Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • she and  johnson need to be kicked off the taxpayers credit card - for starters I'm certain there is cause - taking up 'jobs' when they shouldn't, bringing the nation into disrepute with their antics .. I'm sure it would be a very popular act from a new labour guv
    • Please have a look at this draft letter. It is modelled on yours but I have cut out a load of the unnecessary information. Also, the responsibility lies with the finance company because the vehicle was brought on hire purchase. You send it to them and a copy to big motoring world.   Let us know if there's anything that you disagree with, which is wrong, which you think should be added
    • According to Alastair Campbell on Twitter, anti-Le Pen parties are pointing to RN's fiscal policies and saying they'll cause a 'Truss-style market meltdown'. Liz Truss charged taxpayers for Amazon Prime subscription - Mirror Online WWW.MIRROR.CO.UK The subscription costing £95 gives the ex-PM free shipping from the retail giant, as well as the ability to stream films and TV shows such as My Fault...  
    • Thank-you @BankFodder, your statement is a correct understanding of my position and I agree, it is actually really what I was looking for in starting this thread, as I too believed that the maximum I could claim for is that which I sold it for, even though this was substantially below market value at the time. And so, this sold value is what I shall be claiming for + the other expenses. @dx100uk I get your point, but this is just not what I want to expose myself to. Unfortunately I was one of the unlucky ones to have my details stolen in the Peoples Energy hack, and in 2020 I discovered that those details had been used to take out car insurance, and that the insured was then involved in a collision and my details were dragged through the mud. Despite Aviva cancelling the claim and treating as though it never were, even though I have the letters from them to say that they have removed this claim from the insurance database, I still get refused insurance and credit products to this day until I send across the letter from Aviva which explains that I was a victim of fraud. So you'll forgive me for not jumping up and uploading my data to a server utility for which I have no control over its retention policy, or where the server is located globally, its legal jurisdiction, or its security protocols.
    • Speeding (Revised 2017) – Sentencing (sentencingcouncil.org.uk)  
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Tracey vs HSBC


Lenlu
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5947 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 123
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Thanks again guys, ill let you know when i hear more then :) Just confused me as it says on the front page that the defendant has 28 days from the date of service to file a defence ???!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

It is a bit confusing. they have 14 days from the date of service to acknowledge. This means telling you what they intend to do such as defend or pay you in full or whatever.

Once they have acknowledged, if they have said they intend to defend, the time limit changes to 28 days from the service date to get their defence in!

Hope this makes sense!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

OK the form i received says Notice that acknowledgment of service has been filed, the on the second page it is the acknowledgement of service form and a box has been ticked to state 'I intend to defend all of this claim', so have they missed a step? is is 28 days from now then? or is there another form to say they defend?

 

Sorry for being a pain :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I think that sounds correct, as that is what mine said, I may be wrong but going by mine they still have 28 days to submit their defence, you will then receive a copy of their defence from the court and then you wait for the court to decide next step, if anyone thinks different please say

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

maybe this is a little easier

 

claim filed, claim served (if no date given - considered served 5 days after it is filed), 14 days from served date in which they must acknowledge, when they do then 14 days more in which they must defend. so, total is actually 33 days from filing to their deadline to defend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

OK so just checked MCOL and it says DEFENCE 18/06/2007 so they are obviously defending which is no surprise, but I have yet to receive anything from anywhere? What happens now?

Link to post
Share on other sites

You will receive notice of transfer to your local court together with a copy of thier defence.

Then you will receive directions from your local court as to what the judge want to do with the case.

You need to have a read of the 2 aq threads that lat has done so you know exactly what happens next. I will post the links here for you in a mo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Havent got anything yet from anyone, last post I got was 2 page latter, first page was notice that acknowledgement of service has been filed in the northampton county court. This was dated 20th June? Says 'An acknowledgement of service of your claim has been filed today, a copy of which is attached, the defendant now has 28 days from the date of service of the claim form to file a defence'.

 

The secodn sheet is a copy of the acknowldegement of service

 

I belive northampton is the MCOL court?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes this is a nothampton document.

 

When you first filed your claim you received a notice of issue which has a deemed served date noted on it. DG solicitors have 28 days from this date to submit their defence.

 

Following this you will get a notice of transfer to your local court.

 

pete

Link to post
Share on other sites

Looks like the MCOL dates are wrong somewhere. Acknowledged on the 20th but defended on the 18th? Give thenm a ring and ask what the status of the claim is.

What date did you file your claim? There will be a deemed served date on mcol and it is 28 days from then that they have to defend.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Offer received today for £490, chaim was for £656 originally so a fairly good offer, but not now I have paid my £80 to the court.

anyone off hand got a link to the decline letter?

 

Also still not heard off MCOL with the details for the local court.....will this take a while?

Link to post
Share on other sites

PS In the letter ir does say that the costs are in the terms and conditions and 'if your claim for a refund proceeded to court, we therefore belive we would successfully resist any legal challenge in relation to those fees'

 

eeekkkk scare tactics? That sentance is making me think now :(

Link to post
Share on other sites

Should I be concerned I have not received anything from the local court yet? or even MCOL, its update online they have transfered but I have received nothing and its been over 2 weeks now

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...