Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Thanks dx, with link having multiple accounts for me, I didn’t want to be a pushover in the first one ideally.. hearing is 3rd June, WS’s to be exchanged by 6th may 
    • he may be using a different name but cars and vans/vans and cars it’s all the same Gerard Bird/Gerry Bird/G Bird aka Gurdip Singh Virdi He is still doing the same thing, operating from the same premises at 101a Longford, I’m guessing during Covid they got the great idea to rip people off remotely and charge people for the pleasure. they now deliver cars that are shocking quality and refuse to even accept the issues you find. Then Gaslight you into thinking your the problem and call you an idiot for buying a used car instead of a new one. Buyers beware this thread is vitally important     
    • Changes to China's state secrets law requires internet firms to monitor information shared by users.View the full article
    • The only way to verify whether there is any financial reward for the management is seeing the agreement. That would be required during disclosure IF court proceedings went ahead... Unless you could bring pressure to bear and get a copy?
    • god they've got at you haven't they. told you all the usual utter BS. a CCJ vanishes from your credit file on it's 6th B'Day regardless to being paid off or not or paying or not. same with any debt with a registered defaulted date - it vanishes from your file on the DN's 6th B'day regardless. creditfix are Knightsbridge, (they renamed) there are 100's of threads here on Knightsbridge, if i remember rightly 2 of the directors of a certain very big IVA provider were struck off for embezzling £1m's out of debtors. pers i'd stop paying now.  end of . just ignore them all. 99% of your debts are to utterly powerless DCA's and probably were never owed in the first place only goes to firm up my belief from post one..you got had blind. its very easy to deal with the debts even those with CCJ's. can you copy and paste what you credit file says regarding the IVA please?   
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Help with old uni debt please


oojakapipi
style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 6201 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I was referred to this site by a very helpful member of moneysavingexpert I have a long story that I will try and keep as short as possible.

My old uni contacted me in Oct 2006 on my Dads phone (when I was visiting) saying that I owed them tuition fees from my 3rd year (which I didn't attend) Oct 2003.

I had attended the college to sign the registry, however my cheque bounced and I was having financial difficulty at the time, so as I hadn't paid for the course didn't attend my final year.

I had been in contact with the uni debt collection dept in Feb 2005 when I settled an old library debt, and there was no mention from them at the time about the tuition fees.

Fast forward to Oct 2006, I told them (on the phone) I didn't believe I owed money for fees for a course I didn't attend.

Their solicitors have now filed court action against me, their claim was filed on 3-4-07, I sought legal advise and was told that I would have to admit the debt as I signed a contract (the registration papers), so I filled in the court papers admitting the debt and offering £1 per month. I sent these to the solicitors (copied letter to uni debt collection dept) asking them to stop the court action against me as I am currently unemployed and applying for jobs with financial institutions who will not employ me if I have a ccj (all true). They received this letter signed-for on 17-4-07.

I then got a really nasty letter back from uni debt collection dept saying that what I offered was not enough (even though I sent income/expenditure breakdown which clearly shows that I am in monthly deficit at the moment) and that they want £30 per month and they have instructed their solicitors to continue with court action.

I sent a letter to the Head of College 24-4-07 complaining about this whole thing and sent copies of the correspondence, I havn't heard back yet.

The thing is I think I have been wrongly advised to admit the debt as helpful person on MSE told me they havn't provided a copy of the contract, all this happened before I found any of these sites and I am very green as I have never been in trouble that results in court action before.

I am really worried about all this especially since my future employment prospects are threatened, and worried about losing my home as I have a mortgage and can't get housing benefit at moment, and have been told that the uni can apply to have the (supposed) debt attatched to my property.

Thanks for reading.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi again tomterm8:)

 

1. Correct

 

2. No, i offered the £1 when they sent me the court papers as was advised to admit the debt and make the offer based on my current (lack of) income.

 

3. No, I havn't offered them anything else, was advised to wait for judgement.

 

4. They wrote back after I offered £1 saying they were continuing with court action.

 

5. No, never formally disputed, disputed over the phone with uni collections dept, legel advisor said I had to admit the debt. In the letter of complaint to the Head of College I stated that I don't beleive that I should be charged fees for tuition that I did not take, I didn't get any help with this letter, but can post content (excluding their personal details) if it helps.

 

6. Yes, I have been offered a temporary job ( 8 weeks part time so only helps income a bit) which would not be affected by action, the interview in 2 weeks for a permenant position which I REALLY want would not employ me if I have a ccj.

 

Thanks again for all your help tomterm8

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

  • Haha 1

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can't afford to offer more, I am £300 per month in deficit with essential payments (mortgage, utilities, food), even with the temping job will still be (only just) in deficit.

 

I didn't put anything in writing when I left, I went in and spoke to my tutor, as far as I can remember they didn't ask for it in writing. I naively thought that as I didn't attend my 3rd year I didn't owe money.

 

The person who gave me the legal advise told me that the Judge would laugh my £1 offer out of court as it is not realistic as it is clear that I can't even afford that, she said that the Judge would award the uni the full amount, that the uni would then do searches to find what assets I have (which I will be charged for), then get the debt attatched to my property.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry to be a bit thick but what is a stay of judgement, and how does it work?

 

Nobody has ever mentioned this to me before, rubbish legal advisor said all I could do was admit debt and wait for judgement. I asked if it was worth defending the claim and going to the court to fight it, she said no, it would just cost me more in the long run as Judge is not interested in specifics of situation, just wether I signed the contract or not.

 

There is also no mention of this on the court letter, I did what it says under the title 'if you agree with the claim and are asking for time to pay' and sent my admission form to the solicitors with the offer of £1 per month.

 

What happens if I send the letter and ask the court for a stay and they refuse the offer again?

 

Thanks for all your help with this!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks again for all your help,

 

Will do the letter and contact the court first thing monday. Have just been searching hmcourt website and havn't found any info re: how much time there is between me sending admission and them taking me to court, will keep looking.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ooja, I think a call to Nationaldebtline might help you...just search for them through Google.

From what I've found out via trying to sort my own problems, if you have made a reasonable offer, taking into account your current financial circumstances, the Uni debt collection rejected it...if it does go to court it could be viewed that they have acted unreasonably. I note that your letter of complaint to Head of College has been ignored also!

 

I had a similar situation with a DCA who wouldn't accept what I could afford...so when they threatened court, I put this as part of a letter to them:

 

The commencement of legal proceedings under such circumstances could be counter to the 'Overriding Objectives' of the Civil Procedure Rules. You will be aware that 'Overriding Objectives' underpin everything the court does. Moreover, paragraph 4 of the Protocols Practice Direction states that in cases not covered by approved pre-action protocols, the court will expect the parties 'to act reasonably...in trying to avoid the necessity for the start of proceedings.'

I would suggest that your refusal to accept my offer could be viewved as unreasonable and I would ask the court to consider this matter with reference to the 'Overriding Objectives.'

 

The above might give you some food for thought, and on the whole even if a CCJ is granted judges don't order you to pay more than you can...but I do understand your reasons for wanting to avoid a CCJ. Infact it seems that by pursuing one the Uni debt collection dept would be shooting themselves in the foot! If you can't get that job..they can't get any money!

 

I haven't a clue as to whether Uni tuition fees come under the Consumer Credit Act...I went to Uni in the days when students weren't crippled by massive debts in order to get a higher education. Someone might know or you might be able to find out on some government website. I guess what I'm trying to say is...I don't know if its worth sending a CCA request.

 

Also may be worth finding out if your local CAB has a free legal advisor who may offer some valuable assistance in defending a CCJ. You need to mention that you were intimidated & harassed into admitting the debt...as from what I've read you didn't think you had one.

 

Good luck, Zim.

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Zimmie,

 

Thanks for the post, I am in touch with National Debtline already and think I will call them on monday before I do anything else re: the fact that the uni rejected my offer.

 

The legal advise I was given was by a company I was referred to through the CAB!

 

When I made the £1 offer to the uni, I explained about the ccj being detrimental to my future employment, they don't give a stuff! The letter they sent back was very aggressive.

 

The letter of complaint I sent to the Head of College was only a few days ago, so am still hoping to get some sort of reply. I sent the letter off my own back and I'm not sure I am complaining to the right person. Has anyone else had this kind of problem before?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello; most higher education institutions will offer pro-rata refunds if someone has paid the fees and wants to leave. Therefore if you have registered and then left, you should not be pursued for a full amount. Speak to your Student Union advice centre to find out what is the position on the pro-rata refunds.

Secondly, have you been assesed for any financial support towards your fees? Has this support been paid to your uni? Uni will only get the fee grants paid out for those still on register on 1st of December. You need to make sure that this was a case when you registered as I don't know how far this "1st of December" set up goes.

Next; unless you have formally withdrawn, the uni would have had you on the register. The fact that your cheque bounced is not very relevant because students usually are given few chances to pay their fees.

 

You need to gather the above info before your court appearance or if you wish to give an informed reply to the solicitors.

 

Every SU has an advice centre. The quality of SU advice centres is usually superb. The only snag you can hit is that you are no longer registered with this uni and the advice centres usually offer assistance to registered students. Therefore you need to either convince them that you are still entitled to their help by virtue of the issue (which arose when you were a student) or simply flatter and plead and bring flowers for the manager! ;)

Good Luck!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi CourseRep,

 

Yes, the pro-rata refund is something I had thought happened, I also remember that my uni would allow students to pay their fees in instalments, paying for the first term in September, then the rest in January my friend did this. She was warned that if she couldn't pay the second instalment in Jan she would be kicked off the course, nobody said that she would still have to pay for the rest of the course anyway. I would love to see a copy of this instalment agreement.

 

I havn't been assessed for financial support for fees, don't know anything about this. The court papers say that the uni are claiming from 24-10-03 which is the date I am assuming they are saying that I ended the course.

 

I will try the SU, but as I have been told by legal advisor, they cannot help me as I am no longer a student.

 

I am really frustrated and confused by the fact that in Feb 2005, when I dealt with the library debt, they didn't tell me about these fees that would have been due 18 months earlier, someone told me that they have probably had an audit which brought it to their attention.

 

I feel such a fool for admitting the debt, I was trying to follow the best and quickest route to stop the court action. I wish there was some way of finding out if they can legally get away with charging people for services they havn't used. As Zimmie pointed out, it is difficult to know if they come under the CCA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunatly, I filled the forms in by hand and signed them......

 

Do you think I could put in a plea that I have a personality disorder that means I sign everything that is put in front of me even if I don't use the service/admit the claim? Its called 'panic and sign disorder' :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

I am no longer welcome on CAG

i will be off site for the next month or so. if you have any problems, feel free to report the post so a moderator can help you.

 

I am not a qualified or practicing lawyer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...