Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • and it will be also now written off under age related criteria anyway.
    • @dx100ukThanks for this! I'm still not clear if I'm facing more than 6 points on my license though. Can you explain any further please? When I accept the 2nd speeding ticket, will they just charge me £100 and 3 points, or will they be more severe consequences since that offense took place the following day of the 1st offense? Similarly, when I accept the 3rd offense, will they look at my record or just charge me with the £100 fine and 3 points? @Man in the middleI've been searching the forum and you seem very knowledgeable. Would you mind giving a look at my query please? Thanks in advance!!
    • Yes of course. That's why it says cc:: BIg Motoring World at the bottom. Don't imagine that this solves the issue. It doesn't. He not have to force the finance company and big motoring world to accept the rejection to give your money back. I suggest that you get the letter off tomorrow. And let us know what you hear but on Friday you should then send a threat to the finance company.   Have a look what I have said here about your options and read the whole thread as well.  
    • Been perusing the actual figures on the polls above wondering where the '16% claimed for deform comes from? I understand that there are 'weighted' end results based on secret calculations ...   Probably going to repeat this later, but remember that the ukip/brexit/reform/deform party has ALWAYS had poll speculation FAR better than their actual  performance at elections - by large margins. SO: The labor and Tory votes come largely from simply the people who say they will vote for them - sorted Lab 43% Tory 20%, with maybe another small 1-2% coming from the weightings of the 'not sures' Greens largely get what is declared from 'other' , although with another declared green bit from the 'pressed' question   So as the share of the voting displayed in 'other' granted to reform/deform is around 11%, where does the '16% too often being reported come from? Seems that reform has been granted as beneficiary of effectively ALL the don't knows and wont says, who when pressed didn't actually declare for someone else ... effectively adding 40%+ to their reported polling % - rather strange given their consistent under-performance compared to polling - or perhaps that is the cause of the higher rating eh?   Now I admit the possibility (probability?) of wingers being ashamed of declaring their support for the yuckey lemon end of the spectrum ... but surely  that should affect the 'Torys as well? Maybe the statisticians have simply weighted in that deform wingers are simply more likely to lie?   But - without 'weightings' and assumptions that faragits will get everything that isnt declared as a definite and unequivocal 'not that Piers Morgan' - reform is on around 11% it seems.   Add to that the history of polling a lot less than the hype - and the simple fact that faragit wingers seem to be spread across the country (presumably skulking in their moms spare room despite being 45+) and greens and lib dems seem to be community minded - I think two seats will be an epic result for farage. Hardly the opposition - far more raving wingnut party.   and importantly - Has farage got a home in clacton yet?
    • "as I have no tools available to merge documents, unless you can suggest any free ones that will perform offline merges without watermarking" (which you don't) ... but ok please upload the documents and we'll go from there
  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

kashie V Barclays **Hardship partial refund made**


kashie
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5441 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

:pI'VE CLAIMED MY BARCLAYS CHARGES BACK.:p

£5125.60

Im no expert everything i write is what i learnt from my own experience and reading through other threads. Click my scales if you wish to!:)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Managed to speak to Krysta Campbell this morning, about settlement, she is the one actually dealing with my claim - she says she is currently dealing with the june claims at the moment and advised me to phone back in two weeks.

 

I think it all depends on who is actually dealing with your claim as to whether they settle immeadiately.

 

So worth a try roll on two weeks time!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Rang Krysta last friday, recorded message - leave a message she will get back to us! Did that and emailed, no response, think it might be a bit soon for settling as when i spoke to her a couple of weeks ago she was dealing with june clalims.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just had response from Dino - what a whiz! He says he has forwarded it to Krysta and will speak to her first thing in the morning when she comes back in.

 

Maybe she has had a few days off?

 

Fingers crossed anyway and thanks again Saintly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Just an update - Claim stayed and directions hearing vacated as of the 2nd August. Application for lifting stay sent off on the 4th. Numerous letters sent to MP, MoR and OFT, complaining of situation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Kashie,

 

Sorry to hear this. Time to concentrate on getting your BC claim unstayed !

 

I've posted you over there already.

 

Slick

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 6 months later...

Hi advice needed.....watched Martin Lewis this morning on GMTV, he says that stays are being lifted on the grounds of hardship.

I sent in a removal of stay application in July last year stating that my case was a hardship case, though not really going into any major details. I was wondering if, because this was rejected back then if I could reapply for the lift, or whether I could just go to the Ombusman to look into this for me. My circumstances have not changed and we have been in recipt of benefit for over six years, my husband is disabled and I was in full time education, which I had to give up to care for him and my children as the eldest has autism and the youngest has severe speech and language difficulties. We are currently dealing with the CAB to help repay credit cards (charges already reclaimed).

I want to know which way I need to go to lift the stay - Martin Lewis said this morning to get in touch with the bank and if they don't comply to get in touch with the Ombusman, is this correct??

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Kashie,

 

It's too early to say with any certainty, but I doubt if getting a Stay lifted now will be any easier than before last Thursday's OFT case ruling.

 

Hardship cases should not be, or should not remain, Stayed but judges have not been at all supportive in lifting Stays.

 

If we thought it was easy to do, and likely to succeed, we'd be advising many people to try and get the Stays lifted. However, we've seen too many pay court fees for the Hearing and still get no joy.

 

From what you say, your circumstances are difficult but that may not be enough.

 

During the period over which charges were taken by the bank, were you receiving ONLY benefits or did you have some other income.

 

Personally, I think you may have a better chance going to the FOS rather than court, but it may well be a slow process.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

As far as I can remember we have been in receipt of benefits since 2000, so yes they would have been benefits only, apart from my student loan, which was paid on a termly basis. Reading notes on the FOS, I thought this was only supposed to take 3 weeks???

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are charges still being taken by the bank from benefits income or have you managed to avoid charges recently.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

You have a few options :-

 

1) Wait until the OFT case is settled, appeals and all, then get your refund + interest.

 

2) Take your complaint to the bank and ask that they review your case as one of significant and ongoing hardship as charges have been, and continue to be, taken from benefits income.

 

3) Go to the FOS and ask them to review your case because the bank has refused to do so.

 

If you decide on 2 or 3, bear in mind there may well be a long struggle to prove hardship and have your case reviewed.

 

I don't think the court will reconsider your case favourably and this would cost you additional fees.

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...

Hi advice needed.....watched Martin Lewis yesterday morning on GMTV, he was saying that some banks are paying part payment of claims on the grounds of hardship.

I sent in a removal of stay application in July last 2007 stating that my case was a hardship case, but this was rejected by the court. I have been on the moneysaving expert site and been given advice that I should contact the bank direct. As this site sometimes do things slightly differently I was wondering if this is the right thing to do?

My circumstances have not changed and we have been in recipt of benefit for over eight years, my husband is disabled and I was in full time education, which I had to give up to care for him and my children as the eldest has autism and the youngest has severe speech and language difficulties. We are currently dealing with the CAB to help repay credit cards (charges already reclaimed). And over the winter period had close on £800 arrears for heating due to central heating breaking down.

I want to know what I need to do and whether there is a template I can use to help with contacting the bank (if I have to) as I am always afraid I might say the wrong thing which might ruin any chance of gaining anything.

user_online.gifreputation.gif report.gif digg.gifdelicious.giftechnorati.giffurl.gif

progress.gifedit.gif quote.gif multiquote_off.gif quickreply.gif

kashieView Public ProfileSend a private message to kashieFind More Posts by kashie

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi advice needed.....watched Martin Lewis yesterday morning on GMTV, he was saying that some banks are paying part payment of claims on the grounds of hardship.

I sent in a removal of stay application in July last 2007 stating that my case was a hardship case, but this was rejected by the court. I have been on the moneysaving expert site and been given advice that I should contact the bank direct. As this site sometimes do things slightly differently I was wondering if this is the right thing to do?

My circumstances have not changed and we have been in recipt of benefit for over eight years, my husband is disabled and I was in full time education, which I had to give up to care for him and my children as the eldest has autism and the youngest has severe speech and language difficulties. We are currently dealing with the CAB to help repay credit cards (charges already reclaimed). And over the winter period had close on £800 arrears for heating due to central heating breaking down.

I want to know what I need to do and whether there is a template I can use to help with contacting the bank (if I have to) as I am always afraid I might say the wrong thing which might ruin any chance of gaining anything.

user_online.gifreputation.gif report.gif digg.gifdelicious.giftechnorati.giffurl.gif

progress.gifedit.gif quote.gif multiquote_off.gif quickreply.gif

kashieView Public ProfileSend a private message to kashieFind More Posts by kashie

 

There is one of three people that advised you of that on MSE(either me(natweststaffmember), esmerralda or Orford--think I got all the usual suspects covered ;) ). Do not attempt to get a stay removed because the courts will not remove them. You do need to approach the bank again.

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

I would adopt the standard approach and specifically mention why your claim should be treated as hardship

 

"2.

In making an assessment of financial difficulty the firm will take into account:

a.

evidence of changes in lifestyle, including loss of employment; disability; serious illness; imprisonment; relationship breakdown; death of a partner; starting a lower paid job; parental/carer leave; and starting full-time education;

b.

evidence of the following events:

i.

items repeatedly being returned unpaid due to lack of available funds;

ii.

failing to make loan repayments or other commitments;

iii.

discontinuation of regular credits;

iv.

notification of some form of insolvency or court proceedings;

v.

regular requests for increased borrowing or repeated rescheduling of debts;

vi.

making frequent cash withdrawals on a credit card at a non-promotional rate of interest; and

vii.

repeatedly exceeding a credit card or overdraft limit without agreement (and, in this regard, where a complainant has incurred over £500 in unauthorised overdraft charges in the previous 12 months, that is to be treated as indicative of financial difficulty)."

 

One from 2(a) and as many as possible on 2(b)

.

FSA Waiver on Bank Charges:http://www.fsa.gov.uk/pages/Doing/Regulated/Notify/Waiver/pdf/dir_quart_0709.pdf

Link to post
Share on other sites

We could do with some help from you

                                                                PLEASE HELP US TO KEEP THIS SITE RUNNING

EVERY POUND DONATED WILL HELP US TO KEEP HELPING OTHERS

 

                                            Have we helped you ...?  Please Donate button to the Consumer Action Group

 

Please give something if you can. We all give our time free of charge but the site has bills to pay.

 

Thanks !:-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Just an update - it's taken me this long but I have posted off case for Hardship today.

Tried to email to various Barclays employees using emails from back in 2007, but all must have changed as all addresses were rejected.

How long do i allow them to respond??

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...