Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like

Citicards tactics adjustment?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 5843 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi to all with Citicards issues.

 

First post on this site.

I need a little help from you please.

History

 

Sept 06 when on a DMP with the CCCA (with 8 other creditors)

Mar 07 assigned my contract to 1st Credit (DCA)

11th Arpil C/Court issued to Citicards-deemed to be served on the 16th. Defendant has until the 30th to reply for charges against account.

10th April sent a CCA to 1st Credit.

REPLIES

 

 

1st Credit on the CCA request dated 12th April say it will take a month to seek clients agreements. They had until the 23/04 to comply. Deadline has now passed (12days) and counting.

 

To date no reply to defend the C/Court Notice of Issue.

 

Today received a letter from Mark Clibbens; Quote "Please find enclosed a cheque for £147.66 towards the above customer's account. If there is no longer a debt for this customer, can I ask that you please send the cheque back to me as soon as possible".

 

The cheque is in 1st Credit name.

 

Question. What tactic is CitiCards playing at?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 101
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Sounds like Citi have sent a cheque of refund between the difference of the higher charges and £12 - but accidently sent it to yourself.

  • Haha 1

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The CCA request, i'd be tempted to make a complaint against 1st Credit through the information commissioners office.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Who are the ICO and where do I contact them. What would I say to them regarding this.

This letter was address to me including the cheque but (address to 1st Credit with name on the).

Why pay them when I requested that payments to be sent to me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The complaint would be about your CCA not being supplied to you.

 

ICO – Information Commissioner's Office

 

Sorry to correct you here, but the ICO is nothing to do with cca requests, read here.

 

What is it you are trying to acheive with the CCA request?

Consumer Health Forums - where you can discuss any health or relationship matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No problem.

Advice offered by ENRON is without prejudice and is for your judgement as to whether to take it. You should seek the assistance or hire of a solicitor or other paid professional if in doubt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

 

Your right about this site being monited by Citi.

Today received a phone request by 1st Credit with all the frills about what there going to do! However, I still have not heard whether a defence has been recorded through MCOL, Monday is the deadline set by the courts?

 

It seems the cheque sent by Citicards through me is to say that their have settled but not informed the courts or me. I beleive there want me to send the cheque to 1st Credit as it is already made out to them.

The £147.66 is for (late payment charges plus £30.00 court costs)

 

In my letter to CitiCards I expressed that payment should be made to me.

 

Can anybody help me on what to do next.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Gizmo

You asked what I am trying to acheive with the CCA request.

I wish to estabish a true copy of the agreement and whether as (1st Credit DCA) put it to me "we take no notice of such request".

1) Can their sell the debt without a copy

2) Try to remove the default notice

 

Am I right or not?

I would like some input on this as it seems you have valuable experience on this matter.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi to all

 

Received today a letter from 1st Credit.

Quote "we have recently obtained Office Copy Entries from Land Registry and note that you jointly own the freehold in the above property. As a result with instructions to secure a CCJ against you and enforce this by way of a Final Charging Order registered against your property. Should we succeed in obtaining a FCO, we will be applying to the court for an 'Order For Sale', of your property".

 

Citicards/1st Credit have still not complied to the CCA sent 10/04/07.

Where in the site is a none compliances letter so I can reply to they actions.

Can someone please help.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ist Credit breached the CCA by not complying within 12 working days.If they have still not complied after 30,they have committed a criminal offence.

 

Your account is in dispute,and as such no further action may be taken by them until it is resolved.

 

A quick letter reminding them of all the salient points would be prudent at this time-also a letter to the FSA and your local trading standards outlininh their CCA breach-and tell them you are reporting them to these bodies

 

 

pure scare tactics on their part.....play them at the same game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for your reply LTWFB. Is there a template letter to write to the FAS and LTS bodies?

 

Update concerning Citicards. I have placed a 'Notice of Judgment Entered' against Citifinancial dated 2/5/07.

As written here I received a cheque for the whole amount £147.66 but made out to 1st Credit.No defence had been submitted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi I obtained judgment against citicards through default as they did not file a defence on time. they filed an acknowledgment intending to defend the claim and the deadline was 30th march. So I obtained judment on 5th april, heard nothing so on 23 april rang the court for advice about enforcing the jugment and was told that on that morning citi had applied to have the jugment set aside because the matter was overlooked, also citi had had succesfully defended dozens of times and had real prospect of defending my claim, B Smith also claimed that i would suffer no pregudice by any set aside as i currently owed them around the same amount of the claim and if i won any money would be set off against the debt. Firstly would you know if i can object to the set aside when 18 days had passed before his application, also the debt he claimed i had is the result of fraudulent transactions which were reported to the police and are under investigation for which i have a crime number and he would be fully aware of,

does any one know how many cases citi have succesfully defended, I believe he is misleading the judge.

If i can object to the set aside would anyone know if there is a time limit of my intentions and if there is a special form for me to do this, I think it might be 14 days from their application which would mean that i would have to put something into court by this tues, any help or directions would be most apreciated

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi all

Update!!!

 

Recieved on Sat 12/5/07.

Quote:

Due to an oversight, my client failed to inform you that it had settled this matter by remitting to 1st Credit the entire sum claimed thus reducing your debt to that agency. This approach to claims by debtors where the debt has been sold on has been approved by several courts and is my clients practice.

Love and best wishes yours BRIAN SMITH

 

As adviced I issued a warrant to Citi dated 10/5/07 stating defaults on all that was required by the courts. Letter sent from BS 10/5/07.

Question? do I contact the court with quiry, with the warrant outstanding, or stand my ground and demand that Citi pay me as requested. The sum now stands at £202.66 with the extra fee.

 

I need somebody's help on this. Can you please advice?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Not an expert on this but I would query this with the Court. As GC said earlier sounds like one of their delaying tatics, meant to frighten, I feel that as the warrant has been issued, they will have to pay up, as I understand it, they have written to you, not the court.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They always use the excuse that its, an oversight or its been overlooked, I would ask the court for advice because if you have judgment in your favour you are entitled to enforce it. Was the judgment awarded to you or 1st credit? if it was to you whatever B Smith says about this being his clients practice and approved by several courts was it approved by your court, hes stalling again,howcome he didnt defend your case, after all he said in a letter to me that citi defend all cases, have you seen his new tactic in the Fraser v citi thread. If it was me i,d fight it, an oversight is no excuse they are a massive multi national company and must have shed loads of people working for them. In the Patricia Pearl book it states that a judgment debt can be enforced at any time after judgment so you are well within your rights to do that GC

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...