Jump to content


  • Tweets

  • Posts

    • Morning dx and thank you for your message.   With regards to your comment about them not needing to produce the deed, the additional directions ordered by the judge included 'a copy of any assignment o the debt or agreement relied upon'  so that is why I thought that point was relevant?
    • Sorry for the long post but I don't want to miss out any relevant information: My wife bought a car from Trade Centre UK and have been having nothing but trouble with it. Unfortunately we paid of the finance used to buy the car as we weren't expecting this much trouble with the car as we we though we would have protection as buying from a dealer. We are wondering if we can still reject the vehicle since the finance plan has been paid off. Timeline is as follows: 13/12/2023 -15/12/2023 Bought car from Trade Centre UK for £10548 £2000 deposit paid on credit card on 13/12/2023 £8548 on finance from Moneybarn (arranged through Trade Centre UK). picked up car on 15/12/2023 Also bought lifetime warranty for £50/month 25/12/2023 Engine Management Light comes on. The AA called out and diagnosed the following error codes: P0133 - Lambda sensor (bank 1, sensor 1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Slow reaction. Error sporadic P0135 - Lambda sensor heat. circ.(bank1,sensor1) Oxygen Sensor. Error Message : Component defective Due to it being Christmas took a few days to get through to them but they booked me in for 28/12/2023 to run their own diagnostics. 28/12/2023 Took car in to Trade Centre so could check the car – They agreed it was the Oxygen Sensor and Booked me in for repair on 30/01/2024. I was told they had no earlier slots, and I would be fine to carry on driving car when I said I was afraid of problem worse. During diagnosing the problem, they reset the Engine Management Light. During drive home light comes back on. 29/12/2023 - 29/01/2024 I carry on driving the car but closer to the date, engine goes to reduced power every now and again – not being a mechanic I presumed that this was due to above fault. 20/01/2024 Not expecting any more problems paid off the finance on the car using personal loan from bank with lower interest rate. 30/01/2024 Trade Centre replace to O2 sensor (They also take it on a roughly 60mile road trip which seems a bit excessive to me – I can’t prove this as something prompted me take a picture of milage when I handed car in but I forgot take one on collection – only remembered next day.) 06/02/2024 Engine goes in reduced power mode again and engine management light comes on – Thinking the Trade centre’s 28 day warranty period was over I booked the car the into local garage for the next day to get problem fixed under the lifetime warranty package. Fault seems to clear after engine was switched off. 07/02/2024 In the Morning, I take it to local garage who say as the light gone off – the warranty company is unlikely to cover the cost of the repair or diagnostics and recommend I contact them when the light comes back on. In the evening the light comes back on and luckily I manage to get it back to the garage just before it shuts for the day. 08/02/2024 The Garage sends me a diagnostics video showing a lot error codes been picked up by their diagnostics machine including codes for Oxygen sensor and Nox Sensors, Accelerator pedal and several more. Video also shows EGR Hose not connected to the intake manifold properly, they believed this was confusing the onboard system as it is unlikely this many sensors would trigger at same the time but they couldn’t be certain until they repaired the hose. 13/02/2024 Finally get the car back as it took a while to get approval and payment for the repairs from the Warranty company. Garage told me to keep an eye the car as errors had cleared with the hose but couldn’t 100% certain that’s what caused the problem. 06/03/2024 Engine management light comes on again. Fed up I go into Trade Centre as I was just around the corner when it happened and asked them how to reject the car or have the problem fixed. They insist that as it’s over 28 days I need to get the car fixed under the warranty package I purchased and they could no longer fix the car as it was over 28 days. When I tried telling them it appeared to be the same or related problem they said they couldn’t help as I hadn’t contacted them earlier. I asked them if they were willing to connect the car to the diagnostics machine and tell me what the problem was, as a goodwill gesture, which he agreed to do and took the car to the back He came back around 30 minutes later and said they took a look at the sensor they replaced previously and there was nothing wrong with it and engine management light went off when they removed the sensor to check it. When I asked what the error code he couldn’t give me an exact fault but the said it one of the problems I told him earlier (Accelerator pedal). I have this visit audio recorded on my phone – I informed the reps I was recording several times. As the light wasn’t on, local garage couldn’t book me for a repair under warranty. 07/03/2024 Light came on so managed to book back into local garage for the 12/03/2024 Whilst waiting to take car into garage, I borrowed a OBD sensor and scanned for errors on the car. This showed the following errors: P11BE – Manufacturer specific code (Google showed this to be NOX sensor) P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow 12/03/2024 Took car to local garage and the confirmed the above errors. This leads me to believe that either Trade Centre UK reps lied and just reset the light or just didn’t check properly (Obviously I am unable to prove this) 22/03/2024 Finally got the car back as according to garage, the warranty company took a long to time to pay for the repairs 28/04/2024 Engine management Light has come back on. Using the borrowed OBD scanner I am getting the following codes: P0133 - Oxygen (Lambda) Sensor B1 S1: Response too Slow P2138 - Accelerator Position Sensors (G79) / (G185): Implausible Correlation I have not yet booked into a garage as I wanted to see what my rights are in terms of rejecting the car as to me the faults seem related. I can’t keep using taxi or train to get to work every time the car goes into the garage as it is getting very expensive. Am I right in thinking that they have used up their chance to repair when they conducted the repair end of January or when they refused to repair it in February ? If I am still able to reject the vehicle could you point to any sample letters or emails I can use. Thankyou for your advice on my next steps.
    • Ok noted about the screenshot uploads. In terms of screwing up I had one previous ticket that defaulted and ended up in a CCJ from Southend airport because for some reason during COVID I didn't receive their claim form just a notice of default. This hospital ticket was the 2nd ticket that went to CCJ due to a lack of knowledge of the process. Maybe it's easier just to pay them in future I'm thinking though, I don't get them very often anyway
    • Car maker takes a hit from weakening demand and price war in the world's largest electric vehicle market.View the full article
    • please stop posting up unnecessary unnamed screenshot files  you've done it throughout your threads and we have to renamed them. RENAME THE FILE before you upload if its just text information like a defence or a claim history or a link to a previous post  type it here not by an unnamed screenshot attachment  . sorry NM but you've been here dealing with PPC claims since 2021 somehow you always manage to screw up.......or do totally the opposite of std repeated advice on 10'000 of PPC threads here you are your own worst enemy... dx  
  • Recommended Topics

  • Our picks

    • If you are buying a used car – you need to read this survival guide.
      • 1 reply
    • Hello,

      On 15/1/24 booked appointment with Big Motoring World (BMW) to view a mini on 17/1/24 at 8pm at their Enfield dealership.  

      Car was dirty and test drive was two circuits of roundabout on entry to the showroom.  Was p/x my car and rushed by sales exec and a manager into buying the mini and a 3yr warranty that night, sale all wrapped up by 10pm.  They strongly advised me taking warranty out on car that age (2017) and confirmed it was honoured at over 500 UK registered garages.

      The next day, 18/1/24 noticed amber engine warning light on dashboard , immediately phoned BMW aftercare team to ask for it to be investigated asap at nearest garage to me. After 15 mins on hold was told only their 5 service centres across the UK can deal with car issues with earliest date for inspection in March ! Said I’m not happy with that given what sales team advised or driving car. Told an amber warning light only advisory so to drive with caution and call back when light goes red.

      I’m not happy to do this, drive the car or with the after care experience (a sign of further stresses to come) so want a refund and to return the car asap.

      Please can you advise what I need to do today to get this done. 
       

      Many thanks 
        • Thanks
      • 81 replies
    • Housing Association property flooding. https://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/topic/438641-housing-association-property-flooding/&do=findComment&comment=5124299
      • 161 replies
    • We have finally managed to obtain the transcript of this case.

      The judge's reasoning is very useful and will certainly be helpful in any other cases relating to third-party rights where the customer has contracted with the courier company by using a broker.
      This is generally speaking the problem with using PackLink who are domiciled in Spain and very conveniently out of reach of the British justice system.

      Frankly I don't think that is any accident.

      One of the points that the judge made was that the customers contract with the broker specifically refers to the courier – and it is clear that the courier knows that they are acting for a third party. There is no need to name the third party. They just have to be recognisably part of a class of person – such as a sender or a recipient of the parcel.

      Please note that a recent case against UPS failed on exactly the same issue with the judge held that the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 did not apply.

      We will be getting that transcript very soon. We will look at it and we will understand how the judge made such catastrophic mistakes. It was a very poor judgement.
      We will be recommending that people do include this adverse judgement in their bundle so that when they go to county court the judge will see both sides and see the arguments against this adverse judgement.
      Also, we will be to demonstrate to the judge that we are fair-minded and that we don't mind bringing everything to the attention of the judge even if it is against our own interests.
      This is good ethical practice.

      It would be very nice if the parcel delivery companies – including EVRi – practised this kind of thing as well.

       

      OT APPROVED, 365MC637, FAROOQ, EVRi, 12.07.23 (BRENT) - J v4.pdf
        • Like
  • Recommended Topics

Removing a 3 default?


style="text-align: center;">  

Thread Locked

because no one has posted on it for the last 3036 days.

If you need to add something to this thread then

 

Please click the "Report " link

 

at the bottom of one of the posts.

 

If you want to post a new story then

Please

Start your own new thread

That way you will attract more attention to your story and get more visitors and more help 

 

Thanks

Recommended Posts

Hi, after reading up on defaults by phone companies I have set about removing a default registered on my credit file by 3 in 2005, it wasn’t until I bought a buy to let property that I even knew about the default, as I have been trying to repair my credit rating since leaving collage, A default notice would have been prioritized if I was aware of it. On my credit file it appeared I had defaulted for £81 however when I contacted Experian they investigated it, contacted 3 and they came back with it being settled, this was as much as Experian could do apparently.

Now I had canceled the contract and moved to Orange after my 12 months were up and the 3 phone was cut off and to my understanding paid up in full.

After doing some reading I see that they are not the same as removing a default from a credit agreement, I was going to use these letters on here http://www.learnmoney.co.uk/credit-cards/remove_default_notice.html however am I right in thinking that that would be wrong?

 

What is the best way of attempting to get this default removed as I am 100% sure that I did not receive any notice of this default? And I’m sure the correct procedure wasn’t followed. Any help would be most appreciated, thanks James.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes, you'd be wrong. Your agreement was NOT regulated by the CCA, this was simply a service contract so not 'Notice of Default' is required. You were simply defaulted because you didn't pay your bill - something they can do easily. See the 'sticky' (above) on Mobile Phones and the CCA.

 

http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/telecoms-mobile-fixed-broadband/70464-mobile-phone-companies-consumer.html

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply, I have read many of your posts which have been very helpful, I have gone straight to the credit scoring companies as I didn’t actually owe the money, 3 have ignored all my polite letters so far. Equifax were the ones who got the defaulted £84 removed and now shows as settled, but as I didn’t owe the money this is not satisfactory. Experian who proved very helpful have now raised the point with 3 and should they not answer satisfactorily within the 28 days they can remove the default, The nice bloke I spoke to said that means if they haven’t got my papers in order they can’t keep the default on my credit file. Wouldn’t have minded so much if I did owe the money. Thanks again James.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is one of the most useful 'get outs' that still remains useful to consumers who want to clear their files, the problem is when a firm (mobile phone network) employ enough people who simply say to Experian that the debt exists and/or was valid. The CRA won't seek clarification or 'proof' that the debt existed, just the work of the firm making the original complaint. Now, with 3UK and their Indian Call Centres, this becomes as much of an issue (for them) in the same way UK customer's don't get satisfactory communications. CRAs are pretty much in the same situation, and if their enquiries are not resolved, the disputed files are cleared because the network is not prepared to assert that their data is correct.

 

Not an ideal situation you'll agree - especially for those firms who just want to be vindictive - but at least there is hope!

  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Well I have a reply from Equifax, pretty much the same as I received last time with them, my big issue with 3 is that I didn’t owe them the £82 in the first place so I don’t want it shown as settled I want the default removed, the response I received was so typical of “the computer says no” attitude large companies are taking.

 

I have conducted a full review of your 3 account and I can now confirm that your Credit file has been amended to show outstanding balance has been paid and account is now settled. The payment history will remain on the credit file as a true reflection of how the account was managed. Please note this can take up to 30 days to take effect. Regards, 3, Credit Referrals”

 

Word perfect answer to my last complaint to Equifax, another thing that has annoyed me with this is the way Equifax close the issue with the statement “solved”! It’s far from that.

 

My only hope now is the nice guy at Experian doesn’t receive the same cut and pasted email.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a little confused - Equifax would have no idea that the debt listed originally was unjustified, only 3UK could ascertain this - so the next step from having it correctly shown as 'settled' is to get 3UK to remove it as the only reason it was there was because of their billing error. No?

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, but 3 do not respond to my letters or phone calls so my other option was to ask the CRA’s to question it, however obviously they don’t have to have proof of the default just a response from 3 which is more than I seem able to do. I suppose it was in hope that 3 responded to them as efficiently as they do with me that would be one way of removing the default.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is there any documentation you have from 3UK that admits to their original error? CRAs would accept this in the absence of a formal response on the cause of the problem.

 

Alternatively, you could write by RD to 3UK admin HQ in Glasgow and try and force a response that way.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sadly I don’t have any documentation from 3 as it was several months if not a year before I was made aware of the default and I had shredded the phone bills, a default notice would have been dealt with asap as we were repairing our credit rating to start our buy to let properties. The original amount they say I defaulted on was marked as settled after my first complaint to the CRA’s which confuses me as I had never paid anything after my final bill.

Would a SAR be of any use to me, this should tell me where they think the money is owed from? To be honest I have been concentrating on removing the default as opposed to finding out why they think I owed them in the first place. One of my main reasons on leaving 3 was their poor customer service.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Still ongoing, Experian have at least placed a comment on my CR, what use that will be I’m unsure, however they still haven’t had a reply from 3, when I asked what they can do next as I was told that no response after 28 days they can remove the default, the lady I spoke to now stated that there is nothing until they reply! They can’t remove a default without the companies’ permission and I was wrongly informed!!! That’s 3 months they have had.

Starting again fresh and sending my S.A.R however I don’t have my original account number as I shredded all my old phone bills about a year after closing the account, will this matter, can and will they accept my address as enough information to retrieve my account details? Looking back on it this could be why 3UK haven’t replied? Thanks James.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd suggest to Experian that as the network has not had the courtesy to explain or confirm the data within 28 days, you require them to remove the data immediately. Failing this you'll complain to the ICO about the retention of misleading data, and reserve the right to take them to court for promulgating misleading information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Thanks for the Help Buzby, after nagging the CRA they have nagged 3UK to provide information, 3UK have finally responded by saying they have lost my file/paper work and will remove the default (no paper work as there was no debt more like!) Experian have just confirmed over the phone that it will be removed in the next day or two, :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...

Aaaaaararrgh!!!! Experian confirmed the removal of the default after 3UK told me the default was to be removed, all I had to do was wait for 3UK to update their info with Experian, I waited patiently but had to phone on Friday to chase up why it hadn’t been done yet, again 3UK said yes the default was to be removed, but then at the end of the conversation they said the payment history was to remain?! Phoned Experian to find out what exactly had been sent to them and they confirmed that the status 8 (default) was to be removed as this is what was queried, phoned 3UK again to be told it will be investigated again and it will take a further 28 days!! Phoned Experian back just to confirm, they agreed that the default was to be removed, 3UK have now said that the default was the amount and this now shows as settled, the payment history is totally different! Bum back to square one with them, my file was updated by them on Friday and my status 8 still shows. Gutted.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually, I'm more concerned that they didn't remove the original default, but made it 'satisfied'. Experience has shown that these carry the same weight of damnation, so I think they're trying to be weasel-like in their dealings with you. (The payment record is a different issue). I'd pursue them that the removal of a default was agreed, and their action does not amount to this.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Continuing my phone assault on 3 this morning as Experian have given me the name and direct line to the person who sent them the correspondence, however do you think I should hassle Experian to change the information as they do have the proof that it was intended to be removed by 3UK and have confirmed this on 3 separate occasions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 8 years later...
  • Recently Browsing   0 Caggers

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Have we helped you ...?


×
×
  • Create New...