Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
        • Like
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
        • Like
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

us v the Abbey for £7,500***WON***


ohoh4312
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5486 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wow noobrider, thanks for the speedy reply!:)

 

That puts my mind at rest about compromising the Court claim, and once other half has called tomorrow to find out what they are investigating on his card, I will send a letter to Abbey as you suggest asking them what the hell they are playing at! (or words to that effect).

 

Thanks so much for the advice (sorry again for bothering you with it); it may well be a coincidence, just seemed a bit suspicious.

 

Huge thanks

 

Jo xx

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 424
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Hey Jo.

 

Sorry for not replying sooner. Have been at a funeral all day :(

 

I agree with noobrider that it is probably coincidental. You should still continue with your claim (I would if I was in the same position), and most definitely call them to find out what's going on.

 

"Keep going all the way until your PAYDAY" (quote from deedee1310, 2007) :D

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello Ohoh!

I have just read your thread. Charley Farley's threads will help as it does me. I didn't even write to Abbey to say I was taking them to Court. When they sent their letter 'thanks for asking for chgs refund but sorry no can do' I just started my moneyclaim on line. I am a bit cynical as I worked in Banking for 20 yrs, not since 1999 though. I know a bit about their tactics and how they conduct themselves and I'm afraid they are dogmatic so there's no room to be beating around the bush. I see it like if you wanted to get your money back in a shop for faulty goods. You go with the drive of getting your money back. Get that feeling, taking one stage at a time.

 

 

All the very best to you

 

Determind

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey determindator

 

Thanks for the support!

 

I didn't write specifically to tell them I was taking them to court, just made it clear in my last letter - rejecting their pony and trap GoGW offer - that if they didn't pay up by tomorrow (cat in hell's chance of that!) then "I would commence Court proceedings without further warning."

 

So bring it on! (omg I am soooooooo scared - seriously)

 

Jo xx

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having a dumb blonde moment - nothing new there then!

 

As this is a Joint account I am claiming for, can I be the sole claimant or does it have to be in both names on the N1 with 2 signatures?

 

Looked through loads of threads but couldn't find the answer, so sorry if it has been covered before.

 

Thanks

 

Jo xx

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have just printed off my N1, schedule of charges (future dated for tomorrow) and Particulars of Claim, ready to take to Croydon County Court in the morning.

 

Every page of the attachments has my name and the account number on it, and I left a space on the Particulars of Claim to write in the claim number.

 

Just a thought - do I need to sign each page of the attachments, or is this not necessary?

 

Basic question probably, but it has done my head in getting this far already, and would just like to be as "spot-on" as possible!

 

Thanks in advance

 

Jo xx

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OH MY GOD! :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

 

YOU HAVE TO READ THIS!!!!!

 

Other half back, and just called FCO re the letter (post72). This is a brief transcript of the conversation:

 

OH: I'm calling you regarding the letter you sent me

FCO: Can I have your card number please?

OH: Which number would you like, the one on the letter or my actual card number?

FCO: Oh I see - are they similar then? Did we make a mistake?

OH: Well they are both 16 digits if thats what you mean by similar!

FCO: Oh.......(long silence), then did a few security checks

OH: Also, you missed off a letter in my surname! So, whose card is it that you are investigating?

FCO: I don't know (!)

OH: Well I don't have a lot of faith in the FCO investigations at the moment then, if you can't get my name or card number right.

FCO: Just checking something.....ah, there was a stop put on your partners card?

OH: Thats correct, and she called you on the 15th and was told it was all sorted.

FCO: According to the system, the letter we sent to her was not received, so this letter you have should have gone to her.

OH: But the letter was received, and she called you, and you said it was all cleared? And this is not her name or card number either, so who's is it?

FCO: I really don't know. It appears we transposed the details from another account, but only on the letter. (Oh my God what an admission)!!

OH: So what happens now?

FCO: I have checked your account, and it is all fine.

OH: So neither card is stopped or flagged?

FCO: No, everything is absolutely fine.

OH: Actually it's not. Thanks.

***End of Conversation***

 

What the hell are they playing at? So the whole thing was wrong - name, card number the lot. And the letter was dated the same day that I called them to sort out my card!!

 

So now do I have grounds for a complaint, based on the undue stress they have put on me through total incompetence, or is it a bit flimsy/circumstancial??

 

Has anyone ever experienced this before? I really want to take some sort of action, but am not sure what or how. God I am livid :mad:

 

Any thoughts??

 

Jo xx

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Let me get this right. FCO were playing silly b***ers with your card but in actual fact they had the wrong card in the first place?

 

If that's the case then that is unbelievable. I'm not sure who you would have to complain to (if it's them it will take 8 weeks :mad: )

 

I'm so sorry love. Hopefully this is the end of the drama with your card for the time being but methinks you need to lose the "shAbbey Habit".

 

They are awful to bank with and I am so pleased to no longer bank with them, they were a nightmare :mad: :mad: .

 

Does anyone else have any ideas? Would you like me to send you one of Abbey's "How to Complain" leaflets (sent courtesy of Andrew Nanson after receiving my Prelim letter :-o ).

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks deedee but I have enough of those "complaints" leaflets to wallpaper the toilet walls - best place for them, me thinks :D

 

Anyway.......... I filed my N1 at Croydon County Court at 11am this morning!!!!!

 

So it's official (omg!) and now the waiting game starts I suppose.

 

Oh and just to rub their noses in it a bit more, I wrote the cheque out of the Abbey account!!!!!! :D

 

Jo xx

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) I love it!! The offer of the "complaints" leaflet was made with my tongue firmly in my cheek :D .

 

Yes it is official now - good for you. I've not heard a peep from them since my fob off letter last week. I will sending LBA next Wednesday at this rate.

 

I was thinking of amending my claim to including Contractual Interest at their unauthorised overdraft rate of 29.8% APR. What do you think? :???:

 

If I get to the court stage I would ask the judge to consider three rates:

 

1. interest at their Unauthorised OD rate (29.8%)

2. interest at their Authorised OD rate (16.9%)

3. Statutory interest at 8%.

 

Your opinion and anyone else's is most welcome. I'm still trying to find threads to confirm if Abbey have paid out CI to claimants. If anyone knows of any cases, please let me have the links.

 

dee

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey deedee

 

Not sure on this one but from what I have read you have to include contractual interest right at the start of the claim ie Prelim letter, or else it cannot be considered - that is purely my understanding of it, but I will stand corrected if someone else says otherwise.

 

Hope someone can advise you further.

 

I have subscribed to your thread so will be reading with interest - while mine goes quiet till the Court papers land on their desk!

 

Jo xx

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Do you know what, as it is my first claim (I've wisened up since I started this one), I will leave it as it is. :p

 

My Capital One claim has CI from the outset as does my Haliprats one. It'll be interesting to see how they react to those claims :D

 

Can't take the lulls. Have been reading and contributing to your thread for the last week now.:( Never mind, the excitement will pick up again when Abbey start their usual court shennanigans :D :D

 

Yes - please keep an eye on my threads. I'm just two and a bit weeks behind you with Abbey.

 

deedee x

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Will do hun

 

Mind you with the way Abbey have been treating me just lately, I am sure there will be something else to report soon :rolleyes:

 

Otherwise we can just have a chat!

 

Jo xx

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK, now I have nothing else to do but wait (I wish LOL), everything is going round in my head and I need clarification if possible please on the following:

 

My Prelim letter to Abbey included all the overdraft interest, as charged per month - I hadn't found this wonderful website then, and was following alternative advice!

 

Then reading other websites - still not this one, unfortunately - the advice was NOT to include overdraft interest, so my LBA was amended to reflect this, and I duly informed them in the letter. I did actually take legal advice from a friends' Mum who is a solicitor, and she said that because I was reducing the claim, it did not have any effect, and I did not have to start again.

 

Now, having filed my N1 today it is for less still; I have had to remove two months charges in 2001 to fall within the six year limit (they were valid at the time of the Prelim obviously) and I am nowhere near confident enough to argue the Statute of Limitations.

 

OMG sorry it took so long (:o ), but the question is:

 

If I have to submit a Court Bundle, then the Prelim letter will be included - the others won't because they contain "Without Prejudice" paragraphs - so will the Court question the difference in the amounts? And will this go against me?

 

I know in general a difference in the original request to the Court claim does not matter, but because what I did initially was wrong, I now think thats why Abbey are being so Shabby towards me, because they think I haven't got a clue what I am doing! (How right they are - ish!)

 

I know I am months away from a Court bundle, and may not (prays) ever have to do one, but you know when something is just niggling and won't go away?

 

I would just like some reassurance now please, if possible, that I haven't screwed up and given them an opportunity to throw out my case :confused:

 

Sorry that took so long too!

 

Jo xx

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Jo.

 

Don't know if I'm qualified enough (by experience and knowledge -yet), to help answer.

 

From what I have gleaned, it doesn't matter too much about the schedule of charges in the sense that you can continually amend it, until you file at court. For this reason, I don't see why the Court would question why the amount in the Preliminary Letter is different to the schedule that has been included as part of your evidence.

 

If anyone knows better could you please post and help reassure Jo. :)

 

Apart from that Jo, how is everything otherwise?

 

deedee x

My threads

deedee1310 v Abbey, deedee1310 v Capital One, deedee1310 v Halifax Plc, CapQuest CCJ, deedee1310 v Littlewoods & deedee1310 v Smile

If I have been of help in even the smallest way, please click the star and "add to my reputation" :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks deedee - my fountain of reason as ever :)

 

I was just doing the "headless chicken" again I think! No seriously this has taken over my life at the moment - how sad! - and I am just picking holes in my own case before someone else does! Thanks for the reassurance - again!

 

Will pm you in a bit to burden you with my latest woes! (Joke!)

 

Jo xxx

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha Ha this gave me a fit of the giggles :rolleyes:

 

Just got a letter from Abbey Customer Operations - here are the first lines:

 

" WOULD YOU LIKE TO BORROW UP TO £15,000?

 

As an Abbey customer, you could borrow from £7,500 at a great rate."

 

Was thinking of writing back to them saying "hey, thats how much you borrowed from me, at a much better rate!" :p

 

TeeHee :D made my day!

 

Jo xx

Six Nations Champions 2009

Triple Crown 2009

Grand Slam 2009

:cool::-D:cool:

Link to post
Share on other sites

LOL Hi Jo,

 

Sorry been very busy at work had not time to talk, well everything seems to be going ok for you now.

 

Dont worry about that Prelim list of charges, the court will only really focus on your claim form and the most up to date list of charges. The main thing is you had the amounts correct when you submitted the claim.

 

Im getting nervous myself waiting to hear back from the court about what they intend do next. I hate sitting here twiddling my thumbs waiting for the some action.

 

Keep in touch Leecabs :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just love this thread Jo! Full of ups and downs, keep going. The entire CAG especially is behind u. Even though SHABBEY has tossed u about they will soon be doing the big throw soon, which is to 'throw' u some money. lol

 

Kiddo

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...