Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Hi just typed all defence clicked next and it's deleted all. Any help
    • I forgot to say, there is one last possibility and that is that they will receive your letter of rejection and simply fold, accept the rejection and refund you. Don't wait too long for this. Seven days maximum – but in that seven days you could send your letter of claim anyway and when that you don't hear from them or when they start mucking around at least you are seven days closer to beginning the legal action – and they will know it (which is the important thing).
    • Okay that is excellent that you have an email between the garage and the warranty company confirming that there is a serious problem with the gearbox. That is very powerful evidence. I think the situation is this: you have sent them a letter of rejection but the reputation of big motoring world is that they won't take a lot of notice and they will try to prevaricate and maybe even blame you. Clearly you don't want the car any more and anyway it sounds as if the cost of repairs is going to be enormous. You don't know if the warranty company is going to step up to the mark but the whole thing is going to take a long time and I understand that you have lost confidence in big motoring world because of this event and also their reputation which you are now discovering on Facebook and on this forum and no doubt elsewhere. On the basis that you don't want the car any more and you want your money back, you need to hurry things along. I think the first thing is that you need to decide if you are prepared to bring a claim in the County Court. Even without the warranty money, the claim is worth more than £10,000. For actions less than £10,000, you bring a "small claim" and this means that even if you lose the case you won't be liable for the other side's costs. If you win the case then not only will you get your money plus interest but also you will recover all of the costs of the action. For actions more than £10,000, you go to something called the "fast track" and in the event that you lose the case, then you could be liable to reimburse the winner some of the costs. This means that in addition to not recovering your own money, you would lose your own court fees and also you would have to to bear the costs of the other side probably something less than £5000 – but as a rough guess. If you bring your court claim then your chances of success are almost 100%. Frankly if you brought a court claim then I can imagine that big motoring world will put their hands up and pay you out rather than face go to court and losing and getting a judgement against them. However, it you need to consider that this is a risk factor – although my view it is a negligible risk factor. If you did bring a court case, it wouldn't be instant. If they put their hands up then it would probably happen very quickly. If they didn't put their hands up then you could take anything up to a year for the matter to be resolved and during that time you would be without your car and without your money and in the middle of litigation. I'm explaining this to you say that you understand how it works. Bring a court case would be really the last resort when everything else has failed. However, I'm quite certain that you would win and it would be stupid of big motoring world to try to resist. In order to bring a court case you would have to send a letter of claim giving them 14 days to accept rejection and organise the refund otherwise you would begin the claim. Don't imagine that you could bluff this. If you did send a letter of claim then you would have to go through with it otherwise you lose all credibility and you might as well pack up and go home. So with this in mind, here are possible courses of action you could take. You can simply wait and see what their reaction to your letter of rejection will be. However they may not reply or else they may find some other reason to delay and of course during that time you will be without your car and without your money blah blah blah, not knowing if big motoring world were going eventually to start acting sensibly and respectfully towards you. The second thing you can do – and I think this has been suggested on Facebook – is that you can go along there and simply make yourself present and talk to other customers and generally speaking make a nuisance of yourself and embarrass them to the point where you would be explaining to other potential customers to be careful, to look on Facebook, and to do some careful research before they put their business to big motoring world. This has a reasonable chance of success although you would have to be careful. You should go accompanied by a friend and there should be no anger, no arguments, nothing that could be considered as being overly aggressive so that big motoring world would have no justification in kicking you out or even worse, calling the police. If you did this, then I would suggest that you record everything on the telephone carried in a pocket. A fully charged battery will probably keep a voice recorder and a telephone going for more than 20 hours or 30 hours. The other person can video any incidents so that everything is clear and you can inform big motoring world then it will be going up on the Internet. If you did this, my favourite option would be to issue the letter of claim giving them 14 days, and then going along to big motoring world with a copy of your letter of rejection and a copy of the exchange between the mechanic and the warranty company and a copy of your letter of claim – all settled together – and probably about 20 or 30 copies in all and I would start handing them out to any customers who came in. Big motoring world will soon get the picture and they will either move your the premises in which case you stand outside and carry on doing it or they will finally give in. Of course there is a chance that they won't give in and they will simply call your bluff – but in that case I think you have no choice other than to follow through with your 14 day threat in the letter of claim and to begin the legal action. At the same time you should be putting up reviews on Google and also trust pilot explaining exactly what has happened and also explaining that the mechanic has confirmed to the warranty company that there is the serious problem, that you have asserted the right to reject and that this is been ignored by big motoring world and that you have now sent a letter of claim and that you will be starting a legal action in 14 days. Once again, don't bluff about the legal action. If you threaten it – then you must mean it – and on day 15 you click of the claim. You don't need a solicitor for any of this. It's all fairly straightforward and of course we will help you all the way that it the decision is yours to make and I think you need to make it fairly quickly. I think the cost of starting an action for about £13,000 is 5% and then also if it goes to trial which I would say is almost impossible – there would be an additional fee. You would claim interest at 8%. A judge might award a lower figure but frankly if you can show that big motoring world is attempting to ride roughshod over your very clear statutory consumer rights, I can imagine that the judge will want to show displeasure by awarding the full 8% which is a pretty good rate – even though it's not compensation for the hassle and the distress you are going through. If you decide to get solicitor, then if you win the case, because it is over £10,000 you will recover some of your costs but you won't recover all of them. If the solicitor begins by having exchanges of letters then I doubt whether you will be up to recover the cost of those and you could easily find that you're chalking up 500 quid or even a thousand simply on initial exchanges of correspondence. Also you need to bear in mind that if after having exchanges with a solicitor, big motoring world cave in – then you definitely won't get those costs back because you won't have gone to court and therefore a judge will not have made the order for payment of those costs. I suggest very strongly that you avoid paying any money for a solicitor and that you do it yourself. It's not a big deal – although you will have to you react quickly to the help we offer on this forum. Also, an additional benefit is that you will learn a lot and you will gain confidence and eventually you will feel good about suing anybody else who gets in your way. Nothing not to like! If you do decide to instruct a solicitor then you must take control of the solicitor. Most of them prefer to sit in an office writing letters on the clock. If you do decide to instruct a solicitor then you must instruct the solicitor very firmly that they should send one letter of complaint giving seven days. A second letter – a letter of claim giving 14 days and that they must then begin the action. If you don't do this. If you don't take control then it will simply cost you money, you will be without your car even longer and of course without your money. The whole thing is a nightmare. I think I've laid out the options but please do ask questions. I hope you can see that this is the kind of advice that you won't be getting on Facebook. Nothing against Facebook. It's good as a meeting place and to make people realise that they aren't on their own – but after that the advice given is weak and confusing.  
    • What makes you say that?  I have no idea how I would go about that or why they would even entertain discussions now that they've won the Court case
    • Our main Equity Partner, Cabot Square Capital invests 
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Noddy vs HSBC


Noddy73
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6155 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Wife moved her account to another bank. Sent off her SAR and received her statements. Completed a schedule. Claiming £1,500 and £1000 in contractual interest.

 

Sent off the Prelim letter and got a "were looking into it". 16 days later sent off the LBA.

 

So I am about to complete N1. I have a few questions.

 

1. Can I print the N1 double sided to save the rain forest or should all documents to the court be single sided.

 

2. I am representing my wife so do I need to complete an additional form or where do I do this on the N1.

 

3. I was think of attaching all my current correspondances and some of CAG court papers (OFT, Relevant Case Law to Penalty Charges, EDM, etc). Thoughts.

 

4. I am including a copy of the current terms and conditions and charges sheet (downloaded this from there website) and schedule. Anything else I need to include?

 

 

Thanks

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ok, not too sure on your first two questions, but don't attach any of that to the N1. Just your schedule of charges.

 

If/when you receive AQ use Bankfodder's Draft Order http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/general/57708-draft-order-allocation-questionnaires.html

 

The other stuff will come later - when you've actually got a court date.

 

:)

If I've helped please click my scales! :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

at this point there is no need to include the draft order for allocation questionnaires. just file your n1 with the court and attach a copy of your breakdown of charges - that's all.

  • Haha 1

If i've been helpful in any way....then tip my scales over there!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just completing the N1.

 

1. Got stuck on Value bit as I am claiming Contractual Interest. Is this ok or does anyone have a better one

 

Charges £x

Contractual Interest £x

Court Fee £x

 

TOTAL £x

 

Plus contractual interest from date of issue to date of judgement/settlement at £x per day OR at such rate and for such periods as the court deems just.

 

2. Appendix. Have included the following. Anymore I shoud include.

 

Schedule of Claim for Charges

Personal Banking Terms and Conditions (2005)

Personal Banking Terms and Conditions (2006)

Personal Current Account Banking Services in Northern Ireland

OFT's action on credit card default charges

Calculating fair default charges in credit card contracts

Early Day motion from the House of Parliament

Financial Ombudsman Service News Issue 57

Relevant Case Law to Penalty Charges

Link to post
Share on other sites

take a look at the legendary bong's legendary thread:Bong v HSBC *Contractual Interest & 13yr claim**WON!!!** post 41 is her N1 particulars of claim.

 

for further searches:

on the blue strip line above the forum starting with user cp on the left - go to the right to the internal search and put in what you are looking for and you may strike lucky.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Can not believe it.

 

N1 was filed late May and got a Final Hearing date of late August.

 

No AQ, no allocation hearing, no prelim / directions hearing - straight to FINAL HEARING. Standard Small Claims Directions given.

 

First nudge letter sent and researching my bundle.

 

Please expect questions soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

you would do well to check with the court that even though the aq wasn't required the fee might be - just check it out.

 

also, take a look at the final hearing section on this:

GOT A COURT DATE? A guide to the later stages

 

and there's this, i wrote it just for you! lol

court bundles for dummies

 

seriously - get back with questions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reminder. Have already called the court and letter confirmation was sent yesterday.

 

I am really surprised at the speed of getting a final hearing.

 

Have already read your posts and some others and will be posing my court bundle index next week.

 

And a big thank you for all your help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Bromley. I think I was lucky.

 

I filed two paper N1s at the court using Bong and Josamolly N1s with CCI as a starting point. Include a court bundle as well.

 

Other one settled and HSBC filed a standard defence.

 

Am really looking forward to my day in court and thinking about submiting a Waste of Court Time Order.

 

I also asked HSBC for the old T&Cs. Got nothing and started a new compliant. Waiting for a response and off to the FOS if they do not give them to me. Thought this might help everyone else and assist others in doing the same with other banks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

would like to see you court directions in full, noddy.

in regards preventing a stay....

if dg was required to do something (file an aq, file a bundle, file anything) and didn't - then perhaps you could cut them off with a letter -

take a look at the one auburngreeneyes is toying with sending - read through the last 10 or so entries.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Notice of Allocation to the Small Claims Track (Hearing)

 

DISTRICT JUDGE *** has considered the statements of case and allocation questionnaires filed and allocated the claim to the small claims track.

 

The hearing of the claim will take place at xx:00 on the 24 August 2007 at Bromley County Court, College Road, Bromley, Kent, BR1 3PX and should take no longer than 1 hour.

 

The court must be informed immediately if the case is settled by agreement before the hearing date.

 

Each party shall deliver to every other party and to the court office copies of all documents (including any experts' report) on which he intends to rely at the hearing no later than 14 days before the hearing.

 

The original documents shall be brought to the hearing.

 

Date: 09 July 2007

Link to post
Share on other sites

If there is anything you need, just shout and we will be able to help.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

 

I am finalising my bundle at the moment and have included the following

Correspondance

Schedule of Charges

Bank Statements

Relevant Case Law Summary

Early Day Motion From The House of Parliament

Dunlop v New Garage

UTCCR 1999

UCTA 1977

SOGSA 1982

OFT Statement Summary

BBC Commission Conclusion

Australia Default Charge Report

Peter McNamara Interview

List of Previously Settled Cases

HSBC Bank plc Terms and Conditions

 

I am writing a Statement of Evidence but wanted to know if anyone thinks the following would be useful or overkill

* Case Summary

* Disclosure by List

* Witness Statement. Is this the same as Statement of Evidence.

 

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No the witness statement is different to the satement of evidence. Below is the list of docs I sent in:-

 

Witness Statement

Draft Order for Directions

Correspondence from Claimant

Correspondence from Defendant

Bank Statements

Schedule Of Charges

Statement of Evidence

Relevant Case Law Summary

Early Day Motion From The House Of Parliament

Dunlop v New Garage

UTCCR 1999

UCTA 1977

SOGA 1982

Terms & Conditions 1997

Price List for 1997

Terms & Conditions 2005

OFT Statement Summary

BBC Commission Conclusion

Transcript for Peter Mcnamara BBC Radio Interview

Australian Default Charges report by Nicole Rich

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]If you think my post was helpful, please feel free to click my scales

 

 

A prudent question is one-half of wisdom.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...