Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thank you very much for your letter in regard to the above mentioned shipment.  Due to the high volume of parcels coursing through the courier network each day, undergoing continuous processing and handling, certain packages may experience delays or even can get lost in the course of this journey. Please note that due to the time that has passed, this shipment has been declared as lost.  I have today processed the claim and made offers to the value of £75 as a goodwill gesture without prejudice. I do acknowledge that you have mentioned in your letter that the value was higher, however, you did not take out any protection to that amount. The protection for this shipment was £20 and we will not be increasing our goodwill offer any further.    Please log into your account online in order to accept our offer. Once accepted, our accounts department will process the claim accordingly. The claim payment will be processed and received within 7 working days.                                  In addition, a refund of the carriage fee will be processed as a separate payment and will be received within 3 working days.  If I can further assist, please feel free to contact me.   I have also just noticed that yesterday afternoon they sent me an email stating that "after my request" they have refunded the cost of shipping. I did not request the refund so will mention that in my letter as well.
    • Hi I had to leave Dubai back in 2011, during the financial crisis. And only now have I received a letter from IDRWW. Is this anything to worry about about as I have 2 years left until it’s been 15 years(statute barred in Dubai). Worried as just got a mortgage 2 years ago. Could they force me in to bankruptcy? Red lots of different threads on here. And unsure what true and what isn’t. 
    • Not that TOR will see this now he's thrown in the hand grenade. Rayner has plenty of female supporters on X, for a start. As for the council and HMRC, fair enough and I thought Rayner was already in touch with them. That's where it should be dealt with, not the police force. @tobyjugg2 Daniel Finkelstein thinks the same as you about tax. The Fiver theory. How the Fiver Theory explains this election campaign ARCHIVE.PH archived 28 May 2024 17:36:51 UTC  
    • Often with the Likes of Lowells/ Overdales that 'proof' doesn't stand up to scrutiny.   Think about it like a game of poker, they want to intimidate you into folding and giving up as soon as possible, and just get you to pay up and roll over, that is their business model, make you think your cards are rubbish. What they don't expect, and their business isn't set up for it, is for a defendant to find this place and to learn that they have an amazing set of cards to play. Overdales don't have an infinite number of lawyers, paralegals etc, and the time / money to spend on expensive court cases, that they are highly likely to lose, hence how hard they will try to get you to roll over.  Even to the extent of faking documents, which they need to do because the debts that they purchased were so cheap, in the first place. Nevertheless it works in most cases, most people chicken out, when they are so close to winning, and a holding defence is like slowly showing Overdales your first card, and a marker of intention that this could get tricky for them. In fact it may be,  although by no means guaranteed that it won't even go any further than that.  Even if it does, what they send you back will almost certainly have more holes than Swiss Cheese, and if with the help you receive here, you can identify those weaknesses and get the whole thing tossed in the bin.
    • So Rayner who is don’t forget still being investigated by the local council and HMRC  is now begging to save her seat Not a WOMAN in sight in this video other than Rayner  Farage is utterly correct this country’s values are non existent in her seat   Rayner Pleads With Muslim Voters as Pressure From Galloway Grows – Guido Fawkes ORDER-ORDER.COM Guido has obtained a leaked tape from inside a meeting between Angela Rayner and Muslim voters in Ashton-under-Lyne...  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Glensorie vs Barclays


glensorie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6140 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi all.

Just a question regarding the rejection letter templates.

I received a letter from Barclays offering me £875 as a gesture of goodwill and as Full and Final settlement. The thing is I have not even sent them the preliminary letter with the spreadsheet breakdown of charges yet. This incidentally amounts to just over £1100.

Looking at the rejection letter templates they seem to geared towards having already sent them the request for repayment. I'm not sure which one to send.

Any help would be very much appreciated.

Cheers

Glensorie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Simply use a template, prob #2 and amend it as necessary, saying something like:

thank you for your offer.......which I accept as part payment but I request the amount of £xxxxx which has been taken from my account in the form of unlawful charges.

If this amount is not refunded within 14 days I will consider taking the matter to the Small Claims Court........

  • Haha 1

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Hi all again.

 

Just a quick update.

 

 

Paultry offer from Barclays was duely rejected and charges owed spreadsheet sent.

 

No reply so N1 taken to CC yesterday.

 

Hope I havn't jumped the gun and sent the N1 too soon, although they have had plenty of warnings along the way. Any advice welcome.

 

Cheers

 

Glensorie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry I should have explained in a bit more detail.

The state of play to date is:-

 

DPA sent :- 09/03/2007

Standard Letter from Barclays :- 22/03/2007

30 day DPA reminder sent :- 10/04/2007

ICO complaint letter sent :- 23/04/2007

LBA for unknown amount sent :- 23/04/2007

Standard Letter from Barclays :- 28/04/2007

Reply from ICO :- 02/05/2007

Statements arrive :- 12/05/2007

Barclays initial offer £875 :- 23/05/2007

Refusal Letter sent with Schedule of charges :- 05/06/2007

File to court :- 21/06/2007

 

The question is, because I didn't send the preliminary letter because of the trouble I had getting my statements in the first place and then sent the LBA for unknown amount, was I right to take in the N1 in when I did and would it complicate things later when filling out the AQ and assembling the Court Bundle for instance. ( If it got to that stage that is.

Does this make sense? I could do with some reassurance.

Cheers

Glensorie

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi, you have skipped the process quite a bit, be very careful in future, It could be crucial. ALWAYS post on here what you are ABOUT to do..

You will be answered within a couple of hours and if Saintly is on, bless! in the matter of seconds..LOL

Better to wait and get it confirmed than to have you claim lost on a technicality

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply Dar£n.

I thought that the wording on the refusal letter suggested that the next step was CC action if no reply.

I could do with some advice as to wether my claim is still on track or has been compromised.

Thanks in advance.

Glensorie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Glen, I understand your reasoning and indeed your frustration.

The idea is, is to get your statements [eventually], REQUEST [prelim] the charges back[without interest], Then when they do not comply give them a WARNING [LBA] ..then file at court....They could argue that you didnt give reasonable time for them to act.....

 

I doubt this will happen as you are still at the standard procedure stage and they would have ignored your requests anyhoo.

BUT....they may be waiting for you to slip up seriously enough to get it kicked out.....e.g. incorrect POC's etc.

 

Just keep posting on here and we will correct any mishaps ok

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cheers Dar£n.

Do you think I an still on track or is there anything I could possibly do to rectify my hastiness. I'm a bit worried that the N1 went in too soon, or is it just a case of wait and see what happens.

Glensorie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Okay but dont be surprised if they come back claiming they havent received anything to back up your POC's, this is normal stalling rubbish.

Then, even though we all know you sent them, you will have to send them again..

 

Might pay you to send a copy to Barclays Litigation by recorded delivery. with the covering letter.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Micky the Hippo, sorry It was three copies of the N1 and SOCs I took to the CC. Recieved Notice of issue today Deemed served on 24th June 2007.

 

Hi Dar£n again thanks for your patience.

If you think it would be worth sending the SOCs again to Barclays litigation team then I will, you can't by any chance put your finger on a name and address and is there a template for the covering letter?

Getting a bit worried now

Cheers

glensorie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again.

Bit unsure what to do now. Should I send the Lit team another copy or just sit back and wait for the inevitable Acknowledgement and take it from there.

 

Yours confused

Glensorie.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even if you send them now, barclays will say in their defence they've never seen a SOC from you so you'll have to send them again

28/2/07

Sent request for repayment of charges totalling £2,800 (I want it ALL back!).

8/3/07

Barclays send sorry your not happy letter

14/3/07

Letter before action sent

25/4/07

Barclays offer £1,790

27/4/07

Thanks but no thanks to the offer sent

28/4/07

Filed with mcol, now looking at a figure of £3,500, they should of paid up when i asked nicely :-D

11/5/07

Barclays acknowledge claim

30/5/07

Barclays defend claim

19/6/07

Received notice of transfer to Northampton County Court and barclays excuse for a defence!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Covering letter for the SOC's

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/34887-5-money-claim-line.html

 

obv amend the address to the Litigation Dept

 

AND SEND IT RECORDED DELIVERY

 

NEW!

also see:

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/barclays-bank/101067-send-your-socs.html

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Dar£n.

I have decided to cover all angles and send Barclays litigation team another copy of my SOCs along with the covering letter you suggested. Do you think it would be worth emailing them as well, including the suggested wording in your post#24 in the Litigation team thread :-

 

Quote:

I realise from your defence that you do not agree with my legal analysis that the charges levied to my account amount to penalty clauses and are deemed unfair. I do however recognise the fact that the sum at issue between us is relatively modest and as such, it is not cost effective for either party to take the matter to trial. Therefore in order to avoid the inevitable time and cost associated with pursuing the claim to trial I am willing to settle the claim upon repayment of the charges applied to my account, together with statutory interest and costs totalling £xxx.xx.

Only once in receipt of cleared funds will I then discontinue all action against Barclays in connection with this claim.

 

I am willing to try anything to bring about a swift and painless end to this claim.

 

Oh! one more thing. Is this the address for the Litigation team?

 

Barclays Legal & Compliance

Litigation & Disputes

Level 29

One Churchill Place

London

E14 5HP

 

Cheers

Glensorie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes email them, everything you do to try to settle will benefit YOU if it goes to court, making them look bad as they have had numerous chances to keep it out of the court.

 

email Dino [he seems to be favourite to answer.....but saying that, he not answered ANY of mine] but copy the others in too, this way you should get a response off at least one of them.

.

http://www.findmadeleine.com/

http://news.sky.com/skynews/madeleine

 

If I dont reply to a direct question please feel free to PM me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the rapid response Dar£n.

I'll fire them all an email and see what happens.

I must have been editing my last post when you replied. I wanted to know if this is the right address for the Litigation team:-

 

Barclays Legal & Compliance

Litigation & Disputes

Level 29

One Churchill Place

London

E14 5HP

 

Cheers

Glensorie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes it is :)

28/2/07

Sent request for repayment of charges totalling £2,800 (I want it ALL back!).

8/3/07

Barclays send sorry your not happy letter

14/3/07

Letter before action sent

25/4/07

Barclays offer £1,790

27/4/07

Thanks but no thanks to the offer sent

28/4/07

Filed with mcol, now looking at a figure of £3,500, they should of paid up when i asked nicely :-D

11/5/07

Barclays acknowledge claim

30/5/07

Barclays defend claim

19/6/07

Received notice of transfer to Northampton County Court and barclays excuse for a defence!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

We have to be so you can post your letters quickly lol

  • Haha 1

28/2/07

Sent request for repayment of charges totalling £2,800 (I want it ALL back!).

8/3/07

Barclays send sorry your not happy letter

14/3/07

Letter before action sent

25/4/07

Barclays offer £1,790

27/4/07

Thanks but no thanks to the offer sent

28/4/07

Filed with mcol, now looking at a figure of £3,500, they should of paid up when i asked nicely :-D

11/5/07

Barclays acknowledge claim

30/5/07

Barclays defend claim

19/6/07

Received notice of transfer to Northampton County Court and barclays excuse for a defence!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...