Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Residents are being consulted on plans to run overhead power cables 60km across the county.View the full article
    • The number of people out of work compared to jobs on offer mean more are competing for the same roles.View the full article
    • Small boat crossing numbers in last 7 days much more than the planned number to be sent to Rwanda. Small boat arrivals – last 7 days - GOV.UK WWW.GOV.UK These migrants obviously believe that being sent to Rwanda is not a consideration when they are aware of other migrants having died making the English channel crossing. If Rwanda was going to receive thousands of migrants, then it probably would be a deterrent to some. But the threat of sending 300 migrants to Rwanda is just not going to make any difference.
    • Last June, 3.4m members received a £100 payment from the building society. Now they will be wondering whether the offer will be replicated this year.View the full article
    • Write to the IPC complaining that UKPC have not observed the requirements of PoFA . IPC  Waterside House, Macclesfield SK10 9NR Dear IPC, I am writing to complain about a serious breach of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 by UKPCM. I feel that as it is more a breach of the Act rather than not just  complying with your Code of Practice which is why I am bypassing your operator. Should you decide to insist that I first complain to your operator, I will instead pass over my complaint to the ICO and the DVLA . My story starts with being issued a windscreen PCN on 8/3/24 which was almost immediately removed and a second  PCN was then  sent by post on 13/3/24  [deemed delivered 15/3/24] which I did not receive and had to send an sar to have that particular mess revealed later  but that is not the reason for my complaint. UKPC then sent a Keeper Liability Notice dated 12/4/24 warning me that as 28 days have now elapsed, I as keeper am now liable for the charge.  This is in direct contravention of PoFA since the keeper does not become liable to pay until the day after the original PCN is deemed to have been given which would have been 13/4/24 -a Saturday ]. Not only does it not comply with PoFA but it fails to adhere to your Code of Practice and is in breach of their agreement with the DVLA. You will be aware that this is not the first time that UKPC have fallen foul of the DVLA and presumably yourselves. I have included copies of both Notices for information. You will realise the seriousness of this situation if this is standard practice from the UKPC to all motorists or just those where windscreen tickets are involved since the Law regarding PoFA is being abused and is unfair to misguide motorists. I await your  response which I understand will usually be within a week. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------I would think that should be sufficient for the IPC to cancel your PCN though  you should await comments from the Site team before sending your complaint. Don't forget to include both PCNs.  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

joe1969 V A&L


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6177 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

Having spent a few weeks reading up a lot of threads on this site , i decided to start my claim. I sent my S.A.R. on 5/2/07 and received my statements exactly 40 days later.

I sent my prelim letter on 2/4/07 for charges of £1972.50 plus i decided to go for contractual interest of %17.08 after reading ROS's thread against A&L , which worked out at £853 using Mindzai's spreadsheet. A couple of days later i received standard get lost letter . Sent my L.B.A. on 23/04/07 and again received standard get lost letter.

On 8/5/07 i filled in my N1 and took it to the local county court at Wigan including £120 court fee on my claim totalling £2945.50 , and am now just waiting for them to get back to me with a claim number. I have to admit it was a bit scary going into a court for the first time.

 

Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Young.

Just a quick question for anyone that could help me is that when i received my statements i received 6 1/2 years worth , so i sent off an L.B.A. for non-compliance on 19th April because i opened my account 20 years ago and they have not replied to this.

I know i can file a claim with the court , but how would i prove that they do keep statement information for more than the 6 1/2 years.

 

Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I have received my copy of N1 back from the court and A&L have until the 30th May to reply , do i need to send anything off in the meantime or do i wait until they have acknowledged my claim. Will i receive a letter from the court or do i have to ring them up.

Cheers Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Younganfree.

Just a quick update.

Yesterday 18/05 i received a letter of Wragge & Co. stating their intention to defend the claim. Today 19/5 i received a cheque from A&L for the derisory amount of £273 out of a claim for nearly £3000 stating this is the difference between the charges and the £12 only on charges applied when i was already overdrawn. Rejection letter going on Monday. I also received a letter from another customer services person at A&L dated the day after the letter with the cheque saying they are sorry about the delay in dealing with my claim but will deal with it as soon as they can. I don't think they communicate with each other.

 

Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Younganfree.

Just a quick update.

Yesterday 18/05 i received a letter of Wragge & Co. stating their intention to defend the claim. Today 19/5 i received a cheque from A&L for the derisory amount of £273 out of a claim for nearly £3000 stating this is the difference between the charges and the £12 only on charges applied when i was already overdrawn. Rejection letter going on Monday. I also received a letter from another customer services person at A&L dated the day after the letter with the cheque saying they are sorry about the delay in dealing with my claim but will deal with it as soon as they can. I don't think they communicate with each other.

 

Joe

 

This is what happened to me ... though they sent me a cheque for £850 when claiming for £3k (rejected). Got a letter a couple of days later saying they were dealing with it:rolleyes:

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

lol that got me... for a bank they dont add up very well..... at an average of £25 per charge and they were offering half ish (£12) meant u shud have been offered at least £1500, and to think these banks have our finances in their hands and they cant even work it out.

***************************************

Feels like a lost little girl x

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mimi & Jess

 

This is a section of the letter i received 16/05/07.

 

Default charges may apply to current accounts when items are presented for payment whilst the account is in excess of its overdraft limit and are returned unpaid (bounced) and a fee is charged. We do not believe that the term applies to other types of fee.

We believe that our charges have been made in accordance with the Terms and Conditions of your account, of which you have been given a copy. However having considered the particular circumstances of your case and taking into account the OFT review, in order to resolve this matter, we are prepared to offer the sum of £273 which includes the court fee of £120.

 

 

Just wondering if anyone reads anything into this or wether it is just a standard letter as regards to the small offer as my charges were £1972.50 + £853 contractual interest + £120 court fee.

 

Cheers Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep ... my letter's the same (apart from the amount offered) ... I'm sure they're all pretty standard.:rolleyes:

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Mimi,

For putting my mind at ease, I thought they had singled me out for some reason.

 

That's the intention, but believe you me, I've yet to see something from them that isn't standardicon7.gif

 

x

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

HI think they do the same for everyone on fri got aletter off wragge and co saying they were defending on sat mornin cheque from a & l for the difference between twelve pound charges and my claim going to send rejection letter in the mornin admit was tempted to take it over the weekend but woke up with more resolve today

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi everyone,

I sent the cheque back with rejection letter on Monday.

Received defence papers from Wragge & co. on Tuesday morning , it seems like standard defence others have received but they mention the limitations act , and i haven't claimed any charges over 6 years old. Is this not a false accusation from the defence and is there anything i can do about it or is this on everyones defence papers.

Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

hi joe 1969 they have said the same in mine i am going to send them a copy of the spreadsheets on tue because they said i haven't given proof of the charges eventhough i put three copies with n1 form so think it's standard what they are saying good luck mate because we seem to be at the same stage prob a couple of days behind you

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yep ... another standard defence:rolleyes: I also sent them a copy of my schedule as they stated I hadn't "particularised" my claim. Just another delay tactic.

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Joe and Blue

standard offer letter £12 off each charge

standard photocopied defence but both use the words without prejudice so you cant use any information from the letter or defence papers in court unless asked to do so by the judge

Received offer on 24 May £2311.50 against a claim of £5240 + £250 court

fee received defence on 23 May

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I don't know if this is the place to post this or not, but I can't find anything concernign the information I require.

 

I have claimed a refund of bank charges for accidentally going overdrawn in 2003. A&L have rejected the claim on the grounds that refunds only apply to credit cards and not current accounts. I do not believe this. Can anyone advise if thety can do this?

 

Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup, go for it Bongorob

HFC Bank - First letter claiming £196/LBA sent/£75 offered/rejected/Claim filed

HFC Bank Take 2 - Statements received

A & L - Prelim sent/LBA sent

Barclays (for my Dad) - Awaiting statements/LBA for S.A.R. sent/Statements received/Prelim sent/LBA sent

A & L (for my Son) - Awaiting statements/Statements arrived Prelim letter sent/£280 offered and rejected

Abbey (for my Sister) - ***Won***

Barclays PPI claim

Studio - ***Won***

HSBC - (for my brother-in-law) ***Won*** 8-)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bigmark ,

Have you sent a rejection letter for this offer.

If not you can find rejection letters in the Bank Templates section

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/bank-templates-library/25716-rejecting-offers.html

 

Hi Bongorob

A&L seem to follow a standard procedure

Prelim Letter - Nothing to do with us only credit cards

LBA - As we said its nothing to do with us

Court claim - Oh yeah it does have something to do with us and well offer you the difference between £12 and the charge we applied to you.

 

Just follow the procedure as set out by CAG which follows the Civil Procedure Rules which you will find in the FAQs.

Also it would be better if you start your own thread in this forum called

Bongorob vs A&L and then others will be able to follow your claim and answer any questions you may have.

Joe

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi, I don't know if this is the place to post this or not, but I can't find anything concernign the information I require.

 

I have claimed a refund of bank charges for accidentally going overdrawn in 2003. A&L have rejected the claim on the grounds that refunds only apply to credit cards and not current accounts. I do not believe this. Can anyone advise if thety can do this?

 

Thanks.

 

This is what everyone's been told by A&L and it's rubbish. Every letter they send out seems to be "standard". I'd definitely pursue your claim.

 

They'll try eveything in the book to make you think otherwise and stop you from putting in a claim, but you have every right to do so, so go for it.

A-Z CAG links to all documents you'll need for

your claim

(Thanks to Michael Brown for all his efforts)

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/consumer-forums-website-questions/53182-cant-find-what-youre.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...