend did the right thing on 28 December and are in the right legally. 2.  You are in the early stages of the threatening letter cycle.  We've seen these letters quite literally over 10,000 times.  For the moment your friend has nothing to worry about. 3.  No-one will turn up at your friend's door. 4.  If months down the line this got to court, you would win.  It's blatant disability discrimination.  Some time back I looked through the results of Excel v Caggers court cases, well we won 85% of the time, and you would be 100& certain to win. But this is the bit that you won't like ... 5.  Excel don't care that they are legally in the wrong.  They want your money.  They will go on and on with their letters hoping you'll give in. 6.  They are also the most litigious of the private parking companies and it's perfectly possible, months hence, that they will take your friend to court.  You have to be prepared for this.  They would lose.  But they don't care about the losses since, sadly, presumably so many people are afraid of court and so give in and pay.  7.  We will of course support you all the way!
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Urgent!!! Please Help!


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6095 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Is that refering to the bit where Next say an unenforceable debt is still a debt etc etc?

 

 

Yes its a House of Lords ruling and therefore binding on all lower courts

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 253
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hi Josie thanks for that. Ive tried to google it but I can't find it. :confused:

Do you have the link please?

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh btw, got a letter from the solicitors this morning basically saying thay have noted the contents of the letter sent to them and Next, and advising that they do not hold the information requested as they are the acting solicitors for litigation procedures only.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ah thanks rory. I searched Wilson v Minister for Trade & Industry and didn't get much lol....

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I be doing something? Would it be better for me if Next dropped the case or if I defend? After Next sending the info in post 141, I would've thought that they'd realise they can't enforce the debt anyway and withdraw the claim. Or can they?

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Monopoly,

 

I will respond to your most recent posts either later tonight or tommorow. I am in the middle of drafting a defence for someone, so have very little time. Sit tight till then!;)

 

Regards,

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Laiste. Thought I was all alone for a minute....

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't worry - you are never alone on this site. What a load of guff in such a short space of time!!!! The best thing about this is that whilst you have time (which drags in many ways) you do have time. I mean time to think about coresspondence recieved and reply to it. How about a New Years Honour for the wonderful Laiste! I never thought I would see a legal bod doing anything for nothing - I stand corrected! Best of luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

never thought I would see a legal bod doing anything for nothing - I stand corrected!

Laiste is not the only legal bod on this site. There are other kind people on here from the same background.

HAVE YOU BEEN TREATED UNFAIRLY BY CREDITORS OR DCA's?

 

BEWARE OF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT COMPANIES OFFERING TO WRITE OFF YOUR DEBTS.

 

 

Please note opinions given by rory32 are offered informally as a lay-person in good faith based on personal experience. For legal advice, you must always consult a registered and insured lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think when I get my money back from the bank charges, I will buy her one of those thingy's that types out what you say. Don't know what it's called but I'm sure it would give her more free time for herself :)

 

It IS a load of waffle. They sent the application for a card! Like that makes a difference when their opening sentence is that they do not hold an agreement.

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks. I checked MCOL and the claim is still ongoing.... its quite funny really now I have all the evidence needed :D

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Precisely, you really must sit tight now and let time take its' course. It is frustrating as you wait - believe me, Next is not having sleeples nights over this - nor should you. There are enough people on this site to help you - this is not just help, this is CAG help!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just checked MCOL again - I can't help it!

Claim is still there, still need to defend, I just can't believe it.

Next would surely have to let the solicitors know that there is no credit agreement wouldn't they??

And if there's no agreement, what do they possibly think they can gain?

 

I just can't understand their reasoning behing all this. :confused::confused:

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't understand it either Monopoly! I thought they would have thrown the towel in by now!

 

I do think they are going to wait until the 11th hour to see in you will fold.

 

They are playing a psychological game with you, they have no case and they know it. Hang in there, nearly over..

 

minky xx

Link to post
Share on other sites

If I acknowledge service though, you'd think they might understand that I'm doing it for a reason!

 

Nearly over, yes....

 

Im quite concerned actually because I haven't heard from Laiste in a while. I hope she's ok. She did say she would come back on Thursday, to start going through everything, but not heard a peep :confused:

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Monopoly,

 

There's no need to be concerned, I am always available for emergencies and for defence deadlines. Whilst I try to get back to people when I say I will, it simply isn't always possible! Plus the fact, I have a family member who is very ill, which makes things even more difficult.

 

I will address the substantive issues you raised a few days ago a bit later. What you do need to do, which will help me, is stop fretting about all this. In the absence of an agreement, the debt is entirely unenforceable. They are just making you go through the motions one, to see if you will and two, to upset and annoy you! I don't know why you are surprised

and/or frustrated that these Companies behave unfairly and unreasonably, did you expect any other sort of behaviour from them? If they can't enforce the debt, what's the next best thing for them to do...? Frustrate and annoy the hell out of you, what else is left for them....? So just because there's no agreement, doesn't mean they are in the mood for acquiescing just yet! That's just something you have to accept! At least you're not going to be in the position of having to go to trial, to argue your case in front of a District Judge, which can really be an ordeal for some!

 

What I am saying is, there really is no need whatsoever to be worrying or panicking; a Company not being in possession of an agreement is the best of all scenarios!

 

Regards,

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Laiste! You always turn up when I'm on the edge of panic lol. Ive been fine for about a week... lol

 

Im really sorry to hear about your family member that's ill. I hope s/he gets well soon.

 

Let me know when you want to do this, and I'll make sure I'm available to answer any questions you might have, and I can write a summary of all dates, letters and events etc if that will make it easier for you.

This thread is HUGE!

 

Thanks again :)

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

All thats happening is that they are pushing it as far as they can to see if you will crack under the pressure............

 

Have a look at this thread Provident personal Credit sent this CCA in response to my request slightly different from yours but in this case Provident didn't want to go into court to explain excessive interest charges.

 

Main thing is to keep your chin up..........we're all here to help

  • Haha 1

You may receive different advice to your query as people have different experiences and opinions. Please use your own judgement in deciding whose advice to take.

 

If in doubt seek advice from a qualified insured professional. Any advice I have offered you is done so on an informal basis, without prejudice or liability.

 

If you think I have been helpful PLEASE click the scales

 

court bundles for dummies

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well josie, I certainly won't be cracking under the pressure!

I just can't wait to see the outcome of this. There's so many ways it could go and so many reasons why I don't think they can win, it's hard to imagine the final result. I know I must be patient, Patient, PATIENT but I'm so eager for the result!!!

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Monopoly,

 

I'm responding to the salient points of your post when you received the information from Next. First of all, they have admitted they have no credit agreement, so they are stuffed, basically. I don't know where they get their legal advice from, but they should ask for their money back! An unenforceable debt is not a debt, end of story! They would be laughed out of Court by the District Judge if they proffered that argument! So as far as their case goes, they don't have one! They are no doubt waiting to see if you file a defence or not, because obviously if you didn't they would get Judgment by Default, which is what they're hoping for, hence why they haven't withdrawn from the case.

 

If I am right in presuming that their letter wasn't marked Without Prejudice, then we can refer to it in the Defence basically saying that the Claimants have admitted they are not in possession of an agreement and know the debt is unenforceable. We would then go on to say the claim has been issued vexatiously and amounts to unlawful harassment, as the Claimants knew prior to filing the claim that they had no agreement.

 

One of two things will then happen IMO. They will either file a Notice of Discontinuance bringing the case to an end, or they will simply not respond to your defence as they are required to do, and the case will be put on a stay after 33 days. If the latter happens, they would then have to apply to a Judge to seek permission to continue with the case. The longer they leave it, the harder that becomes. However, in my view, if it gets to that stage they will simply leave it and that will be an end to it. It is highly unlikely they will carry on any further, but we'll have to wait and see....!

 

You do have some options to consider in respect of this case, given that they have no doubt registered a Default Notice (DN) against you. You could file a counter-claim (c/c) against them on the basis of unlawful harassment, if they have sent threatening/hostile letters and telephoned you also. The fact that the claim has been issued without any legal basis, also amounts to harassment. As they cannot produce an agreement, they have processed your personal details unlawfully under the Data Protection Act 1998. Registering the DN also amounts to defamation of character, as they have besmerched your reputation, and will prevent you from obtaining further credit. As part of a c/c for damages, you would be seeking removal of the DN. Bear in mind the more you claim in damages, the higher the fee for filing the c/c. You might decide to let their claim fizzle out and issue your own on the same basis. However, the burden of proving the case then rests with you and definitely preferable that it rests with them, as it does now.

 

What you need to think about is how they are going to react having not been able to collect the debt, if you subsequently ask them to remove the DN. Without the threat of having to answer a c/c or claim you might/will issue, they are going to refuse point blank to remove the DN. It will be their last act of spite, if you like. If they think there are going to be serious consequences for not removing it, then they will in all likelihood give in. Although, if you don't file a c/c, they may leave you with no other option other than to file a claim, which of course will cost you money. It costs either way, but as I've said, it's better to do this by filing a c/c. It all comes down to what you want to do. There is of course the small chance they will go to Court if you file a c/c. They would be very foolish to do this given that no agreement exists, but Companies do stupid things, so it's worth bearing in mind.

 

The DN and whether you received it or not, is a mute point given that they don't have an agreement. That said, they were correct in saying they don't have to provide a certified copy. They do have to provide a true copy however. If you didn't receive it, they won't be able to prove either that it was sent or received, as there is no record of 1st/2nd class post, so they have no evidence. A DN must contain a full date, just the month and year are not sufficient and render it invalid.

 

They haven't supplied you with the information you requested under the Subject Access Request, so I would report them to the Information Commissioner. A formal complaint is justified and may well get them into trouble!:-D They are making things unpleasant for you, so a bit of their own medicine is appropriate I think!

 

Can you remind me when the defence has to be filed by and can you post up the full details of the particulars of claim. Thanks.

 

Regards,

 

Laiste.:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Laiste, good to hear from you! I will answer/reply to each of your paragraphs in order:

 

Their letter wasn't marked without prejudice,

 

If the case is stayed due to them not responding to the defence, where would that leave us? Could they still chase us until we file against them?

 

The letter says - "A default entry will therefore be made on your credit referance file..." I don't know if there is one there or not,

 

They haven't phoned or sent any letters since we last made a payment, but I do want to c/c for the removal of the default,if there is one, depending on the cost. How would you calculate the damages in something like this?

 

The default notice doesn't even contain half the things it should, therefore it IS invalid. Seems like it was meant more of a scare tactic. It's not even headed default notice, though it states "failure to respond will result in a default being registered."

 

They said that as I didn't include the £10 fee, they are not obliged to provide supply it and they would only provide me with info that wasn't archived,

 

The defence has to be filed by 29th June.

 

Their POC:

 

The Claimant's claim is for the sum of £187.42 being the balance outstanding on the Defendant's account in respect of the price of goods supplied and delivered by the Claimant to the order of the Defendant through its mail order catalogue service together with any charges applied to the account in accordance with the terms and conditions of use.

 

Full details of the cost of all purchases made and details of agreed payment arrangements have been given to the Defendant. The Defendant has defaulted in payment.

 

The Claimant claims £187.42

 

That is exactly how it's written, poor punctuation and all. The second paragraph is partly true now they have provided a list of balances each month, but it wasn't correct at the time they filed their claim. Neither have they given us any details of 'payment arrangements'.

 

Let me know if you need anything else. :)

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Getting worried now.... I know I shouldn't but I feel a bit forgotten when no one posts for a while :sad:

Abbey - *SETTLED IN FULL!* ;)

-£445 refunded after one phonecall

HERE

 

Lloyds - Reclaiming Charges ***WON!***

-09/05/07 - Prelim delivered

-22/05/07 - LBA sent - no response

-11/07/07 - Filed at court

- 26/07/07 - Full settlement offer!!!! Donation made ;)

HERE

 

Next - Trying to Sue us with no agreement! :lol:

-29/06/07 - Defence filed

-16/08/07 - AQ filed

-19/09/07 - Claim struck out!! :p

HERE and continued HERE

 

PLEASE CLICK MY SCALES IF I'VE HELPED!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...